Single- and Oligocrystal Behavior
Our first case study addresses the slip in single-crystal samples, which was subjected to an incrementally increasing three-point bending load (as seen in Fig. 1a). The slip activities on the free surface were captured by an optical microscope (OM) as revealed in Figs. 1 and 2, and a microstructurally faithful CPFE model was created to model the plasticity for the given crystal orientation.
From the experiment, two major slip fields are observed: (I) one located within the major tensile region and the extent of this field varies along the length of the beam, as the sample is deformed under three-point bending; and (II) horizontal slip bands operating near the apparent neutral axis on the right of the imaged beam section.
The shape and extent of these fields were well captured by the CPFE modeling, and the results are compared with the OM observed slip activities in Fig. 2a. From the CPFE model, it is apparent that the anisotropic nature of crystal deformation is essential in capturing the nature of plastic slip, even in this simple test, demonstrated by the second slip system activation. The second validation of the operation of these slip systems has been confirmed by using slip trace analysis, and the active slip systems matched well with the CPFE predictions.
The HR-DIC was used to measure the strain field in a region of interest (ROI) of 250 μm × 250 μm size at the middle bottom region of the sample. As revealed in Fig. 2a, captured slip lines roughened and broadened with increasing load. The explicit heterogeneity of dislocation slip (i.e., discrete slip bands) at this length scale is necessarily smoothed out within the CPFE approach, and capturing this would need discrete dislocation modeling. Nevertheless, CPFE can capture the slip fields and the predicted effective strains that agree with those averaged from the HR-DIC measurements (see Fig. 2b). It should be noted that the elliptical ring surface feature in the OM image in Fig. 2a is an artefact as a result of sample preparation. An enlarged OM map of the sample can be found in Ref. 25. The fact that we capture the size, extent, and slip system type for the slip fields in both simulation and experiment, using a single-crystal exemplar, gives confidence about the accuracy of CPFE approach.
A more complex challenge is to capture the heterogeneous nature of a crystal slip in a sample with multiple grains. An oligocrystal sample, consisting of six grains within the ROI, is used. The CPFE model is shown in Fig. 3a. Individual in-plane plastic strain and rotation terms measured by HR-DIC at the ROI were compared with the CPFE predicted results. Quantitative and qualitative agreement between experiment and simulation is excellent, as shown by the HR-DIC experiments and CPFE simulations (Fig. 3b).
HR-EBSD Study of Plasticity in Polycrystals Containing a Second Phase
Nonmetallic inclusions are inevitably mixed into the Ni-based superalloy powders during the powder metallurgy (PM) forming process used to make components, such as turbine disks,26
,
27 and are often found to be the fatigue crack initiation sites28
,
29 and limit fatigue life of PM formed components. Inclusion sizes are carefully controlled by filtering out the large inclusions30 so that the remaining inclusion sizes are comparable with nickel powder particles, which are approximately the size of several grains.
We have conducted two case studies, one which is focused on following the evolution of the strain state using HR-EBSD, and the second is focused on exploring the surface strain state with HR-DIC. We have cut samples to locate an inclusion within the characterized ROI. Three-point bending tests were carried out with increasing load (HR-DIC sample) and an increasing number of fatigue cycles (HR-EBSD sample).
The results from the HR-EBSD study are presented in Fig. 4, which shows characteristic SEM micrographs of this area and that changes in surface topography are microstructurally sensitive as a result of the evolution of the surface slip, shear along the twin boundaries (revealing a stepped morphology with a frequency related to the twin structure), and all these features are observed after only two cycles. A small crack occurred at the inclusion after 20 cycles, which continued to grow through the matrix. Longer cracks (>8 grains) were formed after 5200 cycles.
The evolution of the map-averaged GND and total dislocation density are shown in Fig. 4c. From the total GND density plot, the most striking observation is that the GND density rapidly increases and then shows an apparent decrease. This decrease could be a result of plastic shakedown, where initially high dislocation densities are reduced because of the formation of lower energy structures. Nevertheless, further investigations31 on this sample revealed that there was a systematic reduction in GND density in the locally imaged area, as a result of the growth of a carbon film during imaging, which reduces the sensitivity of the GND measurement, and so the reduction of GND density with cycles should be investigated with care. In addition, the HR-EBSD approach to estimating total dislocation density is based on linking the distribution of stresses probed to a distribution of edge dislocations, while the screw type of dislocations is neglected. To address this problem, ECCI is a promising technique to be used as an alternative dislocation characterization method to determine the total dislocation density.32
,
33
The initial dislocation density was low and homogeneously distributed through the microstructure, and the presence of residual stress gradients was low.31 After two cycles, the GND density and residual stress gradient “hot spot” (red) maps are shown in Fig. 5, where points from the top 5% of GND density distribution from the entire map are overlaid on the EBSD image quality (IQ) map. “String” patterns of these hot spots are found to correlate strongly with the formation of the underlying cracks. From this study, it is unclear whether the presence of a high GND density is the precursor to crack formation or whether the high GND density is forming where the grains are being “pulled apart” the most by their local neighborhood.
HR-DIC and HR-EBSD Study of the Plasticity in Polycrystals with Inclusions
The second sample contains an inclusion in the ROI as shown in Fig. 6. The HR-EBSD analysis was carried out at the beginning and end of the loading process. After each loading cycle, the sample was removed from the rig and placed in a SEM to acquire high-quality micrographs for the HR-DIC analysis. Thus, in this test, we obtained both plastic and elastic distortions at the same region where cracks were formed. Combining with the in situ HR-EBSD analysis mentioned earlier, we were able to link the evolution of elastic and plastic distortions in polycrystals to examine the crack formation process.
The effective strain distribution and evolution are shown in Fig. 6c. Similar to the GND density, the dominant structures within the effective strain maps were formed at the early stage of plasticity. As expected, the map-averaged effective strain values increased with increasing load (this is different to the GND density evolution from the previous example) and the extent of heterogeneity gradually increased as indicated by the error bars in Fig. 6c and d. The effective strain distribution is strongly localized around the inclusion, and it is formed into a “butterfly” shape that is sensitive to both inclusion and the microstructure.
Six micro-cracks within the matrix were observed at locations shown in Fig. 7a. The experimentally measured accumulated plastic slip, GND density, and isotropic elasticity finite element simulation of maximum shear stress at the same area are shown in Fig. 7b, c, and d, respectively. In comparing these three maps, it is interesting to see that the crack sites have high accumulated slip, high maximum shear stress, and high GND density. It is likely that the evolution of these fields and the cracking are related. Yet, detailed inspection of each crack with respect to each field reveals that they are not independent indicators of crack initiation as, for instance, the GND density maps show hot spots toward the interior and away from the inclusion where cracking was not observed. The effective strain map seems to be a more reasonable independent map, and this is supported by a previous study by Dunne et al.34 in which they found that the accumulated slip can accurately predict the fatigue crack nucleation sites for most of the studied samples. Nevertheless, in this previous study, not all cracks could be accommodated through a simple evaluation of the accumulated plastic strain (i.e., slip) alone, and so a better match was achieved with a stored energy density criterion for fatigue crack nucleation.
Use of the new criterion allows for consideration of the local stored energy rate (per loading cycle) developed over an area determined by the local dislocation content to define the appropriate length scale with which to define the energy density. It, therefore, places emphasis on the importance of (Griffith-like) stored energy and dislocation density (Stroh’s model). Dunne et al.34 posited their model through the following argument:
They considered storage volume \( \Delta V \), written in terms of storage area \( \Delta A \), statistically stored dislocation (SSD) and GND density, which is given by:
$$ \Delta V = \frac{\Delta A}{{\sqrt {\rho_{\text{SSD}} + \rho_{\text{GND}} } }} $$
(2)
$$ W = \oint {\frac{{\xi \varvec{\sigma} :{\text{d}}\varvec{\varepsilon}^{p} \Delta A}}{{\sqrt {\rho_{\text{SSD}} + \rho_{\text{GND}} } }}} $$
(3)
The stored energy per cycle within the volume is then determined to be where \( \xi \) is the fraction of the dissipated energy stored in the establishment of dislocation structure, and the integration is carried out over a complete loading cycle. The stored energy rate per cycle is then given by:
$$ \dot{G} = \frac{W}{\Delta A} = \oint {\frac{{\xi \varvec{\sigma} :{\text{d}} \varvec{\varepsilon}^{p} }}{{\sqrt {\rho_{\text{SSD}} + \rho_{\text{GND}} } }}} $$
(4)
For this study, Eq. 4 must be simplified to enable an indication of the stored energy rate to be estimated from our experimental observations. We do not have a measure of the local absolute stress variation, and so the stress is assumed to be constant and uniform according to the tensile boundary conditions because the local microstructural stress around a given cyclic hysteresis loop is not known. Note that Fig. 7d is a finite element model prediction that does not have explicit local microstructural representation so that the stresses calculated in this work are from assuming Mises plasticity. Although this may not be a good representation at localized regions, e.g., grain boundaries, it is likely to be reasonable for the grain-average level and is therefore a tolerable simplification.
Also, we consider that the SSD density \( \rho_{SSD} \) is proportional to the applied plastic strain \( \varepsilon \).14 We therefore only use the GND density as a stronger influence on the distribution of stored energy density.
This reduces Eq. 4 to give:
$$ \dot{G} = \oint {\frac{{I:{\text{d}}\varvec{\varepsilon}^{p} }}{{\sqrt {\rho_{\text{GND}} } }}} $$
(5)
The variation of this parameter was found to have a better correlation with the crack locations as compared with either accumulated plastic strain or accumulated GND density independently.
Explicit CPFE modeling of the inclusion and surrounding microstructure is underway, which should provide more insights on the stress distribution near crack nucleation sites and should allow a better examination of this crack nucleation criterion.
CPFE Model of Polycrystal Containing Second-Phase Particle Fracture and Decohesion
The third sample that contained a distribution of nonmetallic inclusions within the Ni matrix was tested and studied by HR-DIC and CPFE.33 This inclusion was generated as a result of a different processing route, and so the microstructure and properties of this inclusion structure are different than those discussed, as observed in the explicit microstructure rendered for the CPFE study shown in Fig. 8a.
The comparison of the surface strain fields between each grain surrounding the inclusion captured by HR-DIC and simulated by CPFE, shown in Fig. 8, reveals good agreement between model and experiment and enables the study of the inclusion effects on local plasticity and fatigue crack nucleation.
The experimental observations revealed both decohesion of the matrix and fracture of the particles. As the CPFE model matched the total strain fields from the experiment, the stress fields predicted with the CPFE were used to understand the nature of decohesion and failure of the particles and nearby matrix. The full-field maps representing different reductions of the stress tensor for each point within the modeled region were created, and points near the particles that failed in the experiment were highlighted. The evaluation of the hydrostatic and normal stress fields (and many others that were not reported within the article) revealed that the normal stress perpendicular to the inclusion-matrix interface was found to show the strongest “contrast” and best correlation.
The evaluation of the stress differences between the particles that had failed and those that had not enabled us to predict that the interfacial failure stress for these particles was 1270 MPa (as observed in Ref. 35 in Fig. 14c), which is a result possible only through combined CPFE and HR-DIC measurement.