Abstract
The province of New Brunswick (NB), Canada and the state of Maine (ME), USA are heavily forested jurisdictions whose forests provide many social, ecological, and economic functions. Roughly a third of NB and ME’s forested land is owned by private, non-industrial owners [sometimes called family forests or woodlot owners]. The choices of thousands of individual parcel owners of forest land determine the fate of these ecosystems. Ownership of forest land implies a social contract between the landowners and the rest of society. Previous research has focused on utilitarian conceptions of land use such as landowner rights and motivations. This study contributes to the discussion by inviting small-scale forest landowners in NB and ME to articulate their notions of landowner responsibilities. Through qualitative methods, this study ascertains participants’ self-reported behaviors that indicate their overall attitudes about the responsibility of forestland ownership. Respondents from both NB and ME expressed strong sentiments toward using and/or managing their land in ways they considered beneficial to both themselves and to the ecosystems in which they are embedded, or as Leopold (A sand county almanac: and sketches here and there. Oxford University Press, New York, 1949) described, the biotic community. Results varied with regard to responsibility to other entities such as: their immediate families, wildlife and the public or broader society. The results offer insight into what and who influences landowners and, what they value.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11842-012-9222-2/MediaObjects/11842_2012_9222_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11842-012-9222-2/MediaObjects/11842_2012_9222_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11842-012-9222-2/MediaObjects/11842_2012_9222_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11842-012-9222-2/MediaObjects/11842_2012_9222_Fig4_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beckley TM, Boxall PC, Just LK, Wellstead AM (1999) Forest stakeholder attitudes and values: selected social-science contributions. Information report NOR-X-362. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Center, Edmonton
Birch WT (1986) Forest landowners of Maine, 1982. Resource. bull. NE-90. United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station, Broomall
Bliss CJ (2003) Sustaining family forests in rural landscapes: rationale, challenges, and an illustration from Oregon, USA. Small Scale For Econ Manag Policy 2(1):1–8
Boychuk Duchscher EJ, Morgan D (2004) Grounded theory: reflections on the emergence vs. forcing debate. J Adv Nurs 48(6):605–612
Broderick SH, Hadden KP et al (1994) The next generation’s forest: woodland owners’ attitudes toward estate planning and land preservation in Connecticut. North J Appl For 11:47–52
Butler B (2008) Family forest owners of the United States, 2006. Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-27. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Research Station, Newton Square
Butler BJ, Ma Z (2011) Family forest owner trends in the Northern United States. North J Appl For 28:13–18
Cole HD, Grossman ZP (2002) The meaning of property rights: law versus economics. Land Econ 78(3):317–330
Crabtree FB, Miller LW (1992) Primary care research: a multi-method typology and qualitative road map. In: Crabtree FB, Miller LW (eds) Doing qualitative research. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 3–28
Floyd DF, Ritchie R, Rotherham T (2012) New approaches for private woodlots: re-framing the forest policy debate. Province of New Brunswick, Fredericton 48 pp
Freyfogle TE (1998) Bounded people, boundless land. In: Knight LR, Landres BP (eds) Stewardship across boundaries. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 15–37
Freyfogle TE (2003) The land we share: private property and the common good. Island Press, Washington, DC
Freyfogle TE (2007) On private property: finding common ground on the ownership of land. Beacon Press, Boston
Glaser GB (2002) Conceptualization: on theory and theorizing using grounded theory. Int J Qual Methods 1(2):1–31
Karp PJ (1993) A private property duty of stewardship: changing our land ethic. Environ Law 23:735–762
Kendall J (1999) Axial coding and the grounded theory controversy. West J Nurs Res 21(6):743–757
Krueckeberg AD (1995) The difficult character of property. J Am Plan Assoc 61(3):301–310
Leopold A (1949) A sand county almanac: and sketches here and there. Oxford University Press, New York
Macpherson CB (1978) The meaning of property. In: Macpherson CB (ed) Property: mainstream and critical positions. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp 1–15
Maine Land Trust Network Land trusts in Maine (MLTN) Welcome. Web. 27 Aug 2010. http://www.mltn.org/trust_guide/index.php
Nadeau S, Beckley T, McKendy M, Keess H (2012) A snapshot of new brunswick non-industrial forest owners in 2011: attitudes, behaviour, stewardship and future prospects. New Brunswick Department of Natural Resources, Fredericton, NB, pp 1–91
Patton QM (1980) Qualitative evaluation methods. Sage, Beverly Hills
Rubin JH, Rubin SI (1995) Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data. Sage, Thousand Oaks
Schlager E, Ostrom E (1992) Property-rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis. Land Econ 68(3):249–262
Sivacek J, Crano W (1982) Vested interest as a moderator of attitude-behavior consistency. J Pers Soc Psychol 43:210–304
Small Woodland Owners Association of Maine [SWOAM] (2012) Accessed 15 Feb 2012. http://www.swoam.org/
Tuler S, Webler T (1999) Voices from the forest: what participants expect of a public participation process. Soc Nat Res 12:437–453
Vonhof S (2001) Of sticks and seesaws: private property and the stewardship of America’s lands and forests. Doctor of Philosophy Degree, State University of New York, pp 2–300
Walker D, Myrick F (2006) Grounded theory: an exploration of process and procedure. Qual Health Res 16(4):547–559
Worrell R, Appleby MC (2000) Stewardship of natural resources: definition, ethical and practical aspects. J Agric Environ Ethics 12:263–277
Acknowledgments
This research was funded by a grant from the Social Science and Humanities Research Council of the federal government of Canada. We would also like to thank our generous research participants, Drs. Solange Nadeau and Don Floyd, and Tom Doak of the Small Woodlot Owners of Maine.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Quartuch, M.R., Beckley, T.M. Landowners Perceptions of Their Moral and Ethical Stewardship Responsibilities in New Brunswick, Canada, and Maine, USA. Small-scale Forestry 12, 437–460 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-012-9222-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-012-9222-2