Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Supporting teacher learning about argumentation through adaptive, school-based professional development

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
ZDM – Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Engaging students in mathematical argumentation supports language development and conceptual understanding because students use verbal and written language in coordination with mathematical representations to notice patterns, make claims, and create and revise explanations. This study adds to the limited research base on how teachers learn to facilitate discussions specifically aimed to develop students’ capacities to engage in argumentation. We analyze teachers’ sensemaking about supporting argumentation in the classroom through their participation in an adaptive professional development (PD) design. The PD was embedded in two elementary schools with upper grade teachers which enabled them to engage in iterative cycles of investigation and enactment within their own classrooms. Through collaborative lesson design and inquiry into students’ experiences, teachers attended to the language students produced as they tried to formulate conjectures and produce explanations and the classroom participation structures that supported them. Our results suggest shifts in how teachers understood their role. Both cases speak to the complexities teachers face as they try to realize the recommendations for enhancing language learning and provide insight into what “rich” discourse means.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aquino-Sterling, C., Rodríguez-Valls, F., & Zahner, W. (2016). Fostering a culture of discourse in secondary mathematics classrooms: Equity approaches in teaching and teacher education for emergent bilingual students. Revista Internacional de Educación para la Justicia Social (RIEJS), 5(2), 87–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayalon, M., & Hershkowitz, R. (2018). Mathematics teachers’ attention to potential classroom situations of argumentation. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 39, 163–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, M. C. E., Clarke, D. J., Clarke, D. M., Roche, A., Cao, Y., & Peter-Koop, A. (2018). Learning from lessons: Studying the structure and construction of mathematics teacher knowledge in Australia, China and Germany. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 30(1), 89–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D., & Hollingsworth, H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 947–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., & Yackel, E. (1996). Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of development research. Educational Psychologist, 31(3/4), 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erath, K., Ingram, J., Moschkovich, J., & Prediger, S. (2021). Designing and enacting instruction that enhances language for mathematics learning: A review of the state of development and research. ZDM Mathematics Education, 53(2), in this issue.

  • Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 119–161). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke, M. L., Kazemi, E., & Turrou, A. C. (2018). Choral counting and counting collections. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, L. K., Kazemi, E., Hintz, A., & Hartmann, E. (2017). Teacher Time Out: Educators learning together in and through practice. Journal of Mathematics Educational Leadership, 18(2), 28–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrenkohl, L. R., & Mertl, V. (2010). How students come to be, know, and do: A case for a broad view of learning. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Horn, I. S. (2007). Fast kids, slow kids, lazy kids: Framing the mismatch problem in mathematics teachers’ conversations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(1), 37–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, R., Gong, Z., & Han, X. (2016). Implementing mathematics teaching that promotes students’ understanding through theory-driven lesson study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48, 425–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazemi, E., Gibbons, L. K., Lewis, R., Fox, A., Hintz, A., Kelley-Petersen, M., Adrian Cunard, A., Lomax, K., Lenges, A., & Balf, R. (2018). Math Labs: Teachers, teacher educators, and school leaders learning together with and from their own students. Journal of Mathematics Educational Leadership, 19(1), 23–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, J., Stevens, H., Lara-Meloy, T., Kim, H. J., & Shechtman, N. (2018). Mathematical argumentation in middle school: The what, why, and how. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koellner, K., & Jacobs, J. (2014). Distinguishing models of professional development: The case of an adaptive model’s impact on teachers’ knowledge, instruction, and student achievement. Journal of Teacher Education, 66(1), 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korthagen, F. (2017). Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: Towards professional development 3.0. Teachers and Teaching, 23(4), 387–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krummheuer, G. (1995). The ethnography of argumentation. In P. Cobb & H. Bauersfeld (Eds.), The emergence of mathematical meaning: interaction in classroom cultures (pp. 229–269). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krummheuer, G. (2007). Argumentation and participation in the primary mathematics classroom: Two episodes and related theoretical abductions. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(1), 60–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lannin, J., Ellis, A., Elliott, R., & Zbiek, R. (2011). Developing essential understanding of mathematical reasoning for teaching mathematics in grades pre-K-8. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesseig, K. (2016). Fostering teacher learning of conjecturing, generalizing and justifying through Mathematics Studio. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 18(1), 100–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, C., & Tsuchida, I. (1998). A lesson is like a swiftly flowing river: how research lessons improve Japanese education. American Educator, 22(4), 12–17. 50–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, R., Lord, S., & Miller, E. (2019). Doing and talking mathematics: Engaging ELLs in the academic discourse of the mathematical practices. In L. C. de Oliveira, K. M. Obenchain, R. H. Kenney, & A. W. Oliveira (Eds.), Teaching the content areas to English language learners in secondary schools: English language arts, mathematics, science, and social studies (pp. 119–133). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Makar, K., Bakker, A., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2015). Scaffolding norms of argumentation-based inquiry in a primary mathematics classroom. ZDM Mathematics Education, 47(7), 1107–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (2002). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Matos, J. F., Powell, A., Sztajn, P., Ejersbø, L., & Hovermill, J. (2009). Mathematics teachers’ professional development: Processes of learning in and from practice. In R. Even & D. L. Ball (Eds.), The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics (pp. 167–183). Boston, MA: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nasir, N. S., Lee, C. D., Pea, R., & McKinney de Royston, M. (Eds.). (2020). Handbook of the cultural foundations of learning. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J. F., Borko, H., Fishman, E., Gomez Zaccarelli, F., Berson, E., Busch, K. C., Reigh, E., & Tseng, A. (2019). Impacts of a practice-based professional development program on elementary teachers’ facilitation of and student engagement with scientific argumentation. American Educational Research Journal, 56(4), 1067–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, V. (1994). Conducting research on practice. Educational Researcher, 23(5), 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, S. J., Schifter, D., Kasman, R., Bastable, V., & Higgins, T. (2017). But why does it work? Mathematical argument in the elementary classroom. Portsmouth, NY: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, C. V., Braaten, M., Haverly, C., & de los Santos, E. X. (2020). Using sense-making moments to understand how elementary teachers’ interactions expand, maintain, or shut down sense-making in science. Cognition and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2020.1763349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snell, J., & Lefstein, A. (2018). “Low ability”, participation, and identity in dialogic pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 55(1), 40–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staples, M., & Newton, J. (2016). Teachers’ contextualization of argumentation in the mathematics classroom. Theory Into Practice, 55(4), 294–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sztajn, P., Borko, H., & Smith, T. (2017). Research on mathematics professional development. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 793–823). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, A., & McDougal, T. (2016). Collaborative lesson research: Maximizing the impact of lesson study. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(4), 513–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1969). The uses of arguments. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yackel, E. (2002). What we can learn from analyzing the teacher’s role in collective argumentation. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 423–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Education, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

    Elham Kazemi, Elzena McVicar & Alison Fox Resnick

  2. Department of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA

    Hala Ghousseini, Eric Cordero-Siy & Sam Prough

Authors
  1. Elham Kazemi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hala Ghousseini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eric Cordero-Siy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sam Prough
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Elzena McVicar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Alison Fox Resnick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elham Kazemi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kazemi, E., Ghousseini, H., Cordero-Siy, E. et al. Supporting teacher learning about argumentation through adaptive, school-based professional development. ZDM Mathematics Education 53, 435–448 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01242-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01242-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation