Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The spelling of final letter patterns: A comparison of instruction at the level of the phoneme and the rime

  • Part III Research Into Practice: Instruction And Intervention
  • Published:
Annals of Dyslexia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two groups of first graders (n=63) participated in a brief 10-day intervention study in which they were instructed in the spelling of five final letter patterns in monosyllabic words. Apart from the final letter pattern sh, the other four patterns (nk, ke, sk, and ck) incorporated the phoneme /k/. One group received phoneme-based instruction that emphasized the direct relation between final speech sounds and their spelling patterns, whereas the second group received linguistically implicit instruction that focused solely on the spelling of the rime. The group receiving phoneme instruction (PI) improved accuracy of final pattern spelling as well as speed of word reading over the group receiving rime instruction (RI). The representation of one sound with the digraphs sh or ck did not confuse first graders as much as the discrimination and representation of two sounds with the blends sk and nk, or spelling of /k/ with ke when preceded by a long or tense vowel. The results suggest that the difficulty for beginning spelling does not necessarily lie in the letter pattern but in the sound sequence that is represented by letters. The results seem to support phoneme-based spelling instruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, M. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birsh, J. R. (1999). Multisensory teaching of basic language skills. Baltimore: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosman, A. M. T., & Van Orden, G. C. (1997). Why spelling is more difficult than reading. In C. A. Perfetti, L. Rieben, and M. Fayol (eds), Learning to spell. Research, theory, and practice across languages (pp. 173–194). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, S. A. (1997). Ability to encode phonological representations: An underlying difficulty of poor readers. In B. Blachman (ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early interventions (pp. 21–47). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, M., & Treiman, R. (1992). Learning to pronounce words: The limitations of analogies. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 375–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B., Fielding-Barnsley, R., & Ashley, L. (2000). Effects of preschool phoneme identity training after six years: Outcome level distinguished from rate of response. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 659–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carreker, S. (1999). Teaching spelling. In J. R. Birsh (ed.), Multisensory teaching of basic language skills (pp. 217–256). Baltimore: Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, J. B., Davies, P., & Richman, B. (1971). The American heritage word frequency book. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. (1970). Vowel length variation as a function of the voicing of the consonant environment. Phonetica, 22, 129–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A. R. (1977). Situation spelling. Formulas and equations for spelling the sounds of spoken English (rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, A. R. (1984). Structures and techniques. Multisensory teaching of basic language skills. Cambridge, MA: Educators Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denes, P. B., & Pinson, E. N. (1963). The speech chain. The physics and biology of spoken language. Baltimore, MD: Waverly Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, G. (1970). Relative frequency of English spellings. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: AGS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, C. A., Liberman, I. Y., & Shankweiler, D. (1977). On interpreting the error pattern in beginning reading. Language and Speech, 20, 162–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, E. (1994). Grapheme-phoneme correspondence in dyslexic and matched control readers. British Journal of Psychology, 85, 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, S. A., Large, N. R., & Pisoni, D. B. (2000). Perception of word likeness: Effects of segment probability and length on the processing of nonwords. Journal of Memory and Language, 42, 481–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giegerich, H. J. (1992). English phonology: An introduction. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U. (1988). Children’s use of analogy in learning to spell. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goswami, U., & Bryant, P. (1990). Phonological skills and learning to read. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B., Juel, C., & Griffith, P. L. (1992). Reading, spelling, and the orthographic cipher. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 35–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, S. (1999). Speaking in shorthand–A syllable-centric perspective for understanding pronunciation variation. Speech Communication, 29, 159–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helfer, K. S., & Huntley, R. A. (1991). Aging and consonant errors in reverberation and noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90, 1786–1795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, E. H., & Martin, L. A. (2001). The texts of beginning reading instruction. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson, (eds.), Handbook of early literacy research. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, C., Muter, V., & Snowling, M. (1998). Segmentation does predict early progress in learning to read better than rhyme: A reply to Bryant. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 39–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. J., Strange, W., & Trent, S. A. (1999). Context-independent dynamic information for the perception of coarticulated vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, 438–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juel, C., & Roper-Schneider, D. (1985). The influence of basal readers on first grade reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 134–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, B., & Treiman, R. (2001). Relationships between sounds and letters in English monosyllables. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 592–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landerl, K., Wimmer, H., & Frith, U. (1997). The impact of orthographic consistency on dyslexia: A German-English comparison. Cognition, 63, 315–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lisker, L. (1999). Perceiving final voiceless stops without release: Effects of preceding monophthongs versus nonmonophthongs. Phonetica, 56, 44–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchbanks, G., & Levin, H. (1965). Cues by which children recognize words. Journal of Educational Psychology, 56, 57–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride-Chang, C. (1995). Phonological processing, speech perception, and reading disability: An integrative review. Educational Psychologist, 30, 109–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A., & Nicely, P. E. (1955). An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 338–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nation, K., & Hulme, C. (1997). Phonemic segmentation, not onset-rime segmentation, predicts early reading and spelling skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 32, 154–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olive, J. P., Greenwood, A., & Coleman, J. (1993). Acoustics of American English speech. A dynamic approach. New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. R. (1996). Towards a psychology of literacy: On the relations between speech and writing. Cognition, 60, 83–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orton, S. T. (1937). Reading, writing and speech problems in children. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulesu, E., Demonet, J.-F., Fazio, F., McCrory, E., Chanoine, V., Brunswick, N., Cappa, S. F., Cossu, G., Habib, M., Frith, C. D., & Frith, U. (2001). Dyslexia: Cultural diversity and biological unity. Science, 291, 2165–2167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post, Y. V., & Carreker, S. (in press). Orthographic similarity and phonological transparency in spelling. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal.

  • Post, Y. V., Foorman, B. R., & Hiscock, M. (1997). Speech perception and speech production as indicators of reading disability. Annals of Dyslexia, 47, 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post, Y. V., Swank, P. R., Hiscock, M., & Fowler, A. E. (1999). Identification of vowel speech sounds by skilled and less skilled readers and the relation with vowel spelling. Annals of Dyslexia, 49, 161–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, L. J., & Dorman, M. F. (1980). Silence as a cue to the perception of syllable-initial and syllable-final stop consonants. Journal of Phonetics, 8, 269–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Read, C. (1971). Pre-school children’s knowledge of English phonology. Harvard Educational Review, 41, 1–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redford, M. A., & Diehl, R. L. (1999). The relative perceptual distinctiveness of initial and final consonants in CVC syllables. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 106, Pt. 1, 1555–1565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitsma, P. (1983). Printed word learning in beginning readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 36, 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuel, A. G. (1989). Insights from a failure of selective adaptation: Syllable-initial and syllable-final consonants are different. Perception & Psychophysics, 45, 485–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, W., & Gottfried, T.L. (1980). Task variables in the study of vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 68, 1622–1625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strange, W., Verbrugge, R. R., Shankweiler, D. P., & Edman, T. R. (1976). Consonant environment specifies vowel identity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 60, 213–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torgesen, J. K., & Bryant, B. R. (1994). Test of phonological awareness. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R. (1985). Onsets and rimes as units of spoken syllables: Evidence from children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 161–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R., Berch, D., & Weatherston, S. (1993). Children’s use of phoneme-grapheme correspondences in spelling: Roles of position and stress. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 466–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R., Zukowski, A., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). What happened to the “n” of sink? Children’s spellings of final consonant clusters. Cognition, 55, 1–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Leij, A., & van Daal, V. H. P. (1999). Automatization aspects of dyslexia: Speed limitations in word identification, sensitivity to increasing task demands, and orthographic compensation. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32, 417–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, R. M. (1970). A linguistic analysis of first-grade reading errors. Reading Research Quarterly, 5, 427–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, C. G. (1978). Perceptual invariance for stop consonants in different positions. Perception & Psychophysics, 24, 315–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock, R. W., & Johnson, M. B. (1989). Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery-revised. Allen, TX: DLM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeno, S. M., Ivenz, S. H., Millard, R. T., & Duvvuri, R. (1995). The educator’s word frequency guide. Brewster, NY: Touchstone Applied Science Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Neuhaus Education Center, Bellaire, Texas

    Yolanda V. Post, Suzanne Carreker & Ginger Holland

Authors
  1. Yolanda V. Post
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Suzanne Carreker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ginger Holland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yolanda V. Post.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Post, Y.V., Carreker, S. & Holland, G. The spelling of final letter patterns: A comparison of instruction at the level of the phoneme and the rime. Ann. of Dyslexia 51, 121–146 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-001-0008-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-001-0008-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation