Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Pollination dynamics and bee foraging cycles in a tropical squash field

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arthropod-Plant Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Temporal changes in the composition and abundance of floral visitors during floral anthesis influence the rate of deposition and germination of pollen in stigmas, as well as the rate of removal of pollen from anthers. In the tropics, the squash (Cucurbita pepo) is visited by a great diversity of bees, but little is known regarding the dynamics of its pollinators and pollination during its floral anthesis in tropical environments. We studied the foraging cycle of different species of bees in squash crops in Costa Rica and the relationship of this cycle with nectar production, pollen loads in anthers and bees, and number of pollen grains and pollen tubes in stigmas and styles. It was determined that despite the short duration of the floral anthesis of this crop, there are changes in the composition of visitors during anthesis from bees with twilight flight capacity that visit male flowers in the opening to primarily social bees at later hours. Loss of pollen from anthers and deposition of pollen on stigmas occurs rapidly in early hours. Pollen transport by bees may be facilitated by pollen accumulation at the bottom of the corolla of male flowers. After 6 a.m., little change occurs in crop pollination levels. The dominance of stingless bees in the flowers after 6:30 a.m. appears to displace other bees from these flowers, despite the permanence of nectar flow. The Cucurbita species may be an important crop for maintaining bee diversity and enhancing the pollination of other crops in agricultural ecosystems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ali M, Saeed S, Sajjad A, Akbar A (2015) Linking pollination effectiveness and interspecific displacement success in bees. Neotrop Entomol 44:101–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Artz DR, Nault BA (2011) Performance of Apis mellifera, Bombus impatiens, and Peponapis pruinosa (Hymenoptera: Apidae) as pollinators of pumpkin. J Econ Entomol 104:1153–1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barman C, Singh VK, Kakkar M (2020) Secondary pollen presentation in flowering plants. In: Tandon R, Shivanna K, Koul M (eds) Reproductive ecology of flowering plants: patterns and processes. Springer, Singapore, pp 197–214

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brochu KK, van Dyke MT, Milano NJ, Petersen JD, McArt SH, Nault BA, Kessler A, Danforth BN (2020) Pollen defenses negatively impact foraging and fitness in a generalist bee (Bombus impatiens: Apidae). Sci Rep 10:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canto-Aguilar MA, Parra-Tabla V (2000) Importance of conserving alternative pollinators: assessing the pollination efficiency of the squash bee, Peponapis limitaris in Cucurbita moschata (Cucurbitaceae). J Insect Conserv 4:201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers JM (1991) Linear models. In: Chambers JM, Hastie TJ (eds) Statistical Models in S, Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, Florida, pp 95–144.

  • de Santiago-Hernández MH, Martén-Rodríguez S, Lopezaraiza-Mikel M, Oyama K, González-Rodríguez A, Quesada M (2019) The role of pollination effectiveness on the attributes of interaction networks: from floral visitation to plant fitness. Ecology 100(10):e02803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Carrillo O, Martén-Rodríguez S, Ashworth L, Aguilar R, Lopezaraiza-Mikel M, Quesada M (2018) Temporal variation in pollination services to Cucurbita moschata is determined by bee gender and diversity. Ecosphere 9(11):e02506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genung MA, Fox J, Williams NM, Kremen C, Ascher J, Gibbs J, Winfree R (2017) The relative importance of pollinator abundance and species richness for the temporal variance of pollination services. Ecology 98:1807–1816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera CM (1987) Components of pollinator ‘quality’: comparative analysis of a diverse insect assemblage. Oikos 50:79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera CM (1989) Pollinator abundance, morphology and flower visitation rate: analysis of the ‘quantity’ component in a plant–pollinator system. Oecologia 80:241–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera CM (1990) Daily patterns of pollinator activity, differential pollinating effectiveness, and floral resource availability, in a summer-flowering Mediterranean shrub. Oikos 58:277–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoehn P, Tscharntke T, Tylianakis JM, Steffan-Dewenter I (2008) Functional group diversity of bee pollinators increases crop yield. Proc Royal Soc B 275:2283–2291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubbell SP, Johnson LK (1978) Comparative foraging behavior of six stingless bee species exploiting a standardized resource. Ecology 59:1123–1136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurd PD, Linsley EG, Whitaker TW (1971) Squash and gourd bees (Peponapis, Xenoglossa) and the origin of the cultivated Cucurbita. Evolution 25:218–234

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lobo J, Bravo Y (2021) Diversity and foraging patterns of bees on flowers of Cucurbita pepo L. (Cucurbitaceae) in Costa Rica. Rev Biol Trop 69:494–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin FW (1959) Staining and observing pollen tubes in the style by means of fluorescence. Stain Technol 34:125–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McGrady CM, Troyer R, Fleischer SJ (2020) Wild bee visitation rates exceed pollination thresholds in commercial cucurbita agroecosystems. J Econ Entomol 113:562–574

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muggeo VM (2008) Segmented: an R package to fit regression models with broken-line relationships. R News 8:20–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Muniz JM, Pereira ALC, Valim JO, Campos WG (2013) Patterns and mechanisms of temporal resource partitioning among bee species visiting basil (Ocimum basilicum) flowers. Arthropod Plant Interact 7:491–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nepi M, Pacini E (1993) Pollination, pollen viability and pistil receptivity in Cucurbita pepo. Ann Bot 72:527–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nepi M, Guarnieri M, Pacini E (2001) Nectar secretion, reabsorption, and sugar composition in male and female flowers of Cucurbita pepo. Int J Plant Sci 162:353–358

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister SC, Eckerter PW, Schirmel J, Cresswell JE, Entling MH (2017) Sensitivity of commercial pumpkin yield to potential decline among different groups of pollinating bees. R Soc Open Sci 4:170102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisanty G, Afik O, Wajnberg E, Mandelik Y (2016) Watermelon pollinators exhibit complementarity in both visitation rate and single-visit pollination efficiency. J Appl Ecol 53:360–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quesada M, Winsor JA, Stephenson AG (1993) Effects of pollen competition on progeny performance in a heterozygous cucurbit. Am Nat 142:694–706

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rader R, Edwards W, Westcott DA, Cunningham SA, Howlett BG (2013) Diurnal effectiveness of pollination by bees and flies in agricultural Brassica rapa: Implications for ecosystem resilience. Basic Appl Ecol 14:20–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serra BD, Campos LADO (2010) Polinização entomófila de abobrinha, Cucurbita moschata (Cucurbitaceae). Neotrop Entomol 39:153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins GL (1970) Adaptive radiation of reproductive characteristics in angiosperms, I: pollination mechanisms. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 1:307–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone G, Willmer P, Nee S (1996) Daily partitioning of pollinators in an African Acacia community. Proc R Soc B 263:1389–1393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal MDG, Jong DD, Wien HC, Morse RA (2006) Nectar and pollen production in pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.). Braz J Bot 29:267–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal MDG, Jong DD, Wien HC, Morse RA (2010) Pollination and fruit set in pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) by honey bees. Braz J Bot 33:106–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wcislo WT, Arneson L, Roesch K, Gonzalez V, Smith A, Fernández H (2004) The evolution of nocturnal behaviour in sweat bees, Megalopta genalis and M. ecuadoria (Hymenoptera: Halictidae): an escape from competitors and enemies? Biol J Linn Soc 83:377–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmer PG (1983) Thermal constraints on activity patterns in nectar-feeding insects. Ecol Entomol 8:455–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willmer PG, Corbet SA (1981) Temporal and microclimatic partitioning of the floral resources of Justicia aurea amongst a concourse of pollen vectors and nectar robbers. Oecologia 51:67–78

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Willmer PG, Stone GN (2004) Behavioral, ecological, and physiological determinants of the activity patterns of bees. Adv Study Behav 34:347–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winfree R, Reilly JR, Bartomeus I, Cariveau DP, Williams NM, Gibbs J (2018) Species turnover promotes the importance of bee diversity for crop pollination at regional scales. Science 359:791–793

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Winsor JA, Stephenson AG (1995) Demographics of pollen tube growth in Cucurbita pepo. Can J Bot 73:583–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winsor JA, Peretz S, Stephenson AG (2000) Pollen competition in a natural population of Cucurbita foetidissima (Cucurbitaceae). Am J Bot 87(4):527–532

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very thankful to Heiner Morales and his family, who provided guidance and enabled us to collect bees in their squash fields. T. Griswold and C. Ritner collaborated in the identification of bees. This work was supported by Vicerrectoria de Investigación de la Universidad de Costa Rica, Grant No. C0010.

Funding

This work was supported by Vicerrectoria de Investigación de la Universidad de Costa Rica, Grant No. C0010.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica

    Jorge Arturo Lobo

Authors
  1. Jorge Arturo Lobo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Arturo Lobo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Heikki Hokkanen.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lobo, J.A. Pollination dynamics and bee foraging cycles in a tropical squash field. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 15, 797–807 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-021-09850-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-021-09850-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation