Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cross-national comparisons of mathematics curriculum materials: what might we learn?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
ZDM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In most of the world, there is a broad public interest in cross-national comparisons. Despite the myriad difficulties inherent in such comparisons, and despite the fact that most studies explicitly acknowledge limited generalizability, news media representatives, policy makers, politicians and educators often take the findings at face value as providing solid scientific evidence of the achievement of students in the countries studied. This often leads in turn to superficial commentaries and unhelpful recommendations. Our task as scholars of mathematics education is to demonstrate the nuanced complexity of such comparisons. The papers in this issue of ZDM succeed in this regard. Using a range of scholarly perspectives (mathematical, psychological and socio-cultural), the authors offer many insightful observations regarding curriculum and curriculum materials in East Asian countries (especially China) and the USA, with careful attention to the central role of curriculum in the teaching and learning of mathematics in schools. In this commentary study I discuss a few of these insights and develop one illustrative example of how cross-national comparative analyses such as these could be used to sensibly inform policy discussions related to changes in mathematics curriculum, teaching, or teacher preparation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arbaugh, F., & Brown, C. A. (2002). Influences of the mathematical tasks framework on high school mathematics teachers’ knowledge, thinking, and teaching. In Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA.

  • Arbaugh, F., Lannin, J., Jones, D. L., & Park-Rogers, M. (2006). Examining instructional practices in Core-Plus lessons: Implications for professional development. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9(6), 517–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boaler, J., & Staples, M. (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside School. Teachers College Record, 110(3), 608–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. M. (1997). The changing role of the mathematics teacher. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28, 278–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, W. (1983). Academic work. Review of Educational Research, 53(2), 159–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg, A., Cooke, G., Leinwand, S., Noell, J., & Pollock, E. (2005). Reassessing U.S. international mathematics performance: New findings from the 2003 TIMSS and PISA. Washington, D.C: American Institutes for Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grouws, D. A., Smith, M. S., Sztajn, P., et al. (2004). The preparation and teaching practices of U.S. mathematics teachers: Grades 4 and 8. In P. Kloosterman, & F. K. Lester (Eds.), Results and interpretations of the 1990 through 2000 mathematics assessments of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (pp. 221–269). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henningsen, M., & Stein, M. K. (1997). Mathematical tasks and student cognition: Classroom-based factors that support and inhibit high-level mathematical thinking and reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(5), 524–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K. C., Wearne, D., Murray, H., et al. (1997). Making sense: Teaching and learning mathematics with understanding. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J., & Wearne, D. (1993). Instructional tasks, classroom discourse, and students’ learning in second-grade arithmetic. American Educational Research Journal, 30(2), 393–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husén, T. (1983). Are standards in U.S. schools really lagging behind those in other countries? Phi Delta Kappan, 64, 455–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, M., Sen, A., Pahike, E., Partelow, L., Miller, D., Williams, T., Kastberg, D., & Jocelyn, L. (2004). International outcomes of learning in mathematics literacy and problem solving: PISA 2003 results from the U.S. perspective (NCES 2005-003). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, D.C.: NCES.

  • Li, Y. (2000). A comparison of problems that follow selected content presentations in American and Chinese mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 234–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, G. M., & Wilson, M. L. (1998). Supporting innovation: The impact of a teacher’s conception of functions on his implementation of a reform curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29, 248–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 international mathematics report: Findings from the IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Education Statistics [NCES] (2003). Teaching mathematics in seven countries: Result from the TIMSS video study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

  • Remillard, J. (1999). Curriculum materials in mathematics education reform: A framework for examining teachers’ curriculum development. Curriculum Inquiry, 29(3), 315–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romanagno, L. (1994). Wrestling with change: The dilemmas of teaching real mathematics. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, H. L., Cebulla, K. J., Finn, K. F., & Fi, C. (2003). Teacher variables that relate to student achievement when using a standards-based curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34(3), 228–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M. S. (2000). Balancing the old and new: An experienced middle school teacher’s learning in the context of mathematics instructional reform. The Elementary School Journal, 100(4), 351–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., Baxter, J., & Leinhardt, G. (1990). Subject matter knowledge and elementary instruction: a case from functions and graphing. American Educational Research Journal, 27(4), 639–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., Grover, B., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., & Lane, S. (1996). Instructional tasks and the development of student capacity to think and reason: An analysis of the relationship between teaching and learning in a reform mathematics project. Educational Research and Evaluation, 2, 50–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 319–369). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., Smith, M. S., Henningsen, M., & Silver, E. A. (2000). Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (2004). Improving mathematics teaching. Educational Leadership, 61(5), 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarr, J. E., Reys, R. E., Reys, B. J., Chavez, O., Shih, J., & Osterlind, S. J. (2008). The impact of middle-grades mathematics curricula and the classroom learning environment on student achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39, 247–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, I. R., & Pasley, J. P. (2004). What is high quality instruction? Educational Leadership, 61(5), 24–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, I. R., Pasley, J. D., Smith, P. S., Banilower, E. R., & Heck, D. J. (2003). Looking inside the classroom: A study of K–12 mathematics and science education in the United States. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuson, K., & Li, Y. (this issue). Cross-cultural issues in linguistic, quantitative, and computational supports for mathematical thinking. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education.

  • Li, Y, Chen, X, & An, S. (this issue). Conceptualizing and organizing content for teaching and learning in selected Chinese, Japanese and U.S. mathematics textbooks: The case of fraction division. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education.

  • Li, Y., Chen, X., & Kulm, G. (this issue). Mathematics teachers’ practices and thinking in lesson plan development: a case of teaching fraction division. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education.

  • Li, Y., Zhang, J., & Ma, T. (this issue). Approaches and practices in developing school mathematics textbooks in China. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education.

  • Lloyd, G. M., (this issue). School mathematics curriculum materials for teachers’ learning: Future elementary teachers’ interactions with curriculum materials in a mathematics course in the United States. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education.

  • Nie, B., Cai, J. & Moyer, J. C. (this issue). How a standards-based mathematics curriculum difers from a traditional curriculum: With a focus on intended treatments of the ideas of variables. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education.

  • Reys, B. J. & Hirsch, C. (this issue). Mathematics curriculum: A vehicle for school improvement. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward A. Silver.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silver, E.A. Cross-national comparisons of mathematics curriculum materials: what might we learn?. ZDM Mathematics Education 41, 827–832 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0209-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0209-1

Keywords

Navigation