Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Professional development for digital technology task design by secondary mathematics teachers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
ZDM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A crucial step in improving the use of digital technology (DT) for learning mathematical concepts in the classroom appears to be increasing teacher involvement in task development. Hence, this research considered the effect of a professional development (PD) programme designed to assist teachers with DT task production for implementation in their classrooms. Four groups of three Sri Lankan teachers were observed and guided as they designed and implemented DT tasks. We examine the effectiveness of the PD programme in terms of the richness of the tasks produced by the groups before and after the PD. The results suggest the intervention led to richer, more student-centred tasks. The reasons behind this improvement are analysed, along with factors that might have influenced the DT task development. The findings have implications for the design of secondary school PD programmes and may help educators to facilitate the training of mathematics teachers in the use of DT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakker, A., & van Earde, H. A. A. (2013). An introduction to design-based research with an example from statistics education. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping, & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Doing qualitative research: Methodology and methods in mathematics education. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2002). Toward a practice-based theory of mathematical knowledge for teaching. In E. Simmt & B. Davis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 22nd annual meeting of the Canadian Mathematics Education Study Group (pp. 3–14). Edmonton: CMESG.

  • Cennamo, K. S., Ross, J. D., & Ertmer, P. A. (2014). Technology integration for meaningful classroom use: A standards-based approach (2nd ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choy, B. H. (2016). Snapshots of mathematics teacher noticing during task design. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(3), 421–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark-Wilson, A., Aldon, G., Cusi, A., Goos, M., Haspekian, M., Robutti, O. & Thomas, M. O. J. (2014). The challenges of teaching mathematics with digital technologies—The evolving role of the teacher. In P. Liljedahl, C. Nicol, S. Oesterle & D. Allan (Eds.) Proceedings of the 38th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 87–116). Vancouver: IGPME.

  • Clark-Wilson, A., & Hoyles, C. (2017). Dynamic digital technologies for dynamic mathematics: Implications for teachers’ knowledge and practice. University College London. http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1572337/1/DynamicDigitalTechforDynamicMaths_FinalReport.pdf. Accessed 3 July 2020.

  • Clark-Wilson, A., & Timotheus, J. (2013). Designing tasks within a multi-representational technological environment: An emerging rubric. In Watson, A., Ohtani, M., Ainley, J., Bolite Frant, J., Doorman, M., Kieran, C., Leung, A., Margolinas, C., Sullivan, P., Thompson, D. R., & Yang, Y. (Eds.) Task design in mathematics education. Proceedings of ICMI Study 22 (pp. 47–54). Oxford.

  • Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Zhao, Q., & Dean, C. (2009). Conducting design experiments to support teachers’ learning: A reflection from the field. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 18(2), 165–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drijvers, P., Doorman, M., Boon, P., Reed, H., & Gravemeijer, K. (2010). The teacher and tool: Instrumental orchestrations in the technology-rich mathematics classroom. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 75(2), 123–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goos, M., Galbraith, P., Renshaw, P., & Geiger, V. (2000). Reshaping teacher and student roles in technology-enriched classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12(3), 303–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haspekian, M. (2005). An “instrumental approach” to study the integration of a computer tool into mathematics teaching: The case of spreadsheet. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 10, 109–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, L., Hassan, S., Fernandes, A. A., & Frant, J. B. (2013) Designing tasks for a more inclusive school mathematics. In Watson, A., Ohtani, M., Ainley, J., Bolite Frant, J., Doorman, M., Kieran, C., Leung, A., Margolinas, C., Sullivan, P., Thompson, D. R., & Yang, Y. (Eds.) Task design in mathematics education. Proceedings of ICMI Study 22 (pp. 63–70). Oxford.

  • Heid, M. K., Thomas, M. O. J., & Zbiek, R. M. (2012). How might computer algebra systems change the role of algebra in the school curriculum? In M. A. Clements, A. J. Bishop, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & F. K. S. Leung (Eds.), Third international handbook of mathematics education (Vol. 27, pp. 597–641). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, V. R., Lamb, L. L. C., & Philipp, R. A. (2010). Professional noticing of children’s mathematical thinking. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 41(2), 169–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaworski, B. (2006). Theory and practice in mathematics teaching development: Critical inquiry as a mode of learning in teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(2), 187–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K., & Pepin, B. (2016). Research on mathematics teachers as partners in task design. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19, 105–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayi-Aydar, H., & Goering, C. Z. (2019). Socratic circles in professional development sessions: Negotiating peripheral participation and membership in building a community of practice. Action in Teacher Education, 41(2), 154–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kensington-Miller, B., Sneddon, J., & Stewart, S. (2014). Crossing new uncharted territory: Shifts in academic identity as a result of modifying teaching practice in undergraduate mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(6), 827–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieran, C., & Drijvers, P. (2006). The co-emergence of machine techniques, paper-and-pencil techniques, and theoretical reflection: A study of CAS use in secondary school algebra. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 11(2), 205–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kullberg, A., Runesson, U., & Martensson, P. (2013). The same task? Different learning possibilities. In A. Watson, M. Ohtani, J. Ainley, J. B. Frant, M. Doorman, C. Kieran, A. Leung, C. Margolinas, P. Sullivan, D. Thompson & Y. Yang (Eds.), Task design in mathematics education. Proceedings of ICMI Study 22 (pp. 615–622). UK: Oxford.

  • Lauer, P. A., Christopher, D. E., Firpo-Triplett, R., & Buchting, F. (2013). The impact of short-term professional development on participant outcomes: A review of the literature. Professional Development in Education, 40(2), 207–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung, A., & Bolite-Frant, A. (2015). Designing mathematics tasks: The role of tools. In A. Watson & M. Ohtani (Eds.), Task design in mathematics education, new ICMI study series (pp. 191–225). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, D. M., Hammer, D., & Coffey, J. E. (2009). Novice teachers’ attention to student thinking. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(2), 142–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robutti, O., Cusi, A., Clark-Wilson, A., Jaworski, B., Chapman, O., Esteley, C., et al. (2016). ICME international survey on teachers working and learning through collaboration. ZDM Mathematics Education, 48(5), 651–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruthven, K. (2012). The didactical tetrahedron as a heuristic for analyzing the incorporation of digital technologies into classroom practice in support of investigative approaches to teaching mathematics. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 44, 627–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (2010). How we think. A theory of goal-oriented decision making and its educational applications. Routledge: New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P., Knott, L., Yang, Y., Askew, M., Brown, L., Bussi, M. G. B., et al. (2015). The relationship between task design, anticipated pedagogies, and student learning. In A. Watson & M. Ohtani (Eds.), Task design in mathematics education (pp. 83–114). London: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M. O. J., & Chinnappan, M. (2008). Teaching and learning with technology: Realising the potential. In H. Forgasz, A. Barkatsas, A. Bishop, B. Clarke, S. Keast, W.-T. Seah, P. Sullivan, & S. Willis (Eds.), Research in mathematics education in Australasia 2004–2007 (pp. 167–194). Sydney: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M. O. J., & Hong, Y. Y. (2005). Teacher factors in integration of graphic calculators into mathematics learning. In H. L. Chick & J. L. Vincent (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 257–264). Melbourne: University of Melbourne.

  • Thomas, M. O. J., & Hong, Y. Y. (2013). Teacher integration of technology into mathematics learning. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 20(2), 69–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M. O. J. & Lin, C. (2013). Designing tasks for use with digital technology. In C. Margolinas (Ed.) Task design in mathematics education. Proceedings of ICMI Study 22 (pp. 111–119). Oxford.

  • Thomas, M. O. J., & Palmer, J. (2014). Teaching with digital technology: Obstacles and opportunities. In A. Clark-Wilson, N. Sinclair, & O. Robutti (Eds.), The mathematics teacher in the digital era (pp. 71–89). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, M. O. J., Tyrrell, J., & Bullock, J. (1996). Using computers in the mathematics classroom: The role of the teacher. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 8(1), 38–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zbiek, R. M., & Hollebrands, K. (2008). A research-informed view of the process of incorporating mathematics technology into classroom practice by inservice and prospective teachers. In M. K. Heid & G. W. Blume (Eds.), Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics (Vol. 1, pp. 287–344). Charlotte: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zehetmeier, S., & Krainer, K. (2011). Ways of promoting the sustainability of mathematics teachers’ professional development. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43, 875–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Technische Universität Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany

    Iresha Ratnayake

  2. The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand

    Mike Thomas & Barbara Kensington-Miller

Authors
  1. Iresha Ratnayake
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mike Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Barbara Kensington-Miller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mike Thomas.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ratnayake, I., Thomas, M. & Kensington-Miller, B. Professional development for digital technology task design by secondary mathematics teachers. ZDM Mathematics Education 52, 1423–1437 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01180-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01180-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation