Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Positive Peers—The Neglected Stepchildren of Social Influence Theories of Crime

  • Published:
Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite being one of the least studied components of social influence, positive peer associations have much to offer social learning theories of crime. The purpose of the current investigation was to determine whether positive peer associations moderate the peer influence effect central to social learning theory. Data provided by 3869 (1970 boys, 1899 girls) members of the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC) were used to test the hypothesis that positive peer associations interact with components of peer influence to protect adolescents against future delinquency. A simple mediation analysis confirmed the existence of a significant indirect effect running from peer delinquency, to low empathy, to participant delinquency. When positive peer associations were added to the model as moderators, they achieved a significant negative moderating effect on the peer delinquency–low empathy path and a significant positive moderating effect on the low empathy–participant delinquency path. In this study, positive peer associations increased empathy in children with fewer delinquent peer associations and decreased offending in children with lower levels of empathy. Given evidence of their ability to inhibit negative peer influence and promote empathy in the service of reduced delinquency, positive peer associations deserve more attention from social learning theories of crime than they have thus far received.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akers, R. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison, P. D. (2002). Missing data. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute of Family Studies. (2018). Longitudinal study of Australian children data user guide – December 2018. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. (2017). The psychology of criminal conduct (6th ed.). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalano, R. F., Kosterman, R., Hawkins, J. D., Newcomb, M. D., & Abbott, R. D. (1996). Modeling the etiology of adolescent substance use: A test of the social development model. Journal of Drug Issues, 26, 429–455.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558–577.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L. M., Schafer, J. L., & Kam, C. M. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6, 330–351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Costello, B. J., & Hope, T. L. (2016). Peer pressure, peer prevention: The role of friends in crime and conformity. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dishion, T. J., Spracklen, K. M., Andrews, D. W., & Patterson, G. R. (1996). Deviancy training in male adolescent friendships. Behavior Therapy, 27, 373–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dynes, M. E., Domoff, S. E., Hassan, S., Tompsett, C. J., & Amrhein, K. E. (2015). The influence of co-offending within a moderated mediation model of parent and peer predictors of delinquency. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 3516–3525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elwert, F., & Winship, C. (2014). Endogenous selection bias: The problem of conditioning on a collider variable. Annual Review of Sociology, 40, 31–53.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P. (2007). Childhood risk factors and risk-focused prevention. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (4th ed., pp. 602–640). Oxford: University of Oxford Press.

  • Farrington, D. P., Ttofi, M. M., & Piquero, A. R. (2016). Risk, promotive, and protective factors in youth offending: Results from the Cambridge study in delinquency development. Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 63–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, C. B., Catalano, R. F., Mazza, J. J., Brown, E. C., Haggerty, K. P., & Harachi, T. W. (2008). Misbehavior in school, and delinquency from the end of elementary school through the beginning of high school: A test of social development model hypotheses. Journal of Early Adolescence, 28, 277–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallardo, L. O., Barrasa, A., & Guevara-Viejo, F. (2016). Positive peer relationships and academic achievement across early and midadolescence. Social Behavior and Personality, 44, 1637–1648.

  • Gifford-Smith, M., Dodge, K. A., Dishion, T. J., & McCord, J. (2005). Peer influence in children and adolescents: Crossing the bridge from developmental to intervention science. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 255–265.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

  • Haynie, D. L., & Osgood, D. W. (2005). Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter? Social Forces, 84, 1109–1130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (1969). The causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeve, M., Dubas, J. S., Eichelsheim, V. L., van der Laan, P. H., Smeenk, W., & Gerris, J. R. M. (2009). The relationship between parenting and delinquency: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 749–775.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, D. A. (2013). Mediation: Sensitivity analysis [webinar]. Retrieved from http://davidakenny.net/webinars/Mediation/Sensitivity/Sensitivity.html.

  • Matsueda, R. L., & Anderson, K. (1998). The dynamics of delinquent peers and delinquent behavior. Criminology, 36, 269–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGloin, J. M. (2009). Delinquency balance: Revisiting peer influence. Criminology, 47, 439–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meehl, P. E. (1992). Factors and taxa, traits and types, differences of degree and differences in kind. Journal of Personality, 60, 266–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morenoff, J. D., Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2001). Neighborhood inequality, collective efficacy, and the spatial dynamics of urban violence. Criminology, 39, 517–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moses, J. O., & Villodas, M. T. (2017). The potential protective role of peer relationships on school engagement in at-risk adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46, 2255–2272.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. (2010, April 8). Missing data modeling: Multivariate normality. Mplus Discussion Board [Online forum comment] Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/discussion/messages/22/5308.html?1279319060.

  • Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. (1997-2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles: Author.

  • O’Donnell, A. W., & Barber, B. L. (2018). Exploring the association between adolescent sports participation and externalising behaviours: The moderating role of prosocial and risky peers. Australian Journal of Psychology, 70, 361–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J. (2015). Advances in mediation analysis: A survey and synthesis of new developments. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 825–852.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rucker, D. D., Preacher, K. J., Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2011). Mediation analysis in social psychology: Current practices and new recommendations. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 359–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamay-Tsoory, S. C., Aharon-Peretz, J., & Perry, D. (2009). Two systems for empathy: A double dissociation between emotional and cognitive empathy in inferior frontal gyrus versus ventromedial prefrontal lesions. Brain, 132, 617–627.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stattin, H., & Kerr, M. (2000). Parental monitoring: A reinterpretation. Child Development, 71, 1072–1085.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. H. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, G. D. (2015). Proactive criminal thinking and the transmission of differential association: A cross-lagged multi-wave path analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42, 1128–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, G. D. (2016). Friends, cognition, and delinquency: Proactive and reactive criminal thinking as mediators of the peer influence and peer selection effects among male delinquents. Justice Quarterly, 33, 1055–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, G. D. (2017). Modelling the criminal lifestyle: Theorizing at the edge of chaos. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, G. D. (2018). Resistance to peer influence and crime desistance in emerging adulthood: A moderated mediation analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 42, 520–530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, G. D. (2019a). Gang influence: Mediating the gang–delinquency relationship with proactive criminal thinking. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 1044–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, G. D. (2019b). Peer influence or projection bias? Predicting respondent delinquency with perceptual measures of peer delinquency in 22 samples. Journal of Adolescence, 70, 1–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, G. D. (in press). Prosocial peers as risk, protective, and promotive factors for the prevention of delinquency and drug use. Journal of Youth and Adolescence. On-line first: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-019-01058-3.

  • Walters, G. D., & Espelage, D. L. (2018). Resurrecting the empathy–bullying relationship with a pro-bullying attitudes mediator: The Lazarus effect in mediation research. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 46, 1229–1239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C., Williams, K. E., Shahaeian, A., & Harrison, L. J. (2018). Early predictors of escalating internalizing problems across middle childhood. School Psychology Quarterly, 33, 200–212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Warr, M. (2002). Companions in crime: The social aspects of criminal conduct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, L. R., & Anthony, E. K. (2015). A model of positive family and peer relationships on adolescent functioning. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 24, 658–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • You, S., & Kim, A. Y. (2016). Understanding aggression through attachment and social emotional competence in Korean middle school students. School Psychology International, 37, 225–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, J. T. N., Rebellon, C. J., Barnes, J. C., & Weerman, F. M. (2013). Unpacking the black box of peer similarity in deviance: Understanding the mechanisms linking personal behavior, peer behavior, and perceptions. Criminology, 52, 60–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kutztown University, Kutztown, PA, USA

    Glenn D. Walters

Authors
  1. Glenn D. Walters
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Glenn D. Walters.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Walters, G.D. Positive Peers—The Neglected Stepchildren of Social Influence Theories of Crime. J Abnorm Child Psychol 48, 719–732 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-020-00630-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-020-00630-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation