pp 1–12 | Cite as

Making connections among representations of eigenvector: what sort of a beast is it?

  • Gulden KarakokEmail author
Original Article


Many studies provide insights into students’ conceptions of various linear algebra topics and difficulties they face with multiple modes of thinking needed for conceptualization. While it is important to understand students’ initial conceptions, students’ transfer of learning of these conceptions to subsequent courses can provide additional information to structure meaningful curricular materials. This study explores physics students’ transfer of learning of eigenvalues and eigenvectors from prerequisite experiences to quantum mechanics. Data analysis focused on three task-based interviews with undergraduate students, observations of physics courses, and students’ course artifacts. Existing studies on students’ conceptions of linear algebra topics indicate the necessity of developing flexible shifts between different modes of thinking in order to grasp linear algebra. This study’s participants, who had initial learning experiences of linear algebra, were also observed to struggle with such shifts prior to quantum courses. It seems that various contexts in quantum courses, and explicit instructional methods, provided opportunities for students to enhance this initial learning of eigenvalues and eigenvectors. In particular, the explicit reasoning of one of the quantum courses’ instructors concerning the choice of certain representations during problem solving in class, seemed to facilitate students’ construction of similarities, thus providing evidence for actor-oriented transfer. Results of this study align with goals for recently developed instructional materials and interventions that emphasize opportunities for students to inquire and connect multiple modes of thinking.


Actor-oriented transfer Eigentheory Linear algebra Transfer of learning 



  1. Auerbach, C., & Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (1999). Learning and transfer. In J. D. Bransford, A. L. Brown, & R. R. Cocking (Eds.), How people learn: Brain, mind experience, and school (pp. 51–78). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  3. Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences (CBMS) (2016). Active learning in post-secondary education. Accessed 3 Mar 2019.
  4. Dorier, J.-L., & Sierpinska, A. (2001). Research into the teaching and learning of linear algebra. In D. Holton (Ed.), The teaching and learning of mathematics at university level: An ICMI study (pp. 255–273). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Karakok, G. (2009). Studentstransfer of learning of eigenvalues and eigenvectors: Implementation of Actor-Oriented Transfer framework. Doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University, 2009, Corvallis, OR.Google Scholar
  6. Larson, C., & Zandieh, M. (2013). Three interpretations of the matrix equation Ax = b. For the Learning of Mathematics, 33(2), 11–17.Google Scholar
  7. Lester, S. (1999). An introduction to phenomenological research. Taunton: Stan Lester Developments.Google Scholar
  8. Lobato, J. (2003). How design experiments can inform rethinking of transfer and vice versa. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 17–20.Google Scholar
  9. Lobato, J., & Siebert, D. (2002). Quantitative reasoning in a reconceived view of transfer. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 21, 87–116.Google Scholar
  10. Mestre, J. (2003). Transfer of learning: Issues and research agenda. Accessed 2 Nov 2005.
  11. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Sierpinska, A. (2000). On some aspects of students’ thinking in linear algebra. In J. L. Dorier (Ed.), On the teaching of linear algebra (pp. 209–246). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Stewart, S., Andrews-Larson, C., Berman, A., & Zandieh, M. (Eds.). (2018). Challenges and strategies in teaching linear algebra.
  14. Stewart, S., & Thomas, M. (2009). A framework for mathematical thinking: the case of linear algebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(7), 951–961.Google Scholar
  15. Stewart, S., & Thomas, M. O. J. (2010). Student learning of basis, span and linear independence in linear algebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 41(2), 173–188.Google Scholar
  16. Thomas, M. O. J., & Stewart, S. (2011). Eigenvalues and eigenvectors: Embodied, symbolic and formal thinking. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 23, 275–296.Google Scholar
  17. Thompson, C. A., Stewart, S., & Mason, B. (2016). Physics: Bridging the embodied and symbolic worlds of mathematical thinking. In T. Fukawa-Connolly, N. Engelke Infante, M. Wawro & S. Brown (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 1340–1347). Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  18. Wawro, M., Watson, K., & Christensen, W. (2017). Meta-representational competence with linear algebra in quantum mechanics. In A. Weinberg, C. Rasmussen, J. Rabin, M. Wawro, and S. Brown (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education (pp. 326–337), San Diego, CA.Google Scholar
  19. Wawro, M., Zandieh, M., Sweeney, G., Larson, C., & Rasmussen, C. (2011). Using the emergent model heuristic to describe the evolution of student reasoning regarding span and linear independence. In Paper presented at the 14th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
  20. Zandieh, M., Wawro, M., & Rasmussen, C. (2017). An example of inquiry in linear algebra: The roles of symbolizing and brokering. PRIMUS, 27(1), 96–124.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Northern ColoradoGreeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations