Abstract
The official curriculum for mathematics in Singapore schools is based on a framework that has mathematical problem solving as its primary goal. It is detailed and one may say that the gap between the designated curriculum and teacher intended curriculum is often very narrow. This is so as the main source of instructional materials is textbooks which are very closely aligned with the official national curriculum. There is a dearth of research on the enactment of the curriculum in Singapore schools, with the few research studies done so far appearing to cover only a narrow focus. The author’s view is that, even though only a few such studies have been published, schools have always been engaged in small-scale investigations, the findings of which are necessary to guide decisions on matters related to choice of textbooks and pedagogies for improved student learning. Considering all the published research and the investigative work undertaken by educators in Singapore, it may be said that the conceptual model proposed by Remillard and Heck is rigorous. In addition, the issues in this particular issue of ZDM offer educators, both classroom teachers and others, very good perspectives for research on the enactment of the school mathematics curriculum.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Confrey, J., Maloney, A. P., & Corley, A. K. (2014). Learning trajectories: a framework for connecting standards with curriculum. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(5) (this issue). doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0598-7.
Deng, Z., Gopinathan, S., & Lee, C. K-E. (2013). Introduction. In, Z. Deng et al. (Eds.), Globalization and the Singapore curriculum (pp. 3–12). Springer.
Doyle, W. (1992a). Constructing curriculum in the classroom. In F.K. Oser, A. Dick, & Patry (Eds.), Effective and responsible teaching: The new synthesis (pp. 66–79). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Doyle, W. (1992b). Curriculum and pedagogy. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 486–516). New York: Macmillan.
Fan, L., & Zhu, Y. (2000). Problem solving in Singaporean secondary mathematics textbooks. The Mathematics Educator, 5(1), 117–141.
Fan, L., & Zhu, Y. (2007). Representation of problem-solving procedures: a comparative look at China, Singapore, and US mathematics textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 61–75.
Ginsburg, A., Leinwand, S., Anstrom, T., & Pollock, E. (2005). What the United States can learn from Singapore’s world-class mathematics system and what Singapore can learn from the United States: An exploratory study. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.
Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers: maximizing impact on learning. London: Routledge.
Ho, K. F. (2009). Two grade 5 teachers’ enactment of mathematical problem solving and their classroom talk: contrasting approaches. Quaderni di Ricerca in Didattica (Mathematica), Supplemento n.4 al n. 19.
Ho, K. F., & Hedberg, J. (2005). Teachers’ pedagogies and their impact on students’ mathematical problem solving. Journal of mathematical behaviour, 24(3&4), 238–252.
Hogan, D., Kwek, D., Towndrow, P., Rahim, R. A., Tan, T. K., Yang, H. J. & Chan, M. (2013). Visible learning and the enacted curriculum in Singapore. In, Z. Deng et al. (Eds.), Globalization and the Singapore curriculum (pp. 121–149). Springer.
Hunsader, P. D., Thompson, D. R., Zorin, B., Mohn, A. L., Zakrzewski, J., Karadeniz, I., et al. (2014). Assessments accompanying published textbooks: the extent to which mathematical processes are evident. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(5) (this issue). doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0570-6.
Huntley, & Terrell. (2014). (to be inserted when available).
Kaur, B. (2010). A study of mathematical tasks from three classrooms in Singapore. In Y. Shimizu, B. Kaur, R. Huang & D.J. Clarke (Eds.), Mathematical tasks in classrooms around the world. Sense Publishers.
Kaur, B. (2013). What can we learn from international assessments such as TIMSS and PISA? Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Science and Mathematics Education (pp. 1–11). Malaysia: Penang.
Kaur, B. (2014). Evolution of Singapore’s school mathematics curriculum. In J. Anderson, M. Cavanagh, & A. Prescott (Eds.), Curriculum in focus: Research guided practice (Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) (pp. 1–13). Sydney: MERGA.
Kaur, B., Low, H. K. & Seah, L. H. (2006). Mathematics teaching in two Singapore classrooms: The role of the textbook and homework. In D. J. Clarke, C. Keitel, & Y. Shimizu (Eds.), Mathematics classrooms in twelve countries: The insider’s perspective (pp. 99–115). Sense publishers.
Leinwand, S., & Ginsburg, A. (2007). Learning from Singapore math. Educational Leadership, 65(3), 32–36.
Leong, Y. H., Dindyal, J., Toh, T. L., Quek, K. S., Tay, E. G., & Lou, S. T. (2011a). Teacher preparation for a problem-solving curriculum in Singapore. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43(6–7), 819–831.
Leong, Y. H., Tay, E. G., Toh, T. L., Quek, K. S., & Dindyal, J. (2011b). Reviving Polya’s “look back” in a Singapore school. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 30(3), 181–193.
Ministry of Education. (2012a). Primary mathematics teaching and learning syllabus. Singapore: Author.
Ministry of Education. (2012b). O-level, N(A)-level & N(T)-level mathematics teaching and learning syllabus. Singapore: Author.
Otten, S., & Soria, V. M. (2014). Relationships between students’ learning and their participation during enactment of middle school algebra tasks. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(5) (this issue). doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0572-4.
Remillard, J. T., Harris, B., & Agodini, R. (2014). The influence of curriculum material design on opportunities for student learning. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(5) (this issue). doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0585-z.
Remillard, J. T., & Heck, D. J. (2014). Conceptualizing the curriculum enactment process in mathematics education. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(5) (this issue). doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0600-4.
Robitaille, D. F., & Garden, R. A. (1989). The IEA study of mathematics II: content and outcomes of school mathematics. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Ruthven, K. (1994). Better judgement: rethinking assessment in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(4), 433–450.
Sears, R., & Chávez, O. (2014). Opportunities to engage with proof: the nature of proof tasks in two geometry textbooks and its influence on enacted lessons. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(5) (this issue). doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0596-9.
Thompson, D.R. & Senk, S.L. (2014). The same geometry textbook does not mean the same classroom enactment. ZDM-The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 46(5) (this issue). doi:10.1007/s11858-014-0622-y
Toh, T. L., Quek, K. S., Leong, Y. H., Dindyal, J., & Tay, E. G. (2011a). Making mathematics practical: an approach to problem solving. Singapore: World Scientific.
Toh, T. L., Quek, K. S., Tay, E. G., Leong, Y. H., & Dindyal, J. (2011b). Enacting a problem solving curriculum in a Singapore school. In L. A. Bragg (Ed.), Maths is Multi-Dimensional (pp. 77–86). Melbourne: Mathematical Association of Victoria.
Wong, L. F. (2014). A study of mathematics written assessment in secondary schools. Unpublished dissertation. National Institute of Education, Singapore.
Wong, K. Y. & Lee, N. H. (2010). Issues of Singapore mathematics education. In F. K. S. Leung & Y. Li (Eds.), Reforms and issues in school mathematics in East Asia (pp. 91–108). Sense Publishers.
Zhu, Y. & Fan, L. (2002). Textbook use by mathematics teachers at lower secondary level in Singapore. In D. Edge, & B. H. Yeap (Eds.), Proceedings of second East Asia Conference of Mathematics Education (Vol 2, pp. 194–201). Singapore: national Institute of Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kaur, B. Enactment of school mathematics curriculum in Singapore: whither research!. ZDM Mathematics Education 46, 829–836 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0619-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0619-6