Abstract
Ultrasonication was applied to lower the ammonia level in livestock waste to enhance the anaerobic digestion performance. In simulated waste tests, in spite of an identical temperature increase, a higher ammonia removal rate was observed at lower frequency. This could be explained by the existence of athermal effects, accounting for 64% of the total ammonia removal rate. These effects originated from various convections (micro-streaming, micro-convection, shock-waves, and micro-jets), possibly caused by stable bubbles, and this indigenous mixing ability led to a negligible effect of aeration in the ultrasound assisted ammonia stripping process. In actual waste tests, an ammonia removal rate of up to 55% was achieved with a 0.77 h−1 mass transfer rate coefficient. After ultrasonication (28 kHz, pH 11, 15 min) of livestock waste, 58% higher CH4 yield was achieved due to the decrease of ammonia concentration (28%) and enhanced solubilization (51%).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Management of organic wastes, Ministry of Environment, Korea (2009).
J. Mata-Alvarez, S. Mace and P. Llabres. Bioresour. Technol., 74, 3 (2000).
J. Lu, H. N. Gavala, I.V. Skiadas, Z. Mladenovska and B. K. Ahring, J. Environ. Manage., 88, 1361 (2008).
S. Sung and T. Liu, Chemosphere, 53, 43 (2003).
H. B. Nielsen and I. Angelidaki, Bioresour. Technol., 99, 7995 (2008).
I.W. Koster and G. Lettinga, Agric. Wastes, 9, 205 (1984).
I.W. Koster and G. Lettinga, Biol. Wastes, 25, 51 (1988).
R. Borja, E. Sanchez and M.M. Duran, J. Environ. Sci. Health A, 31, 479 (1996).
J. Arogo, R. H. Zhang, G. L. Riskowski, L. L. Christianson and D. L. Day, J. Agric. Eng. Res., 73, 77 (1999).
M. A. D. Matouq and Z. A. Al-Anber, Ultrasonics, 14, 393 (2007).
K. S. Suslick, Science, 247, 1439 (1990).
S. Wang, X. Wu, Y. Wang, Q. Li and M. Tao, Ultrasonics, 15, 933 (2008).
K. C. Cheung, L.M. Chu and M. H. Wong, Water Air Soil Poll., 94, 209 (1997).
S. Basakcilardan-Kabakci, A. N. Ipekoglu and I. Talini, Environ. Eng. Sci., 24, 615 (2007).
J. D. Seader and E. J. Henley, Separation process principles, New York (1998).
C. Matter-Muller, W. Gujer and W. Giger, Water Res., 15, 1271 (1981).
APHA, AWWA and WEF, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th Ed., Baltimore (1998).
L. Lin, S. Yuan, J. Chen, Z. Xu and X. Lu, J. Hazard. Mater., 161, 1063 (2009).
J.-L. Laborde, C. Bouyer, J.-P. Caltagirone and A. Gerard, Ultrasonics, 36, 589 (1998).
S. Khanna, S. Jaiswal, A. Goyal and V. S. Moholkar, Chem. Eng. J., 200–202, 416 (2012).
S. Gustin and R. Marinsek-Logar, Process Safe. Environ., 89, 61 (2011).
K.-Y. Show, T. Mao and D.-J. Lee, Water Res., 41, 4741 (2007).
U. Neis, K. Nickel and A. Tiehm, Water Sci. Technol., 42, 73 (2000).
J. Dwyer, D. Starrenburg, S. Tait, K. Barr, D. Batstone and P. Lant, Water Res., 42, 4699 (2008).
E. Palmqvist and B. Hahn-Hagerdal, Bioresour. Technol., 74, 25 (2000).
A. Bonmati and X. Flotats, Waste Manage., 23, 261 (2003).
L. Zhang and D. Jahng, J. Hazard. Mater., 182, 536 (2010).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cho, SK., Lee, MK., Kim, DH. et al. Enhanced anaerobic digestion of livestock waste by ultrasonication: A tool for ammonia removal and solubilization. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 31, 619–623 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-013-0284-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-013-0284-4