Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Beverage Can in the United States: Achieving a 100% Recycled Aluminum Can through Supply Chain Innovation

  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The purpose of this research is to analyze why recycled content is low (33–50%) in the aluminum can in the United States when it is technically possible to have a product that is made from 100% recycled material. A comprehensive literature review is conducted, followed by identification of five propositions determined with respect to the research problem. With respect to aluminum can recycling (and its research), there is a greater focus on the role of the consumer than the producer in the aluminum can supply chain system, which may impact on the role of innovation in addressing the problem. The upstream primary aluminum supply chain is vertically integrated and efficient within itself, but not integrated with the downstream secondary aluminum can market. Given the importance of the secondary aluminum market in the United States, there are significant recycling/efficiency/sustainability opportunities to address. As opposed to a dominant focus on consumers and their recycling habits, this study focuses on the aggregate aluminum can supply chain to apply innovation to the solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Novelis is the largest supplier of rolled sheet aluminum in the USA, and states its recycled content at 33%, as per its 2011 Sustainability Report. In a 2009 presentation, Alcoa noted that 50% of its can body stock is formed of scrap.

  2. Per Aleris Corporation, 2012.

  3. Buffington, J. and Lundgren, E. are presently researching a new milling technique for UBC that can be utilized in the front end of the secondary market process.

  4. Today, secondary aluminum processing can be cheaper than primary processing, but must continue to improve given the inefficient acquisition process of secondary aluminum.

  5. Per Aleris Corporation.

References

  1. Mother Nature Network, Bill Coors: We Invented Recycling. Retrieved at http://www.mnn.com/food/beverages/sponsor/bill-coors-we-invented-recycling.

  2. G. Bloomquist and B. Koford, The Economics of Aluminum Recycling (CSAI White Paper, January, 2006), p. 1.

  3. S.K. Das, J. Green, T. Boggess, and S. Ningileri, Light Metals (Warrendale, PA.: The Minerals, Metals, and Materials Society, 2007), p. 1147.

  4. Container Recycling Institute (CRI), Aluminum Recycling Rates, http://www.container-recycling.org/alum_rates/htm (Washington, DC).

  5. S.K. Das and W. Yin, JOM 59 (11), 57 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. F. King, Aluminum and Its Alloys (New York: Halsted, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  7. International Aluminum Institute, IAI Current Statistics, Available at http://www.world-aluminum.org//iai/stats/index.asp.

  8. U.S. Geological Survey, Bauxite and Aluminum, Mineral Commodity Summaries, January, 2009. Retrieved from: http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/bauxite/mcs-2009-bauxi.pdf.

  9. P.A. Plunkert, Aluminum Recycling in the United States (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  10. International Aluminum Association, Global Aluminum Recycling: A Cornerstone of Sustainable Development. Retrieved at http://www.world-aluminium.org/cache/fl0000181.pdf.

  11. T.A. Utigard, Light Metals (2004), p. 289.

  12. G. Gelles, Aluminum Recycling, ed. M. Schlesinger (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2007), p. 41.

  13. BCS, Inc., U.S. Energy Requirements for Aluminum Production—Historical Perspective, Theoretical Limits and Current Practices (U.S. Department of Energy, February, 2007) Retrieved at www1.eere.energy.gov/industry/aluminum/pdfs/al_theoretical.pdf.

  14. J.F. Papp, Recycling—Metals, in Metals and Minerals (U.S. Geology Survey, 2009), p. 61.1.

  15. Zacks, Metals and Mining Outlook, March 2012 (2012) Retrieved at www.zacks.com/stock/news/71422/metals+%26amp%amp%3B+Mining+Stock+Outlook+%96+March+2012.html.

  16. T. Shumsky and M. Day, Wall Street J. (2011)

  17. T. Bezezowsky, Will Alcoa’s Smelting Cuts Push Up Global Prices? (2012) Retrieved at http://agmetalminer.com/2012/01/09/will-alcoas-smelting-cuts-push-up-global-aluminum-prices/.

  18. Commodity Online, Goldman: Aluminum Supply Being Crimped, But Demand the Key (2012). Retrieved at www.commodityonline.com/futures-trading/market-report/Goldman:-aluminum-being-crimped-but-demand-the-key-26717.html.

  19. Harbor, Weekly Aluminum Report (2012). Retrieved at www.harboraluminum.com.

  20. Gitlitz, Trashed Cans: The Global Environmental Impacts of Aluminum Can Wasting in America (Washington DC: Container Recycling Institute, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  21. R.U. Ayres, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 21, 145 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zheng, et al., J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manage. 6, 153 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. T. Shinkuma, Environ. Resour. Econ. 24, 77 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gunter Kirchner, Erzmetall 55, 465 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  25. N. Sadao, Corros. Eng. 51, 285 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  26. S. Das, Light Metals (Warrendale, PA.: The Minerals, Metals, and Materials Society, 2006).

  27. S.K. Das, JOM 63, 137 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. B.L. Barham, J.P. Chavas, and O.T. Coomes, Land Econ. 74, 429 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. W.D. Menzie, J.J. Barry, E.L. Bleiwas, T.G. Bray, T.G. Goonan, and G. Matos, The Global Flow of Aluminum From 2006 to 2025. Open File Report 2010-1256 (United States Geological Service, 2010).

  30. S. Das (2006) Light Metals (Warrendale, PA.: The Minerals, Metals, and Materials Society, 2006), p. 911.

  31. J. Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy (New York: Harper, 1942).

    Google Scholar 

  32. S.P. Yang, Appl. Econ. 34, 1411 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. S.P. Yang, Rev. Indus. Org. 19, 365 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Christensen, The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail (Boston, MA: Harvard Business Review, 1997).

  35. R. Jenkins, S. Martinez, K. Palmer, and M. Podolsky, J. Environ. Econ. Mange. 45, 294 (2003).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. K. Palmer, H. Sigman, and M. Walls, J. Environ. Econ. Mange. 33, 128 (1997).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. S.Y. Wu, Choices: Mag Food Farm Resour. Issues 18, 19 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  38. H. Cheng, H. Guo, and X. Wang, Supply chain coordination based on the information asymmetry and virtual third party (December: Inform. Sci. Eng, 2010), p. 179.

    Google Scholar 

  39. R. Yan and Z. Pei, J. Bus. Res. 64, 377 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Bayer Process, Retrieved at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bayer-process-en.svg

  41. Department of Energy, Aluminum Roadmap, http://www.oit.doe.gov/aluminum/aluminum_roadmap.shtml.

Download references

Acknowledgements

I would like to express thanks to Ray Peterson, former president of The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society (TMS), for his support of this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jack Buffington.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buffington, J. The Beverage Can in the United States: Achieving a 100% Recycled Aluminum Can through Supply Chain Innovation. JOM 64, 923–932 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-012-0381-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-012-0381-6

Keywords

Navigation