Abstract
In this study, selected Chinese, Japanese and US mathematics textbooks were examined in terms of their ways of conceptualizing and organizing content for the teaching and learning of fraction division. Three Chinese mathematics textbook series, three Japanese textbook series, and four US textbook series were selected and examined to locate the content instruction of fraction division. Textbook organization of fraction division and other content topics were described. Further analyses were then conducted to specify how the content topic of fraction division was conceptualized and introduced. Specific attention was also given to the textbooks’ uses of content constructs including examples, representations, and exercise problems in order to show their approaches for the teaching and learning of fraction division. The results provide a glimpse of the metaphors of mathematics teaching and learning that have been employed in Chinese, Japanese, and US textbooks. In particular, the results from the textbook analyses demonstrate how conceptual underpinnings were developed while targeting procedures and operations. Implications of the study are then discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In this article, “division of fraction” and “fraction division” refer to the same content topic, and it is also abbreviated as DoF.
References
Abels, M., Wijers, M., & Pligge, M. (2008). Revisiting numbers. In Wisconsin Center for Educational Research & Freudenthal Institute (Ed.), Mathematics in context. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2000). Middle grades mathematics textbooks: A benchmarks-based evaluation. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Cai, J., Lo, J. J., & Watanabe, T. (2002). Intended treatment of arithmetic average in US and Asian school mathematics textbooks. School Science and Mathematics, 102, 391–404.
Collins, W., Howard, A. C., Drisaa, L., McClain, K., Frey, P., Molina, D., et al. (1999). Mathematics: Applications and connections. Course 1. New York: McGraw-Hill Glencoe.
Curriculum and Textbook Research Institute-Elementary Textbook Development Committee. (2006). Shuxue, liunianjie Shangce [Mathematics, Sixth grade (1)]. Beijing: People’s Education Press.
Delaney, S., Charalambous, C. Y., Hsu, H.-Y., & Mesa, V. (2007). The treatment of addition and subtraction of fractions in Cypriot, Irish, and Taiwanese textbooks. In J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park, & D. Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 193–200). Seoul: PME.
Dossey, J. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Lindquist, M. M., & Chambers, D. L. (1988). The mathematics report card: Are we measuring up?. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
Education Development Center, the Seeing and Thinking Mathematics Project (2005). MathScape: Course 1. New York: McGraw-Hill Glencoe.
Fan, L., & Zhu, Y. (2007). Representation of problem-solving procedures: A comparative look at China, Singapore, and US mathematics textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 61–75.
Flanders, J. (1994). Student opportunities in grade 8 mathematics: Textbook coverage of the SIMS test. In I. Westbury, C. A. Ethington, L. A. Sosniak, & D. P. Baker (Eds.), In search of more effective mathematics education: Examining data from the IEA Second International Mathematics Study (pp. 61–93). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Fuson, K., Stigler, J., & Bartsch, K. (1988). Brief report: Grade placement of addition and subtraction topics in Japan, Mainland China, the Soviet Union, Taiwan, and the United States. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 449–456.
Griffiths, H. B., & Howson, A. G. (1974). Mathematics: Society and curricula. London: Cambridge University Press.
Howson, G. (1995). Mathematics textbooks: A comparative study of grade 8 texts. Vancouver: Pacific Educational Press.
Kazumatu, S., Okata, I., Machita, S., Aoyanagi, M., Kiyozawa, I., et al. (2007). Minna to manabu shogakkou Sansuu 6nen (gei) (Everybody learning: Elementary arithmetic, sixth grade, 2). Tokyo: Gakkou Tosho Kabushiki Kaisha.
Lappan, G., Fey, J. T., Fizgerald, W. M., Friel, S. N., & Phillips, E. D. (2008). Bits and pieces 2: Using fraction operations. In Michigan State University (Ed.), Connected mathematics project. Boston: Person Prentice Hall.
Li, Y. (2000). A comparison of problems that follow selected content presentations in American and Chinese mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 234–241.
Li, Y. (2007a). Curriculum research to improve teaching and learning. School Science and Mathematics, 107, 166–168.
Li, Y. (2007b). Curriculum and culture: An exploratory examination of mathematics curriculum materials in their system and cultural contexts. The Mathematics Educator, 10(1), 21–38.
Li, Y. (2007c). Curriculum and cognition: A study on math problems. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 11(2), 86–91.
Li, Y. (2008a). Transforming curriculum from intended to implemented: What teachers need to do and what they learned in the United States and China. In Z. Usiskin & E. Willmore (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum in Pacific Rim countries: China, Japan, Korea, and Singapore (pp. 183–195). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Li, Y. (2008b). What do students need to learn about division of fractions? Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 13, 546–552.
Li, Y., & Kulm, G. (2008). Knowledge and confidence of pre-service mathematics teacher: The case of fraction division. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 833–843.
Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Mayer, R. E., Sims, V., & Tajika, H. (1995). A comparison of how textbooks teach mathematical problem solving in Japan and the United States. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 443–460.
McKnight, C. C., Crosswhite, F. J., Dossey, J. A., Kifer, E., Swafford, J. O., Travers, K. J., et al. (1987). The underachieving curriculum: Assessing US school mathematics from an international perspective. Champaign: Stipes.
Murata, A. (2008). Mathematics teaching and learning as a mediating process: The case of tape diagrams. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10, 374–406.
Nakahara, T., Azemori, T., Sakitani, S., Hirabayashi, I., Ida, S., et al. (2007). Shogakkou Sansuu 6nen (gei) (Elementary Arithmetic, sixth grade, 2). Osaka: Osaka Shoseki Kabushiki Kaisha.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
Reys, B. (Ed.). (2006). The intended mathematics curriculum as represented in state-level curriculum standards. Charlotte: Information Age.
Romberg, T. A. (1992). Problematic features of the school mathematics curriculum. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 749–788). New York: Macmillan.
Schmidt, W. H., Houang, R., & Cogan, L. (2002). A coherent curriculum—The case of mathematics. American Educator, Summer, 2002, 1–18
Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., & Raizen, S. A. (1997). A splintered vision: An investigation of US science and mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. E., Valverde, G. A., Houang, R. T., & Wiley, D. E. (1997). Many visions, many aims (Vol. 1): A cross-national investigation of curricular intentions in school mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.
Steen, L. A. (2007). How mathematics counts. Educational Leadership, 65(3), 8–14.
Stein, M. K., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. K. Lester Jr (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 319–369). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Stigler, J. W., Fuson, K. C., Ham, M., & Kim, M. S. (1986). An analysis of addition and subtraction word problems in American and Soviet elementary mathematics textbooks. Cognition and Instruction, 3, 153–171.
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap—Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press.
Sugiyama, Y. (1987). Comparison of word problems in textbooks between Japan and the US. In J. P. Becker & T. Miwa (Eds.), Proceedings of US–Japan seminar on problem solving. Carbondale: Board of Trustees, Southern Illinois University.
Sugiyama, Y., Itaka, S., Ito, S., Aoyanagi, K., Nakano, Y., et al. (2007). Shinhen, Atarashi Sansuu 6 (New arithmetic) 6(1). Tokyo: Tokyo Shoseki Kabushiki Kaisha.
Sun, L., Wang, L., Lin, G., Chen, C., Li, X., et al. (2007). Shuxue, liunianji Shangce [Mathematics, sixth grade (1)]. Jiangsu, China: Jiangsu Education Publisher.
Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the book: Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice in the world of textbooks. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Westbury, I. (1992). Comparing American and Japanese achievement: Is the United States really an underachiever? Educational Researcher, 21(5), 18–24.
Willoughby, S. S. (1984). Mathematics for 21st century citizens. Educational Leadership, 41, 45–50.
Xia, M., Li, W., Chen, G., Li, J., & Liang, M. (2004). Shuxue, dishiyice [Mathematics, Vol. 11]. Zhejiang, China: Zhejiang Education Publisher.
Acknowledgments
The initial development of studying textbooks on the topic of fraction division was supported in part by a research grant from the Spencer Foundation to the first author. However, any opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Spencer Foundation. We would like to thank the journal editor and three reviewers for their thoughtful comments on a prior version of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, Y., Chen, X. & An, S. Conceptualizing and organizing content for teaching and learning in selected Chinese, Japanese and US mathematics textbooks: the case of fraction division. ZDM Mathematics Education 41, 809–826 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0177-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0177-5