Abstract
In this paper, some fundamental issues on mathematics assessment and how they are related to the underlying cultural values in East Asia are discussed. Features of the East Asian culture that impact on mathematics assessment include the pragmatic nature of the culture, the social orientation of East Asian people, and the lop-sided stress on the utilitarian function of education. East Asians stress the algorithmic side of mathematics, and mathematics is viewed more as a set of techniques for calculation and problem solving. The notion of fairness in assessment is of paramount importance, and there is a great trust in examination as a fair method of differentiating between the able and the less able. The selection function of education and assessment has great impact on how mathematics is taught, and assessment constitutes an extrinsic motivation which directs student learning. Finally, the strengths and weaknesses of these East Asian values are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
An, S. (2004). The middle path in math instruction: solutions for improving math education. Lanham: Scarecrow Education.
Beaton, A. E., Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. A. (1996). Mathematics achievement in the middle school years. Boston: Centre for the Study of Testing, Evaluation and Educational Policy, Boston College.
Biggs, J. B. (1996). Western misconceptions of the Confucian-Heritage learning culture. In D. A. Watkins, & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7–74. doi:10.1080/0969595980050102.
Black, P., Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B., & Wiliam, D. (2003). Assessment for learning: putting it into practice. Berkshire: Open University Press.
Bodin, A. (1993). What does to assess mean? In M. Niss (Ed.), Investigations into assessment in mathematics education, ICMI study series. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Brookhart, S. M. (2005). Research on formative classroom assessment. In Paper presented in the symposium, formative classroom assessment: research, theory, and practice, at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association Montreal, Canada.
Cheng, K. M. (1994). Quality of education as perceived in the Chinese culture. In T. Takala (Ed.), Quality of education in the context of culture in developing countries (pp. 67–84). Tampere: Tampere University Press.
Ding, S. S., & Zhang, Z. G. (1989). Mathematics and education. Changsha: Hunan Education Press. in Chinese.
Ebel, R. L. (1979). Essentials of educational measurement (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Ho, D. Y. F., & Kang, T. K. (1984). Intergenerational comparisons of child-rearing attitudes and practices in Hong Kong. Developmental Psychology, 20, 1004–1016. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.20.6.1004.
Howson, G. (1993). The relationship between assessment, curriculum and society. In M. Niss (Ed.), Investigations into assessment in mathematics education, ICMI study series. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Kaur, B. (2005). Assessment of mathematics in Singapore schools—The present and future. In Paper presented in TSG6, EARCOME3, Shangahi.
Ko, S. B. (2001). China’s pragmatism as a Grand National Development Strategy: Historical legacy and evolution. Issues & Studies, 37(6), 1–28. November–December.
Leahy, S., Lyon, C., Thompson, M., & Wiliam, D. (2005). Classroom assessment: Minute by minute, day by day. Educational Leadership, 63(3), 18–24.
Lee, W. O. (1996). The cultural context for Chinese learners: Conceptions of learning in the Confucian tradition. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese learner. Hong Kong: CERC/ACER.
Leung, F. K. S. (1995). The mathematics classroom in Bejing, Hong Kong and London. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29, 297–325. doi:10.1007/BF01273909.
Leung, F. K. S. (1998). Implications of Confucianism for education today. Journal of Thought, pp. 25–36 (summer issue).
Leung, F. K. S. (2001). In search of an East Asian identity in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47, 35–51. doi:10.1023/A:1017936429620.
Mathematics Education Section (2003). Assessment for learning (secondary mathematics): The open-ended questions. Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR: Curriculum Development Institute, Education & Manpower Bureau.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. A. (1997). Mathematics achievement in the primary school years. Boston: Center for the Study of Testing, Evaluation and Educational Policy, Boston College.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., Gregory, K. D., Garden, R. A., O’Connor, K. M., et al. (2000). TIMSS 1999 international mathematics report. Boston: International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 international mathematics report. Boston: International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (1995). Assessment standard. Reston: NCTM.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: NCTM.
Needham, J. (1954). Science and civilization in China (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Niss, M. (1993). Investigations into assessment in mathematics education, ICMI study series. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation, Development. (2004). PISA 2003 report. Paris: OECD Publications.
Shusterman, R. (2004). Pragmatism and East-Asian thought. Metaphilosophy, 35(1–2), 13–43. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2004.00304.x.
Siu, M. K. (2004). Official curriculum in mathematics in ancient China: How did candidates study for the examination? In L. Fan, N. Y. Wong, J. Cai & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders (pp. 157–185). Singapore: World Scientific.
Sollenberger, R. T. (1968). Chinese-American child-rearing practices and juvenile delinquency. The Journal of Social Psychology, 74, 13–23.
Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wiliam, D. (2007). Keeping learning on track. In F. Lester Jr (Ed.), Second handbook of research in mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1053–1098). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Wong, N. Y. (1998). In search of the ‘CHC’ learner: Smarter, works harder or something more? In H. S. Park, Y. H. Choe, H. Shin, & S. H. Kim (Eds.), Proceedings of the ICMI-East Asia regional conference on mathematical education (Vol. 1, pp. 85–98).
Yang, K. S. (1981). Social orientation and individual modernity among Chinese students in Taiwan. The Journal of Social Psychology, 113, 159–170.
Zhang, D. (2007). The influence of Chinese culture on mathematics education today. Journal of Basic Education, 16(1), 45–55. in Chinese.
Zhang, D., Li, S., & Tang, R. (2004). The “Two Basics’” mathematics teaching and learning in mainland China (Chap. 7). In L. Fan, N. Y. Wong, J. Cai & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: perspectives from insiders (pp. 189–207). Singapore: World Scientific.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This paper is adapted from a plenary lecture presented at the Third East Asian Regional Conference on Mathematics Education (EARCOME3), Shanghai, August 2005.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leung, F.K.S. In the books there are golden houses: mathematics assessment in East Asia. ZDM Mathematics Education 40, 983–992 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0157-1
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-008-0157-1