Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Management of Early (T1 or T2) Rectal Cancer

  • Localized Colorectal Cancer (RD Kim, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Colorectal Cancer Reports

Abstract

Early stage rectal cancers (T1/T2) are being found more commonly due to increasing compliance with population screening guidelines. Patient selection is the most important element in advising local excision versus standard transabdominal resection with total mesorectal excision (TME). Determining the best strategy for an individual patient relies on accurate histologic assessment (a surrogate of biologic behavior), accurate clinical staging (endorectal ultrasound or MRI), and accurate assessment of patient procedural risk. It is important to review the histology for high-risk features associated with occult lymph node metastasis as this portends a higher local recurrence rate. Since the local recurrence rate following local excision for T2 rectal cancer is high, it has been our practice to offer these patients proctectomy with TME unless the patient has a poor performance status, is unwilling to proceed, or is part of a clinical trial. We limit transanal resection to well-selected patients with T1 lesions without high-risk histologic features (lymphovascular invasion, poor grade, or deep submucosal invasion). Factors such as patient procedural preference and comorbidities may influence this decision but it is on a case by case basis. Local excision can be accomplished with conventional transanal procedures; however, newer techniques such as transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) and transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) may have less specimen fragmentation and improved R0 resection rates. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation may add further benefit for maximizing local control but is associated with local wound problems including bleeding and infection. Adherence to a strict surveillance program after local excision allows clinicians to salvage recurrence as early as possible. In a multidisciplinary fashion, the surgeon, pathologist, gastroenterologist, and patient need to make informed decisions about risk and benefit when determining the best individualized care for the patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Althumairi AA, Gearhart SL. Local excision for early rectal cancer: transanal endoscopic microsurgery and beyond. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2015;6(3):296–306.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Stamos MJ, Murrell Z. Management of early rectal T1 and T2 cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(22 Pt 2):6885s–9s.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. American Cancer Society. Colorectal cancer facts and figures 2014-2016.

  4. Bosch SL, Teerenstra S, de Wilt JHW, Cunningham C, Nagtegaal ID. Predicting lymph node metastasis in pT1 colorectal cancer: a systematic review of risk factors providing rationale for therapy decisions. Endoscopy. 2013;45(10):827–34. This article evaluates the relative risk of lymph node metastasis with high risk histologic features.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Elmessiry MM, Van Koughnett JA, Maya A, DaSilva G, Wexner SD, Bejarano P, et al. Local excision of T1 and T2 rectal cancer: proceed with caution. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16(9):703–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nelson H, Sargent DJ. Refining multimodal therapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(9):690–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Banerjee AK. Sexual dysfunction after surgery for rectal cancer. Lancet. 1999;353(9168):1900–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ho VP, Lee Y, Stein SL, Temple LK. Sexual function after treatment for rectal cancer: a review. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011;54(1):113–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Garcia-Aguilar J, Mellgren A, Sirivongs P, Buie D, Madoff RD, Rothenberger DA. Local excision of rectal cancer without adjuvant therapy: a word of caution. Ann Surg. 2000;231(3):345–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Nash GM, Weiser MR, Guillem JG, Temple LK, Shia J, Gonen M, et al. Long-term survival after transanal excision of T1 rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(4):577–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Paty PB, Nash GM, Baron P, Zakowski M, Minsky BD, Blumberg D, et al. Long-term results of local excision for rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2002;236(4):522–9. discussion 9-30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. You YN, Baxter NN, Stewart A, Nelson H. Is the increasing rate of local excision for stage I rectal cancer in the United States justified?: a nationwide cohort study from the National Cancer Database. Ann Surg. 2007;245(5):726–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Blenkinsopp WK, Stewart-Brown S, Blesovsky L, Kearney G, Fielding LP. Histopathology reporting in large bowel cancer. J Clin Pathol. 1981;34(5):509–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Stitzenberg KB, Sanoff HK, Penn DC, Meyers MO, Tepper JE. Practice patterns and long-term survival for early-stage rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(34):4276–82.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Glasgow SC, Bleier JI, Burgart LJ, Finne CO, Lowry AC. Meta-analysis of histopathological features of primary colorectal cancers that predict lymph node metastases. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012;16(5):1019–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Leong KJ, Beggs A, James J, Morton DG, Matthews GM, Bach SP. Biomarker-based treatment selection in early-stage rectal cancer to promote organ preservation. Brit J Surg. 2014;101(10):1299–309.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Haggitt RC, Glotzbach RE, Soffer EE, Wruble LD. Prognostic factors in colorectal carcinomas arising in adenomas: implications for lesions removed by endoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology. 1985;89(2):328–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Matsuda T, Fukuzawa M, Uraoka T, Nishi M, Yamaguchi Y, Kobayashi N, et al. Risk of lymph node metastasis in patients with pedunculated type early invasive colorectal cancer: a retrospective multicenter study. Cancer Sci. 2011;102(9):1693–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nascimbeni R, Burgart LJ, Nivatvongs S, Larson DR. Risk of lymph node metastasis in T1 carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(2):200–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Okabe S, Shia J, Nash G, Wong WD, Guillem JG, Weiser MR, et al. Lymph node metastasis in T1 adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8(8):1032–9. discussion 9-40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Suzuki T, Sadahiro S, Mukoyama S, Ishikawa K, Yasuda S, Tajima T, et al. Risk of lymph node and distant metastases in patients with early invasive colorectal cancer classified as Haggitt’s level 4 invasion: image analysis of submucosal layer invasion. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(2):203–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y, Shimazaki H, Aida S, Hase K, et al. Risk factors for an adverse outcome in early invasive colorectal carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2004;127(2):385–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Network NCC. Rectal Cancer (Version 1.2016). Available from: http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/rectal.pdf.

  24. Piscatelli N, Hyman N, Osler T. Localizing colorectal cancer by colonoscopy. Arch Surg. 2005;140(10):932–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Isler JT, Brown PC, Lewis FG, Billingham RP. The role of preoperative colonoscopy in colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 1987;30(6):435–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Al-Sukhni E, Milot L, Fruitman M, Beyene J, Victor JC, Schmocker S, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of MRI for assessment of T category, lymph node metastases, and circumferential resection margin involvement in patients with rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(7):2212–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Solomon MJ, McLeod RS. Endoluminal transrectal ultrasonography: accuracy, reliability, and validity. Dis Colon Rectum. 1993;36(2):200–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jhaveri KS, Hosseini-Nik H. MRI of rectal cancer: an overview and update on recent advances. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205(1):W42–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Morino M, Risio M, Bach S, Beets-Tan R, Bujko K, Panis Y, et al. Early rectal cancer: the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) clinical consensus conference. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(4):755–73. The first consensus guidelines and evidence for the management of early rectal cancer. Clearly reviews the criteria and evidence for management decisions of early rectal cancer (T1/T2).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Andreola S, Leo E, Belli F, Bufalino R, Tomasic G, Lavarino C, et al. Manual dissection of adenocarcinoma of the lower third of the rectum specimens for detection of lymph node metastases smaller than 5 mm. Cancer. 1996;77(4):607–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kotanagi H, Fukuoka T, Shibata Y, Yoshioka T, Aizawa O, Saito Y, et al. The size of regional lymph-nodes does not correlate with the presence or absence of metastasis in lymph-nodes in rectal-cancer. J Surg Oncol. 1993;54(4):252–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Brown G, Richards CJ, Bourne MW, Newcombe RG, Radcliffe AG, Dallimore NS, et al. Morphologic predictors of lymph node status in rectal cancer with use of high-spatial-resolution MR imaging with histopathologic comparison. Radiology. 2003;227(2):371–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pigot F, Bouchard D, Mortaji M, Castinel A, Juguet F, Chaume JC, et al. Local excision of large rectal villous adenomas—long-term results. Dis Colon Rectum. 2003;46(10):1345–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Piccinini EE, Ugolini G, Rosati G, Conti A. Transanal local resection for benign and malignant rectal tumors. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1995;10(2):112–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ptok H, Marusch F, Meyer F, Schubert D, Koeckerling F, Gastinger I, et al. Oncological outcome of local vs radical resection of low-risk pT1 rectal cancer. Arch Surg. 2007;142(7):649–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Endreseth BH, Myrvold HE, Romundstad P, Hestvik UE, Bjerkeset T, Wibe A, et al. Transanal excision vs. major surgery for T1 rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(7):1380–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Steele Jr GD, Herndon JE, Bleday R, Russell A, Benson 3rd A, Hussain M, et al. Sphincter-sparing treatment for distal rectal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 1999;6(5):433–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Buess G, Hutterer F, Theiss J, Bobel M, Isselhard W, Pichlmaier H. A system for a transanal endoscopic rectum operation. Chirurg. 1984;55(10):677–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Buess G, Mentges B, Manncke K, Starlinger M, Becker HD. Technique and results of transanal endoscopic microsurgery in early rectal cancer. Am J Surg. 1992;163(1):63–9. discussion 9-70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Barendse RM, Dijkgraaf MG, Rolf UR, Bijnen AB, Consten ECJ, Hoff C, et al. Colorectal surgeons’ learning curve of transanal endoscopic microsurgery. Surg Endosc Other Intervent Tech. 2013;27(10):3591–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kennedy ML, Lubowski DZ, King DW. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery excision: is anorectal function compromised? Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(5):601–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Moore JS, Cataldo PA, Osler T, Hyman NH. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is more effective than traditional transanal excision for resection of rectal masses. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51(7):1026–30. discussion 30-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Lee W, Lee D, Choi S, Chun H. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery and radical surgery for T1 and T2 rectal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2003;17(8):1283–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Atallah S, Albert M, Larach S. Transanal minimally invasive surgery: a giant leap forward. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(9):2200–5. This manuscript describes the first large series of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Gill S, Stetler JL, Patel A, Shaffer VO, Srinivasan J, Staley C, et al. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS): standardizing a reproducible procedure. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19(8):1528–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Martin-Perez B, Andrade-Ribeiro GD, Hunter L, Atallah S. A systematic review of transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) from 2010 to 2013. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18(9):775–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Atallah S, Martin-Perez B, Pinan J, Quinteros F, Schoonyoung H, Albert M, et al. Robotic transanal total mesorectal excision: a pilot study. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18(11):1047–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Wu Y, Wu YY, Li S, Zhu BS, Zhao K, Yang XD, et al. TEM and conventional rectal surgery for T1 rectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58(106):364–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Heintz A, Morschel M, Junginger T. Comparison of results after transanal endoscopic microsurgery and radical resection for T1 carcinoma of the rectum. Surg Endosc. 1998;12(9):1145–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Habr-Gama A, de Souza PM, Ribeiro Jr U, Nadalin W, Gansl R, Sousa Jr AH, et al. Low rectal cancer: impact of radiation and chemotherapy on surgical treatment. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41(9):1087–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hiotis SP, Weber SM, Cohen AM, Minsky BD, Paty PB, Guillem JG, et al. Assessing the predictive value of clinical complete response to neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: an analysis of 488 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;194(2):131–5. discussion 5-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Garcia-Aguilar J, Shi Q, Thomas Jr CR, Chan E, Cataldo P, Marcet J, et al. A phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemoradiation and local excision for T2N0 rectal cancer: preliminary results of the ACOSOG Z6041 trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19(2):384–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Garcia-Aguilar J, Renfro LA, Chow OS, Shi Q, Carrero XW, Lynn PB, et al. Organ preservation for clinical T2N0 distal rectal cancer using neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and local excision (ACOSOG Z6041): results of an open-label, single-arm, multi-institutional, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(15):1537–46. Phase 2 trial evaluating the use of neoadjuvant therapy in stage I (T2N0) rectal cancer patients. This trial is the first well done trial evaluating long-term outcomes after neoadjuvant therapy for T2N0 rectal cancers.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Borschitz T, Wachtlin D, Mohler M, Schmidberger H, Junginger T. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation and local excision for T2-3 rectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(3):712–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Marks JH, Valsdottir EB, DeNittis A, Yarandi SS, Newman DA, Nweze I, et al. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for the treatment of rectal cancer: comparison of wound complication rates with and without neoadjuvant radiation therapy. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(5):1081–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Heafner TA, Glasgow SC. A critical review of the role of local excision in the treatment of early (T1 and T2) rectal tumors. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2014;5(5):345–52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Tytherleigh MG, Warren BF, Mortensen NJ. Management of early rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 2008;95(4):409–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Ramirez JM, Mortensen NJ, Takeuchi N, Humphreys MM. Endoluminal ultrasonography in the follow-up of patients with rectal cancer. Br J Surg. 1994;81(5):692–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Chakravarti A, Compton CC, Shellito PC, Wood WC, Landry J, Machuta SR, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with rectal cancer managed by local excision with and without adjuvant irradiation. Ann Surg. 1999;230(1):49–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Friel CM, Cromwell JW, Marra C, Madoff RD, Rothenberger DA, Garcia-Aguilar J. Salvage radical surgery after failed local excision for early rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2002;45(7):875–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. You YN, Roses RE, Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Feig BW, Slack R, et al. Multimodality salvage of recurrent disease after local excision for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012;55(12):1213–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Weiser MR, Landmann RG, Wong WD, Shia J, Guillem JG, Temple LK, et al. Surgical salvage of recurrent rectal cancer after transanal excision. Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(6):1169–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Bentrem DJ, Okabe S, Wong WD, Guillem JG, Weiser MR, Temple LK, et al. T1 adenocarcinoma of the rectum: transanal excision or radical surgery? Ann Surg. 2005;242(4):472–7. discussion 7-9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Madbouly KM, Remzi FH, Erkek BA, Senagore AJ, Baeslach CM, Khandwala F, et al. Recurrence after transanal excision of T1 rectal cancer: should we be concerned? Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48(4):711–9. discussion 9-21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. de Graaf EJ, Doornebosch PG, Tetteroo GW, Geldof H, Hop WC. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery is feasible for adenomas throughout the entire rectum: a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52(6):1107–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Palma P, Horisberger K, Joos A, Rothenhoefer S, Willeke F, Post S. Local excision of early rectal cancer: is transanal endoscopic microsurgery an alternative to radical surgery? Revista espanola de enfermedades digestivas. 2009;101(3):172–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Doornebosch PG, Ferenschild FT, de Wilt JH, Dawson I, Tetteroo GW, de Graaf EJ. Treatment of recurrence after transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for T1 rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53(9):1234–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Albert MR, Atallah SB, deBeche-Adams TC, Izfar S, Larach SW. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for local excision of benign neoplasms and early-stage rectal cancer: efficacy and outcomes in the first 50 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2013;56(3):301–7. The authors describe a series of 50 TAMIS patients and their outcomes.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick S. Sullivan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Benjamin M. Martin, Kenneth Cardona, and Patrick S. Sullivan declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Localized Colorectal Cancer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Martin, B.M., Cardona, K. & Sullivan, P.S. Management of Early (T1 or T2) Rectal Cancer. Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep 12, 94–102 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11888-016-0315-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11888-016-0315-8

Keywords

Navigation