Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Characterization of nonindustrial private forest owners and their influence on forest management aims and practices in Northern Spain

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Small-scale Forestry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Explaining and predicting nonindustrial private forest (NIPF) owner land management based on social, economic, and environmental factors is an increasingly important issue in policy arenas and academic research on rural development and planning. This study empirically explores and assesses management behavior by NIPF owners by analyzing attributes of landowner profile (age, educational level, primary occupation, engagement in farming, membership of professional groups, training in forestry, availability of market information, and specific knowledge and use of production criteria for timber harvesting). With the aim of predicting outcomes, a multiple regression model was constructed to investigate and quantify the probabilities of and factors influencing the participation of owners in agricultural and forestry associations. In March 2004, 103 resident forest landowners were interviewed about their commitment to and involvement in land management during 1999–2003 in Mariña Oriental, a forest region of Galicia, Northern Spain. Results suggest that professional occupation, particularly farming background, is the main factor affecting, either directly or indirectly, the forest management behavior of NIPF owners in the area. In particular, our logistic regression model for landowner membership of professional groups explained 77.9% of the variability observed in the study population, which suggests that the agricultural background of NIPF owners and their expectations from forests, represented by their future intention to enlarge the forestland base, play an important role in membership. In the region, forestry could be a valuable economic activity but it is not considered as such today. Findings could be used as a guide for design, planning, and implementation of research and policy measures that allow NIPF landowners to promote sustainable forestry for rural development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amacher GS, Conway MC, Sullivan J (2003) Econometric analyses of nonindustrial forest landowners: is there anything left to study? J For Econ 9:137–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Arano KG, Munn IA (2006) Evaluating forest management intensity: a comparison among major forestland owner types. For Policy Econ 9:237–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Arano KG, Munn IA, Gunter JE, Bullard SH, Doolitle ML (2004) Comparison between regenerators and non-regenerators in Mississippi: a discriminant analysis. South J Appl For 22(2):132–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Beach RH, Pattanayak SK, Yang J, Murray BC, Abt RC (2005) Econometric studies of non-industrial private forest management a review and synthesis. For Policy Econ 7:261–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Beiras-Torrado XM (1975) A emigración: o seu papel na dinámica da formación social. In: García-Sabell D (ed) A Galicia rural na encrucillada. Vigo, Spain, pp 39–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolkesjø TF, Baardsen S (2002) Roundwood supply in Norway: micro-level analysis of self-employed forest owners. For Policy Econ 4:55–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolkesjø TF, Solberg B, Wangen KR (2007) Heterogeneity in nonindustrial private roundwood supply: lessons from a large panel of forest owners. J For Econ 13:7–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Boon TE, Meilby H (2007) Describing management attitudes to guide forest policy implementation. Small-Scale For 6(1):79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler BJ, Swenson JJ, Alig RJ (2004) Forest fragmentation in the Pacific Northwest: quantification and correlations. For Ecol Manag 189:363–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao-Abad R (2002) Análisis multivariante. Curso de postgrado en estadística aplicada. University of A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway MC, Amacher GS, Sullivan BJ (2003) Decisions non-industrial forest landowners make: an empirical examination. J For Econ 9:181–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis D (1990) A profit analysis of the harvest decision using pooled time-series and cross-sectional data. J Environ Econ Manag 18:176–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewees PA (1992) Social and economic incentives for smallholder tree growing: a case study from Muranga District, Kenya. Community forestry case study series 5, FAO, Rome

  • Doolittle L, Straka TJ (1987) Regeneration following harvest on nonindustrial private lands in the south: a diffusion of innovations perspective. South J Appl For 11(1):37–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Finley AO (2002) Assessing private forest landowners’ attitudes towards, and ideas for, cross-boundary cooperation in western Massachusetts. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 28pp

  • Gunter JE, Bullard SH, Doolitle ML, Arano KG (2001) Reforestation of harvested timberlands in Mississippi: behaviour and attitudes of non-industrial private forest landowners. Mississippi State University, Mississippi, 25 pp

  • Hardie IW, Parks PJ (1996) Program enrolment and acreage response to reforestation cost-sharing programs. Land Econ 72:248–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbohn J (2001) Prospects for small-scale forestry in Australia. In: Niskanen A, Väyrynen J (eds) Economic sustainability of small-scale forestry. European Forest Institute, Finland, EFI Proceedings No. 36, pp 9–20

  • Hodges DG, Cubbage FW (1990) Adoption behaviour of technical assistance foresters in the Southern Pine Region. For Sci 36(3):516–530

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (2000) Applied logistic regression, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hugosson M, Ingemarson F (2004) Objectives and motivations of small-scale forest owners: theoretical modeling and qualitative assessment. Silva Fennica 38(3):217–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyberg B, Holthausen D (1989) The behavior of non-industrial private forest landowners. Can J For Res 19:1014–1023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INE (1999) Agrarian census. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Madrid, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • INE (2004) Consumer Price Index. Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Madrid, Spain. DIALOG, http://www.ine.es/daco/ipc.htm. Accessed 6 Dec 2004

  • Ingemarson F, Lindhagen A, Eriksson L (2006) A typology of small-scale private forest owners in Sweden. Scand J For Res 21(3):249–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karppinen H (1998) Values and objectives of non-industrial private forest owners in Finland. Silva Fennica 32(1):43–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Kittredge DB (2005) The cooperation of private forest owners on scales larger than one individual property: international examples and potential application in the United States. For Policy Econ 7:671–688

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline JD, Butler BJ, Alig RJ (2002) Tree planting in the South: what does the future hold? South J Appl For 26(2):99–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurttila M, Hamalainen K, Kajanus M, Pesonen M (2001) Non-industrial private forest owners’ attitudes towards the operational environment of forestry - a multinomial logit model analysis. For Policy Econ 2(1):13–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuuluvainen J, Salo J (1991) Timber supply and life cycle harvest of non-industrial private forest owners: an empirical analysis of the Finnish case. For Sci 37:1011–1029

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuuluvainen J, Karppinen H, Ovaskainen V (1996) Landowner objectives and non-industrial private timber supply. For Sci 4:300–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindroos O, Lidestav G, Nordfjell T (2005) Swedish non-industrial private forest owners: a survey of self-employment and equipment investments. Small-Scale For 4(4):409–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Löyland K, Kringstad V, Öy H (1995) Determinants of forest activities - a study of private non-industrial forestry in Norway. J For Econ 1(2):219–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahapatra AK, Mitchell CP (2001) Classifying tree planters and non planters in a subsistence farming system using a discriminant analytical approach. Agrofor Syst 54:41–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marey-Pérez MF (2003) Tenencia de la tierra en Galicia: modelo para la caracterización de los propietarios forestales. PhD thesis, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 633 pp

  • Marey-Pérez MF, Rodríguez-Vicente V (2008) Forest transition in Northern Spain: local responses on large-scale programmes of field-afforestation. Land Use Policy 26(1):139–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marey-Pérez MF, Rodríguez-Vicente V, Crecente-Maseda R (2004) El monte en Galicia en el siglo XXI: Balance evolutivo y consideraciones para el futuro. In: Maya-Frades A (ed) ¿Qué futuro para los espacios rurales?. University of León, León, Spain, pp 117–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Marey-Pérez MF, Rodríguez-Vicente V, Crecente-Maseda R (2006) Using GIS to measure changes in the temporal and spatial dynamics of forestland: experiences from north-west Spain. Forestry 79(4):409–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MMA (1998) III Inventario Forestal de España. Dirección General de Conservación de la Naturaleza, Ministerio de Medio Ambiente. Madrid, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen A, Pettenella D, Slee B (2007) Barriers and opportunities for the development of small-scale forest enterprises in Europe. Small-Scale For 6(4):331–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattanayak SK, Murray BC, Abt R (2002) How joint in joint forest production: an econometric analysis of timber supply conditional on endogenous amenity values. For Sci 48(3):479–491

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter-Witter K (2005) A cross-sectional analysis of Michigan non-industrial private forest landowners. South J Appl For 22(2):132–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Prestemon J, Wear D (2000) Linking harvest choices to timber supply. For Sci 46(3):377–389

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross-Davis AL, Broussard SR, Jacobs DF, Davis AS (2005) Afforestation motivations of private landowners: and examination of hardwood tree plantings in Indiana. North J Appl For 22(3):149–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan TP (1997) Modern regression methods. Wiley, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Størdal S, Lien G, Baardsen S (2008) Analyzing determinants of forest owners’ decision-making using a sample selection framework. J For Econ 14:159–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Straka TJ, Doolittle S (1988) Propensity of nonindustrial private forest landowners to regenerate following harvest: relationship to socioeconomic characteristics, including innovativeness. Resour Manag Optim 6(2):121–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Sukhatme PU (1953) Sampling theory of surveys. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gossum P, De Maeyer W (2007) Performance of forest groups in achieving multifunctional forestry in Flanders. Small-Scale For 5(1):19–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gossum P, Luyssaert S, Serbruyns I, Mortier F (2005) Forest groups as support to private forest owners in developing close-to-nature management. For Policy Econ 7:589–601

    Google Scholar 

  • Wear D, Parks P (1994) The economics of timber supply: an analytical synthesis of modelling approaches. Nat Resour Modell 8(3):199–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Flick W (2001) Sticks, carrots and reforestation investment. Land Econ 77(3):443–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang D, Mehmood SR (2001) Predicting non-industrial private forest landowners’ choice of a forester for harvesting and tree planting assistance in Alabama. South J Appl For 25(3):101–107

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Galician Sectorial Forestry Association (ASEFOGA), Doutor Maceira 13-baixo, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain

    Verónica Rodríguez-Vicente

  2. Department of Agroforestry Engineering, University of Santiago de Compostela, Campus Universitario s/n, 27002, Lugo, Spain

    Manuel F. Marey-Pérez

Authors
  1. Verónica Rodríguez-Vicente
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Manuel F. Marey-Pérez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Verónica Rodríguez-Vicente.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 7.

Table 7 Definition of the study variables for statistical analyses
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rodríguez-Vicente, V., Marey-Pérez, M.F. Characterization of nonindustrial private forest owners and their influence on forest management aims and practices in Northern Spain. Small-scale Forestry 8, 479–513 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-009-9097-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-009-9097-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation