Skip to main content
Download PDF

Adherence to hydroxyurea, health-related quality of life domains and attitudes towards a smartphone app among Irish adolescents and young adults with sickle cell disease

Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) volume 191, pages 809–816 (2022)Cite this article

Abstract

Introduction

SCD patients experience declines in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) domains compared with healthy controls. Despite evidence supporting the benefits of hydroxyurea, medication non-adherence remains problematic, especially in adolescents and young adults (AYA). Adherence barriers include forgetfulness and lack of knowledge. Recently, increased interest in technology-based strategies to improve medication adherence has emerged. No data currently exists on hydroxyurea adherence, HRQOL or perceptions of technology-based tools in the Irish SCD population.

Methods

In order to interrogate these domains among Irish AYA SCD patients we administered an anonymous survey at two tertiary referral centres in Dublin, Ireland, in July 2019.

Results

Sixty-three patients participated; 63% female and 37% male, with a median and mean age of 17 and 19 years, respectively. Average monthly adherence was 76% using a visual analogue scale. Recall barriers were present in 62% while 26% omit hydroxyurea for reasons other than forgetting. Reviewing HRQOL; only 36.5% felt always physically able to engage in recreational activities, while 51% experienced disruption to school/college/work due to pain. Eighty-one percent reported that anxiety about health interferes with their lives and non-adherence correlated with worse HRQOL outcomes. Interest in a smartphone app was expressed by the majority, with daily medication reminders being the most popular feature. Sharing adherence data with doctors and discussion forums were less appealing.

Conclusions

Representing over 10% of the Irish SCD population, our survey provides novel and valuable insights into medication adherence and HRQOL domains. Preferred app features may inform future technology-based interventions to improve medication adherence in SCD and other chronic health conditions.

Introduction

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a group of inherited haemoglobin disorders, caused by the sickle beta globin gene mutation and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality including chronic haemolysis, stroke and long-term end-organ damage [1]. Compared with healthy controls, SCD patients experience significant declines in health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes over time [2,3,4]. Globally, SCD affects over 300,000 births per year [5, 6], a figure projected to rise to over 400,000 by 2050 [7]. In Ireland, the number of SCD patients has also grown exponentially over the past two decades: from only 20 paediatric patients in 2000 [8] to over 500 adult and paediatric patients in 2020, a large proportion of whom are AYA. These first-generation Irish AYA SCD patients represent a dynamic patient population in Irish healthcare and present a unique view-point to inform global SCD research.

Significant data has accumulated supporting the safe, efficacious and cost-effective use of hydroxyurea in children and adults with SCD [9, 10] with important beneficial effects on quality of life [11,12,13]. Despite this evidence, however, underutilization of hydroxyurea in SCD remains a challenge and a number of factors have been identified, including provider, patient and system-related barriers [14, 15]. The most commonly identified patient barriers to adherence include forgetfulness, fear of side effects and access barriers [2, 3, 16,17,18,19]. Medication non-adherence among adolescents and young adults (AYA) with chronic illnesses, including SCD is particularly challenging [20]. However, there are a limited number of studies exploring the barriers to hydroxyurea adherence and this has never been investigated in an Irish context. Importantly, low hydroxyurea adherence rates are associated with worse HRQOL [3, 21] while improved adherence is associated with lower healthcare costs [22]. Therefore, understanding and overcoming the barriers to hydroxyurea adherence in AYA could substantially improve HRQOL and other health outcomes.

Recently, there is increased interest in the development of eHealth and technology-based platforms to improve patient care in chronic conditions [23, 24]. Indeed, there is promising evidence supporting the feasibility and efficacy of digital interventions for behaviour change, especially the use of smartphone applications in AYA [25,26,27,28,29]. Specifically, in the context of SCD, improved adherence to medication in children and adolescents using text-messaging reminders [30] and smartphone-based directly observed therapy has been demonstrated [31, 32]. Widespread availability and use of technology particularly by AYA present a unique opportunity for development of tools to promote medication adherence in this cohort.

The objectives of this study were (1) to examine hydroxyurea adherence rates and identify barriers to adherence such as recall, understanding and access barriers, (2) to explore HRQOL domains and explore the relationship between adherence barriers and HRQOL scores and (3) to identify smartphone app preferences for improving compliance in an Irish AYA SCD cohort. We hypothesized that recall barriers (forgetfulness) would play a prominent feature in the barriers to adherence faced by AYA and that participants with increased adherence barriers would report worse HRQOL outcomes.

Methods

Participant enrolment

Following local ethical approval, a cross-sectional study was performed using convenience sampling methodology at the National paediatric and adult SCD centres at Children’s Health Ireland (CHI), Crumlin and St James’s Hospital (SJH), Dublin, respectively. Patients were eligible if they were AYA (12–35 years) with SCD on hydroxyurea for 1 year or more prior to the study. In order to minimise selection bias, participants were recruited from a range of clinical settings, including the hydroxyurea clinic, transition clinic, haematology day ward and inpatient wards. The survey was entirely anonymous, with participants asked to specify only their age and gender.

Study measures and survey design

Our survey was self-administered using pencil/pen and paper and comprised of 24 multiple choice or yes/no questions and a visual analogue scale (VAS) to assess adherence to hydroxyurea over the past month. Questions were inspired by the modified Morisky adherence scale 8 items (©MMAS-8) and Brief Medication Questionnaire (BMQ) to assess adherence rates and barriers, with some adapted elements of the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS ©) used to investigate HRQOL outcomes. All of these tools have been previously used in the context of AYA with SCD [2, 3, 33]. Questions pertaining to smartphone app preferences were based on available evidence in the literature related to app-based interventions and medication adherence in SCD [23, 34]. The final survey content and questions were reflective of multidisciplinary input from experts in the field of SCD including paediatric and adult Haematology, Nursing and Psychology. All self-reported adherence measures were adapted to reflect SCD and hydroxyurea and age-appropriate wording for AYA was used to minimize respondent burden.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were reported in frequencies and percentages for categorical data. A sub-analysis was performed to assess whether age or presence of barriers to adherence influenced adherence rates, HRQOL parameters or preference of proposed smartphone app features. Participants were dichotomized by age group into adolescents (age 12–17 years) and young adults (age 18–35 years). The presence of recall barriers was defined if participants answered ‘yes’ to the question: ‘Do you sometimes forget to take your Hydroxyurea?’ and access barriers were present if respondents ‘sometimes’ or ‘always’ report finding it ‘difficult to take Hydroxyurea because my prescription runs out’. To assess statistical differences between the subgroups, data were analysed using the Mann-Whitney U test. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism 8.3 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA).

Results

Characteristics of participants and overall adherence to hydroxyurea

Sixty-three participants were approached and 100% responded to the survey, 63% female and 37% male with a median and mean age of 17 (IQR 17–21) and 19.5 years, respectively. All participants were of African ethnicity and had homozygous SCD (HbSS). The average monthly self-reported adherence to hydroxyurea was 76% using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Overall, 73% of respondents feel hydroxyurea works either ‘very well’ (38%) or ‘reasonably well’ (35%) for them. Participants with high self-reported hydroxyurea adherence (> 80% according to VAS) perceived more beneficial effects of their medication (hydroxyurea ‘works very well for me’) compared with low (≤ 80%) adherence (hydroxyurea ‘works reasonably well’ or ‘I don’t know’) (p = 0.06). No statistically significant differences were observed among parameters between male and female respondents or between institutions.

Adherence barriers and HRQOL

Recall barriers (forgetting to take hydroxyurea) were apparent in 62% of respondents, with 67% requiring prompts from family members to take their medication (Table 1). Twenty-one percent of participants omit hydroxyurea for reasons other than forgetting, while 11% discontinue their medication when they feel their SCD is under control and only 6% due to adverse effects (Table 1). Recall barriers/forgetfulness was the most common barrier to self-reported hydroxyurea adherence (62%) while access barriers (inability to obtain prescription/medication runs out) were evident in 33% of respondents (Table 1). Participants perceived minimal knowledge barriers with 97% reporting that doctors/nurses had clearly explained the reasons to take hydroxyurea and 92% self-reported a good understanding of their medication (Table 1).

Thirty-five percent of respondents worry about others knowing they take hydroxyurea while 54% worry about the long-term effects of the medication (Table 1). Eight-one percent reported that anxiety about health interferes with their lives (Table 1). Only 37% of respondents felt they were always physically able to do the activities they most enjoy while 51% experience disruption to school/college/work due to pain and 69% due to difficulty concentrating (Table 1).

Participants interest in smartphone app and relevant features

Interest in a smartphone app to improve medication adherence was expressed by 87% (Table 1). While participants expressed interest in most of the proposed app features, the most popular features included: daily medication reminders (73%), adherence progress tracking (77%) and facts about SCD (72%) (Table 1). Discussion forums, sharing adherence data with doctors and rewards/incentives for using the app were less appealing (55%, 48% and 43% respectively) (Table 1). There was no statistically significant difference between app feature preferences between adolescents (12–17 years) and young adults (18–35 years) except for interest in a discussion forum, which was more preferable in the young adult group (p = 0.01) (Table 2).

Subgroup analysis: age

Adolescents (12–17 years) comprised the majority (54%, n = 34) and young adults (18–35 years) represented 46% (n = 29) of the cohort. Overall, there was no difference in recall barriers/forgetfulness or monthly medication adherence using a visual analogue scale between these age groups. However, medication omissions for reasons other than forgetting were more frequent in the young adult group compared with adolescents (38% versus 15%, respectively, p = 0.05) and young adults were more likely to cut back on hydroxyurea due to ‘feeling worse’ when taking it (14% versus 0%, p = 0.04) (Table 2). Young adults were also more likely to report access barriers than adolescents (p = 0.04) but family prompting was less frequent in this subgroup (46% versus 82%, p < 0.001) (Table 2).

Young adults were more likely than adolescents to worry about the long-term effects of hydroxyurea (p = 0.02) and were also more likely to experience interference in their daily lives due to health worries (p = 0.005) (Table 2). Furthermore, young adults were significantly more likely to find their treatment plan bothersome compared with adolescents (p < 0.0001) (Table 2). Other than parameters related to anxiety, there was no significant difference observed between the groups in other HRQOL parameters including ability to perform physical activity, pain or fatigue interference or difficulty concentrating.

Subgroup analysis: recall and access barriers and impact on adherence

Participants with recall barriers (62%) were more likely to report low hydroxyurea adherence over the past month using a visual analogue scale (median 80% versus 95% adherence, p < 0.0001) (Table 3). Additionally, significantly reduced physical ability was apparent in those with recall barriers compared to those without (p = 0.04) (Table 3). Participants with recall barriers were more likely to report difficulty remembering to take hydroxyurea at weekends, whereas those without such barriers were more likely to perceive ‘no difference’ between weekdays and weekends (p = 0.005) (Table 3). Similarly, those with recall barriers reported more difficulty remembering to take their medication at the same time every day compared to those who did not (p = 0.003) (Table 3). Overall, interest in a smartphone app was higher in those with recall barriers (p = 0.02) and interest in the medication reminder feature was also significantly higher (p = 0.003) compared with those without recall barriers (Table 3). Other than reduction in physical ability, there were no differences in HRQOL outcomes, anxiety or perceived benefits of hydroxyurea therapy between those with/without recall barriers.

Access barriers (difficulty in obtaining prescriptions) were reported in 33% of respondents, who were more likely to be older (median age 16 versus 19 years, p = 0.04) but there was no statistically significant difference between these groups across other adherence or HRQOL parameters. Average monthly hydroxyurea adherence rates according to visual analogue scale were 70% and 83% in those with and without access barriers, respectively; however, this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.10).

Discussion

With recent National Institute of Health (NIH) and British Society of Haematology (BSH) guidelines recommending the use of hydroxyurea in SCD patients from 9 months of age [35, 36], optimizing adherence across the lifespan is more essential than ever and understanding barriers to adherence may provide valuable and actionable insights. Our study contributes to the emerging literature on hydroxyurea adherence and is the first to examine adherence, HRQOL and attitudes towards technology-based platforms in an Irish context. The number of SCD patients in Ireland has expanded significantly over the past 20 years, reflecting the changing face of the Irish healthcare system. This dynamic patient population therefore represents a unique perspective  to inform international SCD research.

Forgetfulness was the most common barrier to hydroxyurea adherence with access barriers being less prevalent, findings which are consistent with other studies [3, 37, 38]. Although knowledge gaps and lack of information have been previously reported as barriers to adherence in SCD [19, 39, 40], these issues were less apparent in our cohort with 92% self-reporting a good understanding of their medication.

Despite this, levels of hydroxyurea- and overall health-related anxiety were high. Importantly, anxiety levels were significantly higher among young adults than adolescents. While elevated anxiety levels have been identified in children and adolescents with other chronic health conditions such as type 1 diabetes and haemophilia [41, 42], few studies have evaluated anxiety in AYA with SCD. Our findings suggest that health and medication-related anxiety is common and healthcare providers should be cognisant of anxiety among adolescents and especially young adults with SCD, which may simultaneously impact upon both quality of life and medication adherence.

Although we did not observe a difference in adherence between adolescents and young adults in this study, increased age and negative perceptions of medication have previously been identified as risk factors for non-adherence and worse HRQOL outcomes in SCD [2, 22]. The finding that young adults were significantly less likely to receive family prompting and are more likely to omit their medication deliberately (not due to forgetting) or due to perceived side effects than adolescents is reflective of patients’ increased independence as they grow older and exert more autonomy over their healthcare decisions. These data highlight the importance of self-management skill-building in AYA with SCD to promote hydroxyurea adherence in adulthood and later life.

Previous studies have shown that patients with higher hydroxyurea adherence rates have better HRQOL [3, 11, 12]. Consistent with these findings, we observed that participants with recall barriers had a significantly reduced hydroxyurea adherence using a VAS. Moreover, respondents with recall barriers were less physically able to do the activities they most enjoy. Due to the cross-sectional nature of this study, directionality of any cause-and-effect relationship between recall barriers and HRQOL outcomes such as physical ability cannot be determined. Additionally, in AYA with SCD, deficits in cognitive and executive functioning may be present which could reflect disease severity and impact HRQOL as well as contributing to recall barriers. Although we did not detect a statistically significant difference for other HRQOL domains (e.g. pain, fatigue and poor concentration), this could be related to our small sample size and relatively low statistical power.

Evidence from a recent systematic review of interventions to improve medication adherence in general including eHealth technologies suggest that smartphone applications have the potential to improve medication adherence in SCD [23, 43]. The majority of our cohort expressed interest in a potential app to improve hydroxyurea adherence. Interestingly, patients with recall barriers were significantly more likely to express an interest in the app, specifically in the daily reminder feature, than those without. This suggests that poor recall does not necessarily indicate a lack of patient engagement or willingness to take medication if appropriate prompting and support systems are available. Discussion forums were significantly more popular among young adults than adolescents, again reflective of the increased independence of the former group.

Our study has some limitations that warrant discussion. Firstly, this was a cross-sectional study using convenience sampling and the relatively small sample size may have constrained our ability to find statistically significant relationships between some hydroxyurea adherence barriers and HRQOL scores. Additionally, patients with poor attendance who did not get an opportunity to complete the survey may have provided further insight. Nevertheless, the fact that the study was carried out at two separate hospitals which are the largest and only tertiary SCD referral centres in Ireland adds strength to the findings and generalisability of the study. Furthermore, although absolute numbers of respondents are relatively low (n = 63), this sample represents over 10% of the Irish SCD population. Secondly, we evaluated hydroxyurea adherence using self-reported measures and this method may over-estimate adherence [16, 17, 44]. Supplementation of self-reported data with objective measures such as pill-counting or surrogate laboratory markers of adherence (e.g. haemoglobin F percentage) has been used in other studies [3, 45, 46]; however, this was not possible here due to the anonymous nature of our survey. Information pertaining to indications for treatment, current and maximum tolerated dose of hydroxyurea were also unavailable for the same reason. Finally, we did not explore details in relation to technology access or socioeconomic factors which may influence both adherence barriers and access to technology. However, studies in the USA indicate that the majority of AYA SCD patients have access to smartphones, findings which are likely generalizable to other developed countries such as Ireland [34, 47].

Future developments of any eHealth interventions including smartphone applications should include patient input from the outset of intervention design to ensure both long and short term engagement. Additional consideration must be given to cost analysis of any eHealth intervention going forward as there is a paucity of economic data to support the use of eHealth interventions to date [48, 49].

Conclusions

Our findings enhance our understanding of SCD patient perceptions of and adherence to hydroxyurea and is the first to investigate this in an Irish context. While medication adherence among Irish AYA SCD patients appears relatively high, recall barriers are the most common impediment to adherence and are associated with worse HRQOL. A potential smartphone app to improve adherence was welcomed and the strong preference for daily medication reminders reflects the prevalence of recall barriers in this cohort.

Representing over 10% of the Irish SCD population, our study provides novel and valuable insights into medication adherence and HRQOL domains in AYA. Importantly, data regarding preferred app features may inform future technology-based interventions to improve medication adherence for AYA with SCD as well as other chronic health conditions.

Table 1 Survey results total AYA cohort (n = 63)
Full size table
Table 2 Subgroup analysis by age: adolescents (12–17 years) or young adults (age ≥ 18 years)
Full size table
Table 3 Subgroup analysis by presence or absence of recall barriers (forgetfulness)
Full size table

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Weatherall DJ (1997) ABC of clinical haematology. The hereditary anaemias BMJ 314(7079):492–496

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Badawy SM et al (2017) Adherence to hydroxyurea, health-related quality of life domains, and patients’ perceptions of sickle cell disease and hydroxyurea: a cross-sectional study in adolescents and young adults. Health Qual Life Outcomes 15(1):136

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Badawy SM et al (2017) Barriers to hydroxyurea adherence and health-related quality of life in adolescents and young adults with sickle cell disease. Eur J Haematol 98(6):608–614

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Panepinto JA, Bonner M (2012) Health-related quality of life in sickle cell disease: past, present, and future. Pediatr Blood Cancer 59(2):377–385

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Howard J, Oteng-Ntim E (2012) The obstetric management of sickle cell disease. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 26(1):25–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Piel FB et al (2013) Global epidemiology of sickle haemoglobin in neonates: a contemporary geostatistical model-based map and population estimates. Lancet 381(9861):142–151

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Piel FB et al (2013) Global burden of sickle cell anaemia in children under five, 2010–2050: modelling based on demographics, excess mortality, and interventions. PLoS Med 10(7):e1001484

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. McMahon C et al (2001) The increasing prevalence of childhood sickle-cell disease in Ireland. Ir J Med Sci 170(3):183–185

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang WC et al (2011) Hydroxycarbamide in very young children with sickle-cell anaemia: a multicentre, randomised, controlled trial (BABY HUG). Lancet 377(9778):1663–1672

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Charache S et al (1995) Effect of hydroxyurea on the frequency of painful crises in sickle cell anemia. Investigators of the Multicenter Study of Hydroxyurea in Sickle Cell Anemia. N Engl J Med 332(20):1317–22

  11. Thornburg CD, Calatroni A, Panepinto JA (2011) Differences in health-related quality of life in children with sickle cell disease receiving hydroxyurea. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 33(4):251–254

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ballas SK et al (2006) Hydroxyurea and sickle cell anemia: effect on quality of life. Health Qual Life Outcomes 4:59

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Badawy SM, Thompson AA, Liem RI (2018) Beliefs about hydroxyurea in youth with sickle cell disease. Hematol Oncol Stem Cell Ther 11(3):142–148

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brandow AM, Panepinto JA (2010) Hydroxyurea use in sickle cell disease: the battle with low prescription rates, poor patient compliance and fears of toxicities. Expert Rev Hematol 3(3):255–260

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Oyeku SO et al (2013) Parental and other factors associated with hydroxyurea use for pediatric sickle cell disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer 60(4):653–658

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Loiselle K et al (2016) Systematic and meta-analytic review: medication adherence among pediatric patients with sickle cell disease. J Pediatr Psychol 41(4):406–418

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Walsh KE et al (2014) Medication adherence among pediatric patients with sickle cell disease: a systematic review. Pediatrics 134(6):1175–1183

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Brandow AM, Panepinto JA (2011) Monitoring toxicity, impact, and adherence of hydroxyurea in children with sickle cell disease. Am J Hematol 86(9):804–806

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Haywood C Jr et al (2011) Examining the characteristics and beliefs of hydroxyurea users and nonusers among adults with sickle cell disease. Am J Hematol 86(1):85–87

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Hanghoj S, Boisen KA (2014) Self-reported barriers to medication adherence among chronically ill adolescents: a systematic review. J Adolesc Health 54(2):121–138

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Badawy SM et al (2017) Health-related quality of life and adherence to hydroxyurea in adolescents and young adults with sickle cell disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer 64(6)

  22. Candrilli SD et al (2011) Hydroxyurea adherence and associated outcomes among Medicaid enrollees with sickle cell disease. Am J Hematol 86(3):273–277

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Badawy SM et al (2018) Patient-centered eHealth interventions for children, adolescents, and adults with sickle cell disease: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 20(7):e10940

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Donovan M et al (2020) Telehealth for delivery of haemophilia comprehensive care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Haemophilia 26(6):984–990

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Payne HE et al (2015) Behavioral functionality of mobile apps in health interventions: a systematic review of the literature. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 3(1):e20

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Badawy SM et al (2017) Text messaging and mobile phone apps as interventions to improve adherence in adolescents with chronic health conditions: a systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 5(5):e66

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Thakkar J et al (2016) Mobile telephone text messaging for medication adherence in chronic disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med 176(3):340–349

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Badawy SM, Kuhns LM (2017) Texting and mobile phone app interventions for improving adherence to preventive behavior in adolescents: a systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 5(4):e50

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Majeed-Ariss R et al (2015) Apps and adolescents: a systematic review of adolescents’ use of mobile phone and tablet apps that support personal management of their chronic or long-term physical conditions. J Med Internet Res 17(12):e287

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Estepp JH et al (2014) Improved hydroxyurea effect with the use of text messaging in children with sickle cell anemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer 61(11):2031–2036

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Creary SE et al (2014) A pilot study of electronic directly observed therapy to improve hydroxyurea adherence in pediatric patients with sickle-cell disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer 61(6):1068–1073

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Leonard S et al (2017) Utilizing a novel mobile health “Selfie” application to improve compliance to iron chelation in pediatric patients receiving chronic transfusions. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 39(3):223–229

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Dampier C et al (2016) Initial evaluation of the pediatric PROMIS(R) health domains in children and adolescents with sickle cell disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer 63(6):1031–1037

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Badawy SM, Thompson AA, Liem RI (2016) Technology access and smartphone app preferences for medication adherence in adolescents and young adults with sickle cell disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer 63(5):848–852

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Yawn BP et al (2014) Management of sickle cell disease: summary of the 2014 evidence-based report by expert panel members. JAMA 312(10):1033–1048

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Qureshi A et al (2018) Guidelines for the use of hydroxycarbamide in children and adults with sickle cell disease: a British Society for Haematology Guideline. Br J Haematol 181(4):460–475

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Crosby LE et al (2012) Integrating interactive web-based technology to assess adherence and clinical outcomes in pediatric sickle cell disease. Anemia 2012:492428

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Elliott V et al (2001) Parental health beliefs and compliance with prophylactic penicillin administration in children with sickle cell disease. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 23(2):112–116

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Jensen SA et al (2005) Caregiver knowledge and adherence in children with sickle cell disease: knowing is not doing. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 12(4):333–337

    Google Scholar 

  40. Barakat LP, Smith-Whitley K, Ohene-Frempong K (2002) Treatment adherence in children with sickle cell disease: disease-related risk and psychosocial resistance factors. J Clin Psychol Med Settings 9(3):201–209

    Google Scholar 

  41. Abali O et al (2014) An examination of the symptoms of anxiety and parental attitude in children with hemophilia. Turk J Med Sci 44(6):1087–1090

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Majidi S, Driscoll KA, Raymond JK (2015) Anxiety in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 15(8):47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nieuwlaat R et al (2014) Interventions for enhancing medication adherence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (11):Cd000011

  44. Stirratt MJ et al (2015) Self-report measures of medication adherence behavior: recommendations on optimal use. Transl Behav Med 5(4):470–482

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Kinney TR et al (1999) Safety of hydroxyurea in children with sickle cell anemia: results of the HUG-KIDS study, a phase I/II trial. Pediatric Hydroxyurea Group Blood 94(5):1550–1554

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Ware RE et al (2002) Predictors of fetal hemoglobin response in children with sickle cell anemia receiving hydroxyurea therapy. Blood 99(1):10–14

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Shah N, Jonassaint J, De Castro L (2014) Patients welcome the Sickle Cell Disease Mobile Application to Record Symptoms via Technology (SMART). Hemoglobin 38(2):99–103

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Badawy SM, Kuhns LM (2016) Economic evaluation of text-messaging and smartphone-based interventions to improve medication adherence in adolescents with chronic health conditions: a systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 4(4):e121

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Iribarren SJ et al (2017) What is the economic evidence for mHealth? A systematic review of economic evaluations of mHealth solutions. PLoS ONE 12(2):e0170581

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was performed within the Irish Clinical Academic Training (ICAT) Programme, supported by the Wellcome Trust and the Health Research Board (Grant Number 203930/B/16/Z), the Health Service Executive, National Doctors Training and Planning and the Health and Social Care, Research and Development Division, Northern Ireland. The funders had no role in the preparation, review or approval of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Irish Centre for Vascular Biology, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (RCSI), 123 St Stephen’s Green, Dublin, Ireland

    Helen Fogarty, Alan Gaul, Saifullah Syed & Natalija Aleksejenko

  2. Haematology Department, Children’s Health Ireland (CHI) at Crumlin, Dublin, Ireland

    Helen Fogarty, Rosena Geoghegan, Helena Conroy & Corrina McMahon

  3. Haematology Department, St James’s Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

    Helen Fogarty, Edel Crampton, Noel Ngwenya & Emma Tuohy

Authors
  1. Helen Fogarty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alan Gaul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Saifullah Syed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Natalija Aleksejenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Rosena Geoghegan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Helena Conroy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Edel Crampton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Noel Ngwenya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Emma Tuohy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Corrina McMahon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen Fogarty.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fogarty, H., Gaul, A., Syed, S. et al. Adherence to hydroxyurea, health-related quality of life domains and attitudes towards a smartphone app among Irish adolescents and young adults with sickle cell disease. Ir J Med Sci 191, 809–816 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02588-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02588-1

Keywords

  • Adolescents and young adults (AYA)
  • Health-related quality of life
  • Hydroxyurea
  • Medication adherence
  • Sickle cell disease
  • Smartphone application