Skip to main content
Log in

Screening, Diagnosis, and Staging of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD): Application of Society Guidelines to Clinical Practice

  • Published:
Current Gastroenterology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), formerly nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), is the most common chronic liver disease affecting 30% of the global population. In this article, we summarize current expert guidelines, review clinical practice implications, and provide insight into the utility of non-invasive tests (NITs).

Recent Findings

The burden of MASLD is growing with the obesity epidemic, yet disease awareness and diagnosis is low. Patients can progress to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH, formerly NASH), which can advance to liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation, and liver cancer. NITs help identify high-risk patients who may benefit from specialty referral and MASH-directed therapy.

Summary

Global societies offer various recommendations for the screening and diagnosis of MASLD utilizing evidence-based, widely accessible methods such as serum indices, NITs, and liver biopsy. Several targeted steatotic liver disease (SLD) screening tools and novel therapies are under development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AASLD:

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases

AGA:

American Gastroenterological Association

ADA:

American Diabetes Association

AACE:

Association of Clinical Endocrinology

ALEH:

Latin American Association for the Study of the Liver

APASL:

Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver

EASL:

European Association for the Study of the Liver

EASD:

European Association for the Study of Diabetes

EASO:

European Association for the Study of Obesity

US:

Abdominal ultrasound

CT:

Computed tomography

BMI:

Body mass index

ELF:

Enhanced Liver Fibrosis

FIB-4:

Fibrosis-4

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

MAFLD:

Metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease

MASLD:

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease

MASH:

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis

MRE:

Magnetic resonance elastography

NAFLD:

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

NASH:

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

NFS:

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score

NIT:

Noninvasive test

T2DM:

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

TE:

Transient elastography

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. •• Rinella ME, Lazarus JV, Ratziu V, et al. A multi-society Delphi consensus statement on new fatty liver disease nomenclature. Hepatology. 2023; 9900:https://doi.org/10.1097/HEP.0000000000000520. High impact new document defining a shift in nomenclature for fatty liver disease from non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) to subphenotypes of steatotic liver disease (SLD).

  2. •• Long MT, Noureddin M, Lim JK. AGA Clinical practice update: diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in lean individuals: expert review. Gastroenterology. 2022;163(3):764-774 e761. National society guidance on the evaluation, risk stratification, and management of NAFLD in lean persons.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Eslam M, Newsome PN, Sarin SK, et al. A new definition for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease: an international expert consensus statement. J Hepatol. 2020;73(1):202–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Younossi ZM, Koenig AB, Abdelatif D, Fazel Y, Henry L, Wymer M. Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-Meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes. Hepatology. 2016;64(1):73–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eslam M, Sarin SK, Wong VW, et al. The Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of metabolic associated fatty liver disease. Hepatol Int. 2020;14(6):889–919.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Arab JP, Dirchwolf M, Alvares-da-Silva MR, et al. Latin American Association for the study of the liver (ALEH) practice guidance for the diagnosis and treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Ann Hepatol. 2020;19(6):674–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ye Q, Zou B, Yeo YH, et al. Global prevalence, incidence, and outcomes of non-obese or lean non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;5(8):739–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ratziu V, Bellentani S, Cortez-Pinto H, Day C, Marchesini G. A position statement on NAFLD/NASH based on the EASL 2009 special conference. J Hepatol. 2010;53(2):372–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sanyal AJ. Putting non-alcoholic fatty liver disease on the radar for primary care physicians: how well are we doing? BMC Med. 2018;16(1):148.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Schuppan D, Surabattula R, Wang XY. Determinants of fibrosis progression and regression in NASH. J Hepatol. 2018;68(2):238–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gerhardt F, Petroff D, Blank V, et al. Biopsy rate and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Scand J Gastroenterol. 2020;55(6):706–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sumida Y, Nakajima A, Itoh Y. Limitations of liver biopsy and non-invasive diagnostic tests for the diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(2):475–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. •• Rinella ME, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Siddiqui MS, et al. AASLD Practice Guidance on the clinical assessment and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2023;77(5):1797–835. National society guidance on evidence-based screening, diagnosis, and risk stratification of patients with NAFLD across primary care and specialty settings.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. •• Cusi K, Isaacs S, Barb D, et al. American association of clinical endocrinology clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in primary care and endocrinology clinical settings: co-sponsored by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD). Endocr Pract. 2022;28(5):528–62. National society guidance which defines standards of practice for primary care and endocrinology specialists in the screening, diagnosis, and risk stratification for NAFLD.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. European Association for the Study of the L, European Association for the Study of D, European Association for the Study of O. EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2016;64(6):1388–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kleiner DE, Brunt EM. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: pathologic patterns and biopsy evaluation in clinical research. Semin Liver Dis. 2012;32(1):3–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Leoni S, Tovoli F, Napoli L, Serio I, Ferri S, Bolondi L. Current guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review with comparative analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(30):3361–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Dharmalingam M, Yamasandhi PG. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Indian J Endocrinol Metab. 2018;22(3):421–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Kanwal F, Shubrook JH, Adams LA, et al. Clinical care pathway for the risk stratification and management of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2021;161(5):1657–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Noureddin M, Jones C, Alkhouri N, et al. Screening for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in persons with type 2 diabetes in the united states is cost-effective: a comprehensive cost-utility analysis. Gastroenterology. 2020;159(5):1985-1987 e1984.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Miele L, De Michele T, Marrone G, et al. Enhanced liver fibrosis test as a reliable tool for assessing fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in a clinical setting. Int J Biol Markers. 2017;32(4):e397–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Aroda VR, et al. 4. comprehensive medical evaluation and assessment of comorbidities: standards of care in diabetes-2023. Diabetes Care. 2023;46(Suppl 1):S49–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Park CC, Nguyen P, Hernandez C, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography vs transient elastography in detection of fibrosis and noninvasive measurement of steatosis in patients with biopsy-proven nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2017;152(3):598-607 e592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Santiago-Rolon A, Purcell D, Rosado K, Toro DH. A comparison of brunt’s criteria, the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS), and a proposed NAS scoring that includes fibrosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease staging. P R Health Sci J. 2015;34(4):189–94.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Brunt EM, Kleiner DE, Wilson LA, Belt P, Neuschwander-Tetri BA, Network NCR. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) activity score and the histopathologic diagnosis in NAFLD: distinct clinicopathologic meanings. Hepatology. 2011;53(3):810–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Shaker M, Tabbaa A, Albeldawi M, Alkhouri N. Liver transplantation for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: new challenges and new opportunities. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(18):5320–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Alexander M, Loomis AK, Fairburn-Beech J, et al. Real-world data reveal a diagnostic gap in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. BMC Med. 2018;16(1):130.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YIY wrote the main manuscript text. YIY and RL prepared Tables 1, 2, and 3. BAB, D, RL, and JKL reviewed and revised the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph K. Lim.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

JKL has received research contracts (to institution) from Genfit, Gilead, Intercept, Inventiva, Pfizer, and Viking. All other authors report no competing interests.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ilagan-Ying, Y.C., Banini, B.A., Do, A. et al. Screening, Diagnosis, and Staging of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD): Application of Society Guidelines to Clinical Practice. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 25, 213–224 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-023-00883-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11894-023-00883-8

Keywords

Navigation