Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Landowners Perceptions of Their Moral and Ethical Stewardship Responsibilities in New Brunswick, Canada, and Maine, USA

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Small-scale Forestry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The province of New Brunswick (NB), Canada and the state of Maine (ME), USA are heavily forested jurisdictions whose forests provide many social, ecological, and economic functions. Roughly a third of NB and ME’s forested land is owned by private, non-industrial owners [sometimes called family forests or woodlot owners]. The choices of thousands of individual parcel owners of forest land determine the fate of these ecosystems. Ownership of forest land implies a social contract between the landowners and the rest of society. Previous research has focused on utilitarian conceptions of land use such as landowner rights and motivations. This study contributes to the discussion by inviting small-scale forest landowners in NB and ME to articulate their notions of landowner responsibilities. Through qualitative methods, this study ascertains participants’ self-reported behaviors that indicate their overall attitudes about the responsibility of forestland ownership. Respondents from both NB and ME expressed strong sentiments toward using and/or managing their land in ways they considered beneficial to both themselves and to the ecosystems in which they are embedded, or as Leopold (A sand county almanac: and sketches here and there. Oxford University Press, New York, 1949) described, the biotic community. Results varied with regard to responsibility to other entities such as: their immediate families, wildlife and the public or broader society. The results offer insight into what and who influences landowners and, what they value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beckley TM, Boxall PC, Just LK, Wellstead AM (1999) Forest stakeholder attitudes and values: selected social-science contributions. Information report NOR-X-362. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Center, Edmonton

  • Birch WT (1986) Forest landowners of Maine, 1982. Resource. bull. NE-90. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Broomall

  • Bliss CJ (2003) Sustaining family forests in rural landscapes: rationale, challenges, and an illustration from Oregon, USA. Small Scale For Econ Manag Policy 2(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Boychuk Duchscher EJ, Morgan D (2004) Grounded theory: reflections on the emergence vs. forcing debate. J Adv Nurs 48(6):605–612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Broderick SH, Hadden KP et al (1994) The next generation’s forest: woodland owners’ attitudes toward estate planning and land preservation in Connecticut. North J Appl For 11:47–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler B (2008) Family forest owners of the United States, 2006. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-27. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newton Square

  • Butler BJ, Ma Z (2011) Family forest owner trends in the Northern United States. North J Appl For 28:13–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole HD, Grossman ZP (2002) The meaning of property rights: law versus economics. Land Econ 78(3):317–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree FB, Miller LW (1992) Primary care research: a multi-method typology and qualitative road map. In: Crabtree FB, Miller LW (eds) Doing qualitative research. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 3–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Floyd DF, Ritchie R, Rotherham T (2012) New approaches for private woodlots: re-framing the forest policy debate. Province of New Brunswick, Fredericton 48 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Freyfogle TE (1998) Bounded people, boundless land. In: Knight LR, Landres BP (eds) Stewardship across boundaries. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 15–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Freyfogle TE (2003) The land we share: private property and the common good. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Freyfogle TE (2007) On private property: finding common ground on the ownership of land. Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser GB (2002) Conceptualization: on theory and theorizing using grounded theory. Int J Qual Methods 1(2):1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Karp PJ (1993) A private property duty of stewardship: changing our land ethic. Environ Law 23:735–762

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall J (1999) Axial coding and the grounded theory controversy. West J Nurs Res 21(6):743–757

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krueckeberg AD (1995) The difficult character of property. J Am Plan Assoc 61(3):301–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1949) A sand county almanac: and sketches here and there. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson CB (1978) The meaning of property. In: Macpherson CB (ed) Property: mainstream and critical positions. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Maine Land Trust Network Land trusts in Maine (MLTN) Welcome. Web. 27 Aug 2010. http://www.mltn.org/trust_guide/index.php

  • Nadeau S, Beckley T, McKendy M, Keess H (2012) A snapshot of new brunswick non-industrial forest owners in 2011: attitudes, behaviour, stewardship and future prospects. New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources, Fredericton, NB, pp 1–91

  • Patton QM (1980) Qualitative evaluation methods. Sage, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin JH, Rubin SI (1995) Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlager E, Ostrom E (1992) Property-rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis. Land Econ 68(3):249–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivacek J, Crano W (1982) Vested interest as a moderator of attitude-behavior consistency. J Pers Soc Psychol 43:210–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small Woodland Owners Association of Maine [SWOAM] (2012) Accessed 15 Feb 2012. http://www.swoam.org/

  • Tuler S, Webler T (1999) Voices from the forest: what participants expect of a public participation process. Soc Nat Res 12:437–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vonhof S (2001) Of sticks and seesaws: private property and the stewardship of America’s lands and forests. Doctor of Philosophy Degree, State University of New York, pp 2–300

  • Walker D, Myrick F (2006) Grounded theory: an exploration of process and procedure. Qual Health Res 16(4):547–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Worrell R, Appleby MC (2000) Stewardship of natural resources: definition, ethical and practical aspects. J Agric Environ Ethics 12:263–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by a grant from the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of the federal government of Canada. We would also like to thank our generous research participants, Drs. Solange Nadeau and Don Floyd, and Tom Doak of the Small Woodlot Owners of Maine.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas M. Beckley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Quartuch, M.R., Beckley, T.M. Landowners Perceptions of Their Moral and Ethical Stewardship Responsibilities in New Brunswick, Canada, and Maine, USA. Small-scale Forestry 12, 437–460 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-012-9222-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-012-9222-2

Keywords

Navigation