ZDM

, Volume 48, Issue 4, pp 527–540 | Cite as

Learning to lead, leading to learn: How facilitators learn to lead lesson study

Original Article

Abstract

This article presents research on how teacher developers in the United States learn to conduct lesson study. Although the practice of lesson study is expanding rapidly in the US, high-quality implementation requires skilled facilitation. In contexts such as the United States where this form of professional development is relatively novel, few teachers have participated in lesson study, so leaders of lesson study groups do not have that prior experience to draw upon for facilitation. To establish lesson study groups, teacher developers are therefore needed in the US context, but we know little about how leaders who are new to lesson study learn to do this work. To investigate this, two novice teacher developers were followed for a period of eighteen months, from their first exposure to the literature on lesson study, through their participation in lesson study conferences, apprenticeship with an experienced lesson study leader, and into their independent conduct of lesson study groups. Data show that the facilitators learned to contend with such issues as teacher resistance, the use of time, and the shifting imperatives of directing teachers’ work versus stepping back to give teachers autonomy in determining their collective work. The article concludes by suggesting that lesson study functions as a countercultural bulwark in the field of teacher learning by promoting a participant-driven, time-intensive form of professional development, and that, despite its novelty and complexity, teacher developers with strong mathematical and pedagogical backgrounds become reasonably skillful facilitators in a surprisingly short span of time.

Keywords

Lesson study Professional development Teacher leaders 

References

  1. Bolster, A. S. (1983). Toward a more effective model of research on teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 53(3), 294–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice (R. Nice, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Clift, R. T., & Brady, P. (2005). Research on methods courses and field experiences. In M. Cochran-Smith & K. Zeichner (Eds.), Studying teacher education (pp. 309–424). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edwards, C. (1993). The hundred languages of children: The Reggio Emilia approach to early childhood education. Norwood: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar
  6. Feiman-Nemser, S. (1983). Learning to teach. In L. Shulman & G. Sykes (Eds.), Handbook of teaching and policy (pp. 150–170). New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  7. Gersten, R., Taylor, M. J., Keys, T. D., Rolfhus, E., Newman-Gonchar, R. (2014). Summary of research on the effectiveness of math professional development approaches. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Educational Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast.Google Scholar
  8. Grossman, P., Compton, C., Shahan, E., Ronfeldt, M., Igra, D., & Shaing, J. (2007). Preparing practitioners to respond to resistance: a cross-professional view. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grossman, P., Wineburg, S., & Woolworth, S. (2001). Toward a theory of teacher community. The Teachers College Record, 103(6), 942–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hord, S. M., & Sommers, W. A. (Eds.). (2008). Leading professional learning communities: voices from research and practice. Newbury Park: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  11. Isoda, M., Stephens, M., Ohara, Y., & Miyakawa, T. (Eds.). (2007). Japanese lesson study in mathematics: Its impact, diversity and potential for educational improvement. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Lampert, M., & Clark, C. M. (1990). Expert knowledge and expert thinking in teaching: A response to Floden and Klinzig. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lewis, C. C., Perry, R. R., & Hurd, J. (2009). Improving mathematics instruction through lesson study: A theoretical model and North American case. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12(4), 285–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Murata, A. (2006). How should research contribute to instructional improvement? The case of lesson study. Educational Researcher, 35(3), 3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lewis, C. & Tsuchida, I. (1997). A lesson is like a swiftly flowing river: How research lessons improve Japanese education. American Educator, Winter, pp. 12–17, 50–52.Google Scholar
  16. Lewis, J. M., Fischman, D., Riggs, I., & Wasserman, K. (2013). Teachers learning in lesson study. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 10(3), 583–619.Google Scholar
  17. Lortie, D. C. (1975). Schoolteacher: a sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  18. Miller, J. B., & Stiver, I. (2015). The healing connection: How women form relationships in therapy and in life. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  19. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards: Standards for mathematical process. Author: Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  20. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2014). Education at a glance 2014. OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/eag-2014-en.
  21. Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice. Chicago: University of Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Puchner, L. D., & Taylor, A. R. (2006). Lesson study, collaboration and teacher efficacy: Stories from two school-based math lesson study groups. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(7), 922–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Raider-Roth, M., Stieha, V., & Hensley, B. (2012). Rupture and repair: Episodes of resistance and resilience in teachers’ learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(4), 493–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  25. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© FIZ Karlsruhe 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of EducationWayne State UniversityDetroitUSA

Personalised recommendations