Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Choline chloride-based deep eutectic solvents as additives for optimizing chromatographic behavior of caffeic acid

  • Separation Technology, Thermodynamics
  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A series of deep eutectic solvents (DESs) were prepared using glycerol and choline chloride (ChCl), and Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FT-IR) was used to analyze the spectra of glycerol, choline chloride and DESs based on glycerol and choline chloride. Then DESs were used as the additives of mobile phase to optimize chromatographic behavior of caffeic acid in high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). A 17-run Box-Behnken design (BBD) was employed to evaluate effect of DESs as additives by analyzing the maximum theoretical plate number. Three factors, reaction temperature (60 °C, 80 °C, 100 °C), molar ratio of glycerol and choline chloride (2 : 1, 3 : 1, 4 : 1, n/n), and volume percent of additives (0.05%, 0.10%, 0.15%, v/v), were investigated in BBD. The optimum experiment condition was that of reaction temperature (80 °C), molar ratio of glycerol and ChCl (3 : 1, n/n), and volume percent of additive (0.10%, v/v). The mean chromatographic theoretical plate number of the caffeic acid this condition was 1567.5, and DESs as additives shorten the retention time and modify the chromatogram shape, proving DESs as additives for effective theoretical plate number and column efficiency in HPLC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Berner, D. Krug, C. Bihlmaier, A. Vente, R. Müller and A. Bechthold, J. Bacteriol., 188(7), 2666 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. S. Celik, S. Erdogan and M. Tuzcu, J. Pharmacol. Res., 60(4), 270 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. N. Rajendra Prasad, A. Karthikeyan, S. Karthikeyan and V.R. Bandugula, Mol. Cell. Biochem., 349, 11 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. D.K. Maurya and T.P.A. Devasagayam, Food Chem. Toxicol., 48(12), 3369 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Joyeux, A. Lobstein, R. Anton and F. Mortier, Planta. Med., 61(12), 6 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. A. Miles, P. Zoubouli, P. C. Calder and D. Phil, Nutrition, 21, 389 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. S. Bose, V. Gangan, S. K. Jain and S. K. Manna, Clin. Immunol., 29, 90 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. P. Michaluart, J.L. Masferrer, A.M. Carothers, K. Subbaramaiah, B. S. Zweifel, C. Koboldt, J.R. Mestre, D. Grunberger, P.G. Sacks, T. Tanabe and A. J. Dannenberg, Cancer. Res., 59, 2347 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Z.A. Temerdashev, N. A. Frolova and I.A. Kolychev, J. Anal. Chem., 66, 407 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. T. L. Widmer and N. Laurent, Eur. J. Plant. Path., 115, 377 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Y.H. Song and S. Wang, J. Anhui Med. and Pharm., 11(16), 2 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Gupta and C. S. Manohar, Struct. Saf., 26, 123 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. H.R. Lobo, B. S. Singh and G. S. Shankarling, Green. Chem. Lett. Rev., 5, 487 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Z. Maugeri and P.D. María, RSC Adv., 2, 421 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. E. Durand, J. Lecomte and P. Villeneuve, Eur. J. Lipid. Sci. Tech., 115, 379 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. B. Tang, M. Tian and K.H. Row, J.Chromatogr. A, 1285, 22 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. H. Weingartner, Chem. Int. Ed. Eng., 47, 654 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Baldelli, Acc. Chem. Res., 41, 421 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. P. Bonhote, A. P. Dias, N. Papageorgiou, K. Kalyanasundaram and M. Gratzel, Inorg. Chem., 35, 1168 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. J. H. Li, Y. F. Shen, Y. J. Zhang and Y. Liu, Chem. Commun., 3, 360 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. D. P. Thomas and J. P. Foley, J. Chromatogr. A, 1205, 36 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. M. H. Zhou, G. M. Xiao and M. Hong, Res. Chem. Intermediat., 38, 9 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  23. G. Tittel and H. Wagner, Chem. Lab. Prac., 2, 343 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  24. B. K. Tang and K. H. Row, Monatsh. Chem., 144, 1427 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. A. P. Abbott, T. J. Bell, S. Handa and B. Stoddart, Green Chem., 7, 705 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. A.P. Abbott, G. Capper, D.L. Davis and R.K.R. Tambyrajahv, Chem. Commun., 1(70), 1 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  27. A.E. Jimenez and M.D. Bermudez, Tribol. Lett., 40, 237 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. H.R. Lobo, B. S. Singh and G. S. Shankarling, Green. Chem. Lett. Rev., 5, 487 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Z.K. Shahbaz, F. S. Mjalli, M.A. Hashim and I.M. AlNashef, Fluid. Phase. Equilibr., 319, 48 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. A.P. Abbott, G. Capper, D. L. Davies, K. J. McKenzie and S.U. Obi, J. Chem. Eng. Data, 51, 1280 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. H. L. Ngo, K. LeCompte, L. Hargens, and A. B. McEwen, Thermochim. Acta, 357, 97 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. G. E. P. Box and K. B. Wilson, J. Roy. Stat. Soc. B., 13, 1 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  33. L. RenJie, Carbohyd. Polym., 74, 858 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. A. I. Varnalis, J. Brennan, D.B. MacDougall and S.G. Gilmour, J. Food Process. Eng., 61, 153 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. T. Zhu and K.H. Row, J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol., 34(12), 1036 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. H. Xu, L.P. Sun, Y. Z. Shi, Y. H. Wu, B. Zhang and D.Q. Zhao, Biochem. Eng. J., 39, 66 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Y. Sun, T. Li, J. Yan and J. Liu, Carbohyd. Polym., 80, 242 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Y. Wu, S.W. Cui and J. X. Tang, Food. Chem., 105, 1599 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. K. Zhong and Q. Wang, Carbohyd. Polym., 80, 19 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. T. Zhu and K.H. Row, Sep. Sci. Technol., 48(10), 1510 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tianjin Key Laboratory of Organic Solar Cells and Photochemical Conversion, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Tianjin University of Technology, Tianjin, 300384, China

    Guizhen Li, Tao Zhu & Yingjie Lei

Authors
  1. Guizhen Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tao Zhu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yingjie Lei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tao Zhu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, G., Zhu, T. & Lei, Y. Choline chloride-based deep eutectic solvents as additives for optimizing chromatographic behavior of caffeic acid. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 32, 2103–2108 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-015-0054-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-015-0054-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation