Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

CO and C3H6 oxidation over La0.9Sr0.1CoO3 catalysts: Influence of preparation solvent

  • Catalysis, Reaction Engineering
  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High surface area powders, La0.9Sr0.1CoO3 (LSCO), were prepared by a hard template method with a template of SBA-15. In the preparation process, the solvent was ethanol, the mixture of ethanol and water, and water, respectively. Characterizations were performed to understand the properties of the catalysts. When the solvent is a mixture of ethanol and water, the prepared LSCO has the most easily extracted surface adsorbed oxygen in the H2 atmosphere, exhibiting the best light-off performances for CO oxidation. However, the LSCO prepared in ethanol solvent has the best lattice oxygen mobility, resulting in the best light-off performance for C3H6 oxidation. Moreover, the LSCO prepared in ethanol also shows the best catalytic activity for both CO and C3H6 oxidation under the conditions of simulated diesel exhaust. Furthermore, Pd was impregnated on the LSCO, which was prepared by a sol-gel method and a hard template method, separately; the later one shows higher CO and C3H6 catalytic oxidation activity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Xu, G. Lu, Y. Guo, Y. Guo and X.-Q. Gong, Appl. Catal. A-Gen., 535, 1 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. C. H. Kim, G. Qi, K. Dahlberg and W. Li, Science, 327, 1624 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Russell and W. S. Epling, Catal. Rev., 53, 337 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. W. Tang, W. Xiao, S. Wang, Z. Ren, J. Ding and P.-X. Gao, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 226, 585 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. X. Auvray and L. Olsson, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 168–169, 342 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D. Pinto and A. Glisenti, Catal. Sci. Technol., 9, 2749 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Glisenti and A. Vittadini, Catalysts, 9, 312 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. H. Ziaei-Azad, A. Khodadadi, P. Esmaeilnejad-Ahranjani and Y. Mortazavi, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 102, 62 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. P. Li, Q. Yang, H. Zhang, M. Yao, F. Yan and D. Fu, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 45, 11802 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. S. Cimino, L. Lisi, S. De Rossi, M. Faticanti and P. Porta, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 43, 397 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. B. Kucharczyk and W. Tylus, Catal. Today, 90, 121 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. J. Chen, M. Shen, X. Wang, J. Wang, Y. Su and Z. Zhao, Catal. Commun., 37, 105 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Chen, M. Shen, X. Wang, G. Qi, J. Wang and W. Li, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 134–135, 251 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J. A. Onrubia, B. Pereda-Ayo, U. De-La-Torre and J. R. González-Velasco, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 213, 198 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Ponce, M. A. Peña and J. L. G. Fierro, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 24, 193 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. F. Teng, W. Han, S. Liang, B. Gaugeu, R. Zong and Y. Zhu, J. Catal., 250, 1 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. C. Zhang, W. Hua, C. Wang, Y. Guo, Y. Guo, G. Lu, A. Baylet and A. Giroir-Fendler, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 134–135, 310 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. N. Mota, M. C. Alvarez-Galván, R. M. Navarro, S. M. Al-Zahrani, A. Goguet, H. Daly, W. Zhang A. Trunschke, R. Schlög and J. L. G. Fierro, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 113–114, 271 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. P. Xiao, J. Zhu, H. Li, W. Jiang, T. Wang, Y. Zhu, Y. Zhao and J. Li, Chemcatchem, 6, 1774 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. M. V. Landau, L. Titelman, L. Vradman and P. Wilson, Chem. Commun., 5, 594 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. X. Wang, J. Catal., 222, 565 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. P. Li, X. Chen, Y. Li and J. W. Schwank, Catal. Today, 364, 7 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. P. Li, X. Chen, L. Ma, A. Bhat, Y. Li and J. W. Schwank, Catal. Sci. Technol., 9, 1165 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. J. A. Lupescu, J. W. Schwank, K. A. Dahlberg, C. Y. Seo, G. B. Fisher, S. L. Peczonczyk, K. Rhodes, M. J. Jagner and L. P. Haack, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 183, 343 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. L. Ma, C. Y. Seo, X. Chen, K. Sun and J. W. Schwank, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 222, 44 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. J. Luo, M. Meng, Y. Zha and L. Guo, J. Phys. Chem. C, 112, 15293 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. L. Ma, C. Y. Seo, X. Chen, K. Sun and J. W. Schwank, Appl. Catal. B-Environ., 222, 44 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. P. Li, X. Chen, Y. Li and J. W. Schwank, Catal. Today, 327, 90 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. P. Li, R. Dong, X. Jiang, S. Zhang, T. Liu, R. Wang, F. Yan and D. Fu, J. Electroanal. Chem., 873, 114513 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. L. Ma, C. Y. Seo, X. Chen, J. Li and J. W. Schwank, Chem. Eng. J., 350, 419 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. M. Aghabararnejad, G. S. Patience and J. Chaouki, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 92, 1903 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. S. Hosokawa, R. Tada, T. Shibano, S. Matsumoto, K. Teramura and T. Tanaka, Catal. Sci. Technol., 6, 7868 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2020MS124 and 2020MS126) and Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (No. B2020502002 and B2020502003)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hebei Key Lab of Power Plant Flue Gas Multi-Pollutants Control, Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, North China Electric Power University, Baoding, 071003, China

    Fei Yan & Ping Li

  2. MOE Key Laboratory of Resources and Environmental Systems Optimization, North China Electric Power University, Beijing, 102206, China

    Fei Yan & Ping Li

  3. Advanced Research Institute for Multidisciplinary Science, QiLu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Science), Jinan, Shandong Province, 250353, China

    Xia Zhang

Authors
  1. Fei Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ping Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xia Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ping Li.

Additional information

Supporting Information

Additional information as noted in the text. This information is available via the Internet at http://www.springer.com/chemistry/journal/11814.

Supporting Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yan, F., Li, P. & Zhang, X. CO and C3H6 oxidation over La0.9Sr0.1CoO3 catalysts: Influence of preparation solvent. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 38, 945–951 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-021-0781-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-021-0781-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation