Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Learning the integral concept by constructing knowledge about accumulation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
ZDM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 22 March 2014

Abstract

We propose an approach to the integral concept for advanced high school students and provide evidence for the potential of this approach to support students in acquiring an in-depth proceptual view of the integral. The approach is based on the mathematical idea of accumulation. A ten-lesson unit has been implemented with four pairs of students. The students’ learning processes were micro-analysed using the methodological–theoretical framework of Abstraction in Context. In this paper, we focus on the lessons in which the notions of approximation and accumulation are introduced. The work of one student pair is analysed in detail, and the work of the other pairs is summarized. Our results show that most of the students reached a proceptual understanding of the integral that prepared them for the next step in the curriculum, namely the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Many other relevant research studies had to be left out because of space limitations.

References

  • Bagni, G. T. (1999). Integral and continuity in high school students’ conceptions. In A. Gagatsis (Ed.), A multidimensional approach to learning in mathematics and sciences (pp. 171–182). Nicosia, Cyprus: Intercollege Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belova, O. (2006). Computer based approach to integral calculus for prospective teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University, Krasnoyarsk (in Russian).

  • Blum, W., & Törner, G. (1983). Didaktik der Analysis. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S., & Hsu, E. (2002). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33, 352–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davydov, V. V. (1990). Types of generalization in instruction: logical and psychological problems in the structuring of school curricula. In J. Kilpatrick (Ed.) & J. Teller (Trans.), Soviet studies in mathematics education (Vol. 2). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (original work published in 1972).

  • Dreyfus, T., Hershkowitz, R., & Schwarz, B. B. (in press).The nested epistemic actions model for abstraction in context. Theory as methodological tool and methodological tool as theory. In A. Bikner-Ahsbahs, C. Knipping & N. Presmeg (Eds.), Doing (qualitative) research: Methodology and methods in mathematics education. Dordrecht: Springer, Advances in Mathematics Education Series.

  • Dreyfus, T., & Tsamir, P. (2004). Ben’s consolidation of knowledge structures about infinite sets. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 23, 271–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education. China lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldin, G. A. (2000). A scientific perspective on structured, task-based interviews in mathematical education research. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 517–545). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, E., & Tall, D. O. (1994). Duality, ambiguity & flexibility: Aproceptual view of simple arithmetic. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 115–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenier, D., Richard, F. O., & Legrand, M. (1990). Un changement de point de vuesurl’enseignement de l’intégrale. Commission interIREMUniversité, Enseignerautrement les mathématiques en DEUG a premiere année (pp. 205–220). LIRDIS: Lyon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hershkowitz, R., Schwarz, B. B., & Dreyfus, T. (2001). Abstraction in context: Epistemic actions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32, 195–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, A. (1976). Eine intellektuell ehrliche Einführung des Integralbegriffs in Grundkursen. Didaktik der Mathematik, 2, 87–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kouropatov, A., & Dreyfus, T. (2013a). Constructing the integral concept on the basis of the idea of accumulation: Suggestion for a high school curriculum. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44, 641–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouropatov, A., & Dreyfus, T. (2013b). Constructing the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. In A. Heinze & A. Lindmeier (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education Methodology and Methods in Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 201–209). Kiel, Germany: PME.

  • Oehrtman, M. (2008). Layers of abstraction: theory and design for the instruction of limit concepts. In M. Carlson & C. Rasmussen (Eds.), Making the connection: Research and teaching in undergraduate mathematics education (pp. 65–80). Washington, DC: MAA.

  • Schwarz, B. B., Dreyfus, T., & Hershkowitz, R. (2009). The nested epistemic actions model for abstraction in context. In B. B. Schwarz, T. Dreyfus & R. Hershkowitz (Eds.), Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction (pp. 11–42). London, UK: Routledge.

  • Sealey, V. (2006). Student understanding of definite integrals, Riemann sums and area under a curve: what is necessary and sufficient? In S. Alvatore, J. L. Cortina, M. Sáiz & A. Mendez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. [CD-ROM]. Yucatan, Mexico: Merida.

  • Thomas, M. O. J., & Hong, Y. Y. (1996). The Riemann integral in calculus: Students’ processes and concepts. In P. C. Clarkson (Ed.), Proceedings of the 19th Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia Conference (pp. 572–579). Australia: Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. W. (1994). Images of rate and operational understanding of the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 275–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, P. W., & Silverman, J. (2008). The concept of accumulation in calculus. In M. Carlson & C. Rasmussen (Eds.), Making the connection: Research and teaching in undergraduate mathematics (pp. 43–52). Washington, DC: MAA.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

    Anatoli Kouropatov & Tommy Dreyfus

Authors
  1. Anatoli Kouropatov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tommy Dreyfus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anatoli Kouropatov.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kouropatov, A., Dreyfus, T. Learning the integral concept by constructing knowledge about accumulation. ZDM Mathematics Education 46, 533–548 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0571-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-014-0571-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation