Abstract
We tested the hypothesis that systemic insecticides should be effective against sap-sucking insects which acquire toxicants from the tissues of treated plants whereas their natural enemies should be unaffected. Under this hypothesis, the suppression of early-season cotton insect infestations and the interaction with predatory insects of different feeding habits were investigated using the systemic insecticides cyantraniliprole and thiamethoxam through foliar application (FA) and seed treatment (ST). Insecticide residues on ST plants were quantified at 12, 22, and 32 days after emergence (DAE) to assess the survival of the zoophytophagous (Orius insidiosus) and chewing (Eriopis connexa), both predators of early-season cotton pests, when confined on treated plant material. Residues of both insecticides were detected on ST plants, but the level was significantly reduced between 12 and 22 DAE and not detected at 32 DAE. Both insecticides offered aphid suppression but with a more prolonged effect of thiamethoxam, and both were ineffective against high thrips infestation. Whitefly densities were at or below economic threshold in all treatments after the expected control provided through ST. Cyantraniliprole was compatible with both predators (> 92% survival) through FA and ST. Thiamethoxam was highly toxic to O. insidiosus through FA (0.5% survival) and diminished through ST (27.6% survival). At 22 DAE, O. insidiosus still showed lower survival with FA than ST with thiamethoxam (51.4% vs. 90.7%). Regardless of the insecticide used in ST, supplementary FA was required against early-season pests. The results show that ecological selectivity through seed treatment depends on the feeding habit of the predator and the insecticide applied.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets and analysis protocols used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on request.
References
AGROFIT - Sistema de agrotóxicos fitossanitários (2022) http://agrofit.agricultura.gov.br/agrofit_cons/principal_agrofit_cons.
Albajes R, Lopez C, Pons X (2003) Predatory fauna in cornfields and response to imidacloprid seed treatment. J Econ Entomol 96:1805–1813. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/96.6.1805
Ali A, Desneux N, Lu Y, Liu B, Wu K (2016) Characterization of the natural enemy community attacking cotton aphid in the Bt cotton ecosystem in Northern China. Sci Rep 6:e24273. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep24273
Barros EM, Rolim GG, Torres JB (2018) Pragas iniciais do algodoeiro. Rev Cultivar Grandes Culturas 234:47–51
Barry JD, Portillo HF, Annan LB, Cameron RA, Clagg DG, Dietrich RF, Watson LJ, Leighty RM, Ryan DL, McMillan JA, Swain RS, Kaczmarczyk RA (2015) Movement of cyantraniliprole in plants after foliar applications and its impact on the control of sucking and chewing insects. Pest Manag Sci 71:395–403. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3816
Baugh BA, Kerns DL (2010) Efficacy of insecticides targeting cotton aphids and impact on key aphid predators. In: Proceedings of the 2010 Beltwide Cotton Conference, New Orleans, LA, pp 956–961
Bestete LR, Torres JB, Silva RBB, Silva-Torres CSA (2016) Water stress and kaolin spray affect herbivorous insects success on cotton. Arthrop Pl Int 10:445–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-016-9454-8
Bordini I, Ellsworth PC, Naranjo SE, Fournier A (2021) Novel insecticides and generalist predators support conservation biological control in cotton. Biol Control 154:104502. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104502
Cook D, Herbert A, Akin DS, Reed J (2011) Biology, crop injury, and management of thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) infesting cotton seedlings in the United States. J Integr Pest Manag 2:B1–B9. https://doi.org/10.1603/IPM10024
Ding J, Li H, Zhang Z, Lin J, Liu F, Mu W (2018) Thiamethoxam, clothianidin, and imidacloprid seed treatments effectively control thrips on corn under field conditions. J Insect Sci 18:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iey128
Douglas MR, Tooker JF (2016) Meta-analysis reveals that seed-applied neonicotinoids and pyrethroids have similar negative effects on abundance of arthropod natural enemies. PeerJ 4:e2776. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2776
Dubey A, Lewis MT, Dively GP, Hamby KA (2020) Ecological impact of pesticide seed treatments on arthropod communities in a grain crop rotation. J Appl Ecol 57:936–951. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13595
Esquivel CJ, Martinez EJ, Baxter R, Trabanino R, Ranger CM, Michel A, Canas LA (2020) Thiamethoxam differentially impacts the survival of the generalist predators, Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) and Hippodamia convergens (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), when exposed via the food chain. J Insect Sci 20:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieaa070
Frisvold GB, Tronstad RE, Nichols RL, Watson MD, Hequet EF (2007) Scope and economic effects of sticky cotton. In: Hequet E, Henneberry TJ, Nichols RL (eds) Sticky cotton: causes, effects, and prevention. USDA-ARS. Technical Bulletin 1915, National Technical Information Service, Springfield, pp 5–30
FurlanL PA, Duso C, Simon-Delson N, Sanchez-Bayo F, Marchand PA, Codato F, van Lexmond MB, Bonmatin JM (2021) An update of the Worldwide Integrated Assessment (WIA) on systemic insecticides. Part 3: alternatives to systemic insecticides. Environ Sci Poll Res 28:11798–11820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-1052-5
Galbieri R, Boldt AS, Scoz LB, Rodrigues SM, Rabel DO, Belot JL, Vaslin M, Silva TF, Kobayasti L, Chitarra LG (2017) Cotton blue disease in central-west Brazil: Occurrence, vector (Aphis gossypii) control levels and cultivar reaction. Trop Pl Pathol 42:468–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40858-017-0165-1
Gontijo PC, Moscardini VF, Michaud JP, Carvalho GA (2015) Non-target effects of two sunflower seed treatments on Orius insidiosus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae). Pest Manag Sci 71:515–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3798
Hendrix DL, Henneberry TJ, Chu CC, Coates WE (2001) Enzyme treatment of honeydew–contaminated cotton fiber. Appl Engineer Agric 17:571–576. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.6907
Hill MP, MaCfadyen S, Nash MA (2017) Broad spectrum pesticide application alters natural enemy communities and may facilitate secondary pest outbreaks. PeerJ 5:e4179. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4179
Hull LA, Beers EH (1985) Ecological selectivity: Modifying chemical control practices to preserve natural enemies. In: Hoy MA, Herzog DC (eds) Biological control in agricultural IPM systems. Academic Press Inc, New York, pp 103–122
Hunt TE, Wright JR, Hein GL (2009) Economic thresholds for today’s commodity values. In: Proceedings of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln Crop Production Clinics. Lincoln, UNL, pp 93−96
Jones A, Harrington P, Turnbull G (2014) Neonicotinoid concentrations in arable soils after seed treatment applications in preceding years. Pest Manag Sci 70:1780–1784. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3836
Kolupaeva VN, Kokoreva AA, Belik AA, Pletenev PA (2019) Study of the behavior of the new insecticide cyantraniliprole in large lysimeters of the Moscow State University. Open Agric. 4: 599−607. https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2019-0057
Kohl KL, Harrell LK, Mudge JF, Subbiah S, Kasumba J, Osma E, Barman AK, Anderson TA (2019) Tracking neonicotinoids following their use as cotton seed treatments. PeerJ 7:e6805. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6805
Labrie G, Gagnon AV, Vanasse A, Latraverse A, Tremblay G (2020) Impacts of neonicotinoid seed treatments on soil-dwelling pest populations and agronomic parameters in corn and soybean in Quebec (Canada). PLoS ONE 15:e0229136. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229136
Leigh TF, Roach SH, Watson TF (1996) Chapter 2: Biology and ecology of important insect and mites pests of cotton. In King EG, Phillips JR, Coleman RJ (eds) Cotton Insects and mites: characterization and management. Cotton Foundation, Memphis, pp 17–85.
Machado AVA, Potin DM, Torres JB, Silva-Torres CSA (2019) Selective insecticides secure natural enemies action in cotton pest management. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 184:e109669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109669
Mandal S (2012) Bio-efficacy of Cyazypyr 10% OD, a new anthranilic diamide insecticide, against the insect pests of tomato and its impact on natural enemies and crop health. Acta Phytopathol Hun 47:233–249
Marshall KL, Collins D, Wilson LJ, Herron GA (2015) Efficacy of two thiamethoxam pre-germination seed treatments and a phorate side-dressing against neonicotinoid- and pirimicarb-resistant cotton aphid, Aphis gossypii (Hemiptera: Aphididae). Austral Entomol 54:351–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/aen.12136
Milosavljević I, Esser AD, Murphy KM, Crowder DW (2019) Effects of imidacloprid seed treatments on crop yields and economic returns of cereal crops. Crop Prot 119:166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2019.01.027
Moscardini VF, Gontijo PC, Michaud JP, Carvalho GA (2014) Sublethal effects of chlorantraniliprole and thiamethoxam seed treatments when Lysiphlebus testaceipes feed on sunflower extrafloral nectar. Biocontrol 59:503–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-014-9588-5
Mourtzinis S, Krupke CH, Esker PD, Varenhorst A, Arneson NJ, Bradley CA, Byrne AM, Chilvers MI, Giesler LJ, Herbert A, Kandel YR, Kazula MJ, Hunt CJ, Lindsey LE, Malone S, Muller DS, Naeve S, Nafziger E, Reisig DD, Ross WJ, Rossman DS, Taylor S, Conley SP (2019) Neonicotinoid seed treatments of soybean provide negligible benefits to US farmers. Sci Rep 9:e11207. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47442-8
Mullin CA, Saunders MC, Leslie TW, Biddinger DJ, Fleischer SJ (2005) Toxic and behavioral effects to Carabidae of seed treatments used on Cry3Bb1- and Cry1Ab/c-protected corn. Environ Entomol 34:1626–1636. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-34.6.1626
Naranjo SA (2001) Conservation and evaluation of natural enemies in IPM systems for Bemisia tabaci. Crop Prot 20:835–852. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(01)00115-6
Naranjo SE, Flint HM, Henneberry TJ (1996) Binomial sampling plans for estimating and classifying population density of adult Bemisia tabaci on cotton. Entomol Exp Appl 80:343–353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1996.tb00947.x
North JH, GoreJ CAL, Stewart SD, Lorenz GM, Musser FR, Cook DR, Kerns DL, Dodds DM (2017) Value of neonicotinoid insecticide seed treatments in Mid-South cotton (Gossypium hirsutum [Malvales: Malvaceae]) production systems. J Econ Entomol 111:10–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tox324
Nottingham L, Kuhar TP, Kring T, Herbert DA, Arancibia R, Schultz P (2017) Effects of thiamethoxam-treated seed on Mexican bean beetle (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae), nontarget arthropods, and crop performance in southwestern Virginia snap beans. Environ Entomol 46:1397–1405. https://doi.org/10.1093/ee/nvx152
Pecenka JR, Ingwell LL, Foster RF, Krupke CH, Kaplan I (2021) IPM reduces insecticide applications by 95% while maintaining or enhancing crop yields through wild pollinator conservation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 118:e2108429118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2108429118
Pedigo LP, Hutchins SH, Higley LG (1986) Economic injury levels in theory and practice. Annu Rev Entomol 31:341–368. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.en.31.010186.002013
Pisa LW, Amaral-Rogers V, Belzunces LP, Bonmatin JM, Downs CA, Goulson D et al (2015) Effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on non-target invertebrates. Environ Sci Poll Res 22:68–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3470-y
Potin DM, Machado AVA, Barbosa PRR, Torres JB (2022) Multiple factors mediate insecticide toxicity to a key predator for cotton insect pest management. Ecotoxicology 31:490–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-022-02526-6
Potin DM, Machado AVA, Delabie JHV, Martins IVC, Whitehouse MEA, Torres JB (2023) Response of foliage- and ground-dwelling arthropods to insecticide application: early step for cotton IPM in the Brazilian semiarid. Agric Ecosyst Environ 344:108308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.108308
Reisig D, Herbert DA, Malone S (2012) Impact of neonicotinoid seed treatments on thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) and soybean yield in Virginia and North Carolina. J Econ Entomol 105:884–889. https://doi.org/10.1603/EC11429
Samson-Robert O, Labrie G, Chagnon M, Fournier V (2017) Planting of neonicotinoid-coated corn raises honey bee mortality and sets back colony development. PeerJ 5:e3670. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3670
SAS Institute (2002) SAS/STAT User's guide, release 9.0. Cary, SAS Institute
Satpathy S, Gotyal BS, Babu VR (2020) Role of novel insecticides in crop protection and their selectivity to natural enemies: a review. J Environ Biol 41:149–160. https://doi.org/10.22438/jeb/41/2/MRN-
Schaafsma A, Limay-Rios V, Baute T, Smith J, Xue Y (2015) Neonicotinoid insecticide residues in surface water and soil associated with commercial maize (corn) fields in Southwestern Ontario. PLoS ONE 10:e0118139. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118139
Seagraves MP, Lundgren JG (2012) Effects of neonicitinoid seed treatments on soybean aphid and its natural enemies. J Pest Sci 85:125–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-011-0374-1
Selby TP, Lahm GP, Stevenson TM, Hughes KA, Cordova D, Annan LB, Barry JD, Benner EA, Currie MJ, Pahutski TF (2013) Discovery of cyantraniliprole, a potent and selective anthranilic diamide ryanodine receptor activator with cross-spectrum insecticidal activity. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 23:6341–6345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.09.076
SelbyTP LGP, Stevenson TM (2017) A retrospective look at anthranilic diamide insecticides: discovery and lead optimization to chlorantraniliprole and cyantraniliprole. Pest Manag Sci 73:658–665. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4308
Silvie PJ, Thomazoni D, Soria MF, Saran PE, Bélot JL (2013) Pragas e seus danos em algodoeiro. Instituto Mato-grossense do Algodão – IMAmt, Primavera do Leste, MT
Singh V, Sharma N, Sharma SK (2016) A review on effects of new chemistry insecticides on natural enemies of crop pests. Int J Sci Environ Technol 5:4339–4361
Stern VM, Smith RRF, van den Bosch R, Hagen KS (1959) The integrated control concept. Hilgardia 29:81–101. https://doi.org/10.3733/hilg.v29n02p081
Stewart SD, Akin DS, Reed J, BachelerJ CA, Cook D, Gore J, Greene J, Herbert A, Jackson RE, Kerns DL, Leonard BR, Lorenz GM, Micinski S, Reisig D, Roberts P, Studebaker G, Tindall K, Toews M (2013) Survey of thrips species infesting cotton across the Southern U.S. Cotton Belt J Cotton Sci 17:263–269
Taylor AG, Eckenrode CJ, Straub RW (2001) Seed coating technologies and treatments for onion: challenges and progress. HortScience 36:199–205. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.36.2.199
Tomlin CDS (2007). The e-pesticide manual: A world compendium. 14th edition, Farnham, British Crop Council.
Torres JB, Ruberson JR (2004) Toxicity of thiamethoxam and imidacloprid to Podisus nigrispinus (Dallas) (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae) nymphs associated to aphid and whitefly control in cotton. Neotrop Entomol 33:99–106. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1519-566X2004000100017
Torres JB, Silva-Torres CSA, Barros R (2003) Relative effects of the insecticide thiamethoxam on the predator Podisus nigrispinus and the tobacco whitefly Bemisia tabaci in nectaried and nectariless cotton. Pest Manag Sci 59:315–323. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.640
Torres JB, Barros EM, Coelho RR, Pimentel RMM (2010) Zoophytophagous pentatomids feeding on plants and implications for biological control. Arthrop Pl Inter 4:219–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-010-9095-2
Zhang L, Greenberg SM, Zhang Y, Liua T (2011) Effectiveness of thiamethoxam and imidacloprid seed treatments against Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) on cotton. Pest Manag Sci 67:226–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.2056
Zhang Z, Zhang X, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Lin J, Liu F, Mu W (2016) Nitenpyram, dinotefuran, and tiamethoxam used as seed treatments act as efficient controls against Aphis gossypii via high residues in cotton leaves. J Agric Food Chem 64:9276–9285. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b03430
Acknowledgements
To the “Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, Brazil)” for granting a Master Science scholarship to KLC, and a research grant to JBT. We thank Hermógeno Timóteo for allowing us to conduct several studies in his fields since 2015, including this one, and to the “Programa Pesquisa em Movimento (PPM)” of UFRPE for providing vehicles for many field trips.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors disclose no conflict of financial or non-financial interest of any kind associated with this paper.
Additional information
Communicated by Vartika Mathur and Heikki Hokkanen.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Campos, K.L., Bastos, C.S., Sequeira, R.V. et al. Systemic insecticides in cotton plants: seed treatment, protection against early-season sucking insects, and their ecological selectivity with predatory insects of different feeding habits. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 17, 601–613 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-023-09981-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-023-09981-w