Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A retrospective cohort analysis of hypoglycaemic and cardiovascular agent use in young adults in the Irish primary care setting

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

The prevalence of type 2 diabetes in young adults is increasing, yet little is known about medication use in this population. This study aimed to describe hypoglycaemic and cardiovascular treatment patterns in young adults newly treated with oral hypoglycaemic agents.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study from 2008–2011 was conducted using the Irish national pharmacy claims database. Subjects aged 15–39 years were analysed for use of hypoglycaemic therapy, subsequent regimen changes, and any co-prescription of cardiovascular agents 1 year after treatment initiation. Cox-proportional-hazards regression and logistic regression were used to examine factors associated with non-persistence to initial hypoglycaemic therapy (in males only), insulin use as a regimen change, and use of cardiovascular agents. Hazard ratios (HR), odds ratios (OR), and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) are presented.

Results

There were 5284 individuals initiated on hypoglycaemic agents. Most were initiated on metformin (88 %); 13 % of subjects received a hypoglycaemic agent regimen change, with insulin being used in 26 % of these cases. A total of 38 % of males were non-persistent with their initial hypoglycaemic agent, with males aged 15–29 years and those on sulphonylureas significantly more likely to be non-persistent with therapy. Over 40 % of subjects were initiated on cardiovascular agents. Females were less likely to receive cardiovascular agents [OR 0.50 (95 % CI 0.42–0.83)].

Conclusions

Treatment patterns were found to be associated with high levels of non-persistence, substantial use of insulin, and a low use of cardiovascular agents. This may pose problems for the management of the long-term complications associated with type 2 diabetes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hillier TA, Pedula KL (2003) Complications in young adults with early-onset type 2 diabetes: losing the relative protection of youth. Diabetes Care 26:2999–3005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Song SH, Hardisty CA (2009) Early onset type 2 diabetes mellitus: a harbinger for complications in later years—clinical observation from a secondary care cohort. QJM 102:799–806

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Song SH (2008) Review: early-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus: a condition with elevated cardiovascular risk? Br J Diabetes Vasc Dis 8:61–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zeitler P, Fu J, Tandon N, Nadeau K, Urakami T, Barrett T, Maahs D (2014) ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2014. Type 2 diabetes in the child and adolescent. Pediatr Diabetes 15(Suppl 2):26–46

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Huxley R, Barzi F, Woodward M (2006) Excess risk of fatal coronary heart disease associated with diabetes in men and women: meta-analysis of 37 prospective cohort studies. BMJ 332:73–78

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Peters SAE, Huxley RR, Woodward M (2014) Diabetes as a risk factor for stroke in women compared with men: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 64 cohorts, including 775,385 individuals and 12,539 strokes. Lancet 383:1973–1980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N, Jensen GVH, Parving H-H, Pedersen O (2003) Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 348:383–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bloomgarden ZT (2004) Type 2 diabetes in the young: the evolving epidemic. Diabetes Care 27:998–1010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. American Diabetes Association (2013) Standards of medical care in diabetes–2013. Diabetes Care 36(Suppl 1):S4–S10

    Google Scholar 

  10. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2009) The management of type 2 diabetes. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg87

  11. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2015). Type 2 diabetes (NG28). https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng28

  12. Rydén L, Grant PJ, Anker SD, Berne C, Cosentino F, Danchin N (2013) ESC Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases developed in collaboration with the EASD. Eur Heart J 34:3035–3087

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (2015) Diabetes in pregnancy: management of diabetes and its complications from preconception to the postnatal period. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng3

  14. Balsells M, Garcia-Patterson A, Sola I, Roque M, Gich I, Corcoy R (2015) Glibenclamide, metformin, and insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 350:h102–h102

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Tang T, Lord JM, Norman RJ, Yasmin E, Balen AH (2012) Insulin-sensitising drugs (metformin, rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, d-chiro-inositol) for women with polycystic ovary syndrome, oligo amenorrhoea and subfertility. Cochrane database Syst Rev 5:CD003053

    Google Scholar 

  16. Godfrey LM, Erramouspe J, Cleveland KW (2012) Teratogenic risk of statins in pregnancy. Ann Pharmacother 46:1419–1424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cooper WO, Hernandez-Diaz S, Arbogast PG, Dudley JA, Dyer S, Gideon PS, Hall K, Ray WA (2006) Major congenital malformations after first-trimester exposure to ACE inhibitors. N Engl J Med 354:2443–2451

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grégoire J-P, Sirois C, Blanc G, Poirier P, Moisan J (2010) Persistence patterns with oral antidiabetes drug treatment in newly treated patients—a population-based study. Value Health 13:820–828

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Grimes RT, Bennett K, Tilson L, Usher C, Smith SM, Henman MC (2015) Initial therapy, persistence and regimen change in a cohort of newly treated type 2 diabetes patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 79:1000–1009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Cefalu WT (2013) “TODAY” reflects on the changing “faces” of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 36:1732–1734

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Health Service Executive (2012) Health Service Executive Primary Care Reimbursement. Statistical Analysis of Claims and Payments, Dublin

    Google Scholar 

  22. D’Adamo E, Caprio S (2011) Type 2 diabetes in youth: epidemiology and pathophysiology. Diabetes Care 34(Suppl 2):S161–S165

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Leeman L, Acharya U (2009) The use of metformin in the management of polycystic ovary syndrome and associated anovulatory infertility: the current evidence. J Obstet Gynaecol 29:467–472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Flory JH, Hennessy S (2015) Metformin use reduction in mild to moderate renal impairment. JAMA Intern Med. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6936

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kahn SE, Lachin JM, Zinman B, Haffner SM, Aftring RP, Paul G, Kravitz BG, Herman WH, Viberti G, Holman RR (2011) Effects of rosiglitazone, glyburide, and metformin on β-cell function and insulin sensitivity in ADOPT. Diabetes 60:1552–1560

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Kahn SE, Haffner SM, Heise MA, Herman WH, Holman RR, Jones NP, Kravitz BG, Lachin JM, O’Neill MC, Zinman B, Viberti G, ADOPT Study Group (2006) Glycemic Durability of Rosiglitazone, Metformin, or Glyburide Monotherapy. NEJM 355:2427–2443

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fu AZ, Qiu Y, Davies MJ, Engel SS (2012) Initial sulfonylurea use and subsequent insulin therapy in older subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Ther 3:12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Corrao G, Romio SA, Zambon A, Merlino L, Bosi E, Scavini M (2011) Multiple outcomes associated with the use of metformin and sulphonylureas in type 2 diabetes: a population-based cohort study in Italy. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 67:289–299

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cernea S, Buzzetti R, Pozzilli P (2009) Beta-cell protection and therapy for latent autoimmune diabetes in adults. Diabetes Care 32(Suppl 2):S246–S252

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Hertz RP, Unger AN, Lustik MB (2005) Adherence with pharmacotherapy for type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study of adults with employer-sponsored health insurance. Clin Ther 27:1064–1073

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Beest FJAP, van der Bij S, Erkens JA, Kessabi S, Groot M, Herings RMC (2008) Effect of non-persistent use of oral glucose-lowering drugs on HbA1c goal attainment. Curr Med Res Opin 24:2523–2529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. McHorney CA, Spain CV (2011) Frequency of and reasons for medication non-fulfillment and non-persistence among American adults with chronic disease in 2008. Health Expect 14:307–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Laufs U, Rettig-Ewen V, Böhm M (2011) Strategies to improve drug adherence. Eur Heart J 32:264–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Peyrot M, Rubin RR, Lauritzen T, Skovlund SE, Snoek FJ, Matthews DR, Landgraf R, Kleinebreil L (2005) Resistance to insulin therapy among patients and providers: results of the cross-national diabetes attitudes, wishes, and needs (DAWN) study. Diabetes Care 28:2673–2679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Silverstein JH, Rosenbloom AL (2000) Treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab 13(Suppl 6):1403–1409

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ray JG, O’Brien TE, Chan WS (2001) Preconception care and the risk of congenital anomalies in the offspring of women with diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. QJM 94:435–444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Benhalima K, Song SH, Wilmot EG, Khunti K, Gray LJ, Lawrence I, Davies M (2011) Characteristics, complications and management of a large multiethnic cohort of younger adults with type 2 diabetes. Prim Care Diabetes 5:245–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Guthrie B, Emslie-Smith A, Morris AD (2009) Which people with Type 2 diabetes achieve good control of intermediate outcomes? Population database study in a UK region. Diabet Med 26:1269–1276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hernández-Díaz S, García Rodríguez LA (2006) Cardioprotective aspirin users and their excess risk of upper gastrointestinal complications. BMC Med 4:22

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Cleland JGF (2013) Is aspirin useful in primary prevention? Eur Heart J 34:3412–3418

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Today Study Group (2012) A clinical trial to maintain glycemic control in youth with type 2 diabetes. NEJM 366:2247–2256

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Today Study Group (2013) Rapid rise in hypertension and nephropathy in youth with type 2 diabetes: the TODAY clinical trial. Diabetes Care 36:1735–1741

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

R. G. would like to thank the School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences for the award of a Trinity College Dublin postgraduate research studentship. This work was conducted as part of the HRB Ph.D. Scholars Programme in Health Services Research Grant No. PHD/2007/16. We also thank the HSE- Primary Care Reimbursement Service for providing the data on which the study was based.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. T. Grimes.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at http://www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf (available on request from the corresponding author) and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years; no other relationships or activities could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grimes, R.T., Bennett, K., Hoey, H. et al. A retrospective cohort analysis of hypoglycaemic and cardiovascular agent use in young adults in the Irish primary care setting. Ir J Med Sci 186, 461–470 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-016-1491-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-016-1491-x

Keywords

Navigation