Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Standards for professionalization of mathematics teachers: policy, curricula, and national teacher employment test in Korea

  • Original Article
  • Published:
ZDM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

International comparative studies such as the Trend in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) and the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) indicate that Korean students have consistently performed well. In addition, a recent study titled Mathematics Teaching in the 21st Century (MT21) compared prospective teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about teaching and learning in six participant countries, reporting that Korean prospective secondary mathematics teachers were better prepared than those in other countries. In this context, this study has examined the curricula for mathematics teacher education and teacher employment tests in order to investigate the social expectation for teacher professionalization in Korea, particularly focusing on teacher knowledge. The analysis shows that while elementary mathematics teacher education emphasizes pedagogical knowledge, the secondary mathematics education curricula are highly content knowledge oriented. However, the secondary mathematics teacher education includes various aspects of pedagogical content knowledge in its curricula and teacher employment test. This research also identifies the discourse concerning mathematics instruction for diversity and equity and the emphasis of reflective practice as the significant development of the current Korean teacher education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S., & Mewborn, D. S. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 433–456). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, R. F. (1991). Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters. Havard Journal on Legislation, 28, 465–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, R. Y., Ham, S.-H., & Paine, L. W. (2011). Knowledge expectations in mathematics teacher preparation programs in Korea and the United States: Towards international dialogue. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(1), 48–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEST (2011). Globalization for teachers in Korea. Technical report. http://www.MEST.go.kr.

  • Monk, D. H. (1994). Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 13(2), 125–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. W. (2002). Alternative paradigms and structures of secondary teacher education. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 19(3), 31–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park J. Y. (2003) The relationship between elementary school teachers’ teaching experiences and professional experiences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul.

  • Park, D.-K., & Park, J.-Y. (1987). A study on the validity of curriculum of teacher preparation: Focusing on the relevance of curriculum with job and roles of teachers in the schools. RR87-22. Seoul: KEDI.

  • Schmidt, W. H., Tatto, M. T., Bankov, K., Blömeke, S., Cedillo, T., Cogan, L., et al. (2007). The preparation gap: Teacher education for middle school mathematics in six countries (MT21 report). East Lansing, MI: Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, Michigan State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations for the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirosh, D., & Even, R. (1997). To define or not to define: The case of (−8)1/3. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33, 321–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. M., Floden, R. E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mi-Kyung Ju.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kwon, O.N., Ju, MK. Standards for professionalization of mathematics teachers: policy, curricula, and national teacher employment test in Korea. ZDM Mathematics Education 44, 211–222 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0384-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0384-3

Keywords

Navigation