Practicalities of mapping PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations on city-wide scales using a portable particulate monitor
- 1.7k Downloads
Fine particulate matter is considered to be the most significant ambient air pollutant in terms of potential health impacts. Therefore, it is important that regulators are able to accurately assess the exposure of populations to PM10 and PM2.5 across municipal areas. We report on the practicalities of using a laser light scattering portable particulate monitor (Turnkey Instruments DustMate), in combination with a GPS, to map PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations on city-wide scales in Newcastle upon Tyne/Gateshead (UK), during a series of walking surveys. A heated inlet is necessary to remove moisture droplets from the sampled air prior to analysis by the instrument, though this also results in the loss of volatile particulate components, particularly from the PM2.5 fraction. A co-location calibration study was carried out with a reference urban background Tapered Element Oscillating Micro-Balance/Filter Dynamics Measuring System (TEOM-FDMS) system in Newcastle that is part of the UK’s Automatic Urban and Rural Network (AURN) of air quality monitoring stations. For PM10, orthogonal regression of the DustMate against TEOM-FDMS data gave a slope and intercept of 1.02 ± 0.06 and −3.7 ± 1.2, respectively (R2 = 0.73), whereas for PM2.5, the respective values were 0.78 ± 0.06 and −0.63 ± 0.55 (R2 = 0.79). These parameters are comparable to literature calibration studies using this technology. There was good agreement between simultaneous samples taken using two DustMate instruments: for PM10, a slope and intercept of 1.05 ± 0.03 and 0.36 ± 0.5, respectively (R2 = 0.73), were obtained, whereas for the PM2.5, the respective values were 0.79 ± 0.01 and 0.19 ± 0.06 (R2 = 0.86). Correction factors based on the slope and intercepts obtained from the calibration exercise were applied to raw data collected from the DustMate. An annually-normalised correction procedure was then used to account for different background particulate concentrations on different sampling days. These corrected PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations and corresponding GPS coordinates were displayed on a base map using Google Fusion Tables and Google Earth Professional. Almost all areas surveyed in Newcastle/Gateshead were well below the EU Air Quality Standards for PM10 and PM2.5.
KeywordsPM10 PM2.5 DustMate Osiris Ambient monitoring
The increasing portability of analytical instruments capable of monitoring airborne pollutants has made the concept of dynamic mapping of air pollution in towns and cities a viable proposition, possibly even in real time (Moltchanov et al. 2015). This has already been realised for pollutants that can be measured using electrochemical techniques, where improved sensitivity, combined with a high level of portability, has allowed such sensors to be used alongside GPS devices to map pollution concentrations in cities including Cambridge, Valencia and Lagos (Mead et al. 2013). Typically, the pollutants that can be measured with such devices are ozone, nitrogen dioxide, nitric oxide and carbon monoxide (Mead et al. 2013). There are still cross-sensitivity issues with these devices, particularly between nitrogen dioxide and ozone, though this can be compensated for by measuring both pollutants simultaneously and then applying a correction algorithm (Lin et al. 2015). Some promising work has been carried out in this field that raises the prospect of these cheap and unobtrusive sensors being utilised in an array of fixed and mobile locations that, combined with smartphone technology, may allow detailed real-time pollution concentrations to be monitored at high resolution on city-wide scales (Moltchanov et al. 2015; Kumar et al. 2015). Detailed mapping of airborne pollutant concentrations in real time or otherwise will allow greater refinement of pollutant exposure estimation for population groups, as well as facilitating the identification of areas of poor air quality (Moltchanov et al. 2015). Such technology also has application in determining the personal exposure of people throughout the day as they encounter a range of pollution microenvironments at home, at work and in recreational/leisure facilities, thus providing a refined estimation of potential health impacts that is not simply reliant on a generalised exposure derived from one or two fixed ambient air quality stations and associated dispersion modelling (de Nazelle et al. 2013; Gulliver and Briggs 2004; Gerharz et al. 2009; Buonanno et al. 2011, 2014; Deary and Uapipatanakul 2014).
Whilst this is encouraging from the perspective of more effectively characterising the exposure of populations to nitrogen oxides, ozone and carbon monoxide, which are major pollutants in many cities globally, the monitoring of particulate pollution in a similar way is not so straightforward. Considerable progress has been made in designing real-time portable particulate monitors, usually based on light scattering technology; however, sensitivity requirements mean that they remain relatively bulky and quite costly in comparison to the electrochemical sensors. There are also significant technical issues in their use, specifically related to calibration and equivalence with other particulate monitoring techniques. One major issue is the necessity to use a heated inlet to vaporise fine water droplets that would otherwise contribute to the particulate counts but which also serves to remove a significant proportion of the volatile organic component of the sample. It is important that such problems are overcome so that the mapping capability for particulates matches those of other pollutants because PM10 and, especially, PM2.5 are the ambient air pollutants considered to represent the most significant risk to health (Anderson et al. 2013; Kelly and Fussell 2015; Sapkota et al. 2012; Fann and Risley 2013).
In this paper, we present data from a study using a Turnkey DustMate portable particulate monitor in combination with a hand-held GPS to map PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations in Newcastle upon Tyne/Gateshead, UK. We report on the calibration against a reference method (Tapered Element Oscillating Micro-Balance/Filter Dynamics Measuring System (TEOM-FDMS)) and the results of between-sampler comparisons. Illustrative maps of ambient particulate concentrations, plotted using Google Fusion Maps and Google Earth Pro, are presented to demonstrate the application of our approach.
Overview of the Turnkey Instruments DustMate particulate monitor
The DustMate is a lightweight portable version of the Osiris laser light scattering particulate monitor that is capable of measuring total suspended particulates (TSP), PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 with a resolution of 0.1 μg m−3. Air is drawn into the instrument at a rate of 0.6 L min−1, and the flow is configured so that only one particle is illuminated by the laser light beam (670 nm) at any particular moment in time. The signal obtained from the diffraction of these individual particles is then converted to an equivalent mass using a look-up table. The instrument only measures diffraction angles between 0 and 10°, over which range diffraction is independent of particulate composition (Turnkey Instruments 2002).
This technology, in the form of the Osiris monitor, has been widely used for ambient particulate monitoring in urban environments (King and Dorling 1997) as well as in major fire incidents (Griffiths et al. 2015). It has also been used for investigating individual exposure to particulates during different modes of travel (Gulliver and Briggs 2004, 2007). The DustMate itself, whilst intended primarily for workplace situations, has nevertheless been used to monitor ambient concentrations (Liu et al. 2004; Chen et al. 2015; Mustapha et al. 2011; Kim et al. 2008; Duché and Beltrando 2012), as well as to assess individual exposure in different pollution microenvironments (Gulliver and Briggs 2007; Li et al. 2006). There have also been more exotic applications: for example, being attached to a Cessna light aircraft to measure particulate concentrations in north-west Germany during and after the Eyafjallajökull volcanic eruption in 2010 (Weber et al. 2012). The DustMate has an optional battery-powered heated inlet comprising two cylindrical ceramic heating elements attached to an axially located steel inlet tube. The incoming air is heated to approximately 50 °C which vaporises moisture droplets that would otherwise have contributed to the particulate concentration.
Instrument performance and calibration
Effect of heated inlet use
PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 concentrations were measured over a range of meteorological conditions with and without the heated inlet in operation: three alternating 15-min sampling periods were used for each, with an averaging time of 1 min.
Reproducibility of PM10 and PM2.5 measurements was determined by deploying two DustMate monitors to take simultaneous measurements during nine separate monitoring exercises, totalling 470 individual minute averages. The monitoring was carried out in Sunderland (UK) city centre and comprised the same walk carried out during morning (7.30 to 8.30), mid-day (11.30 to 12.30) and late afternoon (16.30 to 17.30), repeated on the Friday of three consecutive weeks.
Instrument performance compared to the TEOM-FDMS reference method
A co-location calibration study was carried out for the DustMate and an urban background TEOM-FDMS analyser operated by Newcastle City Council as part of the UK Automatic Urban and Rural Network (AURN) of air quality monitoring stations (DEFRA 2015). Data was collected for 41-h-long periods at various times throughout the day (between 9.00 and 20.00) and during a range of different meteorological conditions. Calibration factors (slope and intercept) were determined from orthogonal (major axis) regression of DustMate against TEOM-FDMS data for both PM10 and PM2.5 (EC Working Group on Guidance for the Demonstration of Equivalence 2010).
Application of the DustMate to map PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations on a city-wide scale
Walking surveys were carried out in Newcastle/Gateshead on weekdays between the period 09 Jun 2015 to 29 Jun 2015 inclusive, each between 7.30 and 9.30 a.m. (local time) to coincide with the morning rush hour. Each walk took place in a different area of the city.
DustMate monitors are designed for hand-held operation, but this is not practical for the longer-term monitoring exercises carried out in this study, and so a specifically designed polyurethane foam lined box was used to house the instrument and its battery and also the battery used to power the heated inlet. The controls were accessible via a slot cut in the box, and the inlet was attached through a hole at the top of the box (see Figs. S1, S2, S3 and S4 in the Supplementary Material). The box was carried in a 30-L capacity backpack. A Trimble Juno SB GPS, installed with TerraSync Centimeter Edition, was used to record the latitude/longitude (decimal degrees) positions of the monitors every 5 s (the ‘feature logging’ setting was set as ‘time’). The DustMate internal clock was synchronised to that of the GPS.
Particulate concentrations were matched to location by creating a spreadsheet of particulate concentrations and corresponding measurement time and then defining this as a database in Microsoft Excel. The VLOOKUP function was used to match individual GPS coordinates to particulate concentrations using time as the common parameter. The time outputs for both devices had to be re-coded to a common format (see sample spreadsheet in the Supplementary Material).
In order to plot the data on Google Maps/Google Earth, it is preferable to use line segments rather than individual points: these can be created from the GPS coordinates of two adjacent points, by converting to KML line code using the formula shown in the sample spreadsheet included in the Supplementary Material. The data was uploaded to Google Fusion Tables (Google 2015) as a csv file. Line segments are overlaid onto a base map and colour coded according to particulate concentration. A complete KML file, or a KML link, can also be exported from Google Fusion Tables for import into Google Earth Professional which allows higher-resolution images to be output (maximum of 4800 × 3195 pixels), as used in this paper.
Results and discussion
Effect of using the heated inlet
Comparison of particulate matter concentrations measured by the DustMate monitor with and without using the heated inlet under a variety of meteorological conditions
WS (m s−1)
PM10( μg m−3)
PM2.5 (μg m−3)
PM1 (μg m−3)
Northumbria University, 13 Feb 2015, mid-morning
Dunston Road, Gateshead; 14 Feb 2015, evening
New Bridge Street, Newcastle; 16 Feb 2015, evening.
Shieldfield, Newcastle, 20 Feb 2015, mid-morning
Jesmond By-pass, 10 Mar 2015, mid-day.
St Mary’s Place, Newcastle, 10 Mar 2015, mid-day.
Instrument performance compared to the TEOM-FDMS reference method
The variation in calibration data between different studies and also between different environments such as rural and urban (Halliburton et al. 2007) makes it desirable that in advance of ambient studies, such as those described in this paper, a field calibration is carried out in the specific study location over the same time period. Correction factors based on the slope and intercepts obtained from our calibration were applied to raw data collected from the DustMate.
Sensitivity to pollution sources
Air quality mapping
For PM2.5 concentrations, shown in Fig. S7 (Supplementary Material), there were no areas that exceeded the annual Air Quality Standard of 25 μg m−3. Raw data for PM10 and PM2.5 is mapped in Figs. S6 and S8 in the Supplementary Material, respectively, which also contains a link to the normalised data in Google Fusion Maps.
This study has demonstrated how ambient PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations can be mapped on city-wide scales using portable particulate monitors in combination with a GPS. The approach presented in this paper has the potential to identify areas of elevated PM concentrations that might not have been detected when employing modelling approaches alone.
We have shown that in order for these monitors to be used over a range of meteorological conditions, prior removal of moisture droplets is necessary, in this case using a heated inlet. Nevertheless, the diurnally and seasonally varying volatile content of ambient particulate matter is likely to influence the accuracy of the DustMate measurements when made with a heated inlet; significant loss of volatiles is likely during the heating process, particularly for PM2.5, when compared to TEOM-FDMS measurements. There is scope for further work on alternative methods for removal of water droplets.
Finally, the relatively low cost of these portable particulate monitors (ca. $5k with heated inlet) presents municipal authorities with an opportunity to carry out high-resolution mapping of ambient particulate concentrations by enlisting walking commuters in different city areas. This could also form the basis of community or educational projects, especially since the results can be made publicly available using Google Maps, as we have demonstrated. Such initiatives have the potential to raise public awareness of air quality issues and to facilitate the involvement of local communities in schemes designed to reduce the levels of ambient air pollutants.
We thank Martin Purvis for his help in constructing the DustMate housing.
- DEFRA (2009) Local air quality management technical guidance LAQM.TG(09). LondonGoogle Scholar
- DEFRA (2015) Automatic urban and rural network (AURN). http://uk-air.defra.gov.uk/networks/network-info?view=aurn. Accessed 27/08/15
- Duché S, Beltrando G (2012) Spatial variability of fine particles in Parisian streets. Paper presented at the ICUC8 - 8th International Conference on Urban Climates, UCD, Dublin, IrelandGoogle Scholar
- EC Working Group on Guidance for the Demonstration of Equivalence (2010) Guide to the demonstration of equivalence of ambient air monitoring methods. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/quality/legislation/pdf/equivalence.pdf. Accessed 4th January 2016
- Google (2015) About Google fusion tables. https://support.google.com/fusiontables/answer/2571232?hl=en. Accessed 28/08/15
- Griffiths SD, Deary ME, Entwistle JA (2015) Particulate emissions to air from major incident fires. Paper presented at the Northumbria Research Conference, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon TyneGoogle Scholar
- Halliburton BW, Carras JN, Nelson PF, Morrison AL, Rowland R (2007) Comparison of three different real time particle measuring instruments. In: Doley D (ed) 14th IUAPPA World Congress, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
- Mead MI, Popoola OAM, Stewart GB, Landshoff P, Calleja M, Hayes M, Baldovi JJ, McLeod MW, Hodgson TF, Dicks J, Lewis A, Cohen J, Baron R, Saffell JR, Jones RL (2013) The use of electrochemical sensors for monitoring urban air quality in low-cost, high-density networks. Atmos Environ 70:186–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (2008) Directive 2008/50/EC on ambient air and cleaner air for Europe. Off J Eur Communities L152:1–44Google Scholar
- Turnkey Instruments (2002) Dustmate fume and particle detector operating instructions. Turnkey Instruments LtdGoogle Scholar
- Waldén J, Hillamo R, Aurela M, Mäkelä T, Laurila S, Institutet M (2010) Demonstration of the equivalence of PM2. 5 and PM10 measurement methods in Helsinki 2007–2008. Studies No. 3, vol 3. HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
- Weber K, Eliasson J, Vogel A, Fischer C, Pohl T, van Haren G, Meier M, Grobety B, Dahmann D (2012) Airborne in-situ investigations of the Eyjafjallajokull volcanic ash plume on Iceland and over north-western Germany with light aircrafts and optical particle counters. Atmos Environ 48:9–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.