Advertisement

Small-scale Forestry

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 89–104 | Cite as

From Forests to Food Security: Pathways in Nepal’s Community Forestry

  • Rahul Karki
  • Krishna K. Shrestha
  • Hemant Ojha
  • Naya Paudel
  • Dil B. Khatri
  • Ian Nuberg
  • Anukram Adhikary
Research Paper

Abstract

There is an increasing recognition of the contribution of forests to food security of poor and marginalized people. However, empirical findings remain limited on how forests contribute to food security. Drawing on four case studies of community forestry in Nepal, this paper discusses pathways through which forests are contributing to food security needs of local communities. The evidence presented here was gathered through 4 years of action research and draws insights from the past 40 years of Nepal’s community forestry practice, which is often regarded as a successful case of conservation and development. It is shown that there are four distinct pathways through which community forests contribute to food security as a source of: (1) income and employment; (2) inputs to increase food production; (3) directly for food; and (4) renewable energy for cooking. Despite emerging pathways linking forest management to food systems at the local level, forestry policies and institutions have neither explicitly recognized nor strengthened the linkage between forest and food security. The paper highlights that there is a need for a fundamental shift in thinking from the conventional notion of ‘forests for soil conservation’ to ‘sustainable forest management for food security’.

Keywords

Food security Forest management practices Forest policy Forestry institutions Livelihood 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study draws on the findings from a research project entitled ‘Enhancing Livelihoods and Food Security from Agroforestry and Community Forestry in Nepal’, project FST/2011/076, also called EnLiFT (http://enliftnepal.org/), funded by the Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR). We are grateful to Tony Bartlett, ACIAR Forestry Program Manager, for his support throughout this project, and Madan Bashyal, Kamal Bhandari and Mitra Jirel for their support in field data collection. We would also like to express our gratitude to the local communities in the research sites for providing us with information in relation to this research.

References

  1. Adhikari J (2006) Land reform in Nepal: problems and prospects. NIDS and Development Fund, Norway, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  2. Adhikari J, Ojha H, Bhattarai B (2016) Edible forest? Rethinking Nepal’s forest governance in the era of food insecurity. Int For Rev 18(3):265–279Google Scholar
  3. Agarwal A, Jamnadass R, Kleinschmit D, Mcmullin S, Mansourian S, Neufeldt H, Parrotta JA, Sunderland T, Wildburger C (2015) Introduction: forests, trees and landscapes for food security and nutrition. In: Vira B, Wildburger C, Mansourian S (eds) Forests, trees and landscapes for food security and nutrition. IUFRO World series vol. 33, International Union for Forest Research OrganizationsGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrett CB (2010) Measuring food insecurity. Science 327(5967):825–828CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bharucha Z, Preety J (2010) The roles and values of wild foods in agricultural systems. Philos Trans R Soc Biol Sci 365(1554):2913–2926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Branney P, Yadav KP (1998) Changes in community forest condition and management 1994–1998: analysis of information from forest resources assessment study and socio-economic study in the Koshi hills. Nepal-UK Community Forestry Project Report G/NUKCFP/32. Kathmandu, NepalGoogle Scholar
  7. CBS (2009) Report on Nepal labor force survey. Central Bureau of Statistics, Government of Nepal, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  8. CBS (2011a) Nepal living standard survey 2010/2011: statistical report, vol I and II. Central Bureau of Statistics (CBS), KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  9. CBS (2011b) Poverty in Nepal 2010/11. Central Bureau of Statistics, Government of Nepal, NepalGoogle Scholar
  10. CBS (2014) Statistical pocket book Nepal 2014. Central Bureau of Statistics, Government of Nepal, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  11. Christensen M, Bhattarai S, Devkota S, Larson HO (2008) Collection and use of wild edible fungi in Nepal. Econ Bot 62(1):12–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. DFRS (2015) State of Nepal’s forests. Forest resource assessment (FRA) Nepal. Department of Forest Research and Survey, Government of Nepal, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  13. Dhakal B, Bigsby H, Cullen R (2005) Impacts of community forestry development on livestock based livelihood in Nepal. J For Livelihood 4(2):43–49Google Scholar
  14. Dhakal B, Bigsby H, Cullen R (2011) Forests for food security and livelihood sustainability: policy problems and opportunities for small farmers in Nepal. J Sustain Agric 35(1):85–115Google Scholar
  15. DoF (2015) Forest tenure status, issues and challenges in Nepal. Department of Forests, Babar Mahal, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  16. FAO (2006) Food security. Policy brief issue 2. Food and Agriculture Organization, RomeGoogle Scholar
  17. FAO (2010) Assessment of food security and nutrient situation in Nepal. Food and Agriculture Organization, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  18. FAO (2013) Towards food security and improved nutrition: increasing the contribution of forests and trees. Food and Agriculture Organization, RomeGoogle Scholar
  19. Gautam AP, Webb EL, Shivakoti GP, Zoebisch MA (2003) Land use dynamics and landscape change pattern in a mountain watershed in Nepal. Agr Ecosyst Environ 99(1–3):83–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Godfray CJ, Beddington JR, Crute IR, Haddad L, Lawrence D, Muir JF, Pretty J, Robinson S, Thomas SM, Toulmin C (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327(5967):812–818CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gregory PJ, George TS (2011) Feeding nine billion: the challenge to sustainable crop production. J Exp Bot 62(15):5233–5239CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gritten D, Greijmans M, Lewis SR, Sokchea T, Atkinson J, Quang TN, Poudyal B, Chapagain B, Sapkota LM, Mohns B, Paudel NS (2015) An uneven playing field: regulatory barriers to communities making a living from the timber from their forests-examples from Cambodia, Nepal and Vietnam. Forests 6(10):3433–3451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gurung A, Bista R, Karki R, Shrestha S, Uprety D, Oh SE (2013a) Community based forest management and its role in improving forest conditions in Nepal. Small Scale For 12(3):377–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gurung A, Karki R, Cho JS, Park KW, Oh SE (2013b) Roles of renewable energy technologies in improving rural energy situation in Nepal: gaps and opportunities. Energy Policy 62:1104–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guthman J (1997) Representing crisis: the theory of Himalayan environmental degradation and the project of development in post-Rana Nepal. Dev Change 28(1):45–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hobley M (1996) Participatory forestry: the process of change in India and Nepal. Rural Development Forestry Network, Overseas Development Institute, LondonGoogle Scholar
  27. Kanel KR, Niraula DR (2004) Can rural livelihood be improved in Nepal through community forestry? BankoJanakari 14:19–26Google Scholar
  28. Kanel KR, Shrestha K, Tuladhar AR, Regmi MR (2012) Demand and supply of wood products in different regions of Nepal. REDD Forestry and Climate Change Cell, Government of Nepal, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  29. Khatri DB, Shrestha KK, Ojha H, Paudel G, Paudel N, Pain A (2016) Reframing community forestry governance for food security in Nepal. Environ Conserv. doi: 10.1017/S0376892916000369 Google Scholar
  30. Mahapatra R (2001) Betrayed: Nepal’s forest bureaucracy prepares for the funeral of the much hailed community forest management programme. Down Earth 9(22):20–22Google Scholar
  31. Mahat TBS (1987) Forestry-farming linkages in the mountains. Occasional paper no 7. International Center for Integrated Mountain Development, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  32. Marquardt K, Khatri D, Pain A (2016) REDD+, forest transition, agrarian change and ecosystem services in the hills of Nepal. Hum Ecol. doi: 10.1007/s10745-016-9817-x Google Scholar
  33. MoFSC (2013) Persistence and change: review of 30 years of community forestry in Nepal. Ministry of Forest and Soil Conservation, Government of Nepal, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  34. Nagendra H (2002) Tenure and forest conditions: community forestry in the Nepal terai. Environ Conserv 29(4):530–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Neupane HR (2000) Factors that influence the poorer households benefit from community forests: an analysis of forest management and benefit sharing processes. Dissertation, The University of Reading, UKGoogle Scholar
  36. Nightingale A, Sharma JR (2014) Conflict resilience among community forestry user groups: experiences in Nepal. Disasters 38(3):517–539CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Ojha H, Persha L, Chhatre A (2009) Community forestry in Nepal: a policy innovation for local livelihoods. IFPRI discussion paper 00913Google Scholar
  38. Pandit BH, Thapa GB (2004) Poverty and resource degradation in Nepal. Soc Nat Resour 17(1):1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Paudel NS, Banjade MR, Dahal GR (2009) Community Forestry in changing context: emerging market opportunities and tenure rights. ForestAction and CIFOR, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  40. Paudel NS, Karki R, Paudel G, Ojha H, Shrestha KK (2014) Reframing the farm –forest interface: how can community forestry better address food security and livelihoods in Nepal? Paper presented during the 6th National Community Forestry Workshop Babarmahal, Kathmandu, pp 16–18Google Scholar
  41. Pender J (2004) Development pathways for hillsides and highlands: some lessons from Central America and East Africa. Food Policy 29(4):339–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pokharel B, Paudel D, Branney P, Khatri DB, Nurse M (2006) Reconstructing the concept of forest-based enterprise development in Nepal: towards a pro-poor approach. J For Livelihood 5(1):53–65Google Scholar
  43. Pokharel BK, Branney P, Nurse M, Malla YB (2007) Community forestry: conserving forests, sustaining livelihoods and strengthening democracy. J For Livelihood 6(2):8–19Google Scholar
  44. Reithmuller P (2003) The social impact of livestock: a developing country perspective. Anim Sci J 74(4):245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sapkota IP, Oden P (2008) Household characteristics and dependency of community forests in Terai of Nepal. Int J Soc For 1(2):123–144Google Scholar
  46. Sen A (1983) Poverty and famines: an essay of entitlement and deprivation. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shrestha PM, Dhillion S (2006) Diversity and traditional knowledge concerning wild food species in a locally managed forest in Nepal. Agrofor Syst 66(1):55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Springate-Baginski O, Blaikie P (2007) (eds) Forests, people and power: the political ecology of reform in South Asia. EarthScan Forestry Library. Earthscan, London and SterlingGoogle Scholar
  49. Subedi BP, Ghimire PL, Khanal SC, Gyawali S, Katwal P, Sthapit KR, Gauli K (2014) Potential of forestry sector in economic growth and development: short concept notes on five themes. Multi Stakeholder Forestry Programme, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  50. Tester M, Langridge P (2010) Breeding technologies to increase crop production in a changing world. Science 327(5967):818–822CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Thapa G, Weber KE (1995) Natural resource degradation in a small watershed in Nepal. Nat Resour Forum 19(4):285–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Thoms C (2008) Community control of resources and the challenge of improving local livelihoods: a critical examination of community forestry in Nepal. Geoforum 39(3):1452–1465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vira B, Wildburger C, Mansourian S (eds) (2015) Forests, trees and landscapes for food security and nutrition. IUFRO world series volume 33, Vienna, p 172Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Steve Harrison, John Herbohn 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.ForestAction NepalKathmanduNepal
  2. 2.University of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden
  4. 4.University of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations