Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Congenital constriction ring in children: sine plasty combined with removal of fibrous groove and fasciotomy

  • Original Clinical Article
  • Published:
Journal of Children's Orthopaedics

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the clinical and functional results of a technical procedure used in the surgical treatment of congenital constriction ring (CCR) in children.

Materials and methods

This was a retrospective study undertaken to evaluate the results of surgical techniques performed from January 1995 to December 2005 on 95 patients with 134 congenital constriction bands. Due to the drop-out of nine patients during follow-up, data on 86 patients (121 congenital constriction rings; average age at surgery 1 year 2 months) were analyzed. The extent of the constrictions was classified by according to the Patterson criteria. All patients were treated by two-stage sine plasty combined with removal of the fibrous groove and fasciotomy, with one-half of the ring removed during the first stage and the other half removed 1 week later during the second state. The surgical outcomes were assess according to the Moses criteria.

Results

Three types of CCR (Patterson criteria) were identified among the 86 patients (121 constriction rings): types I (5 patients, 4.1 %), II (107, 88.5 %), III (9, 7.4 %). Of the 121 constriction rings, good results were attained in 73.6 % and fair results in 26.4 %. Sensory deficits were seen in six patients immediately after the surgery but all six had improved to a normal condition at the final follow-up examination. There were no skin necrosis or wound healing problems.

Conclusion

The combined sine plasty/removal of fibrous groove and fasciotomy method reported here is a simple and safe surgical technique for treating CCR in children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Montgomery WF (1832) Observation on the spontaneous amputation of the limbs of the fetus in utero, with an attempt to explain the occasional cause of its production. Dublin Med Chem Sci J 1:140–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gorlin RJ, Cohen MM Jr, Hennekam RCM. Syndromes of the head and neck, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 10–13

  3. Jones K (2005) Smith’s recognizable patterns of human malformation, 6th edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kiehn M, Leshem D, Zuker R (2007) Constriction rings: the missing link. Eplasty 8:4

    Google Scholar 

  5. Robin NH, Franklin J, Prucka S, Ryan AB, Grant JH (2005) Clefting, amniotic bands, and polydactyly: a distinct phenotype that supports an intrinsic mechanism for amniotic band sequence. Am J Med Genet A 137:298–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rayan GM (2002) Amniotic constriction band. J Hand Surg [Am] 27:1110–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Stevenson TW (1946) Release of circular constricting scars by Z flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 1:39–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Takayuki M (1984) Congenital constriction band syndrome. J Hand Surg 9A:82–88

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mehmet M, Mahmut S (2006) A new technique for correction of congenital constriction rings. Ann Plast Surg 57:646–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yohanness M, Williams HB (2008) Surgical correction of congenital constriction band syndrome in children: replacing Z-plasty with direct closure. Can J Plast Surg 16(4):221–223

    Google Scholar 

  11. Patterson T (1961) Congenital ring constrictions. Br J Plast Surg 69:532–569

    Google Scholar 

  12. Koichi T, Kazuo Y, Swanson AB (1984) Congenital constriction band syndrome. J Pediatr Orthop 4:726–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tada K, Yonenobu K, Swanson AB (1984) Congenital constriction band syndrome. J Pediatr Orthop 1984(4):726–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moses JM, Flatt AE, Cooper RR (1979) Annular constricting bands. J Bone Joint Surg 61-A(4):562–565

    Google Scholar 

  15. Patterson TJ (1961) Congenital ring constrictions. Br J Plast Surg 14:1–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kay SP, McCombe D (2005) Absence of fingers. In: Green DP, Hotchkiss RN, Pedersen WC, Wolfe SC (eds) Green’s operative hand surgery. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 1415–1430

    Google Scholar 

  17. Upton J (2006) Constriction ring syndrome. In: Mathes SJ, Hentz UR (eds) Plastic surgery. Elsevier, Philadelphia, pp 185–213

    Google Scholar 

  18. Upton J (1990) Congenital anomalies of the hand and forearm. In: McCarthy J, May JW, Little J (eds) Plastic surgery. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 5373–5378

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hall EJ, Johnson-Giebink R, Vasconez LO (1982) Management of the ring constriction syndrome: a reappraisal. Plast Reconstr Surg 69:532–536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Streeter GL (1930) Focal deficiencies in fetal tissues and their relation to intra-uterine amputation. Contrib Embryol 22:1–44

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mutaf M, Sunay M (2006) A new technique for correction of congenital constriction rings. Ann Plast Surg 2006(57):646–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Di Meo I, Mercer DH (1987) Single stage correction of constriction ring syndrome. Ann Plast Surg 19:469–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Muguti GI (1990) The amniotic band syndrome-single stage correction. Br J Plast Surg 43:706–714

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Beaty JH (1992) Congenital anomalies of lower extremity. In: Crenshaw AH (ed) Campbell’s operative orthopaedics, vol 3. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 2061–2158

    Google Scholar 

  25. Baker C Jr, Rudolf AJ (1971) Congenital ring constriction and intrauterine amputations. Am J Dis Child 121:393–400

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Greg A, Errol G (1988) Congenial constriction band syndromes. J Pediatr Orthop 8:461–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sanmugasundaram TK (1999) Congenital anomalies. In: Kulkarni GS (ed) Textbook of orthopaedics and trauma, vol 4. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers, Chennai, pp 3439–3947

  28. Tachdian MO (2002) Paediatrics orthopaedics, vol 1, 3rd edn. W.B Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 461–466

    Google Scholar 

  29. Upton J, Tan C (1991) Correction of constriction rings. J Hand Surg 16A:947–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Greene WB, Hill C (1993) One stage release of congenital circumferential constriction bands. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:650–655

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Visuthikosol V, Hompuem T (1988) Constriction band syndrome. Ann Plast Surg 21:489–495

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Daniel RK, Williams HB (1973) The free transfer of skin flaps by microvascular anastornoses. An experimental study and a reappraisal. Plast Reconstr Surg 52:16–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wanter BG (1993) One-stage release of congenital circumferential constriction bands. J Bone Joint Surg 75(5):650–655

    Google Scholar 

  34. Quintero RA, Morales WJ, Phillips J, Kalter CS, Angel JL (1997) In utero lysis of amniotic bands. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 10:316–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Sentilhes L, Verspyck E, Eurin D, Ickowicz V, Patrier S, Lechevallier J, Marpeau L (2004) Favourable outcome of a tight constriction band secondary to amniotic band syndrome. Prenat Diagn 24:198–201

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nguyen Ngoc Hung.

About this article

Cite this article

Hung, N.N. Congenital constriction ring in children: sine plasty combined with removal of fibrous groove and fasciotomy. J Child Orthop 6, 189–197 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-012-0420-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-012-0420-4

Keywords

Navigation