Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Safety and Workflow Considerations for Modern Metal Additive Manufacturing Facilities

  • Additive Manufacturing: Striving Toward Quality Control
  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is a strong desire within the metal additive manufacturing industry to immediately leverage research discoveries to improve process and part quality. Rapid transfer of knowledge from a university setting to a factory floor is greatly enhanced if researchers have direct access to the same type of equipment being used by industry. Challengingly, the operation of much of this equipment requires specially designed facilities—the specifications for which are not well reported in the prior literature. Informed by their recent experience of constructing a new metal additive manufacturing research laboratory, the authors enumerate many of the design challenges they faced and the solutions they implemented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Often classified as flammable solids.12

  2. This value is based on a conservative interpretation of guidelines from the National Fire Protection Agency.14

  3. Provided that such enclosures remain non-flammable.

  4. Because many AM machines reject significant amounts of heat into the surrounding area via chillers, more substantial air conditioning resources may need to be allocated than is typical for a similarly sized laboratory.

References

  1. P. Zelinski, Additive manufacturing belongs in a machine shop (Modern Machine Shop, 2017), http://www.mmsonline.com/articles/additive-manufacturing-belongs-in-a-machine-shop. Accessed 6 Aug 2017.

  2. R.E. Laureijs, J. Bonnín Roca, S. Prabha Narra, C. Montgomery, J.L. Beuth, and E.R.H. Fuchs, J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4035420.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Bourell, M. Leu, and D. Rosen, Roadmap for additive manufacturing: identifying the future of freeform processing (The University of Texas at Austin, 2009), http://wohlersassociates.com/roadmap2009A.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2017.

  4. S. Moylan, K. Jurrens, S. Moylan, A. Cooke, and K. Jurrens, Lessons learned in establishing the NIST metal additive manufacturing laboratory (The National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2013) https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/TechnicalNotes/NIST.TN.1801.pdf. Accessed 2 Aug 2017.

  5. P. Azimi, D. Zhao, C. Pouzet, N.E. Crain, and B. Stephens, Environ. Sci. Technol. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12498.

    Google Scholar 

  6. C. Hamby, Unchecked dust explosions kill, injure hundreds of workers (The Center for Public Integrity, 2012), https://www.publicintegrity.org/2012/05/29/8957/unchecked-dust-explosions-kill-injure-hundreds-workers. Accessed 4 Aug 2017.

  7. Safety data sheet EOS Ti64/Ti64ELI (EOS GmbH, 2015).

  8. A. Hall, Powder safety awareness for additive manufacturing (Sandia National Laboratories, 2014), https://www.osti.gov/scitech/servlets/purl/1242062. Accessed 4 Aug 2017.

  9. Safety data sheet EOS In625 (EOS GmbH, 2012).

  10. P. Graff, B. Ståhlbom, E. Nordenberg, A. Graichen, P. Johansson, and H. Karlsson, J. Ind. Ecol. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12498.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Special detailed requirements based on use and occupancy: hazardous materials §414.2 (International Building Code, 2006).

  12. Use and occupancy classification: high-hazard group H §307 (International Building Code, 2009).

  13. I. Wolff, Breathing safely around metal 3D printers (AdditiveManufacturing.org, 2016), http://advancedmanufacturing.org/breathing-safely-around-metal-3d-printers/. Accessed 4 Aug 2017.

  14. NFPA 400: hazardous materials code (National Fire Protection Agency, 2016).

  15. Immersion Separator and Wet Vacuums (Ruwac, 2016), http://explosionproofvacuums.com/products/immersion-separators-a-wet-collection. Accessed 13 Aug 2017.

  16. Safety data sheet ExOne aqueous binder 05 (ExOne, 2015).

  17. R.J. Hebert, J. Mater. Sci. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-9479-x.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Technology overview (ExOne, 2018), http://www.exone.com/Resources/Technology-Overview. Accessed 4 Jan 2018.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Ideas for the design of the NextManufacturing Center’s Additive Manufacturing Laboratory originated from a variety of sources. In particular the authors would like to thank the following individuals for their contributions: Tara Balonick, Debomita Basu, Dr. Brian Fisher, Dr. Zachary Francis, Jeffery Harris, Dr. Colt Montgomery, Dr. Sneha Prabha Narra, Michael Patrick, Prof. Allen Robinson, and Edward Wojciechowski of CMU; Mick McNutt of GBBN Architects; Joseph Gaus, A.J. Kryzosiak, and Carl Thieret of CJL Engineering; Mark Rayburn and Kevin Shaffer of Rycon Construction; and Cliff Humes, Bob Kappas, Tim Kunz, and Bob Oddis of various sub-contractors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luke Scime.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Scime, L., Wolf, S.D., Beuth, J. et al. Safety and Workflow Considerations for Modern Metal Additive Manufacturing Facilities. JOM 70, 1830–1834 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-018-2971-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-018-2971-4

Navigation