Abstract
The environmental effects of air pollutants released to the atmosphere from coal-based residential heating should be regarded as one of the primary environmental concerns in cities. Unfortunately, in Turkey, hundreds of medical cases still occur due to gas poisoning from coal-based conventional stoves used for heating purposes. This study attempts to investigate the effects of coal-based residential heating on CO and SO2 air quality in a city of the south Marmara Region located between Europe and Asia. A total of 138 chimneys were sampled in the heating season that falls from October 1st through March 31st in the city. Ambient air pollutants released from those chimneys were analyzed to evaluate the background air quality variations in the city. The mean of CO concentrations was approximately 11,000 mg/m3, with variations from nearly 9500 to 12,500 mg/m3, while the mean of SO2 concentrations was roughly 173 mg/Nm3 ranging from 108 to 240 mg/Nm3 in the sampled chimneys. The AERMOD predicted the maximum daily mean CO concentration for the model was 41.5 μg/m3 on February 29th at midnight for the downtown area and exceeded the official limits. The predicted highest periodic SO2 concentration was 45.1 μg/m3 on February 29th at midnight in the heating season. The highest periodic SO2 concentration was observed in the old settlements of the downtown, where the most coals were utilized for residential heating with antiquated systems. It is confirmed that the AERMOD results are valid by using meteorological and air pollution data for the modeling study.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and materials
The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Abril GA, Diez SC, Pignata ML, Britch J (2016) Particulate matter concentrations originating from industrial and urban sources: validation of atmospheric dispersion modeling results. Atmos Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2015.08.009
ADMGO (2016) Air dispersion modeling guideline for Ontario, Version 3.0. Ontario Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change, Ontario, Canada
Akgun M (2017) Analysis of the chimney related carbon monoxide poisoning. Paper presented at the annual meeting of 13. National Installation Engineering Conference. Izmir, Turkey. April 19–22, 2017
Borm PJA (1997) Toxicity and occupational health hazards of coal fly ash (CFA). A review of data and comparison to coal mine dust. Ann Occup Hyg 41(6):659–676
CAAP (2018) The clean air action plan for Balikesir City. The Center of Marmara Clean Air Division, Balikesir
Chang JC (2002) Methodologies for evaluating performance and assessing the uncertainty of atmospheric dispersion models. Dissertation, George Mason University
Chang JC, Hanna SR (2004) Air quality model performance evaluation. Meteorol Atmos Phys. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-003-0070-7
Dresser AL, Huizer RD (2011) CALPUFF and AERMOD Model Validation Study in the Near Field: Martins Creek Revisited. J Air Waste Manage. https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.61.6.647
Dzioubinski O, Chipman R (1999) Trends in consumption and production: household energy consumption. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (DESA) Discussion Paper No. 6. http://www.sustainabledevelopment.un.org. Accessed 14 Sep 2018
Economopoulos AP (1997) Management of space heating emissions for effective abatement of urban smoke and SO2 pollution. Atmos Environ 31(9):1327–1337
Finkelman RB (2004) Potential health impacts of burning coal beds and waste banks. Int J Coal Geol 59(1–2):19–24
Finkelman RB, Orem W, Castranova V, Tatu CA, Belkin HE, Zheng BS, Lerch HE, Maharaj SV, Bates AL (2002) Health impacts of coal and coal use: possible solutions. Int J Coal Geol 50:425–443
Fox DG (1984) Uncertainty in air quality modeling. Bull Amer Meteorol Soc. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1984)
Gibson MD, Kundu S, Satish M (2013) Dispersion model evaluation of PM2.5, NOX, and SO2 from point and major line sources in Nova Scotia, Canada using AERMOD Gaussian plume air dispersion model. Atmos Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.5094/APR.2013.016
Hanna SR (1993) Uncertainties in air quality model predictions. Bound-Layer Meteorology 62:3–20
Hanna S, Chang J (2012) Acceptance criteria for urban dispersion model evaluation. Meteorol Atmospheric Phys 116:133–146
Hanna SR, Strimaitis DG, Chang JC (1991) Hazard response modeling uncertainty (A quantitative method), vol. I: User’s guide for software for evaluating hazardous gas dispersion models; vol. II: evaluation of commonly-used hazardous gas dispersion models; vol. III: components of uncertainty in hazardous gas dispersion models. Report no. A119/A120. Prepared by Earth Tech, Inc. Washington, DC USA
IBM-SPSS (2016) Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. IBM Corp, Armonk
llten N, Selici AT (2008) Investigating the impacts of some meteorological parameters on air pollution in Balikesir, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-007-9865-1
Irwin JS (2014) A suggested method for dispersion model evaluation. J Air Waste Manag. https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2013.833147
Jingchao Z, Kotani Z, Saijo T (2018) Public acceptance of environmentally friendly heating in Beijing: A case of a low-temperature air source heat pump. Enerji Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.02.041
Kerimray A, Rojas-Solórzano L, Torkmahalleh MA, Hopke PK, Ó Gallachóiref BP (2017) Coal use for residential heating: Patterns, health implications and lessons learned. Energy Sustain Dev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2017.05.005
Kesarkar AP, Dalvi M, Kaginalkar A, Ojha A (2007) Coupling of the weather research and forecasting model with AERMOD for pollutant dispersion modeling. A case study for PM10 dispersion over Pune, India. Atmos Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.10.042
Kumar A, Dixit S, Varadarajan C, Vijayan A, Masuraha A (2006) Evaluation of the AERMOD dispersion model as a function of atmospheric stability for an urban area. Environmental Progress 25(2):141–151
Lakes Environmental Software (2017) AERMOD Processor, Version 9.4.0, Ontario, Canada
Langner C, Klemm O (2011) A comparison of model performance between AERMOD and AUSTAL2000. J Air Waste Manag. https://doi.org/10.3155/1047-3289.61.6.640
Li D, Wu D, Xu F, Lai J, Shao L (2018) Literature overview of Chinese research in the field of better coal utilization. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.216
Li H, You S, Zhang H, Zheng W, Zou L (2018) Analysis of the impacts of heating emissions on the environment and human health in North China. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.013
Li S, Feng K, Li M (2017) Identifying the main contributors of air pollution in Beijing. J Clean Prod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.127
Liu ZY, He XZ, Chapman RS (1991) Smoking and other risk factors for lung cancer in Xuanwei, China. Int J Epidemiol 20:26–31
Loomis D, Grosse Y, Lauby-Secretan B, Ghissassi FE, Bouvard V, Benbrahim-Tallaa L et al (2013) The carcinogenicity of outdoor air pollution. Lancet Oncol 14(13):1262–1263
Meng K, Xu X, Cheng X, Xu X, Qu X, Zhu W et al (2018) Spatio-temporal variations in SO2 and NO2 emissions caused by heating over the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region constrained by an adaptive nudging method with OMI data. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.021
Metin S, Yildiz S, Cakmak S, Demirbas S (2011) Frequency of Carbon Monoxide Poisoning in Turkey. TAF Prev Med Bull 10(5):587–592
Mutlu A (2019) Hava Kalitesi ve Meteoroloji: Korelasyon, Trend ve Epizot Analizleri. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.17714/gumusfenbil.563848
NAQI (2016) National Air Quality Index. Ministry of Environmental and Urbanization. Ankara, Turkey. http://www.havaizleme.gov.tr/hava.html. Accessed 3 Sep 2019
O’Shaughnessy and Altmaier, 2011O’Shaughnessy PT, Altmaier R (2011) Use of AERMOD to determine a hydrogen sulfide emission factor for swine operations by inverse modeling. Atmos Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.05.061
Perry SG, Cimorelli AJ, Paine RJ, Brode RW, Weil JC, Venkatram A (2004) AERMOD: a dispersion model for industrial source applications. Part II: Model performance against 17 field study databases. J Appl Meteorol 44:694–708
RAQAM (2008) Regulation on air quality assessment and management. Ministry of Environmental and Urbanization. Ankara, Turkey
RCAPCH (2005) Regulation on control of air pollution caused by heating. Ministry of Environmental and Urbanization. Ankara, Turkey
Saffari A, Daher N, Samara C, Voutsa D, Kouras A (2013) Increased biomass burning due to the economic crisis in Greece and its adverse impact on wintertime air quality in Thessaloniki. Environ Sci Technol 47:13313–13320
Sari D, Bayram A (2013) Quantification of emissions from domestic heating in residential areas of İzmir, Turkey and assessment of the impact on local/regional air-quality. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.033
Schipper L, Ketoff A, Kahane A (1985) Explaining residential energy use by international bottom-up comparisons. Annu Rev Energy 10:341–405
Seangkiatiyuth K, Surapipith V, Tantrakarnapa K, Lothongkum AW (2011) Application of the AERMOD modeling system for environmental impact assessment of NO2 emissions from a cement complex. J Environ Sci. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(10)60499-8
Sickles JE, Shadwick DS (2015) Air quality and atmospheric deposition in the eastern US: 20 years of change. Atmos Chem Phys 15:173–197
Smith K, Bruce N, Balakrishnan K, Adair-Rohani H, Balmes J, Chafe Z (2014) Millions dead: how do we know and what does it mean? Methods used in the comparative risk assessment of household air pollution. Annu Rev Public Health 35:185–206
Stein AF, Wyngaard JC (2001) Fluid modeling and the evaluation of inherent uncertainty. J Appl Meteorol. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450
Stein AF, Isakov V, Godowitch J, Draxler RR (2007) A hybrid modeling approach to resolve pollutant concentrations in the urban area. Atmos Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.09.004
Tartakovsky D, Stern E, Broday DM (2016) Dispersion of TSP and PM10 emissions from quarries in complex terrain. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.10.133
Tecer LH (2009) A factor analysis study: Air pollution, meteorology, and hospital admissions for respiratory diseases. Toxicol Environ Chem. https://doi.org/10.1080/02772240902732316
Tian J, Ni H, Han Y, Shen Z, Wang Q, Long X, Zhang Y, Cao J (2018) Primary PM2.5 and trace gases emissions from residential coal combustion: Assessing semi-coke briquette for emission reduction in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, China. Atmos Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.07.031
TSMS (2018) Turkish state meteorological service. Ankara, Turkey. https://www.mgm.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-istatistik.aspx?k=undefined&m=BALIKESIR. Accessed 3 Nov 2019
TUIK (2017) The population of provinces by years 2000–2017. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/UstMenu.do?metod=temelist. Accessed 12 Aug 2018
Tuygun GT, Altug H, Elbir T, Gaga EE (2017) Modeling of air pollutant concentrations in an industrial region of Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8492-9
US CB (2011) Historical census of housing tables: house heating fuel [website]. Washington, DC: United States Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/hhes/www/housing/census/historic/fuels.html. Accessed 22 May 2021
US EPA (1998) Revised draft user’s guide for the AMS/EPA regulatory model-AERMOD. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Emissions. Monitoring, and Analysis Division. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
US EPA (2003) AERMOD: Latest Features and Evaluation Results. US Environmental Protection Agency. EPA-454/R-03–003. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Emissions Monitoring and Analysis Division. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
US EPA (2004) AERMOD: Description of Model Formula. US Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Emissions Monitoring and Analysis Division. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
US EPA (2009) AERMOD Implementation Guide. US Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Emissions Monitoring and Analysis Division. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
US EPA (2018) User's Guide for the AERMOD Terrain Preprocessor (AERMAP). US Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Air Quality Modeling Group. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
US EPA (2019) AERMOD Implementation Guide. US Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards. Emissions Monitoring and Analysis Division. Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
Van der Lans R, Glarborg P, Dam-Johansen K, Knudsen P, Hesselmann G, Hepburn P (1998) Influence of coal quality on combustion performance. Fuel. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(98)00037-4
Venkatram A (1979) The expected deviation of observed concentrations from predicted ensemble means. Atmos Environ 11:1547–1549
Weil JC, Sykes RI, Venkatram A (1992) Evaluating air-quality models: Review and outlook. J Appl Meteorol. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450
WHO (World Health Organization) (2015) Residential heating with wood and coal. Health impacts and policy options in Europe and North America. Copenhagen, Denmark
Yun X, Shen G, Shen H, Meng W, Chen Y, Xu H et al (2020) Residential solid fuel emissions contribute significantly to air pollution and associated health impacts in China. Sci Adv. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aba7621
Zhang J, Smith KR (2007) Household air pollution from coal and biomass fuels in China: measurements, health impacts, and interventions. Environ Health Perspect. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.9479
Zhang Y, Schauer JJ, Zhang Y, Zeng L, Wei Y, Liu Y, Shao M (2008) Characteristics of Particulate Carbon Emissions from Real-World Chinese Coal Combustion. Environ Sci Technol 42:5068–5073
Zhang J, Liu L, Xu L, Lin Q, Zhao H, Wang Z et al (2020) Exploring wintertime regional haze in northeast China: role of coal and biomass burning. Atmos Chem Phys.https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5355-2020
Zhao C, Luo K (2018) Household consumption of coal and related sulfur, arsenic, fluorine and mercury emissions in China. Energy Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.021
Zou B, Zhan B, Wilson JG, Zeng Y (2010) Performance of AERMOD at different time scales. Simul Model Theory. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2010.01.005
Acknowledgements
I wish to express my sincere gratitude to the Balikesir University for the financial support, the Balikesir Metropolitan Municipality, and the Provincial Environmental Agency for their cooperation in order to complete this study.
Funding
This study received no specific grant from any funding agency in the official or commercial.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The corresponding author conceived and designed the study. All data including air quality and meteorological have been analyzed in this study by the corresponding author and dispersion modeling steps have been carried out by the authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mutlu, A., Bayraktar, O.M. Urban scale air quality analysis due to coal-based residential heating. Air Qual Atmos Health 14, 1487–1503 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-021-01063-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-021-01063-1