Skip to main content
Log in

Conceptualizing and organizing content for teaching and learning in selected Chinese, Japanese and US mathematics textbooks: the case of fraction division

  • Original Article
  • Published:
ZDM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, selected Chinese, Japanese and US mathematics textbooks were examined in terms of their ways of conceptualizing and organizing content for the teaching and learning of fraction division. Three Chinese mathematics textbook series, three Japanese textbook series, and four US textbook series were selected and examined to locate the content instruction of fraction division. Textbook organization of fraction division and other content topics were described. Further analyses were then conducted to specify how the content topic of fraction division was conceptualized and introduced. Specific attention was also given to the textbooks’ uses of content constructs including examples, representations, and exercise problems in order to show their approaches for the teaching and learning of fraction division. The results provide a glimpse of the metaphors of mathematics teaching and learning that have been employed in Chinese, Japanese, and US textbooks. In particular, the results from the textbook analyses demonstrate how conceptual underpinnings were developed while targeting procedures and operations. Implications of the study are then discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In this article, “division of fraction” and “fraction division” refer to the same content topic, and it is also abbreviated as DoF.

References

  • Abels, M., Wijers, M., & Pligge, M. (2008). Revisiting numbers. In Wisconsin Center for Educational Research & Freudenthal Institute (Ed.), Mathematics in context. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2000). Middle grades mathematics textbooks: A benchmarks-based evaluation. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J., Lo, J. J., & Watanabe, T. (2002). Intended treatment of arithmetic average in US and Asian school mathematics textbooks. School Science and Mathematics, 102, 391–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, W., Howard, A. C., Drisaa, L., McClain, K., Frey, P., Molina, D., et al. (1999). Mathematics: Applications and connections. Course 1. New York: McGraw-Hill Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curriculum and Textbook Research Institute-Elementary Textbook Development Committee. (2006). Shuxue, liunianjie Shangce [Mathematics, Sixth grade (1)]. Beijing: People’s Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, S., Charalambous, C. Y., Hsu, H.-Y., & Mesa, V. (2007). The treatment of addition and subtraction of fractions in Cypriot, Irish, and Taiwanese textbooks. In J. H. Woo, H. C. Lew, K. S. Park, & D. Y. Seo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 31st conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 2, pp. 193–200). Seoul: PME.

  • Dossey, J. O., Mullis, I. V. S., Lindquist, M. M., & Chambers, D. L. (1988). The mathematics report card: Are we measuring up?. Princeton: Educational Testing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education Development Center, the Seeing and Thinking Mathematics Project (2005). MathScape: Course 1. New York: McGraw-Hill Glencoe.

  • Fan, L., & Zhu, Y. (2007). Representation of problem-solving procedures: A comparative look at China, Singapore, and US mathematics textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66, 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanders, J. (1994). Student opportunities in grade 8 mathematics: Textbook coverage of the SIMS test. In I. Westbury, C. A. Ethington, L. A. Sosniak, & D. P. Baker (Eds.), In search of more effective mathematics education: Examining data from the IEA Second International Mathematics Study (pp. 61–93). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuson, K., Stigler, J., & Bartsch, K. (1988). Brief report: Grade placement of addition and subtraction topics in Japan, Mainland China, the Soviet Union, Taiwan, and the United States. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 449–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, H. B., & Howson, A. G. (1974). Mathematics: Society and curricula. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howson, G. (1995). Mathematics textbooks: A comparative study of grade 8 texts. Vancouver: Pacific Educational Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazumatu, S., Okata, I., Machita, S., Aoyanagi, M., Kiyozawa, I., et al. (2007). Minna to manabu shogakkou Sansuu 6nen (gei) (Everybody learning: Elementary arithmetic, sixth grade, 2). Tokyo: Gakkou Tosho Kabushiki Kaisha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lappan, G., Fey, J. T., Fizgerald, W. M., Friel, S. N., & Phillips, E. D. (2008). Bits and pieces 2: Using fraction operations. In Michigan State University (Ed.), Connected mathematics project. Boston: Person Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. (2000). A comparison of problems that follow selected content presentations in American and Chinese mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 234–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. (2007a). Curriculum research to improve teaching and learning. School Science and Mathematics, 107, 166–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. (2007b). Curriculum and culture: An exploratory examination of mathematics curriculum materials in their system and cultural contexts. The Mathematics Educator, 10(1), 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. (2007c). Curriculum and cognition: A study on math problems. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 11(2), 86–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. (2008a). Transforming curriculum from intended to implemented: What teachers need to do and what they learned in the United States and China. In Z. Usiskin & E. Willmore (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum in Pacific Rim countries: China, Japan, Korea, and Singapore (pp. 183–195). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y. (2008b). What do students need to learn about division of fractions? Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 13, 546–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., & Kulm, G. (2008). Knowledge and confidence of pre-service mathematics teacher: The case of fraction division. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40, 833–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics: Teachers’ understanding of fundamental mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., Sims, V., & Tajika, H. (1995). A comparison of how textbooks teach mathematical problem solving in Japan and the United States. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 443–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, C. C., Crosswhite, F. J., Dossey, J. A., Kifer, E., Swafford, J. O., Travers, K. J., et al. (1987). The underachieving curriculum: Assessing US school mathematics from an international perspective. Champaign: Stipes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murata, A. (2008). Mathematics teaching and learning as a mediating process: The case of tape diagrams. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10, 374–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakahara, T., Azemori, T., Sakitani, S., Hirabayashi, I., Ida, S., et al. (2007). Shogakkou Sansuu 6nen (gei) (Elementary Arithmetic, sixth grade, 2). Osaka: Osaka Shoseki Kabushiki Kaisha.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reys, B. (Ed.). (2006). The intended mathematics curriculum as represented in state-level curriculum standards. Charlotte: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romberg, T. A. (1992). Problematic features of the school mathematics curriculum. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 749–788). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W. H., Houang, R., & Cogan, L. (2002). A coherent curriculum—The case of mathematics. American Educator, Summer, 2002, 1–18

  • Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., & Raizen, S. A. (1997). A splintered vision: An investigation of US science and mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. E., Valverde, G. A., Houang, R. T., & Wiley, D. E. (1997). Many visions, many aims (Vol. 1): A cross-national investigation of curricular intentions in school mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen, L. A. (2007). How mathematics counts. Educational Leadership, 65(3), 8–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, M. K., Remillard, J., & Smith, M. S. (2007). How curriculum influences student learning. In F. K. Lester Jr (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 319–369). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, J. W., Fuson, K. C., Ham, M., & Kim, M. S. (1986). An analysis of addition and subtraction word problems in American and Soviet elementary mathematics textbooks. Cognition and Instruction, 3, 153–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap—Best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugiyama, Y. (1987). Comparison of word problems in textbooks between Japan and the US. In J. P. Becker & T. Miwa (Eds.), Proceedings of US–Japan seminar on problem solving. Carbondale: Board of Trustees, Southern Illinois University.

  • Sugiyama, Y., Itaka, S., Ito, S., Aoyanagi, K., Nakano, Y., et al. (2007). Shinhen, Atarashi Sansuu 6 (New arithmetic) 6(1). Tokyo: Tokyo Shoseki Kabushiki Kaisha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, L., Wang, L., Lin, G., Chen, C., Li, X., et al. (2007). Shuxue, liunianji Shangce [Mathematics, sixth grade (1)]. Jiangsu, China: Jiangsu Education Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the book: Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice in the world of textbooks. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westbury, I. (1992). Comparing American and Japanese achievement: Is the United States really an underachiever? Educational Researcher, 21(5), 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willoughby, S. S. (1984). Mathematics for 21st century citizens. Educational Leadership, 41, 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xia, M., Li, W., Chen, G., Li, J., & Liang, M. (2004). Shuxue, dishiyice [Mathematics, Vol. 11]. Zhejiang, China: Zhejiang Education Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The initial development of studying textbooks on the topic of fraction division was supported in part by a research grant from the Spencer Foundation to the first author. However, any opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Spencer Foundation. We would like to thank the journal editor and three reviewers for their thoughtful comments on a prior version of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yeping Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, Y., Chen, X. & An, S. Conceptualizing and organizing content for teaching and learning in selected Chinese, Japanese and US mathematics textbooks: the case of fraction division. ZDM Mathematics Education 41, 809–826 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0177-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-009-0177-5

Keywords

Navigation