Abstract
Purpose of Review
The purpose of this review is threefold: (i) to give an overview of well-established invasive methods for assessing patients with ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) in the cardiac catheterization laboratory; (ii) to describe the prognostic and treatment implications based on these findings, and (iii) to discuss current knowledge gaps and future perspectives.
Recent Findings
Recent studies have demonstrated that invasive coronary function testing not only allows for risk stratification of patients with INOCA but also guides medical therapy with improvement in symptoms and quality of life. Based on these findings, invasive coronary function assessment is now a class 2a recommendation in the 2021 ACC/AHA chest pain guideline to improve the diagnosis of coronary microvascular dysfunction and to enhance risk stratification.
Summary
Invasive functional testing for patients with INOCA is well established and easily performed in the catheterization laboratory. Comprehensive invasive assessment is a key to differentiating INOCA endotypes and optimizing both medical therapy and preventive strategies including lifestyle modification.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Patients with angina and/or signs of ischemic heart disease are often found to have no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) [1]. This condition is referred to as ischemia with no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA) and affects up to 70% of women [2] and up to 50% of men [3]. INOCA is a heterogeneous and non-benign condition associated with poor cardiovascular outcomes and economic burden [1, 4, 5]. Thus, it is imperative to identify those at risk and optimize therapy [6]. Invasive coronary function testing offers a distinctive advantage over non-invasive assessments due to a comprehensive assessment of microvascular and vasospastic angina (Table 1) [7, 8], and is currently a class 2a recommendation for patients with suspected INOCA in the latest American College of Cardiology (ACC) and American Heart Association (AHA) chest pain guideline [9••].
Due to a growing recognition of INOCA and technical advances in diagnostic testing, multiple studies have proposed and validated various invasive approaches for the differentiation of INOCA endotypes, prognostication, and individualization of therapy in recent years. The current review gives an overview of each well-established invasive assessment and discusses prognostic value and treatment implications in INOCA.
Structure and Function of the Coronary Circulation
The coronary arterial system consists of the epicardial coronary artery (>400 μm), pre-arterioles (100–400 μm), and arterioles (40–100 μm) each of which is regulated by different mechanisms (Fig. 1) [10]. The epicardial vessels represent 5–10% of the total coronary vascular resistance and are responsive to flow-dependent dilatation [11]. Pre-arterioles, especially distal pre-arterioles, are more sensitive to intravascular pressure variations whereas arterioles are responsive to changes in the intramyocardial concentration of metabolites [11]. The pre-arterioles and arterioles account for most of the total vascular resistance (80%) and control coronary artery blood flow by endothelium-dependent and -independent mechanisms. The normal coronary endothelium releases various vasodilatory or vasoconstrictive substances, which, in turn, affect the tone of vascular smooth muscle cells [12]. In contrast, the myogenic response of arterioles is independent of the coronary endothelium and plays a key role in maintaining coronary microvascular tone in response to pressure changes [13].
Adenosine and acetylcholine (ACh) are the two vasoactive agents most used in the cardiac catheterization laboratory and act on the coronary arterial system differently. Adenosine primarily induces endothelium-independent relaxation of vascular smooth muscle cells [14, 15], whereas the vasodilatory effect of ACh results from the endothelium-mediated release of vasodilatory substances such as nitric oxide [16, 17]. ACh also has a vasoconstrictive effect via direct vasoconstriction of vascular smooth muscle cells especially at a higher ACh dose [16].
Limitations of Traditional Cardiovascular Testing and Angiography
Traditional cardiovascular testing, such as exercise treadmill testing, stress echocardiography, and SPECT, have limited diagnostic accuracy for detecting coronary vasomotor dysfunction (a reported sensitivity and specificity of non-invasive testing are 41% and 57%, respectively) [18, 19]. Non-invasive assessments that include myocardial blood flow reserve (MBFR) measurements using stress positron emission tomography (PET) or stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging can detect coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) and enhance risk stratification in patients with suspected INOCA [20,21,22,23,24,25]. As a result, these noninvasive measures of MBFR are also class 2a recommendations for the evaluation of INOCA in the latest chest pain guideline [9••]. However, coronary artery spasm is highly prevalent in INOCA populations [26•], and there is currently no established non-invasive method to diagnose coronary artery spasm accurately and safely.
Invasive coronary angiography and coronary computed tomography angiography are the mainstay for the anatomic assessment of CAD and are required to confirm the absence of no hemodynamically significant obstructive stenosis. Moreover, coronary computed tomography angiography is the gold standard for the identification of myocardial bridging [27]. However, the coronary microvasculature is beyond their resolution, limiting structural, and functional assessments of the whole coronary arterial system. Invasive coronary function testing addresses these limitations and allows a more comprehensive assessment of INOCA (Fig. 2).
Invasive coronary assessment in INOCA. ACh, acetylcholine; CBF, coronary blood flow; CFR, coronary flow reserve; CMD, coronary microvascular dysfunction; FFR, fractional flow reserve; hMR, hyperemic microvascular resistance; IMR, index of microcirculatory restriction; INOCA, ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease
Invasive Testing of Coronary Flow Reserve
Doppler Method
Direct measurement of coronary flow velocity using a Doppler-tipped guidewire is one of the established techniques for the invasive assessment of coronary flow reserve (CFR) (Fig. 3). Peak flow velocities over three consecutive heartbeats are averaged at rest and during hyperemia induced by intravenous or intracoronary administration of adenosine, and Doppler-derived CFR is calculated as the ratio of hyperemic to resting average peak velocity. This technique has existed since the 1970s and may be limited by the ability to obtain a stable, high-quality Doppler flow signal [28, 29]. However, repositioning the Doppler wire helps enable reproducible measurements [30]. It should also be noted that CFRs in response to intravenous infusion of adenosine may result in lower values than intracoronary adenosine injection and caution is needed to interpret CFR depending on how hyperemia is induced [31].
The use of Doppler-derived CFR in INOCA was first validated in a cohort from the WISE (Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) study [32]. Doppler-derived CFR in response to intracoronary adenosine infusion was well correlated with coronary volumetric flow reserve, the traditional standard for CMD diagnosis, and demonstrated a high diagnostic performance to identify women with CMD (sensitivity and specificity were 90% and 89%, respectively) [32]. Doppler-derived CFR also has a strong correlation with PET-derived CFR [33], and a widely used cutoff suggestive of CMD in INOCA is <2–2.5 [34,35,36].
Thermodilution Method
CFR can also be estimated using the thermodilution technique, which uses a pressure-temperature sensor-tipped guidewire to monitor temperature changes in response to intracoronary saline administration (Fig. 4) [37]. Room-temperature saline is given as a manual bolus to measure the transit time of the injected saline traveling from the proximal to the distal sensor at rest and during maximal hyperemia induced by intravenous adenosine infusion [38, 39]. This bolus thermodilution method allows indirect measurement of coronary flow velocity and is now the most widely used alternative to the Doppler technique. On the other hand, a newer method in which saline is continuously administered using a dedicated monorail catheter connected to an infusion pump has also emerged [40], allowing direct volumetric blood flow measurement. CFR obtained from this continuous thermodilution technique has a higher reproducibility than bolus thermodilution-derived CFR [41]. It should be noted that the catheter used in this method is available only in some countries and is not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration.
Coronary physiology assessment using the thermodilution technique. Simultaneous recordings of aortic pressure (Pa; red tracing), distal coronary pressure (Pd; green tracing), their ratio (Pd/Pa; yellow tracing), and intracoronary temperature after consecutive injections of 3 boluses at rest (blue tracings) and 3 boluses during steady-state hyperemia (orange tracings). These recordings allow simultaneous measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR), coronary flow reserve (CFR), and the index of microvascular resistance (IMR). The yellow arrows point to the average values of resting and hyperemic mean transient time (Tmn) as well as to the average distal coronary pressure (Pd) during hyperemia. These values are needed to derive CFR and IMR. (Reprinted from Candreva et al.37 with permission. Copyright ©2021, Elsevier)
To date, a number of studies have assessed the correlation between CFRs derived from bolus thermodilution, Doppler, and non-invasive techniques [29, 33, 39, 42,43,44]. These investigations report varying degrees of correlation. The same CFR range as used in the Doppler method (i.e., 2–2.5) is widely adopted for the diagnosis of CMD using thermodilution techniques [4, 36].
Prognosis and Treatment Implications
Aside from the diagnosis of CMD based on CFR, it is important to recognize that CFR is a continuous predictor of adverse outcomes rather than a step-like threshold [45]. In the WISE study, low CFR (<2.32) was associated with an increased risk of combined death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or congestive heart failure, supporting the usefulness of invasive CFR measurement for risk stratification in women with suspected INOCA [34, 46]. The use of beta-blockers is the standard therapy for patients with a low CFR and was one of the treatment pathways studied in a blinded, randomized fashion in the CorMicA (coronary microvascular angina) trial which demonstrated significant improvement in angina and quality of life in INOCA with medical therapy guided by invasive coronary function testing including CFR measurement [6].
Invasive Testing of Microvascular Resistance
Index of Microcirculatory Resistance
The index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) is calculated as hyperemic mean distal intracoronary pressure multiplied by hyperemic mean transit time both of which can be measured using a pressure-temperature sensor-tipped guidewire in a similar manner to bolus thermodilution-derived CFR (Fig. 4) [47]. However, unlike CFR which assesses the flow status of the entire coronary arterial system, IMR specifically interrogates the coronary microcirculation [47]. Moreover, IMR has better reproducibility and less hemodynamic dependence than CFR [48], addressing limitations inherent to invasive CFR measurement. Recently, efforts have been made to estimate IMR without the need for intracoronary wiring or hyperemia by leveraging techniques for computational physiology based on coronary angiography images [49, 50]. This novel technique has the potential to help streamline comprehensive physiological assessment in the cardiac catheterization laboratory once further validated.
Based on prior studies in healthy subjects [51,52,53], the normal range of IMR is <25. With this cutoff value, the reported prevalence of CMD in INOCA is approximately 20–40% [54,55,56]. Although the diagnosis of CMD can be made if CFR is <2.0 in the absence of occlusive epicardial coronary arteries regardless of IMR values in the 2021 AHA/ACC guideline [9••], some patients have discordant results between CFR and IMR (i.e., low CFR and low IMR) due to elevated resting coronary flow [57]. Currently, the underlying mechanisms of discordant results are not fully understood, but concurrent measurement of IMR and CFR is useful to differentiate such an endotype from patients with concordant results (low CFR and high IMR) who appear to be pathophysiologically different [57,58,59].
Hyperemic Microcirculatory Resistance
Alternatively, microvascular resistance can be assessed with hyperemic microvascular resistance (hMR), defined as the ratio of hyperemic mean distal pressure to hyperemic average peak velocity, using a pressure/Doppler sensor–tipped guidewire [60]. hMR >2.5 mmHg/cm/s is a common cutoff to diagnose CMD [43, 58, 61]. The correlation of hMR with IMR is modest and hMR may have better diagnostic performance to predict invasive CFR <2.0 than IMR [43, 44].
Prognosis and Treatment Implications
Evidence suggests that high IMR/hMR accompanied by low CFR or vasospastic angina, but not high IMR/hMR alone, is associated with long-term cardiovascular events in INOCA [59, 62]. This highlights the importance of comprehensive physiological assessments for better risk stratification. As described above, IMR/hMR allows us to identify patients with low CFR due to elevated resting coronary blood flow for who enhancing vasodilation is less likely to work, though vasodilators such as calcium channel blockers are often initiated empirically after being found to have no obstructive CAD [63]. IMR was also part of invasive coronary function testing in the CorMicA trial and helped to optimize stratified medical therapy [6].
Invasive Testing of Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction
Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction
ACh-mediated increase in coronary blood flow volume measured using a Doppler-tipped guidewire is a surrogate of coronary endothelial microvascular function [64]. Coronary endothelial dysfunction is defined as [1] <50% increase in coronary blood flow in response to ACh compared with baseline or [2] any degree of epicardial vasoconstriction [64]. The dose of ACh used for the assessment of endothelial function varies in the literature from 20 to 40ug and is generally given as a slower infusion (e.g., over 2 min). This is a lower dose than that in spasm provocation testing as discussed below. It should be noted that normal epicardial endothelial function does not necessarily indicate normal microvascular endothelial function and vice versa [35]. A combination of ACh-mediated coronary blood flow increase and epicardial vasoconstriction assessment is needed for a comprehensive evaluation of coronary endothelial function.
Impaired endothelial function in INOCA as assessed with coronary blood flow response was first reported in the early 1990s and is known to be highly prevalent [65, 66•, 67]. In the WISE study, 58% of women with INOCA were found to have epicardial vasoconstriction in response to ACh [68], highlighting a high prevalence of impaired endothelial macrovascular function in INOCA. Another prior comprehensive investigation has also demonstrated that severe epicardial endothelial dysfunction is common and present with other coronary abnormalities such as CMD and myocardial bridging in INOCA [54]. Such an overlap of possible causes of chest pain illustrates the clinical relevance of comprehensive invasive assessment in those with suspected INOCA.
Although the current ACC/AHA guideline does not specifically recommend invasive coronary endothelial function testing [9••], the assessment of coronary blood flow volume in response to ACh increases the diagnostic yield of coronary function testing. For example, endothelial dysfunction was present in 68% of patients with normal CFR and no inducible coronary artery vasospasm, which was similarly high in patients (80%) with positive spasm testing and/or impaired adenosine-mediated vasodilation [18, 66]. These results support its diagnostic role in INOCA.
Prognosis and Treatment Implications
Impaired coronary vascular response to ACh is independently associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events as well as decreased time free of adverse events in patients with INOCA [64, 69]. Endothelial dysfunction is believed to precede clinical coronary atherosclerosis, and the initiation of medications targeting atherosclerotic disease such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and statins along with lifestyle modification is recommended in patients with endothelial dysfunction [70, 71].
Invasive Testing of Coronary Artery Spasm
Epicardial Vasospasm
ACh is also used for the assessment of epicardial and microvascular vasospastic angina (VSA) [7]. Invasive protocols to assess coronary vasospasm vary in both dosing and speed of administration [26•]. Dosing is generally incremental, with lower doses used not only to allow for the assessment of endothelial function but also to avoid giving higher doses if epicardial spasm is present at lower doses. The most commonly used dose for assessing epicardial spasm is 100μg, though some groups advocate giving 200μg if spasm is strongly suspected and not present at lower doses. ACh can be manually infused into the coronary artery. Most centers have recommended ACh injection over 30–60 s, but a slower injection of 2 min is adopted in some institutions. Administration should be performed under continuous monitoring of the patient’s symptoms and the 12-lead electrocardiogram [26•]. Intracoronary ACh injection has a high diagnostic performance for the diagnosis of VSA (sensitivity and specificity are 90% and 99%, respectively) [72]. Alternatively, intracoronary ergonovine can be used [7]. Provocative testing is positive if all of the following are induced in response to provocative stimuli; (i) transient total or subtotal coronary artery occlusion (≥ 90% vasoconstriction), (ii) development of chest pain, and (iii) ischemic ECG changes (Fig. 5) [7, 73].
A representative case with positive provocative spasm testing. An example of a patient with A diffuse epicardial spasm of the left anterior descending artery (black arrows) provoked by intracoronary injection of 200μg acetylcholine (ACh) accompanied by recognizable chest pain (red dot on torso) and new-onset ischemic ECG changes (red arrows). B Coronary spasm, angina symptoms, and ECG changes resolved after intracoronary nitroglycerin (NTG) injection at the end of routine ACh testing. C After rechallenge with 200μg ACh 3 minutes later, no epicardial vasoconstriction was observed. However, the patient again reported recognizable chest pain, and ischemic ECG changes (red arrows) reoccurred, suggesting coexisting microvascular spasm refractory to NTG pre-treatment. (Reprinted from Seitz et al.73 with permission. Copyright ©2022, Elsevier)
The reported prevalence of VSA is approximately 40% in INOCA [56]. Identifying these patients is crucial because, compared to other endotypes of INOCA, VSA has more established treatment as described below and vasospasm can be prevented in those with an identifiable trigger (e.g., smoking).
Microvascular Vasospasm
Microvascular vasospasm (MVS) is defined as symptom reproduction with ischemic ECG changes but no epicardial vasospasm during provocative spasm testing [8]. Although the reported prevalence of MVS ranges from 20 to 40% in INOCA [26•], MVS was traditionally underrecognized because the presence of epicardial spasm during spasm testing masked the diagnosis of MVS. However, a novel method called ACh rechallenge was recently proposed to help detect coexisting MVS with VSA [73]. In this approach, the ACh dose that induced vasospasm is reinjected after intracoronary administration of nitroglycerin. The investigators reported that approximately 50% of patients who were diagnosed with VSA during the initial ACh testing were found to have coexisting MVS after nitroglycerin injection (Figs. 5 and 6) [73]. This result also indicates that nitroglycerin alone may not be adequate to treat such a subset of patients given the remaining microvascular spasm even after nitroglycerin. ACh rechallenge is thus not only diagnostic but also allows us to assess their responsiveness to nitroglycerin.
Acetylcholine rechallenge. A Sankey plot illustrating the results of the initial acetylcholine (ACh) spasm provocation test and the ACh rechallenge after nitroglycerin. Nitroglycerin was most effective in preventing focal epicardial spasm and least effective in patients with microvascular spasm. ACh rechallenge revealed coexisting nitroglycerin-refractory microvascular spasm in approximately 50% of patients with focal or diffuse epicardial spasm. (Reprinted from Seitz et al.73 with permission. Copyright ©2022, Elsevier)
Prognosis and Treatment Implications
Recent, long-term follow-up data in a total of 736 INOCA patients who underwent ACh testing demonstrated that the risk of all-cause and cardiac deaths was low irrespective of spasm provocation results [74]. However, VSA was independently associated with myocardial infarction and repeat coronary angiography while patients with MVS were at increased risk of recurrent angina [74]. Although the use of nitrates and calcium channel blockers are the mainstay of pharmacological vasospasm management along with preventive measures (e.g., smoking cessation) [4], nitrates may not be as effective in MVS as in VSA as discussed above [73]. In addition, a recent, randomized, placebo-controlled trial showed no significant improvement in symptoms in patients with MVS treated with diltiazem [75], highlighting challenges in the management of MVS compared to VSA.
Coronary Slow Flow
TIMI Frame Count
The coronary slow flow phenomenon is an angiographic finding first reported in 1972 and characterized by the delayed flow of contrast medium in the absence of obstructive CAD [76]. The TIMI (thrombolysis in myocardial infarction) frame count is a semi-quantitative method to assess the degree of slow flow and is determined as the number of cine frames required for contrast to reach the end-point branch [77]. In the international standardization of diagnostic criteria for microvascular angina proposed by the Coronary Vasomotion Disorders International Study Group (COVADIS), a TIMI frame count >25 is listed as evidence of impaired coronary microvascular function along with decreased CFR, high IMR, and MVS [8]. An advantage of the TIMI frame count is no need for wire instrumentation or provocative stimuli. Moreover, previous studies showed that patients with this phenomenon had increased resting microvascular resistance without decreased CFR or elevated hMR [78, 79], which indicates the unique nature of this condition and supports the additive value of the TIMI frame count for identifying patients with microvascular angina who might not be diagnosed by other methods.
Prognosis and Treatment Implications
The prognostic value of the TIMI frame count was reported in a pilot study from the WISE study [80]. Although the TIMI frame was not predictive of all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, it was an independent predictor of hospitalizations for angina.
A variety of agents such as dipyridamole and simvastatin were studied as a potential pharmacologic intervention for the coronary slow flow phenomenon and were found to improve coronary flow as assessed with the TIMI flow count [81, 82]. However, due to a lack of clinical outcome data, there is currently no established treatment specific to this phenomenon.
Safety of Coronary Function Testing
The risk of invasive coronary assessment is reported to be low. In the WISE study, serious adverse events related to comprehensive invasive testing occurred in 2 out of 293 women with INOCA (0.7%) and included 1 iatrogenic coronary artery dissection and 1 ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction due to coronary artery spasm [68]. A recent meta-analysis examined the safety of provocative spasm testing with intracoronary ACh and reported excellent safety records in Western populations primarily presenting with INOCA or myocardial infarction with nonobstructive coronary arteries (the rate of procedure-related major complications was 0.0%; 95% confidence interval: 0.0–0.45%) [26•]. The addition of invasive coronary assessment to diagnostic left heart catheterization, which is also a safe procedure in the contemporary era [83], does not appear to significantly increase procedural risk in INOCA.
Knowledge Gaps and Future Directions
It is currently believed that the additional time and cost related to invasive coronary assessment is offset by preventing unnecessary testing/treatment and future adverse clinical events as a consequence of optimal management guided by invasive testing [84]. However, due to multiple invasive methods available as well as emerging techniques as described above, invasive procedure protocols vary from institution to institution. Thus, it is crucial to develop a standardized, effective protocol from the perspective of time- and cost-efficiency and diagnostic accuracy. Additionally, depending on the endotypes of INOCA, the current management may not be specific but rather be a generalized approach such as risk and lifestyle modification. This highlights the need for therapeutic advances that target underlying pathophysiology and improve long-term clinical outcomes. Rigorous prospective studies are needed to address these knowledge gaps related to invasive diagnosis and subsequent management of INOCA.
Conclusion
Although obstructive CAD is only one of the many causes of myocardial ischemia, false reassurance after being found no obstructive CAD is often given to patients who might have other structural and/or functional abnormalities in the coronary arterial system. Consequently, these patients continue to have angina with an increased risk of adverse clinical events. INOCA should be recognized as a clinically important diagnosis for which further invasive coronary assessment is indicated to differentiate its endotypes, risk stratify patients, and individualize treatment. This guideline-directed approach needs to be implemented in our clinical practice so that patients with INOCA will receive symptomatic and prognostic benefits.
Abbreviations
- ACh:
-
Acetylcholine
- CAD:
-
Coronary artery disease
- CFR:
-
Coronary flow reserve
- CMD:
-
Coronary microvascular dysfunction
- CorMicA:
-
Coronary microvascular angina
- COVADIS:
-
Coronary Vasomotion Disorders International Study Group
- hMR:
-
Hyperemic microvascular resistance
- IMR:
-
The index of microcirculatory resistance
- INOCA:
-
Ischemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries
- MVS:
-
Microvascular spasm
- PET:
-
Positron emission tomography
- TIMI:
-
Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction
- VSA:
-
Vasospastic angina
- WISE:
-
Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Jespersen L, Hvelplund A, Abildstrøm SZ, et al. Stable angina pectoris with no obstructive coronary artery disease is associated with increased risks of major adverse cardiovascular events. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:734–44.
Merz CN, Kelsey SF, Pepine CJ, et al. The Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study: protocol design, methodology and feasibility report. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:1453–61.
Davis MB, Maddox TM, Langner P, Plomondon ME, Rumsfeld JS, Duvernoy CS. Characteristics and outcomes of women veterans undergoing cardiac catheterization in the Veterans Affairs Healthcare System: insights from the VA CART Program. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015;8:S39–47.
Kunadian V, Chieffo A, Camici PG, et al. An EAPCI expert consensus document on ischaemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries in collaboration with European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology & Microcirculation Endorsed by Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:3504–20.
Shaw LJ, Merz CN, Pepine CJ, et al. The economic burden of angina in women with suspected ischemic heart disease: results from the National Institutes of Health--National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute--sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation. Circulation. 2006;114:894–904.
Ford TJ, Stanley B, Good R, et al. Stratified medical therapy using invasive coronary function testing in angina: the CorMicA Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:2841–55.
Beltrame JF, Crea F, Kaski JC, et al. International standardization of diagnostic criteria for vasospastic angina. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:2565–8.
Ong P, Camici PG, Beltrame JF, et al. International standardization of diagnostic criteria for microvascular angina. Int J Cardiol. 2018;250:16–20.
•• Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D, et al. AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2021;144:e368–454. Invasive coronary function assessment is a class 2a recommendation in this latest guideline to improve the diagnosis of coronary microvascular dysfunction and to enhance risk stratification.
Taqueti VR, Di Carli MF. Coronary microvascular disease pathogenic mechanisms and therapeutic options: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72:2625–41.
Camici PG, Crea F. Coronary microvascular dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:830–40.
Lerman A, Zeiher AM. Endothelial function: cardiac events. Circulation. 2005;111:363–8.
Kuo L, Chilian WM, Davis MJ. Coronary arteriolar myogenic response is independent of endothelium. Circ Res. 1990;66:860–6.
Hori M, Kitakaze M. Adenosine, the heart, and coronary circulation. Hypertension. 1991;18:565–74.
Mustafa SJ, Morrison RR, Teng B, Pelleg A. Adenosine receptors and the heart: role in regulation of coronary blood flow and cardiac electrophysiology. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2009:161–88.
Drexler H. Nitric oxide and coronary endothelial dysfunction in humans. Cardiovasc Res. 1999;43:572–9.
Furchgott RF. The role of endothelium in the responses of vascular smooth muscle to drugs. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 1984;24:175–97.
Cassar A, Chareonthaitawee P, Rihal CS, et al. Lack of correlation between noninvasive stress tests and invasive coronary vasomotor dysfunction in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2009;2:237–44.
Pargaonkar VS, Kobayashi Y, Kimura T, et al. Accuracy of non-invasive stress testing in women and men with angina in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol. 2019;282:7–15.
Bateman TM, Heller GV, Beanlands R, et al. Practical guide for interpreting and reporting cardiac PET measurements of myocardial blood flow: an information statement from the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. J Nucl Cardiol. 2021;28:768–87.
Kotecha T, Martinez-Naharro A, Boldrini M, et al. Automated pixel-wise quantitative myocardial perfusion mapping by CMR to detect obstructive coronary artery disease and coronary microvascular dysfunction: validation against invasive coronary physiology. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12:1958–69.
Murthy VL, Naya M, Taqueti VR, et al. Effects of sex on coronary microvascular dysfunction and cardiac outcomes. Circulation. 2014;129:2518–27.
Rahman H, Scannell CM, Demir OM, et al. High-resolution cardiac magnetic resonance imaging techniques for the identification of coronary microvascular dysfunction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;14:978–86.
Thomson LE, Wei J, Agarwal M, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion reserve index is reduced in women with coronary microvascular dysfunction. A National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored study from the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015:8.
Zhou W, Lee JCY, Leung ST, et al. Long-term prognosis of patients with coronary microvascular disease using stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021;14:602–11.
• Takahashi T, Samuels BA, Li W, et al. Safety of provocative testing with intracoronary acetylcholine and implications for standard protocols. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79:2367–78. This study shows that provocative testing with intracoronary administration of ACh for the diagnosis of vascular spasm is generally safe in INOCA.
Sternheim D, Power DA, Samtani R, Kini A, Fuster V, Sharma S. Myocardial bridging: diagnosis, functional assessment, and management: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021;78:2196–212.
Hartley CJ, Cole JS. An ultrasonic pulsed Doppler system for measuring blood flow in small vessels. J Appl Physiol. 1974;37:626–9.
Barbato E, Aarnoudse W, Aengevaeren WR, et al. Validation of coronary flow reserve measurements by thermodilution in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2004;25:219–23.
de Bruyne B, Bartunek J, Sys SU, Pijls NH, Heyndrickx GR, Wijns W. Simultaneous coronary pressure and flow velocity measurements in humans. Feasibility, reproducibility, and hemodynamic dependence of coronary flow velocity reserve, hyperemic flow versus pressure slope index, and fractional flow reserve. Circulation. 1996;94:1842–9.
AlBadri A, Sharif B, Wei J, et al. Intracoronary bolus injection versus intravenous infusion of adenosine for assessment of coronary flow velocity reserve in women with signs and symptoms of myocardial ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:2125–7.
Reis SE, Holubkov R, Lee JS, et al. Coronary flow velocity response to adenosine characterizes coronary microvascular function in women with chest pain and no obstructive coronary disease. Results from the pilot phase of the Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;33:1469–75.
Everaars H, de Waard GA, Driessen RS, et al. Doppler flow velocity and thermodilution to assess coronary flow reserve: a head-to-head comparison with [(15)O]H(2)O PET. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:2044–54.
AlBadri A, Bairey Merz CN, Johnson BD, et al. Impact of abnormal coronary reactivity on long-term clinical outcomes in women. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:684–93.
Sara JD, Widmer RJ, Matsuzawa Y, Lennon RJ, Lerman LO, Lerman A. Prevalence of coronary microvascular dysfunction among patients with chest pain and nonobstructive coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;8:1445–53.
Perera D, Berry C, Hoole SP, et al. Invasive coronary physiology in patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary artery disease: a consensus document from the coronary microvascular dysfunction workstream of the British Heart Foundation/National Institute for Health Research Partnership. Heart. 2022;109(2):88–95.
Candreva A, Gallinoro E, van’t Veer M, et al. Basics of coronary thermodilution. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14:595–605.
De Bruyne B, Pijls NH, Smith L, Wievegg M, Heyndrickx GR. Coronary thermodilution to assess flow reserve: experimental validation. Circulation. 2001;104:2003–6.
Pijls NH, De Bruyne B, Smith L, et al. Coronary thermodilution to assess flow reserve: validation in humans. Circulation. 2002;105:2482–6.
Aarnoudse W, Van't Veer M, Pijls NH, et al. Direct volumetric blood flow measurement in coronary arteries by thermodilution. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50:2294–304.
Gallinoro E, Bertolone DT, Fernandez-Peregrina E, et al. Reproducibility of bolus versus continuous thermodilution for assessment of coronary microvascular function in patients with ANOCA. EuroIntervention. 2023;
Fearon WF, Farouque HM, Balsam LB, et al. Comparison of coronary thermodilution and Doppler velocity for assessing coronary flow reserve. Circulation. 2003;108:2198–200.
Williams RP, de Waard GA, De Silva K, et al. Doppler versus thermodilution-derived coronary microvascular resistance to predict coronary microvascular dysfunction in patients with acute myocardial infarction or stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 2018;121:1–8.
Demir OM, Boerhout CKM, de Waard GA, et al. Comparison of Doppler flow velocity and thermodilution derived indexes of coronary physiology. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15:1060–70.
Bairey Merz CN, Pepine CJ, Walsh MN, Fleg JL. Ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA): developing evidence-based therapies and research agenda for the next decade. Circulation. 2017;135:1075–92.
Pepine CJ, Anderson RD, Sharaf BL, et al. Coronary microvascular reactivity to adenosine predicts adverse outcome in women evaluated for suspected ischemia results from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute WISE (Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:2825–32.
Fearon WF, Balsam LB, Farouque HM, et al. Novel index for invasively assessing the coronary microcirculation. Circulation. 2003;107:3129–32.
Ng MK, Yeung AC, Fearon WF. Invasive assessment of the coronary microcirculation: superior reproducibility and less hemodynamic dependence of index of microcirculatory resistance compared with coronary flow reserve. Circulation. 2006;113:2054–61.
Takahashi T, Theodoropoulos K, Latib A, Okura H, Kobayashi Y. Coronary physiologic assessment based on angiography and intracoronary imaging. J Cardiol. 2022;79:71–8.
Li W, Takahashi T, Rios SA, et al. Diagnostic performance and prognostic impact of coronary angiography-based Index of Microcirculatory Resistance assessment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;99:286–92.
Luo C, Long M, Hu X, et al. Thermodilution-derived coronary microvascular resistance and flow reserve in patients with cardiac syndrome X. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2014;7:43–8.
Melikian N, Vercauteren S, Fearon WF, et al. Quantitative assessment of coronary microvascular function in patients with and without epicardial atherosclerosis. EuroIntervention. 2010;5:939–45.
Solberg OG, Ragnarsson A, Kvarsnes A, et al. Reference interval for the index of coronary microvascular resistance. EuroIntervention. 2014;9:1069–75.
Lee BK, Lim HS, Fearon WF, et al. Invasive evaluation of patients with angina in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2015;131:1054–60.
Mejía-Rentería H, Wang L, Chipayo-Gonzales D, et al. Angiography-derived assessment of coronary microcirculatory resistance in patients with suspected myocardial ischaemia and non-obstructive coronary arteries. EuroIntervention. 2023;18:e1348–56.
Mileva N, Nagumo S, Mizukami T, et al. Prevalence of coronary microvascular disease and coronary vasospasm in patients with nonobstructive coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022;11:e023207.
Nardone M, McCarthy M, Ardern CI, et al. Concurrently low coronary flow reserve and low index of microvascular resistance are associated with elevated resting coronary flow in patients with chest pain and nonobstructive coronary arteries. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15:e011323.
Rahman H, Demir OM, Khan F, et al. Physiological stratification of patients with angina due to coronary microvascular dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:2538–49.
Lee JM, Jung JH, Hwang D, et al. Coronary flow reserve and microcirculatory resistance in patients with intermediate coronary stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:1158–69.
Meuwissen M, Chamuleau SA, Siebes M, et al. Role of variability in microvascular resistance on fractional flow reserve and coronary blood flow velocity reserve in intermediate coronary lesions. Circulation. 2001;103:184–7.
Rahman H, Ryan M, Lumley M, et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction is associated with myocardial ischemia and abnormal coronary perfusion during exercise. Circulation. 2019;140:1805–16.
Suda A, Takahashi J, Hao K, et al. Coronary functional abnormalities in patients with angina and nonobstructive coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:2350–60.
Tjoe B, Barsky L, Wei J, et al. Coronary microvascular dysfunction: considerations for diagnosis and treatment. Cleve Clin J Med. 2021;88:561–71.
Suwaidi JA, Hamasaki S, Higano ST, Nishimura RA, Holmes DR Jr, Lerman A. Long-term follow-up of patients with mild coronary artery disease and endothelial dysfunction. Circulation. 2000;101:948–54.
Egashira K, Inou T, Hirooka Y, Yamada A, Urabe Y, Takeshita A. Evidence of impaired endothelium-dependent coronary vasodilatation in patients with angina pectoris and normal coronary angiograms. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1659–64.
• RGT F, CKM B, Woudstra J, et al. Presence of coronary endothelial dysfunction, coronary vasospasm, and adenosine-mediated vasodilatory disorders in patients with ischemia and nonobstructive coronary arteries. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15:e012017. This study shows that coronary endothelial dysfunction is highly prevalent in INOCA, indicating the relevance of performing endothelial function testing in addition to adenosine testing and vasospasm provocation.
Quyyumi AA, Cannon RO 3rd, Panza JA, Diodati JG, Epstein SE. Endothelial dysfunction in patients with chest pain and normal coronary arteries. Circulation. 1992;86:1864–71.
Wei J, Mehta PK, Johnson BD, et al. Safety of coronary reactivity testing in women with no obstructive coronary artery disease: results from the NHLBI-sponsored WISE (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:646–53.
von Mering GO, Arant CB, Wessel TR, et al. Abnormal coronary vasomotion as a prognostic indicator of cardiovascular events in women: results from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-Sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE). Circulation. 2004;109:722–5.
Kayikcioglu M, Payzin S, Yavuzgil O, Kultursay H, Can LH, Soydan I. Benefits of statin treatment in cardiac syndrome-X1. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:1999–2005.
Pauly DF, Johnson BD, Anderson RD, et al. In women with symptoms of cardiac ischemia, nonobstructive coronary arteries, and microvascular dysfunction, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition is associated with improved microvascular function: a double-blind randomized study from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE). Am Heart J. 2011;162:678–84.
Okumura K, Yasue H, Matsuyama K, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of intracoronary injection of acetylcholine for the induction of coronary artery spasm. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988;12:883–8.
Seitz A, Feenstra R, Konst RE, et al. Acetylcholine rechallenge: a first step toward tailored treatment in patients with coronary artery spasm. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15:65–75.
Seitz A, Gardezy J, Pirozzolo G, et al. Long-term follow-up in patients with stable angina and unobstructed coronary arteries undergoing intracoronary acetylcholine testing. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13:1865–76.
Jansen TPJ, Konst RE, de Vos A, et al. Efficacy of diltiazem to improve coronary vasomotor dysfunction in ANOCA: the EDIT-CMD randomized clinical trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;15:1473–84.
Tambe AA, Demany MA, Zimmerman HA, Mascarenhas E. Angina pectoris and slow flow velocity of dye in coronary arteries--a new angiographic finding. Am Heart J. 1972;84:66–71.
Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Daley WL, et al. TIMI frame count: a quantitative method of assessing coronary artery flow. Circulation. 1996;93:879–88.
Fineschi M, Bravi A, Gori T. The “slow coronary flow” phenomenon: evidence of preserved coronary flow reserve despite increased resting microvascular resistances. Int J Cardiol. 2008;127:358–61.
Dutta U, Sinha A, Demir OM, Ellis H, Rahman H, Perera D. Coronary slow flow is not diagnostic of microvascular dysfunction in patients with angina and unobstructed coronary arteries. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023;12:e027664.
Petersen JW, Johnson BD, Kip KE, et al. TIMI frame count and adverse events in women with no obstructive coronary disease: a pilot study from the NHLBI-sponsored Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE). PLoS One. 2014;9:e96630.
Cakmak M, Tanriverdi H, Cakmak N, Evrengul H, Cetemen S, Kuru O. Simvastatin may improve myocardial perfusion abnormality in slow coronary flow. Cardiology. 2008;110:39–44.
Kurtoglu N, Akcay A, Dindar I. Usefulness of oral dipyridamole therapy for angiographic slow coronary artery flow. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87(777-9):a8.
Al-Hijji MA, Lennon RJ, Gulati R, et al. Safety and risk of major complications with diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:e007791.
Ahmad A, Corban MT, Moriarty JP, et al. Coronary reactivity assessment is associated with lower health care-associated costs in patients presenting with angina and nonobstructive coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2023:e012387.
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group for their work in advancing the diagnosis and understanding of coronary vasomotor disorders.
Funding
Open access funding provided by SCELC, Statewide California Electronic Library Consortium
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
N/A.
Conflict of Interest
Dr. Samuels has served as a consultant and on a speaker’s bureau for the Abbott Vascular and Philips. Dr. Wei has served on an advisory board for the Abbott Vascular. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Takahashi, T., Gupta, A., Samuels, B.A. et al. Invasive Coronary Assessment in Myocardial Ischemia with No Obstructive Coronary Arteries. Curr Atheroscler Rep 25, 729–740 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-023-01144-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11883-023-01144-9