Irish Journal of Medical Science

, Volume 180, Issue 2, pp 457–461 | Cite as

A comparison of antibiotic point prevalence survey data from four Irish regional/general hospitals

Original Article



Point prevalence surveys (PPS) are increasingly used to examining and compare hospital antibiotic consumption. The aim of this study was to identify the (1) point prevalence of antibiotic use in one regional hospital and (2) compare PPS data from similar regional/general hospitals.


Data were collected on all inpatients with an active antibiotic prescription and on all prescriptions issued in the emergency department over a 24-h period. Point prevalence data were obtained from three other regional/general hospitals.


The frequency of antibiotic use was hospital A = 29%, B = 38%, C = 34% and D = 37%. Overall, the most commonly prescribed antibiotic was co-amoxiclav (30%), followed by macrolides (12%). However, new generation broad-spectrum antibiotics, such as piperacillin/tazobactam or ciprofloxacin, were also commonly used. Prescribing for common conditions such as respiratory infection or cellulites showed diverse antibiotic selection.


Point prevalence survey data using a standardised methodology could facilitate both local audit and national benchmarking to monitor antibiotic use.


Antibiotic Prescribing Point prevalence Survey 


  1. 1.
    WHO (2001) Global strategy for containment of antimicrobial resistance. Accessed 11 Nov 2010
  2. 2.
    Goossens H (2005) European status of resistance in nosocomial infections. Chemotherapy 51(4):177–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Livermore D (2004) Can better prescribing turn the tide of resistance? Nat Rev Microbiol 2(1):73–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mackenzie FM, Struelens MJ, Towner KJ, Gould IM (2005) Report of the Consensus Conference on Antibiotic Resistance; Prevention and Control (ARPAC). Clin Microbiol Infect 11(11):938–954PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    HSE-HPSC (2009) Health Protection Surveillance Centre Annual Report 2008. Accessed 11 Nov 2010
  6. 6.
    SARI (2001) Strategy for the control of antimicrobial resistance in Ireland. Accessed 22 Nov 2010
  7. 7.
    HSE-HPSC (2010) Hospital antimicrobial consumption report: sept Q1 Q2. Accessed 11 Nov 2010
  8. 8.
    Vlahovic-Palcevski V, Dumpis U, Mitt P et al (2007) Benchmarking antimicrobial drug use at university hospitals in five European countries. Clin Microbiol Infect 13(3):277–283PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bergman U, Popa C, Tomson Y et al (1998) Drug utilization 90%—a simple method for assessing the quality of drug prescribing. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 54(2):113–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kern WV, de WK, Steib-Bauert M, Fellhauer M, Plangger A, Probst W (2005) Antibiotic use in non-university regional acute care general hospitals in southwestern Germany, 2001–2002. Infection 33(5–6):333–339PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ansari F, Erntell M, Goossens H, Davey P (2009) The European surveillance of antimicrobial consumption (ESAC) point-prevalence survey of antibacterial use in 20 European hospitals in 2006. Clin Infect Dis 49(10):1496–1504Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kanerva M, Ollgren J, Lyytikainen O (2007) Antimicrobial use in Finnish acute care hospitals: data from national prevalence survey. J Antimicrob Chemother 60(2):440–444PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McNulty CA, Francis NA (2009) Optimizing antibiotic prescribing in primary care settings in the UK: findings of a BSAC multi-disciplinary workshop. J Antimicrob Chemother 65(11):2278–2284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arnold SR, Straus SE (2005) Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices in ambulatory care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (4). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003539.pub2
  15. 15.
    Naughton C, Feely J, Bennett K (2009) A RCT evaluating the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of academic detailing versus postal prescribing feedback in changing GP antibiotic prescribing. J Eval Clin Pract 15(5):807–812PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Royal Academy of Medicine in Ireland 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Naughton
    • 1
    • 2
  • Y. Hennessy
    • 3
  • C. Mannion
    • 4
  • M. Philbin
    • 5
  1. 1.Quality, Audit and Risk Management Team, HSE-Dublin Mid LeinsterMidlands Regional Hospital MullingarMullingarIreland
  2. 2.UCD School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health SystemsUCD Health Sciences CentreDublinIreland
  3. 3.Pharmacy DepartmentWexford General HospitalWexfordIreland
  4. 4.Pharmacy DepartmentSt Lukes HospitalKilkennyIreland
  5. 5.Pharmacy DepartmentMidlands Regional Hospital TullamoreTullamoreIreland

Personalised recommendations