Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparative Experimental Study on Copper Slag Valence-Controlled and its Synergistic High-Activity Copper Preparation Deep Dechlorination Method in the Ultrasonic Field

  • Technical Article
  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the high chloride ion concentration will have a serious impact on the zinc electrolysis process, the copper slag price adjustment method for dechlorination and the copper slag price adjustment synergistic high-activity copper deep dechlorination method are proposed, and a comparative experimental study is carried out. The single-stage chloride ion removal rate of the copper slag valence adjustment method was 86.1%, and the copper slag valence adjustment was synergistic with the deep dechlorination of highly active copper. This method can increase the chloride ion removal effect to 92.43%. Both can reduce the chloride ion concentration to below 100 mg/L, while the latter can reduce the chloride ion concentration to 30 mg/L due to the high activity of copper. Under ultrasonic condition, the removal rate of chloride ion can be further increased to 96.6%, and the chloride ion can be reduced to less than 20 mg/L, to achieve the effect of deep dechlorination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Mechili, C. Vaitsis, N. Argirusis, P.K. Pandis, G. Sourkouni, and C. Argirusis, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 156, 111970 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. I. Daigo, S. Osako, Y. Adachi, and Y. Matsuno, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 82, 35–40 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. X. Zhang, Y. Hu, Z. Xia, X. Zhao, Z. Zhou, and L. Ye, Sep. Purif. Technol. 283, 120221 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. E. Rudnik, Miner. Eng. 139, 105871 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. H.-F. Xiao, Q. Chen, H. Cheng, X.-M. Li, W.-M. Qin, B.-S. Chen, D. Xiao, and W.-M. Zhang, J. Membr. Sci. 537, 111–118 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. W. Liu, L. Lü, Y. Lu, X. Hu, and B. Liang, Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 27, 1037–1043 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R. Raghavan, P.K. Mohanan, and S.K.J.H. Verma, ScienceDirect 51, 187–206 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  8. I. Mazurek, A. Skawińska, and M. Sajdak, J. Energy Inst. 94, 337–351 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. W. Dou, X. Peng, L. Kong, and X. Hu, Sci. Total Environ. 824, 153909 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Cheng, H.-F. Xiao, Q. Chen, X.-M. Li, W.-M. Qin, B.-S. Chen, D. Xiao, and W.-M. Zhang, J. Membr. Sci. 563, 142–148 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Z.-Y. Guo, T. Lei, W. Li, H.-L. Luo, S.-H. Ju, J.-H. Peng, and L.-B. Zhang, Chem. Eng. Process. 92, 67–73 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Liu, Y.-Y. Wang, L.-Y. Chai, H.-J. Xiao, F. Pei, and Y.-D. Shu, Trans. Nonferrous Metals Soc. China 21, 1665–1672 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. E. Rudnik, and E. Bayaraa, Hydrometallurgy 159, 110–119 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. X. Wu, Z. Liu, and X. Liu, Hydrometallurgy 134–135, 62–65 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. K.F. Cao, Z. Chen, Y.H. Wu, Y. Mao, Q. Shi, X.W. Chen, Y. Bai, K. Li, and H.Y. Hu, Water Res. 215, 118271 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. M. Nicol, C. Akilan, V. Tjandrawan, and J.A. Gonzalez, Hydrometallurgy 173, 125–133 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. C. Bolognesi, and G. Morasso, Trends Food Sci. Technol. 11, 182–187 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S.S. Raut, S.P. Kamble, and P.S. Kulkarni, Chemosphere 159, 359–366 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Deepti, A. Sinha, P. Biswas, S. Sarkar, U. Bora, and M.K. Purkait, J. Water Process Eng. 33, 101108 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. I. Ali, Z.A. Alothman, and A. Alwarthan, J. Mol. Liq. 241, 123–129 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. T.A. Khan, M. Nazir, I. Ali, and A. Kumar, Arab. J. Chem. 10, S2388–S2398 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. W. Liu, Z. Xiong, H. Liu, Q. Zhang, and G. Liu, China Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 216, 147–154 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. T.A. Saleh, and V.K. Gupta, Sep. Purif. Technol. 89, 245–251 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. D. Wang, R. Zhu, J. Lou, J. Yuan, J. Xu, and X. Fan, J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 9, 106434 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Y. Li, Z. Yang, K. Yang, J. Wei, Z. Li, C. Ma, X. Yang, T. Wang, G. Zeng, G. Yu, Z. Yu, and C. Zhang, Sci. Total Environ. 821, 153174 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. W. Liu, R. Zhang, Z. Liu, and C. Li, Hydrometallurgy 160, 147–151 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. X. Wang, Y. Du, H. Yang, S. Tian, Q. Ge, S. Huang, and M. Wang, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 93, 170–175 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. X. Hu, F. Zhu, L. Kong, and X. Peng, J. Hazard. Mater. 410, 124540 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. H. Li, L. Zhu, S. Wu, Y. Liu, and K. Shih, Int. J. Coal Geol. 170, 69–76 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. D.K. Kozlica, A. Kokalj, and I. Milošev, Corros. Sci. 182, 109082 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. P. Cornette, S. Zanna, A. Seyeux, D. Costa, and P. Marcus, Corros. Sci. 174, 108837 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. S. Liu, X. Jiang, G.I.N. Waterhouse, Z.-M. Zhang, and L.-M. Yu, J. Electroanal. Chem. 897, 115558 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. G. Dong, B. Du, L. Liu, W. Zhang, Y. Liang, H. Shi, and W. Wang, Appl. Surf. Sci. 399, 86–94 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China Regional Foundation (No. 52264050), Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Key Project (No. 202201AS070031), 2022 The central government guides the local “development of key technologies for clean and efficient utilization of copper resources” project and Yunnan Province Top young talents of The Ten Thousand Project. The authors are grateful for The Central Government Guides Local Science and Technology Development Plans (No. 202107AA110002), the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2019YFC1904204), Kunming Key Laboratory of Special Metallurgy, Kunming Academician Workstation of Advanced Preparation for Super hard Materials Field, Kunming Academician Workstation of Metallurgical Process Intensification, and Yunnan Chihong Zinc Germanium Co., Ltd. Non-ferrous Metal Electrodeposition Technology Provincial Innovation Team.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China Regional Foundation (No. 52264050). 2022 The central government guides the local “development of key technologies for clean and efficient utilization of copper resources” project. Yunnan Provincial Science and Technology Key Project (No. 202201AS070031). The Central Government Guides Local Science and Technology Development Plans (No. 202107AA110002).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Metallurgical and Energy Engineering, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650093, China

    Jiayao He, Jing Li & Shuai Wang

  2. Kunming Key Laboratory of Special Metallurgy, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650093, China

    Jiayao He, Jing Li & Shuai Wang

  3. State Key Laboratory of Complex Nonferrous Metal Resources Clean Utilization, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650093, Yunnan, China

    Jiayao He, Jing Li & Shuai Wang

  4. National Local Joint Laboratory of Engineering Application of Microwave Energy and Equipment Technology, Kunming, 650093, Yunnan, China

    Jiayao He, Jing Li & Shuai Wang

  5. Key Laboratory of Unconventional Metallurgy, Ministry of Education, Kunming, 650093, China

    Jiayao He, Jing Li & Shuai Wang

Authors
  1. Jiayao He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jing Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Shuai Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, J., Li, J. & Wang, S. Comparative Experimental Study on Copper Slag Valence-Controlled and its Synergistic High-Activity Copper Preparation Deep Dechlorination Method in the Ultrasonic Field. JOM 75, 3097–3104 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-023-05851-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-023-05851-1

Search

Navigation