Abstract
International comparative studies such as the Trend in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) and the OECD Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) indicate that Korean students have consistently performed well. In addition, a recent study titled Mathematics Teaching in the 21st Century (MT21) compared prospective teachers’ knowledge and beliefs about teaching and learning in six participant countries, reporting that Korean prospective secondary mathematics teachers were better prepared than those in other countries. In this context, this study has examined the curricula for mathematics teacher education and teacher employment tests in order to investigate the social expectation for teacher professionalization in Korea, particularly focusing on teacher knowledge. The analysis shows that while elementary mathematics teacher education emphasizes pedagogical knowledge, the secondary mathematics education curricula are highly content knowledge oriented. However, the secondary mathematics teacher education includes various aspects of pedagogical content knowledge in its curricula and teacher employment test. This research also identifies the discourse concerning mathematics instruction for diversity and equity and the emphasis of reflective practice as the significant development of the current Korean teacher education.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ball, D. L., Lubienski, S., & Mewborn, D. S. (2001). Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teachers’ mathematical knowledge. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 433–456). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from exemplary programs. San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Ferguson, R. F. (1991). Paying for public education: New evidence on how and why money matters. Havard Journal on Legislation, 28, 465–498.
Hill, H., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking pedagogical content knowledge: Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.
Kim, R. Y., Ham, S.-H., & Paine, L. W. (2011). Knowledge expectations in mathematics teacher preparation programs in Korea and the United States: Towards international dialogue. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(1), 48–61.
MEST (2011). Globalization for teachers in Korea. Technical report. http://www.MEST.go.kr.
Monk, D. H. (1994). Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 13(2), 125–145.
Park, S. W. (2002). Alternative paradigms and structures of secondary teacher education. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 19(3), 31–54.
Park J. Y. (2003) The relationship between elementary school teachers’ teaching experiences and professional experiences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul.
Park, D.-K., & Park, J.-Y. (1987). A study on the validity of curriculum of teacher preparation: Focusing on the relevance of curriculum with job and roles of teachers in the schools. RR87-22. Seoul: KEDI.
Schmidt, W. H., Tatto, M. T., Bankov, K., Blömeke, S., Cedillo, T., Cogan, L., et al. (2007). The preparation gap: Teacher education for middle school mathematics in six countries (MT21 report). East Lansing, MI: Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, Michigan State University.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations for the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–21.
Tirosh, D., & Even, R. (1997). To define or not to define: The case of (−8)1/3. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33, 321–330.
Wilson, S. M., Floden, R. E., & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (2001). Teacher preparation research: Current knowledge, gaps, and recommendations. Seattle, WA: Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kwon, O.N., Ju, MK. Standards for professionalization of mathematics teachers: policy, curricula, and national teacher employment test in Korea. ZDM Mathematics Education 44, 211–222 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0384-3
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-012-0384-3