Abstract
This paper comments on the other papers in this issue related to how “mathematics teaching expertise” is conceptualized and the approaches employed to facilitate its development in Western and Eastern countries. Similarities and differences are found to exist in the conceptualization of mathematics teaching expertise and the development approaches employed. The papers in this issue share the similarity of exploring mathematics teaching expertise from the perspective of knowledge. Under the influence of this perspective, the approaches mentioned in the papers mainly focus on the development of teachers’ knowledge. A feature in common among teacher development approaches employed in Western countries is to let teachers attend some courses or training programs designed or organized by mathematics teacher educators at universities. In contrast, teacher development approaches employed in Eastern countries, particularly those employed in Mainland China, are relatively more practical in nature and directly related to teachers’ needs, like learning from observing exemplary teaching. This shows that the conception of mathematics teaching expertise and development approaches are culturally and contextually dependent. It is argued that a broader perspective of mathematics teaching expertise should be taken to explore mathematics teaching expertise and its development, and teacher expertise development should be conceptualized as a complex system rather than as some separated knowledge, skills and techniques.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
An, S. (2004). The middle path in math instruction: Solutions for improving math education. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Education.
Ball, D. L. (1997). What do students know? Facing challenges of distance, context, and desire in trying to hear children. In B. J. Biddle, T. L. Good, & I. F. Goodson (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 769–818). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practicebased theory of professional development. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Ball, D., Thames, M., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59, 389–407.
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1993). Surpassing ourselves: An inquiry into the nature and implications of expertise. Chicago: Open Court.
Berliner, D. C. (1994). Expertise: The wonder of exemplary performances. In J. N. Mangieri & C. C. Block (Eds.), Creating powerful thinking in teachers and students: Diverse perspectives (pp. 161–186). Fort Worth, Tex: Harcourt Brace College.
Berliner, D. C. (2001). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 35(5), 463–482.
Berliner, D. C. (2004). Describing the behavior and documenting the accomplishments of expert teachers. Bulletin of Science Technology and Society, 24(3), 200–212.
Berliner, D. C. (2007). Expert teachers: Their characteristics, development and accomplishments. Retrieved 18 April, 2007. http://dewey.uab.es/didllengua/simposiumccss/llibre/David%20C.%20Berliner.pdf.
Berliner, D. C., & Carter, K. J. (1989). Differences in processing classroom information by expert and novice teachers. In J. Lowyck & C. M. Clark (Eds.), Teacher thinking and professional action (pp. 55–74). Leuven, Belgium: Leuven University Press.
Berliner, D. C., Stein, P., Sabers, D., Clarridge, P. B., Cushing, K., & Pinnegar, S. (1988). Implications of research on pedagogical expertise and experience for mathematics teaching. In D. A. Grouws & T. J. Cooney (Eds.), Perspectives on research on effective mathematics teaching (pp. 67–95). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Bloemeke, S., Suhl, U., & Kaiser, G. (2011). Teacher education effectiveness: Quality and equity of future primary teachers’ mathematics and mathematics pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 154–171.
Bond, L., Smith, T., Baker, W. K., & Hattie, J. A. (2000). The certification system of the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards: A construct and consequential validity study. Greensboro, North Carolina: Center for Educational Research and Evaluation, University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
Borko, H., & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 473–498.
Borko, H., & Putnam, R. (1997). Learning to teach. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 673–708). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Bullough, R., & Baughman, K. (1995). Changing contexts and expertise in teaching: First-year teacher after seven years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(5), 461–477.
Bullough, R., & Baughman, K. (1997). “First-year teacher” eight years later: An inquiry into teacher development. New York: Teachers College Press.
Cobb, P., & Bowers, J. (1999). Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 4–15.
Cowley, T. (1996). Expert teachers in transition: An exercise in vitiation or renascence? A case study of one. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April, 8–12, 1996, New York.
Cuban, L. (1988). Constancy and change in schools (1880s to the present). In P. Jackson (Ed.), Contribution to Educational Change: Perspectives on Research and Practice (pp. 85–106). Berkeley, CA: McCutcheon.
Even, R., & Ball, D. L. (2009). Setting the stage for the ICMI study on the professional education and development of teachers of mathematics. In R. Even & D. L. Ball (Eds.), The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics: the 15th ICMI study (pp. 1–9). New York: Springer.
Even, R., Robinson, N., & Carmeli, M. (2003). The work of providers of professional development for teachers of mathematics: Two case studies of experienced practitioners. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(2), 227–249.
Fan, L., & Zhu, Y. (2004). How have Chinese students performed in mathematics? A perspective from large-scale international comparisons. In L. Fan, N. Wong, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders (pp. 3–26). Singapore: World Scientific.
Goldsmith, L. T., & Shifter, D. (1997). Understanding teachers in transition: Characteristics of a model for the development of mathematics teaching. In E. Fennema & B. Scott Nelson (Eds.), Mathematics teachers in transition (pp. 19–54). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Greeno, J. G., Collins, A. M., & Resnick, L. (1996). Cognition and learning. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfree (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15–46). New York, NY: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
Hargreaves, A. (1994). Series editor’s introduction. In A. Hargreaves (Ed.), Changing teachers, changing times: Teachers’ work and culture in the postmodern age (pp. ix–xi). London: Cassell.
Huang, R. (2006, October). Tension and alternative of in-service secondary mathematics teacher profession development in China. Paper presented at the Second International Forum on Teacher Education, Shanghai, China.
Kaiser, G., & Li, Y. (2011). Reflections and future prospects. In Y. Li & G. Kaiser (Eds.), Expertise in mathematics instruction. An international perspective (pp. 343–353). New York: Springer.
Lee, S. Y. (1998). Mathematics learning and teaching in the school context: Reflections from cross-cultural comparisons. In S. G. Paris & H. M. Wellman (Eds.), Global prospects for education: Development, culture, and schooling (pp. 45–77). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Leinhardt, G., & Greeno, J. G. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 75–95.
Leinhardt, G., McCarthy Young, K., & Merriman, J. (1995). Commentary: Integrating professional knowledge: The theory of practice and the practice of theory. Learning and Instruction, 5, 401–408.
Lerman, S. (1998). Cultural perspectives on mathematics and mathematics teaching and learning. In F. Seeger, J. Voigt, & U. Waschescio (Eds.), The culture of the mathematics classroom (pp. 290–307). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leung, F. K. S., & Park, K. (2002). Competent students, competent teachers? International Journal of Educational Research, 37(2), 113–129.
Li, Y., & Huang, R. (2008, June). Developing mathematics teachers’ expertise with apprenticeship practice and professional promotion system as contexts. Paper presented at the U.S.-Sino workshop on science and mathematics education, NSF-funded workshop on Mathematics and Science Education: Common Priorities that Promote Collaborative Research, Murfreesboro, USA.
Lin, Y. W., & Cheng, T. J. (2004). An investigation of rationales of school-based teacher training. Journal of Educational Research, 6, 77–83.
Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ; London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Moir, E., Barlin, D., Gless, J., & Miles, J. (2009). New teacher mentoring: Hopes and promise for improving teacher effectiveness. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Education Press.
Paine, L., Fang, Y., & Wilson, S. (2003). Enter a culture of teaching: Teacher induction in Shanghai. In E. Britton (Ed.), Comprehensive teacher induction (pp. 20–82). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Paine, W. L., & Ma, L. (1993). Teachers working together: A dialogue on organizational and cultural perspectives of Chinese teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 19(8), 667–778.
Palmer, D. J., Stough, L. M., Burdenski, J. T. K., & Gonzales, M. (2005). Identifying teacher expertise: An examination of researchers’ decision making. Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 13–25.
Ropo, E. (2004). Teaching expertise: Empirical findings on expert teachers and teacher development. In H. P. A. Boshuizen, R. Bromme, & H. Gruber (Eds.), Professional learning: Gaps and transitions on the way from novice to expert (pp. 159–179). Dordrecht, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Research, 15(2), 4–14.
Sowder, J. T. (2007). The mathematical education and development of teachers. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 157–224). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Sternberg, R. J., & Horvath, J. A. (1995). A prototype view of expert teaching. Educational Researcher, 24(6), 9–17.
Stevenson, H. W., Chen, C. S., & Lee, S. Y. (1993). Mathematics achievement of Chinese, Japanese, and American children: Ten years later. Science, 25(9), 53–59.
Stevenson, H. W., & Lee, S. Y. (1995). The East Asian version of whole-class teaching. Educational Policy, 9(2), 152–168.
Stigler, J. W., & Fernandez, C. (1995). Learning mathematics from classroom instruction: Cross-cultural and experimental perspectives. In C. A. Nelson (Ed.), Basic and applied perspectives on learning, cognition, and development (pp. 103–130). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. W. (1999). The teaching gap: Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press.
Tatto, M. T., & Senk, S. (2011). The mathematics education of future primary and secondary teachers: Methods and Findings from the teacher education and development study in mathematics. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(2), 121–137.
Tsui, A. B. M. (2003). Understanding expertise in teaching: Case studies of second language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tsui, A. B. M. (2009). Distinctive qualities of expert teachers. Teachers and Teaching, 15(4), 421–439.
Tsui, A. B. M., & Wong, J. L. N. (2009). In search of a thrid space: Teacher development in Mainland China. In C. K. K. Chan & N. Rao (Eds.), Revisiting the Chinese learner: Changing contexts, changing education (pp. 281–311). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong.
Weinert, F. E., Helmke, A., & Schrader, F. W. (1992). Research on the model teacher and the teaching model. In F. K. Oser, A. Dick, & J.-L. Patry (Eds.), Effective and responsible teaching: The new synthesis (pp. 249–260). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Yang., X. (2010). Conception and characteristics of expert mathematics teacher in Mainland China. Unpublished doctoral thesis, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, X., Leung, F.K.S. Mathematics teaching expertise development approaches and practices: similarities and differences between Western and Eastern countries. ZDM Mathematics Education 43, 1007–1015 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0374-x
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-011-0374-x