Advertisement

JOM

, Volume 70, Issue 8, pp 1616–1621 | Cite as

Recovery of Gold and Silver from Secondary Sources of Electronic Waste Processing by Thiourea Leaching

  • Hyunju Lee
  • Emily Molstad
  • Brajendra Mishra
Technical Communication
  • 138 Downloads

Abstract

Fine materials, such as flue dust, generated during processing of electronic waste (e-waste) contain valuable metal resources, such as Au and Ag. However, recovery of valuable metals from this flue dust has not been extensively studied. In this study, a leaching process was investigated for effective recovery of Au and Ag from flue dust. In particular, thiourea was used as leaching reagent to replace cyanide, which has environmental problems. The effects of various parameters on the process, such as leaching time (1–10 h), thiourea concentration (20–60 g/L), and pulp density (20–100 g/L) as well as reaction temperature (20–60°C), were systematically examined. One- and two-step leaching methods were proposed to recover Au and Ag, respectively. Au and Ag leaching efficiencies of about 90% and 100% were obtained by one-step thiourea leaching. However, metals such as Fe and Al were also dissolved together. In the two-step process, Fe and Al were dissolved using H2SO4 as a first step, then Au and Ag were recovered using thiourea leaching. Using this two-step process, Au and Ag were dissolved at higher purity than when using the one-step leaching process, achieving leaching efficiencies of about 98% and 100%, respectively. This investigation will lead to a cost-effective method for recovering precious metals from secondary waste.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the members of the NSF I/UCRC on Resource Recovery and Recycling (CR3) and the National Science Foundation for their support of this work.

References

  1. 1.
    B.H. Robinson, Sci. Total Environ. 408, 183 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. Widmer, H. Oswald-Krapf, D. Sinha-Khetriwal, M. Schnellmann, and H. Böni, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 25, 436 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Tuncuk, V. Stazi, A. Akcil, E.Y. Yazici, and H. Deveci, Miner. Eng. 25, 28 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    U. Jadhav and H. Hocheng, Sci. Rep. 5, 14574 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    A. Kumari, M.K. Jha, and R.P. Singh, Hydrometallurgy 165, 97 (2016).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Y. Xiao, Y. Yang, J. van den Berg, J. Sietsma, H. Agterhuis, G. Visser, and D. Bol, Hydrometallurgy 140, 128 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    I. Birloaga, V. Coman, B. Kopacek, and F. Vegliò, Waste Manag 34, 2581 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Syed, Hydrometallurgy 115–116, 30 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    G. Hilson and A.J. Monhemius, J. Cleaner Prod. 14, 1158 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    J. Cui and L. Zhang, J. Hazard. Mater. 158, 228 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Ubaldini, P. Fornari, R. Massidda, and C. Abbruzzese, Hydrometallurgy 48, 113 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Vítková, V. Ettler, J. Hyks, T. Astrup, and B. Kříbek, Appl. Geochem. 26, S263 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    A.N. Banza, E. Gock, and K. Kongolo, Hydrometallurgy 67, 63 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    A.A. Verbeek and M.C. Mitchell, A. and M. Ure. Anal. Chim. Acta 135, 215 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. Li and J.D. Miller, Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 27, 177 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    R. Ranjbar, M. Naderi, and A. Ghazitabar, J. Adv. Mater. Process. 5, 22 (2017).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Z. Fang and M. Muhammed, Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 11, 39 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical EngineeringWorcester Polytechnic InstituteWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations