Skip to main content
Log in

Iron Oxide Ore Mineralogy and Its Plant Flotation Circuits Nodal Analysis Simulation and Comparison

  • Technical Article
  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mining operations usually provide ore of varying characteristics. At the Donganshan Sintering Plant, the ore is a low-grade, complex, hard-to-separate carbonate containing iron ore, and a two-step flotation circuit was previously developed to overcome the negative impact of the carbonates on the reverse flotation process. However, with the further expansion in the mining operations, it was difficult to maintain a highly efficient flotation process. Thus, the mineral liberation analyzer (MLA) was utilized to conduct an in-depth process mineralogy investigation. MLA showed that the main useful minerals in this ore are magnetite/hematite of 45% total iron, and the main gangue mineral is quartz of 29.97%, followed by 2.55% chlorite and 1.48% ankerite with about 0.03% siderite. Accordingly, flotation circuit modification was mandatory by eliminating the direct flotation process used prior to reverse flotation. Therefore, two-step and reverse flotation circuits were balanced using nodal simulation, and the two circuits produced 48.91% and 49.45% yield, 65.03% and 65.22% total iron grade, and 70.96% and 72.08% total iron recovery, respectively. Thus, reverse flotation is comparable with two-step flotation by 0.54%, 0.19%, and 1.12% higher yield, grade, and recovery, respectively. In addition, the process flow sheet was not only simplified but it also enhanced the performance with reduced reagent consumption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to institutional roles and confidential conditions but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. A. Pattanaik, and R. Venugopal, Colloid Interface Sci. Commun. 25, 41 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Li, Z. Zhang, L. Li, Z. Zhang, J. Chen, and T. Yao, Ore Geol. Rev. 57, 264 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. R3: Seven countries with the largest iron ore reserves in the world in 2019 [WWW Document], n.d. https://www.nsenergybusiness.com/features/world-iron-ore-reserves-countries/. Accessed 2 Jan 2023.

  4. Q. Jia, F. Li, and Y. Qu, Appl. Mech. Mater. 303–306, 2559 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Y. Zhao, C. Feng, and D. Li, Acta Geologica Sin. English Edn. 88, 1895 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D. Li, W. Yin, J. Yao, A. Ji, J. Xue, and Y. Fu, Jinshu Kuangshan/Metal Mine 51 (2016). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312372725_Classification_Flotation_of_Donganshan_Siderite-containing_Hematite_Ore

  7. L. Li, W. Yin, D. Feng, and B. Zhang, Adv. Mat. Res. 455–456, 91 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. Montes, and G. Montes Atenas, Miner. Eng. 18, 1032 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. W.Z. Yin, Y.X. Han, and F. Xie, J. Cent. S Univ. Technol. 2010(17), 750 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. X. Zhang, X. Gu, Y. Han, N. Parra-Álvarez, V. Claremboux, and S.K. Kawatra, Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 42, 184 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. G. Fan, L. Wang, Y. Cao, and C. Li, Minerals https://doi.org/10.3390/min10080681 (2020).

  12. L.O. Filippov, K. Silva, A. Piçarra, N. Lima, I. Santos, L. Bicalho, I.V. Filippova, and A.E.C. Peres, Minerals 11, 699 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. K. Silva, L.O. Filippov, A. Piçarra, I.V. Flilippova, N. Lima, A. Skliar, L. Faustino, and L.L. Filho, Miner. Eng. 170, 107004 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Hou, A. Sobhy, and Y. Wang, Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 57, 284 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Hou, and A. Sobhy, Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process. 58, 37 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. Tao, Z. Wu, and A. Sobhy, Powder Technol. 379, 12 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Sobhy, Z. Wu, and D. Tao, Miner. Eng. 163, 106799 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. D. Zhang, and X. Gao, J. Manuf. Syst. 63, 238 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmed Sobhy.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hou, Y., Sobhy, A. & Abdel Aziz, S. Iron Oxide Ore Mineralogy and Its Plant Flotation Circuits Nodal Analysis Simulation and Comparison. JOM 75, 4771–4781 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-023-06122-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-023-06122-9

Navigation