Abstract
The dynamic model of educational effectiveness refers to eight factors that describe teachers’ instructional role. A multidimensional framework for measuring both quantitative and qualitative characteristics of teaching factors is also proposed. Empirical support for the validity of the model has been provided, which revealed that the teaching factors can be grouped into five stages situated in developmental order. In this study, for the first time, a qualitative methodology is used to provide an in-depth analysis of three video-lessons through the perspective of the five stages of effective teaching. Thus, we present how each stage is defined and use the cases of the three video-lessons to justify the rationale for these stages and help readers see how observational data are used to identify individual improvement priorities and provide differentiated feedback, even to teachers allocated to the same stage. Finally, based on the qualitative analysis of the three case-studies, strengths and limitations of the dynamic model to evaluate quality of teaching for formative reasons are identified.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andrich, D. (1988). A general form of Rasch’s extended logistic model for partial credit scoring. Applied Measurement in Education, 1(4), 363–378.
Antoniou, P., & Kyriakides, L. (2011). The impact of a dynamic approach to professional development on teacher instruction and student learning: Results from an experimental study. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(3), 291–311.
Antoniou, P., & Kyriakides, L. (2013). A dynamic integrated approach to teacher professional development: Impact and sustainability of the effects on improving teacher behavior and student outcomes. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29(1), 1–12.
Azigwe, J. B., Kyriakides, L., Panayiotou, A., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2016). The impact of effective teaching characteristics in promoting student achievement in Ghana. International Journal of Educational Development, 51, 51–61.
Azkiyah, S. N., Doolaard, S., Creemers, B. P. M., & Van Der Werf, M. P. C. (2014). The effects of two intervention programs on teaching quality and student achievement. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 49(1), 4–11.
Brekelmans, M., Sleegers, P., & Fraser, B. (2000). Teaching for active learning. New learning (pp. 227–242). Netherlands: Springer.
Brophy, J., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behaviour and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 328–375). New York: MacMillan.
Campbell, R. J., Kyriakides, L., Muijs, R. D., & Robinson, W. (2004). Effective teaching and values: Some implications for research and teacher appraisal. Oxford Review of Education, 30(4), 451–465.
Chen, W., Hendricks, K., & Archibald, K. (2011). Assessing pre-service teachers’ quality teaching practices. Educational Research and Evaluation, 17(1), 13–32.
Christoforidou, M., Kyriakides, L., Antoniou, P., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2014). Searching for stages of teacher skills in assessment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 40, 1–11.
Christoforidou, M., & Xirafidou, E. (2014). Using the dynamic model to identify stages of teacher skills in assessment. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 49(1), 12–25.
Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). The dynamics of educational effectiveness: A contribution to policy, practice and theory in contemporary schools. London and New York: Routledge.
Creemers, B. P. M., & Kyriakides, L. (2015). Developing, testing and using theoretical models of educational effectiveness for promoting quality in education. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(1), 102–119.
Flanders, N. A. (1970). Analyzing teacher behavior (pp. 100–107). Reading: Addison-Wesley.
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2000). Models of teaching. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Kirschner, P. A. (2002). Cognitive load theory: Implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning. Learning and instruction, 12(1), 1–10.
Kyriakides, L., Archambault, I., & Janosz, M. (2013). Searching for stages of effective teaching: A study testing the validity of the dynamic model in Canada. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 48(2), 11–24.
Kyriakides, L., Christoforidou, M., Panayiotou, A., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2017). The impact of a three-year teacher professional development course on improving quality of teaching: Strengths and limitations of the dynamic approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51(1), 51–61.
Kyriakides, L., Christoforou, C., & Charalambous, C. Y. (2013). What matters for student learning outcomes: A meta-analysis of studies exploring factors of effective teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 36, 143–152.
Kyriakides, L., & Creemers, B. P. M. (2009). The effects of teacher factors on different outcomes: Two studies testing the validity of the dynamic model. Effective Education, 1(1), 61–86.
Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B. P. M., & Antoniou, P. (2009). Teacher behaviour and student outcomes: Suggestions for research on teacher training and professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 12–23.
Mislevy, R. J., & Wilson, M. (1996). Marginal maximum likelihood estimation for a psychometric model of discontinuous development. Psychometrica, 61, 41–71.
Muijs, D., Kyriakides, L., van der Werf, G., Creemers, B., Timperley, H., & Earl, L. (2014). State of the art–teacher effectiveness and professional learning. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(2), 231–256.
Panayiotou, A., Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B. P. M., McMahon, L., Vanlaar, G., Pfeifer, M., Rekalidou, G., & Bren, M. (2014). Teacher behavior and student outcomes: Results of a European study. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 26(1), 73–93.
Pellegrino, J. W. (2004). Complex learning environments: Connecting learning theory, instructional design, and technology. In N. M. Seel & S. Dijkstra (Eds.), Curriculum, plans, and processes in instructional design (pp. 25–49). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rosenshine, B., & Stevens, R. (1986). Teaching Functions. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd ed., pp. 376–391). New York: Macmillan.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1998). Toward a theory of teaching-in-context. Issues in education, 4(1), 1–94.
Stenmark, J. K. (1992). Mathematics assessment: Myths, models, good questions and practical suggestions. Reston, VA: NCTM.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B.P.M. & Panayiotou, A. Using educational effectiveness research to promote quality of teaching: the contribution of the dynamic model. ZDM Mathematics Education 50, 381–393 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0919-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0919-3