Skip to main content
Log in

Quenched and Partitioned CMnSi Steels Containing 0.3 wt.% and 0.4 wt.% Carbon

  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of partitioning parameters on mechanical properties and carbon partitioning in quenching and partitioning (Q&P)-treated C-1.5Mn-1.5Si steels was studied using 0.3 wt.% and 0.4 wt.% carbon compositions. Fully austenitized specimens were quenched to a fixed quenching temperature followed by partitioning at 400°C and 450°C for varying times. In most cases, increasing the partitioning temperature decreased UTS and increased TE, and both UTS and TE decreased with increasing partitioning times. Similar ultimate tensile strength levels were obtained for the 0.3C alloy partitioned at 400°C and the 0.4C alloy partitioned at 450°C. Increasing alloy carbon content increased retained austenite fractions. Mössbauer effect spectroscopy results were used to investigate carbon redistribution after Q&P processing in the 0.4C alloy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Keeler and M. Kimchi, AHSS Application Guidelines (WorldAutoSteel, 2014), http://www.worldautosteel.org/. Accessed 22 June 2015.

  2. J.G. Speer, A.M. Streicher, D.K. Matlock, and F.C. Rizzo, Austenite Formation and Decomposition Proceedings Symposia (Chicago, Nov 9–12, 2003), pp. 505–522.

  3. J.G. Speer, E. De Moor, and A.J. Clarke, Mater. Sci. Technol. 31, 3 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. E. De Moor, P.J. Gibbs, J.G. Speer, D.K. Matlock, and J.G. Schroth, AIST Trans. 7, 133 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. De Moor, J.G. Speer, C. Föjer, and J. Penning, Proc. Mater. Sci. Technol. (2009), pp. 1554–1563.

  6. E. Paravicini Bagliani, M.J. Santofimia, L. Zhao, J. Sietsma, and E. Anelli, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 559, 486 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M.J. Santofimia, T. Nguyen-Minh, L. Zhao, R. Petrov, I. Sabirov, and J. Sietsma, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 527, 6429 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. D.V. Edmonds, K. He, F.C. Rizzo, B.C. De Cooman, D.K. Matlock, and J.G. Speer, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 438–440, 25 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. George Krauss, Steels—Processing, Structure, and Performance, 4th ed. (Ohio: ASM International, 2012), pp. 298–299.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C.F. Jatczak, SAE (Technical paper), pp. 1–23 (1980).

  11. D.T. Pierce, D.R. Coughlin, D.L. Williamson, K.D. Clarke, A.J. Clarke, J.G. Speer, and E. De Moor, Acta Mater. 90, 417–430 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. G.R. Speich and H. Warlimont, J. Iron Steel Inst. Lond. 206, 385 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  13. D.T. Pierce, D.R. Coughlin, D.L. Williamson, K.D. Clarke, A.J. Clarke, J.G. Speer, D.K. Matlock, and E. De Moor, Proceedings of Phase Transformations in Inorganic Materials (2015), pp. 91–98.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by the Department of Energy Advanced Manufacturing Office under Award Number DE-EE0005765. The support of the sponsors of the Advanced Steel Processing and Products Research Center, an industry-university cooperative research center at the Colorado School of Mines is gratefully acknowledged.

Disclaimer

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. De Moor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kähkönen, J., Pierce, D.T., Speer, J.G. et al. Quenched and Partitioned CMnSi Steels Containing 0.3 wt.% and 0.4 wt.% Carbon. JOM 68, 210–214 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-015-1620-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-015-1620-4

Keywords

Navigation