Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mechanical approaches to alter remodeling

  • Published:
Current Heart Failure Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Regression of pathologic cardiac hypertrophy and dilation, so-called reverse remodeling, has emerged as an important therapeutic target in the treatment of dilated cardiomyopathies. Although pharmacologic therapies may promote regression of pathologic remodeling, the magnitude of reverse remodeling is usually small. In contrast, reverse remodeling associated with cardiovascular devices, as highlighted in this review, often has been more rapid and reliable. For example, circulatory support with a left ventricular assist device produces the dramatic reverse remodeling in severely diseased hearts and typically provides myocardial tissue samples to generate new insights into the basic biology of reverse remodeling. Alternatively, multisite ventricular pacing to improve the synchrony of ventricular contraction has demonstrated clinical efficacy that includes the ability to reduce cardiac dilation and hypertrophy, and improvements in symptoms and functional capacity. Passive cardiac support devices comprise another promising strategy to prevent or reverse detrimental cardiac remodeling in patients with dilated cardiomyopathies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and Recommended Reading

  1. Zafeiridis A, Jeevanandam V, Houser SR, Margulies KB: Regression of cellular hypertrophy after left ventricular assist device support. Circulation 1998, 98:656–662.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Levin HR, Oz MC, Chen JM, et al.: Reversal of chronic ventricular dilation in patients with end-stage cardiomyopathy by prolonged mechanical unloading. Circulation 1995, 91:2717–2720.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Li YY, Feng Y, McTiernan CF, et al.: Downregulation of matrix metalloproteinases and reduction in collagen damage in the failing human heart after support with left ventricular assist devices. Circulation 2001, 104:1147–1152. This is a tissue-based study demonstrating that alterations in matrix metalloproteinases and their endogenous inhibitors (TIMPs) may increase collagen crosslinking and myocardial stiffness after 2 or more months of LVAD support.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Heerdt PM, Holmes JW, Cai B, et al.: Chronic unloading by left ventricular assist device reverses contractile dysfunction and alters gene expression in end-stage heart failure. Circulation 2000, 102:2713–2719.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ogletree-Hughes ML, Stull LB, Sweet WE, et al.: Mechanical unloading restores beta-adrenergic responsiveness and reverses receptor downregulation in the failing human heart. Circulation 2001, 104:881–886.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Dipla K, Mattiello JA, Jeevanandam V, et al.: Myocyte recovery after mechanical circulatory support in humans with endstage heart failure. Circulation 1998, 97:2316–2322.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Barbone A, Holmes JW, Heerdt PM, et al.: Comparison of right and left ventricular responses to left ventricular assist device support in patients with severe heart failure: a primary role of mechanical unloading underlying reverse remodeling. Circulation 2001, 104:670–675.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Khan T, Delgado RM, Radovancevic B, et al.: Dobutamine stress echocardiography predicts myocardial improvement in patients supported by left ventricular assist devices (LVADs): hemodynamic and histologic evidence of improvement before LVAD explantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 2003, 22:137–146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen X, Piacentino V 3rd, Furukawa S, et al.: L-type Ca2+ channel density and regulation are altered in failing human ventricular myocytes and recover after support with mechanical assist devices. Circ Res 2002, 91:517–524.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Harding JD, Piacentino V 3rd, Gaughan JP, et al.: Electrophysiological alterations after mechanical circulatory support in patients with advanced cardiac failure. Circulation 2001, 104:1241–1247.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Blaxall BC, Tschannen-Moran BM, Milano CA, Koch WJ: Differential gene expression and genomic patient stratification following left ventricular assist device support. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003, 41:1096–1106. This study uses microarray techniques to demonstrate that LVAD support induces a distinct pattern of gene expression in failing human hearts. There is evidence that the impact of LVAD support may differ between hearts with ischemic and nonischemic etiologies for heart failure.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen Y, Park S, Li Y, et al.: Alterations of gene expression in failing myocardium following left ventricular assist device support. Physiol Genomics 2003, 14:251–260. This study uses microarray techniques to demonstrate that genes related to the process of transcription, cell growth/apoptosis/DNA repair, structural proteins, metabolism, and cell signaling are upregulated after LVAD support, whereas genes related to cytokines are downregulated.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Razeghi P, Young ME, Ying J, et al.: Downregulation of metabolic gene expression in failing human heart before and after mechanical unloading. Cardiology 2002, 97:203–209.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Torre-Amione G, Stetson SJ, Youker KA, et al.: Decreased expression of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in failing human myocardium after mechanical circulatory support: a potential mechanism for cardiac recovery. Circulation 1999, 100:1189–1193.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Flesch M, Margulies KB, Mochmann HC, et al.: Differential regulation of mitogen-activated protein kinases in the failing human heart in response to mechanical unloading. Circulation 2001, 104:2273–2276.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. de Jonge N, van Wichen DF, van Kuik J, et al.: Cardiomyocyte death in patients with end-stage heart failure before and after support with a left ventricular assist device: low incidence of apoptosis despite ubiquitous mediators. J Heart Lung Transplant 2003, 22:1028–1036.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Margulies KB, Eskandari T, Matiwala S, Bednarik D: Identification of myocardial recovery genes with a multi-comparison PRISM. J Card Fail 2003, 9:S40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Abraham WT, Fisher WG, Smith AL, et al.: Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. N Engl J Med 2002, 346:1845–1853.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yu CM, Lin H, Fung WH, et al.: Comparison of acute changes in left ventricle volume, systolic and diastolic functions, and intraventricular synchronicity after biventricular and right ventricular pacing for heart failure. Am Heart J 2003, 145:e18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Saxon LA, De Marco T, Schafer J, et al.: Effects of long-term biventricular stimulation for resynchronization on echocardiographic measures of remodeling. Circulation 2002, 105:1304–1310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sogaard P, Egeblad H, Kim WY, et al.: Tissue Doppler imaging predicts improved systolic performance and reversed left ventricular remodeling during long-term cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002, 40:723–730.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. St John Sutton MG, Plappert T, Abraham WT, et al.: Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy on left ventricular size and function in chronic heart failure. Circulation 2003, 107:1985–1990. This is a pivotal clinical study demonstrating significant and timedependent reverse remodeling with multisite pacing in patients with NYHA class III or IV symptoms of heart failure. This relative, large clinical study also highlights some host factors that may predict the magnitude of reverse remodeling with multisite pacing.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chaudhry PA, Anagnostopouls PV, Mishima T, et al.: Acute ventricular reduction with the acorn cardiac support device: effect on progressive left ventricular dysfunction and dilation in dogs with chronic heart failure. J Card Surg 2001, 16:118–126.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chaudhry PA, Mishima T, Sharov VG, et al.: Passive epicardial containment prevents ventricular remodeling in heart failure. Ann Thorac Surg 2000, 70:1275–1280. In this study, the authors report that passive epicardial containment of the ventricles with the ACORN CSD ameliorates LV remodeling and improves LV systolic function in dogs with established heart failure.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pilla JJ, Blom AS, Brockman DJ, et al.: Ventricular constraint using the acorn cardiac support device reduces myocardial akinetic area in an ovine model of acute infarction. Circulation 2002, 106(Suppl 1):I207-I211. This study reports that the ACORN passive CSD attenuates regional wall stress and reduces infarct expansion when placed in sheep with recent myocardial infarction.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Konertz W, Dushe S, Hotz H, et al.: Safety and feasibility of a cardiac support device. J Card Surg 2001, 16:113–117. This is an uncontrolled clinical study demonstrating that 6 months of passive cardiac support with the ACORN device is associated with time-dependent increases in LVEF, improved symptoms, and improved quality of life indicators.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kashem A, Hassan S, Crabbe DL, et al.: Left ventricular reshaping: effects on the pressure-volume relationship. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003, 125:391–399.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Guccione JM, Salahieh A, Moonly SM, et al.: Myosplint decreases wall stress without depressing function in the failing heart: a finite element model study. Ann Thorac Surg 2003, 76:1171–1180. This quantitative analysis demonstrates that passive CSDs that acutely reshape the left ventricle actually reduce myocardial wall stress.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fukamachi K, Inoue M, Doi K, et al.: Device-based left ventricular geometry change for heart failure treatment: developmental work and current status. J Card Surg 2003, 18(Suppl 2):S43-S47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kashem A, Kashem S, Santamore WP, et al.: Early and late results of left ventricular reshaping by passive cardiac-support device in canine heart failure. J Heart Lung Transplant 2003, 22:1046–1053.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Matiwala, S., Margulies, K.B. Mechanical approaches to alter remodeling. Curr Heart Fail Rep 1, 14–18 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-004-0012-9

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-004-0012-9

Keywords

Navigation