Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of sodium acetate and glucose as minor additives with calcium chloride as optimum mixed draw solutes for fruit juice concentration via forward osmosis

  • Separation Technology, Thermodynamics
  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The selection of an appropriate draw solution is decisive to augment the performance of the forward osmosis (FO) process with maximal permeate flux and minimal reverse solute flux. Inorganic salts provide higher permeate flux in FO, but high reverse salt flux (RSF) associated with greater diffusivity limits their potential application. Herein, the incorporation of organic compounds including sodium acetate (NaAce) and glucose in CaCl2 provides draw solutions with constant osmotic pressure for boosting FO performance. The PRO mode (active layer facing draw solution) is examined with 0.18m/s of cross-flow velocity using a polyamide membrane associated with a polyethyleneimine (PEI) interlayer on a NaOH treated polyacrylonitrile substrate. The 5% NaAce with CaCl2 as a draw solution (DS) delivers better performance against deionized water compared to glucose, resulting in lower RSF (6.64 g/m2 h) and higher water flux (23.9 L/m2 h). The NaAce with CaCl2 suppresses RSF up to 41% without a significant reduction in permeate flux compared to single salt DS. The optimized draw solution concentrates the orange juice, resulting in 2.13 L/m2 h of average water flux and 3.6 g/m2 h of RSF for 72 h, thus concentrating the orange juice from the initial concentration of 13 °Brix to 24 °Brix.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. R. Darabi, M. Peyravi and M. Jahanshahi, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 38, 843 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Subramani and J. G. Jacangelo, Sep. Purif. Technol., 122, 472 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Zhang, X. Wang, L. Wang, Y. Lv, Z. Zhang and H. Wang, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 28, 46303 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Le, Y. Yun, M. Wang, W. Liu, S. Dong, K. Yang, S. T. Ud Din, W. Yang and G. Liu, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 38, 975 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. P. Pal, S. Chakrabortty, J. Nayak and S. Senapati, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 24, 15768 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. G. Q. Chen, A. Artemi, J. Lee, S. L. Gras and S. E. Kentish, Sep. Purif. Technol., 215, 652 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. B. Valverde-Perez, M. L. Pape, A. F. Kjeldgaard, A. A. Zachariae, C. Schneider, C. Hélix-Nielsen, A. Zarebska and B. F. Smets, Sep. Purif. Technol., 235, 116133 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. N. C. Nguyen, S.-S. Chen, S. Jain, H. T. Nguyen, S. S. Ray, H. H. Ngo, W. Guo, N. T. Lam and H. C. Duong, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 25, 5203 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. H. El Zayat, P. Nasr and H. Sewilam, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 28, 39938 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Z. L. Cheng, X. Li and T.-S. Chung, J. Membr. Sci., 559, 63 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. F. J. Fu, S. Zhang, S. P. Sun, K. Y. Wang and T. S. Chung, J. Membr. Sci., 443, 144 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. L. Zheng, W. E. Price, J. McDonald, S. J. Khan, T. Fujioka and L. D. Nghiem, J. Membr. Sci., 587, 117184 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. A. F. H. A. Rahman, Z. A. Khushairi, M. N. A. Seman, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 38, 2313 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Cai, Desalination, 391, 16 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. L. Zheng, W. E. Price and L. D. Nghiem, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 26, 33758 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. W. Wang, Y. Guo, M. Liu, X. Song and J. Duan, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 37, 1573 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. A. K. D'Haese, J. Membr. Sci., 597, 117636 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. W. Zhang and B. Dong, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 25, 21555 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. M. M. Ling and T. S. Chung, J. Membr. Sci., 372, 201 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. N. Sato, Y. Sato and S. Yanase, Desalination, 349, 102 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. J. S. Yong, W. A. Phillip and M. Elimelech, J. Membr. Sci., 39, 9 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Q. Ge, L. Yang, J. Cai, W. Xu, Q. Chen and M. Liu, J. Membr. Sci., 520, 550 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. A. Achilli, T. Y. Cath and A. E. Childress, J. Membr. Sci., 364, 233 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. S. Phuntsho, H. K. Shon, S. Hong, S. Lee and S. Vigneswaran, J. Membr. Sci., 375, 172 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. M. M. Ling, K. Y. Wang and T.-S. Chung, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 49, 5869 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Q. Ge, J. Su, T.-S. Chung and G. Amy, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 50, 382 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. C. Boo, Y. F. Khalil and M. Elimelech, J. Membr. Sci., 473, 302 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. C. J. Orme and A. D. Wilson, Desalination, 371, 126 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Q. Long, G. Qi and Y. Wang, AIChE J., 61, 1309 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Q. Long and Y. Wang, AIChE J., 62, 1226 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. J. Y. Law and A. W. Mohammad, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 51, 264 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Q. Long, L. Shen, R. Chen, J. Huang, S. Xiong and Y. Wang, Environ. Sci. Technol., 50, 12022 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Q. Ge and T.-S. Chung, Chem. Commun., 51, 4854 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Y. Chen, X. Song, N. Zhang, X. Zhang, G. Su, M. Huang and H. Jiang, Macromol. Mater. Eng., 306, 2000818 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. J. R. McCutcheon, J. Membr. Sci., 284, 237 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. J. Huang, Q. Long, S. Xiong, L. Shen and Y. Wang, Desalination, 421, 40 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. M. Hamdan, A. O. Sharif, G. Derwish, S. Al-Aibi and A. Altaee, J. Food Eng., 155, 10 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. B. D. Coday, D. M. Heil, P. Xu and T. Y. Cath, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47, 2386 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. X. Lu, C. Boo, J. Ma and M. Elimelech, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 14369 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. R. W. Holloway, R. Maltos, J. Vanneste and T. Y. Cath, J. Membr. Sci., 491, 121 (2015).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. K. B. Petrotos, P. Quantick and H. Petropakis, J. Membr. Sci., 150, 99 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. H. K. Shon, S. Phuntsho, T. C. Zhang and R. Y Surampalli, ASCE (2015).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is financially supported by the Pakistan Science Foundation [PSF/NSFC-II/Eng/KP-UET (09)].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saeed Gul.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farman, A.A., Irfan, M., Amin, N. et al. Evaluation of sodium acetate and glucose as minor additives with calcium chloride as optimum mixed draw solutes for fruit juice concentration via forward osmosis. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 39, 3102–3108 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-022-1228-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-022-1228-7

Keywords

Navigation