Abstract
Increasingly, plantations for food, fiber and wood, are necessary to provide a growing world population. Agroforestry systems become more and more important, however these systems usually develop in marginal conditions, limited land, restricted funding, occasional technical support and above this, there is limited documentation and evaluation of innovated traditional systems in indigenous and small-scale contexts, which challenge forest scientists. The aim of this research was to assess the quality of trees in plots managed by Mayan indigenous farmers who planted agroforestry systems with fine wood species to increase the value of land and labor in localities with highly-marginal social conditions in Northern Chiapas, México. Twenty oldest plots were selected within a group of previously established plots (eight with improved fallow, six with shaded coffee and six with maize crop associated to trees) where forest inventories were carried out in nested 100 and 1000 m2-circular plots. In all plots tree diameter, height, quality indicators and the incidence of the pest Hypsipyla grandella were measured. Trees in the maize-associated-to-trees system are favored by the practices applied to annual crop during the first 3rd–5th years, a period in which they are free from the interference of other trees and benefit from favorable light conditions, weeding and a higher intensive care from the farmer while shaded coffee and improved fallow have higher tree densities and a more closed canopy condition than maize associated to trees. In consequence, maize associated to trees shows 68.1 % stems with good form; shaded coffee and improved fallow averaged 40.5 and 39.7 % of good quality stems, respectively; improved fallow exhibited a greater number of suppressed trees than shaded coffee and maize associated to trees (p < 0.0001). In addition, maize associated to trees showed the highest proportion of trees with commercial value with 56.9 %, followed by improved fallow with 28.2 %, and shaded coffee with 11.8 % (p < 0.0001); the rest were trees with domestic uses. However, maize associated to trees significantly result with high incidence of H. grandella probably due to the crown exposure. Timber volume averaged 92.9 ± 68.9 m3 for improved fallow, 77.3 ± 24.8 m3 for shaded coffee, and 52.5 ± 39.7 m3 for maize associated to trees. The value of the fine wood represents increment in income, variety of products and self-employment for households. Nonetheless, improved fallow and coffee plantations might benefit from the elimination of competitors from larger trees to favor promising immature ones and pruning, while maize crop associated to trees might benefit from opportune pruning for controlling the stem borer as well as tree replacement to achieve long term replacement and harvesting.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adekunle VAJ, Bakare Y (2004) Rural livelihood benefits from participation in the Taungya agroforestry system in Ondo State of Nigeria. Small-Scale Econ Manag Policy 3(1):131–138
Baynes J, Herbohn J, Gregorio N, Fernández J (2015) How useful are small stands of low quality timber? Small-Scale For 14:193–204
Bray DB, Merino LP (2005) La experiencia de las comunidades forestales en México. Mexico D. F. Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, Instituto Nacional de Ecología, Consejo Civil Mexicano para la Silvicultura Sostenible A. C., Ford Foundation. México. p 276
CATIE (2000) Parcelas permanentes de muestreo en bosque natural tropical, guía para el establecimiento y medición. Turrialba, Costa Rica, Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza (CATIE)
Chazdon LR (2014) The promise of tropical forest regeneration in an age of deforestation. The University of Chicago Press, London
De Sousa K, Detlefsen G, Melo E, Tobar D, Casanoves F (2015) Timber yield from smallholder agroforestry systems in Nicaragua and Honduras. Agrofor Syst. doi:10.1007/s10457-015-9846-2
Diemont SAW, Martin JF (2009) Lacandon Maya ecosystem management: sustainable design for subsistence and environmental restoration. Ecol Appl 19(1):254–266
Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations (FAO) (2014) State of the world’s forests: enhancing the socioeconomic benefits from forests. Food and Agriculture Organization of The United Nations, Rome, Italy (State of the World’s Forests)
Ford A, Nigh R (2015) The Maya forest garden. Eight millennia of sustainable cultivation of the tropical woodlands. Left Coast Press, Walnut 259p
Guariguata MR, Sáenz GP (2002) Post-logging acorn production and oak regeneration in a tropical montane forest, Costa Rica. For Ecol. Manag 167:285–293
Holbrook NM, Putz FW (1989) Influence of neighbors on tree form: effects of lateral shade and prevention of sway on the allometry of Liquidambar styraciflua (sweet gum). Am J Bot 76(12):1740–1749
Hutchinson ID (1981) Sarawak liberation thinning: background and initial analysis of performance. In: UNDP/FAO, Sarawak, Malaysia, p 121
Hutchinson ID (1993) Puntos de partida y muestreo diagnóstico para la silvicultura de bosques naturales del trópico húmedo. Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza, Turrialba
Hutchinson ID, Wadsworth FH (2006) Efectos de la liberación en un bosque secundario de Costa Rica. Recur Nat Ambiente, Costa Rica 46–47:152–157
Imo M (2009) Interactions amongst trees and crops in Taungya systems of western Kenya. Agrofor Syst 76:265–273
Kalame FB, Aidoo R, Nkem J, Ajayie OC, Kanninen M, Luukkanen O, Idinoba M (2011) Modified Taungya system in Ghana: a win-win practice for forestry and adaptation to climate change? Environ Sci Policy 14:519–530
Lamprecht H (1990) Silvicultura en los trópicos: los ecosistemas forestales en los bosques tropicales y sus especies arbóreas, posibilidades y métodos para un aprovechamiento sostenido. GTZ, Eschborn 340p
Mahroof RM, Hauxwell C, Edirisinghe JP, Watt AD, Newton AC (2002) Effects of artificial shade on attack by the mahogany shoot borer, Hypsipyla robusta (Moore). Agric For Entomol 4:283–292
Nyland RD (2002) Silviculture: concepts and applications, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York 682 p
Olvera-Vargas M, Moreno-Gómez S, Figueroa-Rangel B (1996) Sitios Permanentes para la Investigación Silvícola. Manual para su Establecimiento. Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara
Opuni-Frimpong E, Karnowky DF, Storer AJ, Cobbinah JR (2008) Silvicultural systems for plantation mahogany in Africa: influences of canopy shade on tree growth and pest damage. For Ecol Manag 255:328–333
Pérez-Salicrup DR, Esquivel R (2008) Tree infection by Hypsipyla grandella in Swietenia macrophylla and Cedrela odorata (Meliaceae) in Mexico’s southern Yucatan Peninsula. For Ecol Manag 255(2):324–327
SAS Institute Inc. (2008) SAS/STAT User’s Guide, Release 9.2 edn. SAS Institute, Cary
Segura M, Venegas G (1999) Tablas de volumen comercial con corteza para encino, roble y otras especies del bosque pluvial montano de la cordillera de Talamanca, Costa Rica. CATIE, Turrialba
Soto-Pinto L, Aguirre-Dávila CM (2015) Carbon stocks in organic coffee systems in Chiapas, Mexico. J Agric Sci 7(1):117–128
Soto-Pinto L, Armijo-Florentino C (2014) Changes in agroecosystem structure and function along a chronosequence of Taungya system in Chiapas, Mexico. J Agric Sci 6(11):37–57
Soto-Pinto L, Perfecto I, Castillo-Hernández J, Caballero-Nieto J (2000) Shade effect on coffee production at the northern tzeltal zone of the state of Chiapas, Mexico. Agric Ecosyst Environ 80(1–2):61–69
Soto-Pinto L, Villalvazo V, Jimenez-Ferrer G, Ramírez-Marcial N, Montoya G, Sinclair F (2007) The role of local knowledge in determining shade composition of multistrata coffee systems in Chiapas, Mexico. Biodiver Conserv 16:419–436
Soto-Pinto L, Anzueto-Martinez M, Mendoza J, Jiménez-Ferrer G, De Jong B (2010) Carbon sequestration through agroforestry in indigenous communities of Chiapas, Mexico. Agrofor Syst 78(1):39–51
Soto-Pinto L, Anzueto MM, Quechulpa (2011) El acahual mejorado. Un prototipo agroforestal. El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, San Cristóbal de las Casas
Soto-Pinto L, Castillo Santiago MA, Jiménez Ferrer G (2012) Agroforestry systems and local institutional development for preventing deforestation in Chiapas, Mexico. In: Moutinho P (ed) Deforestation around the world. InTech Open Access, Rijeka, pp 333–350
Soto-Pinto L, Anzueto-Martínez M (in press) Los acahuales mejorados. Una práctica agroforestal innovadora de los Maya Tseltales. In: Moreno Calles I, Vallejo Ramos M, Casas A, Toledo VM (eds) Manejo Etnoagroforestal en México. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Morelia, México
Tschakert P, Coomesb OT, Potvin C (2007) Indigenous livelihoods, slash-and-burn agriculture, and carbon stocks in Eastern Panama. Ecol Econ 60:807–820
Villegas Z, Peña-Claros M, Mostacedo M, Alarcón A, Licona JC, Leaño C, Pariona W, Choque U (2009) Silvicultural treatments enhance growth rates of future crop trees in a tropical dry forest. For Ecol Manag 258(6):971–977
Wadsworth FH, Zweede JC (2006) Liberation: acceptable production of tropical forest timber. For Ecol Manag 233:45–51
Wiersum KF (1997) Indigenous exploitation and management of tropical forest resources: an evolutionary continuum in forest-people interactions. Agric Ecosyst Environ 63:1–16
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the farmers from Muquenal, Jolcalcuala, Alan Kantajal and Cololteel in Municipality of Chilón, and Arroyo Palenque in the Municipality of Salto de Agua, Chiapas, Mexico. Thanks also go to the Cooperative Ambio for the accompaniment, to Emmanuel Valencia for geographical assistance, and financial support from the projects: “Proyecto Multidisciplinario y Transversal de Café”, supported by ECOSUR and “Diseño, construcción, equipamiento y puesta en marcha de un Centro Estatal de Innovación y Transferencia de Tecnología para el Desarrollo de la Caficultura Chiapaneca” (FOMIX 249930 Mexican National Council for Science and Technology-CONACYT).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pinto, L.S., Martínez, M.A., Zurimendi, P.M. et al. Tree Quality in Agroforestry Systems Managed by Small-Scale Mayan Farmers in Chiapas, Mexico. Small-scale Forestry 16, 103–118 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-016-9345-y
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-016-9345-y