Skip to main content
Log in

Surgical Salvage of Recurrent Rectal Cancer After Transanal Excision

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

PURPOSE

This study examines surgical salvage of locally recurrent rectal cancer following transanal excision of early tumors.

METHODS

Through retrospective review of a colorectal database we identified 50 patients who underwent attempted surgical salvage for local recurrence following initial transanal excision of T1 or T2 rectal cancer. Eight patients had resectable synchronous distant disease. Clinicopathologic variables were associated with extent of surgery required for salvage and outcome.

RESULTS

Salvage procedures included abdominoperineal resection (31), low anterior resection (11), total pelvic exenteration (4), and transanal excision (3). One patient had unresectable disease at exploration, requiring diverting ostomy. Of the 49 patients who underwent successful salvage, 27 (55 percent) required an extended pelvic dissection with en bloc resection of one or more of the following structures: pelvic sidewall and autonomic nerves (18); coccyx or portion of sacrum (6); prostate (5); seminal vesicle (5); bladder (4); portion of the vagina (3); ureter (2); ovary (1); and uterus (1). Complete pathologic resection (R0) was accomplished in 47 of 49 patients. Of the eight patients with distant and local recurrence, two underwent synchronous resection and six had delayed metastasectomy. With a median follow-up of 33 months, 29 patients had recurred or died of disease at the time of this analysis. Five-year disease-specific survival was 53 percent. Factors predictive of survival included evidence of any mucosal recurrence on endoscopy, low presalvage carcinoembryonic antigen, and absence of poor pathologic features (lymphovascular and perineural invasion). Patients who required an extended pelvic resection had a worse survival rate.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic recurrence following transanal excision of early rectal cancer is often locally advanced, requiring an extended pelvic dissection with en bloc resection of adjacent pelvic organs to achieve salvage. The long-term outcome in patients undergoing resection is less than expected, considering the early stage of their initial disease. When contemplating local excision for early rectal cancer, the risk of local recurrence, the extent and morbidity of surgery required for salvage, and the modest cure rate following salvage should be considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. D Blumberg PB Paty AI Picon et al. (1998) ArticleTitleStage I rectal cancer: identification of high-risk patients J Am Coll Surg 186 574–9 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00018-0 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3ktlSmtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9583699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. J Garcia-Aguilar A Mellgren P Sirivongs D Buie RD Madoff DA Rothenberger (2000) ArticleTitleLocal excision of rectal cancer without adjuvant therapy: a word of caution Ann Surg 231 345–51 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200003000-00007 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7nslWjuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10714627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. A Mellgren P Sirivongs DA Rothenberger RD Madoff J Garcia-Aguilar (2000) ArticleTitleIs local excision adequate therapy for early rectal cancer? Dis Colon Rectum 43 1064–71 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvitVSgsA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10950004

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. CM Friel JW Cromwell C Marra RD Madoff DA Rothenberger J Garcia-Aguilar (2002) ArticleTitleSalvage radical surgery after failed local excision for early rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 45 875–9 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s10350-004-6320-z Occurrence Handle12130873

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. PB Paty GM Nash P Baron et al. (2002) ArticleTitleLong-term results of local excision for rectal cancer Ann Surg 236 522–9 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200210000-00015 Occurrence Handle12368681

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. M Shoup JG Guillem KM Alektiar et al. (2002) ArticleTitlePredictors of survival in recurrent rectal cancer after resection and intraoperative radiotherapy Dis Colon Rectum 45 585–92

    Google Scholar 

  7. JC Salo PB Paty J Guillem BD Minsky LB Harrison AM Cohen (1999) ArticleTitleSurgical salvage of recurrent rectal carcinoma after curative resection: a 10-year experience Ann Surg Oncol 6 171–7

    Google Scholar 

  8. F Lopez-Kostner VW Fazio A Vignali LA Rybicki IC Lavery (2001) ArticleTitleLocally recurrent rectal cancer: predictors and success of salvage surgery Dis Colon Rectum 44 173–8

    Google Scholar 

  9. PL Baron WE Enker MF Zakowski C Urmacher (1995) ArticleTitleImmediate vs. salvage resection after local treatment for early rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 38 177–81 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqC2Mvgs10%3D Occurrence Handle7851173

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. BC Morson HJ Bussey S Samoorian (1977) ArticleTitlePolicy of local excision for early cancer of the colorectum Gut 18 1045–50 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CSeC3cjovFM%3D Occurrence Handle606631

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. JJ DeCosse RJ Wong SH Quan NB Friedman SS Sternberg (1989) ArticleTitleConservative treatment of distal rectal cancer by local excision Cancer 63 219–23 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiaD1cbltFM%3D Occurrence Handle2910430

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. T Hager FP Gall P Hermanek (1983) ArticleTitleLocal excision of cancer of the rectum Dis Colon Rectum 26 149–51

    Google Scholar 

  13. NK Kim MJ Kim SH Yun SK Sohn JS Min (1999) ArticleTitleComparative study of transrectal ultrasonography, pelvic computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative staging of rectal cancer Dis Colon Rectum 42 770–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzgsV2ntA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10378601

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. GF Gualdi E Casciani A Guadalaxara C D’Orta E Polettini G Pappalardo (2000) ArticleTitleLocal staging of rectal cancer with transrectal ultrasound and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with histologic findings Dis Colon Rectum 43 338–45 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7psFamsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10733115

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. C Maldjian R Smith A Kilger M Schnall G Ginsberg M Kochman (2000) ArticleTitleEndorectal surface coil MR imaging as a staging technique for rectal carcinoma: a comparison study to rectal endosonography Abdom Imaging 25 75–80 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s002619910015 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7hvVGhsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10652927

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. RH Taylor JH Hay SN Larsson (1998) ArticleTitleTransanal local excision of selected low rectal cancers Am J Surg 175 360–3 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00038-5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c3mtV2jtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9600277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. A Chakravarti CC Compton PC Shellito et al. (1999) ArticleTitleLong-term follow-up of patients with rectal cancer managed by local excision with and without adjuvant irradiation Ann Surg 230 49–54 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199907000-00008 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MzisFKhsQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10400036

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin R. Weiser M.D..

Additional information

Reprints are not available.

About this article

Cite this article

Weiser, M., Landmann, R., Wong, W. et al. Surgical Salvage of Recurrent Rectal Cancer After Transanal Excision. Dis Colon Rectum 48, 1169–1175 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0930-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0930-3

Key words

Navigation