Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mediating the Peer Influence Effect with Facets of Criminal Thought Process and Content in a Group of Early Adolescents: Replication and Extension

  • Published:
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prior research indicates that criminal thought content and criminal thought process mediate the peer influence effect (peer delinquency → participant delinquency). This study sought to model the temporal order of these two categories of antisocial cognition in mediating peer influence. Responses provided by 1,795 (847 male, 948 female) members of the Gang Resistance Education and Training study (mean age = 12.11 years) on measures of criminal thought content (negative attitude toward the police) and criminal thought process (proactive criminal thinking in the form of neutralizing techniques) were analyzed. Only the “content before process” model achieved significance, however. Thus, while peer associations may stimulate criminal thought content and criminal thought process, the effect on criminal thought content may be more proximal and the effect on criminal thought process may be mediated by criminal thought content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akers RL (1998) Social learning and social structure: a general theory of crime and deviance. Northeastern University Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison PD (2012) Handling missing data by maximum likelihood. SAS Global Forum 2012 (Paper 312-2012). SAS Institute, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Augustyn MB, McGloin JM (2013) The risk of informal socializing with peers: considering gender differences across predatory delinquency and substance use. Justice Quart 30:117–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1986) Social foundations of thought and action. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A (1999) Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 3:193–209

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berger J (2008) Identity signaling, social influence, and social contagion. In: Prinstein MJ, Dodge KA (eds) Understanding peer influence in children and adolescents. Guilford, New York, pp 181–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Brechwald WA, Prinstein MJ (2011) Beyond homophily: a decade of advances in understanding peer influence processes. J Res Adolescence 21:166–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown BB, Bakken JP (2011) Parenting and peer relationships: reinvigorating research on family–peer linkages in adolescence. J Res Adolescence 21:153–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole DA, Maxwell SE (2003) Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. J Abnorm Psychol 112:558–577

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins LM, Schafer JL, Kam CM (2001) A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychol Methods 6:330–351

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dodge KA, Coie JD (1987) Social-information processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children’s peer groups. J Pers Soc Psychol 53:1146–1158

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elwert F, Winship C (2014) Endogenous selection bias: the problem of conditioning on a collider variable. Ann Rev Soc 40:31–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Esbensen F-A (2002) National evaluation of the Gang Resistance Education and Training (G.R.E.A.T.) program: final report (94-IJ-CX-0058). U.S. Department of Justice, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfert A (2015) Inner speech, natural language, and the modularity of the mind. J Philos Sci 14:7–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons FX, Gerrard M, Lane DJ (2003) A social reaction model of adolescent health risk. In: Suls JM, Wallson K (eds) Social psychological foundations of health and illness. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 107–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson MR, Hirschi T (1990) A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression-based approach. Guilford, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynie DL, Osgood DW (2005) Reconsidering peers and delinquency: how do peers matter? Soc Forces 84:1109–1130

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeben EM, Meldrum RC, Walker D, Young JTN (2016) The role of peer delinquency and unstructured socializing in explaining delinquency and substance use: a state-of-the-art review. J Crim Justice 47:108–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard DJ, Pratt TC (2002) A meta-analysis of the predictors of delinquency among girls. J Offender Rehabil 34(3):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai K, Keele L, Tingley D (2010) A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychol Methods 15:309–334

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SL, Burke JG, Gielen AC (2012) Urban students’ perceptions of the school environment’s influence on school violence. Child Sch 34:92–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A. (2013). Mediation: sensitivity analysis [webinar]. Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/webinars/Mediation/Sensitivity/Sensitivity.html.

  • Kiesner J, Poulin F, Nicotra E (2003) Peer relations across contexts: individual-network homophily and network inclusion in and after school. Child Dev 74:1328–1343

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knecht A, Snijders TAB, Baerveldt C, Steglich CEG, Raub W (2010) Friendship and delinquency: selection and influence processes in early adolescence. Soc Dev 19:494–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroner DG, Morgan RD (2014) An overview of strategies for the assessment and treatment of criminal thinking. In: Tafrate RC, Mitchell D (eds) Forensic CBT: a handbook for clinical practice. Wiley, Chichester, pp 87–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahey BB, Van Hulle CA, D’Onofrio BM, Rodgers JL, Waldman ID (2008) Is parental knowledge of their adolescent offspring’s whereabouts and peer associations spuriously associated with offspring delinquency? J Abnorm Child Psychol 36:807–823

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Landenberger NA, Lipsey MW (2005) The positive effects of cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders: a meta-analysis of factors associated with effective treatment. J Exp Criminol 1:451–476

    Google Scholar 

  • McGloin JM, Shermer LO (2009) Self-control and deviant peer network structure. J Res Crime Delinq 46:35–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Meldrum RC, Young JTN, Weerman FM (2009) Reconsidering the effect of self-control and delinquent peers: implications of measurement for theoretical significance. J Res Crime Delinq 46:353–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Monahan KC, Steinberg L, Cauffman E (2009) Affliliation with antisocial peers, susceptibility to peer influence, and antisocial behavior during the transition to adulthood. Dev Psychol 45:1520–1530

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan RD, Fisher WH, Duan N, Mandracchia JT, Murray D (2010) Prevalence of criminal thinking among state prison inmates with serious mental illness. Law Hum Behav 34:324–336

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mpofu E, Athanasou JA, Rafe C, Belshaw SH (2018) Cognitive-behavioral therapy efficacy for reducing recidivism rates of moderate- and high-risk sexual offenders: a scoping systematic literature review. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 62:170–186

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén B, Muthén L (2017) Mplus user’s guide, 8th edn. Muthén and Muthén, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt TC, Cullen FT, Sellers CS, Winfree T, Madensen TD et al (2010) The empirical status of social learning theory: a meta-analysis. Justice Q 27:765–802

    Google Scholar 

  • Preacher KJ (2015) Advances in mediation analysis: a survey and synthesis of new developments. Ann Rev Psychol 66:825–852

    Google Scholar 

  • Preacher KJ, Selig JP (2012) Advantages of Monte Carlo confidence intervals for indirect effects. Commun Methods Meas 6:77–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT (2002) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland EH (1947) Principles of criminology, 4th edn. J.B. Lippincott, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykes GM, Matza D (1957) Techniques of neutralization: a theory of delinquency. Am Sociol Rev 22:664–670

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornberry TP (1987) Toward an interactional theory of delinquency. Criminology 25:863–891

    Google Scholar 

  • Trzepacz PT, Baker RW (1993) The Psychiatric Mental Status Examination. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky L (1994) The development of thinking and concept formation in adolescence. In: van der Veer R, Valsiner J (eds) The Vygotsky reader. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 185–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters GD (2015) Proactive criminal thinking and the transmission of differential association: a cross-lagged multi-wave path analysis. Crim Justice Behav 42:1128–1144

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters GD (2016a) Criminal thought content and criminal thought process as mediators of peer influence: combined versus individual effects. Crim Justice Rev 41:318–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters GD (2016b) Friends, cognition, and delinquency: proactive and reactive criminal thinking as mediators of the peer influence and peer selection effects. Justice Q 33:1055–1079

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters GD (2017) Modelling the criminal lifestyle: theorizing at the edge of chaos. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters GD, Morgan RD (2018) Assessing criminal thought content: preliminary validation of the Criminal Thought Content Inventory (CTCI). Psychol Crime Law 24:603–620

    Google Scholar 

  • Warr M (2002) Companions in crime: the social aspects of criminal conduct. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Weerman FM, Wilcox P, Sullivan CJ (2018) The short-term dynamics of peers and delinquent behavior: an analysis of bi-weekly changes within a high school student network. J Quant Criminol 34:431–463

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wu AD, Zumbo BD (2008) Understanding and using mediators and moderators. Soc Indic Res 87:367–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Young R, Johnson DR (2013) Methods for handling missing secondary respondent data. J Marriage Fam 75:221–234

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Young JTN, Rebellon CJ, Barnes JC, Weerman FM (2013) Unpacking the black box of peer similarity in deviance: understanding the mechanisms linking personal behavior, peer behavior, and perceptions. Criminology 52:60–86

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glenn D. Walters.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The author declares that there is no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

Study approved by the Kutztown University Institutional Review Board.

Informed Consent

This is a secondary data analysis, but the authors of the original GREAT study did obtain informed consent from parents and informed assent from participating children.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Walters, G.D. Mediating the Peer Influence Effect with Facets of Criminal Thought Process and Content in a Group of Early Adolescents: Replication and Extension. J Police Crim Psych 35, 207–218 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-019-09360-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-019-09360-3

Keywords

Navigation