Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does interdisciplinary instruction raise students’ interest in mathematics and the subjects of the natural sciences?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
ZDM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents the research project IFUN (the acronym IFUN refers to Interesse og Fagoverskrindende Undervisning i Naturvidenskab and Interesse und Fächerübergreifender Unterricht in den Naturwisseschaften which is Danish and German, respectively, for Interest and Interdisciplinary Instruction in Science and Mathematics)—Interest and Interdisciplinary Instruction in Science (we use the term science as a common denominator for the subjects of physics, chemistry and biology) and Mathematics. The aim of the project was to investigate on how upper secondary students’ interest in the subjects of mathematics, physics, chemistry and biology might be improved by increased instructional interplay and integration between the subjects. The individual student’s interests in interdisciplinary domains of mathematics and science are studied within a three-dimensional framework: (1) the student’s interest in a particular interdisciplinary domain of mathematics and science. (2) The characteristics of a specific learning setting that causes a situational interest in the topic and promotes and supports a shift from catching interest to holding interest. (3) The student’s affiliation with and valuation of mathematics and science. We present the main results from an interest study conducted with a 147 item Likert questionnaire administered to 255 grade 11 students. The results of the study show that students have a high interest in mathematics and are positive towards interdisciplinary instruction. When it comes to the individual student’s affiliation with and valuation of mathematics and science, the study shows that future studies and careers play an important role. We conclude that the results indicate it is possible to expand interest in one subject to another subject through interdisciplinary instruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. One of the students did not respond to this part of the questionnaire.

References

  • Baumert, J., & Köller, O. (1998). Interest research in secondary level I: An overview. In L. Hoffman, A. Krapp, K. A. Renninger & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning (pp. 241–256). Kiel: IPN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, D. F. (2003). Integrated mathematics: From models to practice. In S. A. McGraw (Ed.), Integrated mathematics. Choices and challenges (pp. 43–58). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, D. F., & White, A. L. (1998). Integrated science and mathematics education: Evolution and implications of a theoretical model. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 499–512). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bikner-Ahsbahs, A. (2002) Interest density. A concept for an interactionist view of interest in maths classes. In Developments in mathematics education in German-speaking countries 2000, Hildesheim: Franzbecker, pp. 33–43.

  • Bikner-Ahsbahs, A. (2003a) A social extension of a psychological interest Theory. In Peitman, N. A., Dougherty, B. J., Zilliox, J. T. Proceedings of the 2003 joint meeting of PME and PMENA (27th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education), Vol. 2, Honolulu, pp. 97–104.

  • Bikner-Ahsbahs, A. (2003b) Interesse zwischen Subjekt und Situation—empirisch begründete Konstruktion einer Theorie interessendichter Situationen. (Interest between subject and situation—empirical based construction of a theory about interest-dense situations.) Habilitationsschrift, Flensburg University, Flensburg Juni 2003.

  • Boekaerts, M. (1999). Motivated learning: Studying student-situation transactional units. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 41–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Confrey, J., di Sessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13. doi:10.3102/0013189X032001009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L. (1992). The relation of interest to the motivation of behavior: A self determination theory perspective. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi & A. Krapp (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 43–70). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). A motivational approach to self: Integration in personality. In R. Dienstbier (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation: Vol. 38. Perspectives on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1916). Education and Democracy. Macmillan, New York.

  • Fink, B. (1991). Interest development as a structural change in person-object relationhips. In L. Oppenheimer & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The origins of action: Interdisciplinary and international perspectives (pp. 175–204). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting mathematics education. China lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gräber, W. (1998). Schooling for lifelong attention to chemistry issues: The role of interest and achievment. In L. Hoffman, A. Krapp, K. A. Renninger & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning (pp. 290–300). Kiel: IPN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, L., Krapp, A., Renninger, K. A., & Baumert, J. (Eds.). (1998). Interest and learning. Kiel: IPN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaput, J. (1994). The representational roles of technology in connecting mathematics with authentic experience. In Biehler et al. (eds.) Mathematics didactics as a scientific discipline. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 379–397.

  • Köller, O., Baumert, J., & Schnbel, K. (2001). Does interest matter? The relationship between academic interest and achievement in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 32(5), 448–470. doi:10.2307/749801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development: theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and instruction, 12, 383–409. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00011-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krapp, A. (2003). Interest and human development: An educational-psychological perspective. Development and Motivation. BJEP Monograph Series, II(2), pp. 57–84.

  • McGraw, S. A. (Ed.). (2003). Integrated mathematics. Choices and challenges. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelsen, C. (2005). Expanding the domain: Variables and functions in an interdisciplinary context between mathematics and physics. In A. Beckmann, C. Michelsen & B. Sriraman (Eds.) Proceedings of The First International Symposium of Mathematics and its Connection to the Arts and Sciences. Hildesheim: Verlag Franzbecker, 201–214.

  • Michelsen, C., & Sriraman, B.(2007). Design Science perspectives in mathematics and science education classroom research. Proceedings of the 9th International History, Philosophy and Science Teaching Group (IHPST) 2007, Calgary, June 2007.

  • Middleton, J. A. (1995). A study of intrinsic motivation in the mathematics classroom: A personal constructs approach. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26, 254–279. doi:10.2307/749130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, J. A., Lesh, R., & Heger, M. (2003). Interest, identity, and social functioning: Central features of modeling activity. In Doerr. Lesh (Ed.), Beyond constructivism. models and modeling perspectives on mathematical problem solving, learning, and teaching (pp. 501–517). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 424–436. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCTM. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nenninger, P. (1998). Changes of interests in academic and vocational learning. In L. Hoffman, A. Krapp, K. A. Renninger & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning (pp. 420–429). Kiel: IPN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niss, M. & Jensen, T. H. (2002). Kompetencer og matematiklæring. Ideer og inspiration til udvikling af matematikundervisningen i Danmark (in Danish). Copenhagen: Undervisningsministeriet.

    Google Scholar 

  • NissOppenheim, A. N. (1992). Questionnaire design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London: Printer Publisher Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rennie, L. J., Feher, E., Dierking, L., & Falk, J. H. (2003). Toward an agenda for advancing research on science learning in out-of-school settings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(2), 112–120. doi:10.1002/tea.10067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renninger, K. A., Hidi, S., & Krapp, A. (Eds.). (1992). The role of interest in learning and development. Hillsdal: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 299–323. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2603&4_5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele, U. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1994). Interest and the quality of experience in classrooms. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 9(3), 251–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiefele, U., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1995). Motivation and ability as factors in mathematics experience and achievement. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(2), 163–181. doi:10.2307/749208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman, B., & Dahl, B. (2008). On bringing interdisciplinary ideas to gifted education. In Shavinina, L. V. (Ed). The international handbook of giftedness (pp. 1235–1254). Springer Science & Business (in press).

  • Todt, E., & Schreiber, S. (1998). Development of interests. In L. Hoffman, A. Krapp, K. A. Renninger & J. Baumert (Eds.), Interest and learning (pp. 25–40). Kiel: IPN.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The IFUN-project is granted by the EU Interreg IIIa Programme in the regions of Fyn/KERN and Sønderjylland/Scleswig.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bharath Sriraman.

Additional information

This article is an extended version of the article “Promoting students’ in mathematics and science through interdisciplinary activities interest” presented on the The Second International Symposium on Mathematics and its Connections to the Arts and Sciences, Odense, Denmark, May 2007.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Michelsen, C., Sriraman, B. Does interdisciplinary instruction raise students’ interest in mathematics and the subjects of the natural sciences?. ZDM Mathematics Education 41, 231–244 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0161-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0161-5

Keywords

Navigation