Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hall cell energy recovery and anode pre-heating, gauging the opportunity

  • Aluminum
  • Research Summary
  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Anode pre-heating was proposed as an alternative for recycling waste heat from smelting operations, which currently consume substantially more energy than the theoretical minimum required. Aside from direct electricity savings, anode pre-heating can provide extra metal production and reduce carbon dioxide emissions. Public data on energy and aluminum production is analyzed to examine the value of these three potential components and define a research development path. It is concluded that indirect process gains show the most potential value with economies on the order of 3 TWh per year in electricity, an avoidance of about 1.8 million metric tons of CO2 emissions, and an increase in production capacity of about 200,000 metric tons of aluminum per year without any expansion of installed capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C.W. Bale et al., “Factsage” (Thermfact and GTTTechnologies, CRCT, Canada).

  2. International Aluminum Institute, Statistical Tables, www.world-aluminium.org/.

  3. K. Grjotheim and H. Kvande, Introduction to Aluminum Electrolysis, 2nd ed. (Düsseldorf, Germany: Aluminium-Verlag, 1993), p. 149.

    Google Scholar 

  4. DOE-EIA, “Voluntary Reporting of Green House Gases,” Form EIA-1605 (2007), www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/pdf/Appendix%20F_r071023.pdf.

  5. The World Factbook 2009 (Washington, D.C.: Central Intelligence Agency, 2009), https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html.

  6. DOE-EIA, International Electricity Prices and Fuel Costs (June 2010), www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/international/elecprii.html.

  7. J. Elliot et al., “Trade and Carbon Taxes”, Argonne National Laboratory Papers and Proceedings, 100(2) (May 2010), 5p.

  8. J.P. O’Brien and L.W. Kruger, “Century Aluminum Annual Report New Horizons” (Monterrey, CA: Century Aluminum, April 2008), p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E.L. Bray, 2007 Minerals Yearbook [Advance Release] (Reston, VA: U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Feb. 2009), p. 5.10.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R.T. Poole and C. Etheridge, “Aluminum Reduction Cell Variables and Operations in Relation to Current Efficiency,” Light Metals 1977, vol. 1, ed. R. Huglen (Warrendale, PA: The Metallurgical Society of AIME, 1977), pp. 163–182.

    Google Scholar 

  11. T.G. Pearson and J. Waddington, Disc. Faraday Society, 1 (1947), p. 307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Kvande and W. Haupin, “Cell Voltage in Aluminum Electrolysis: A Practical Approach,” JOM, 52(2) (2000), pp. 31–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Otavio Fortini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fortini, O. Hall cell energy recovery and anode pre-heating, gauging the opportunity. JOM 63, 127–131 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-011-0125-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-011-0125-z

Keywords

Navigation