Skip to main content
Log in

Integration of qualitative and quantitative risk assessment methods for gas refinery plants

  • Process Systems Engineering, Process Safety
  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on the development of an integrated risk assessment system to increase the safety of gas refinery plants. This integration is important in managing the design and the operation of chemical plants and it requires significant time, effort and specialized expertise. We propose a systematic procedure to apply quantitative and qualitative hazard identification methods before constructing the refinery plants. Advantages of this assessment procedure are 1) systematic method in identifying most of the important hazards, 2) complete and rigorous analysis, and 3) reducing budget and time. The qualitative and quantitative assessment method consists of two and three steps, respectively. After these five steps, the risk of the same plant was calculated and analyzed. This method can identify risk and potential hazards from local gas refinery plants effectively and systematically. We applied the integrated qualitative and quantitative risk assessment method to remove the risk of a local gas refinery plant with 160 P&ID sheets. The result of this work confirmed that no residential population existed within the bounds of the 1×10−6 per annum risk contour. Therefore, the risk to the public from the gas refinery plants should be considered acceptable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I.K. Adu, H. Sugiyama, U. Fischer and K. Hungerbühler, Process Saf. Environ., 86, 77 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. N. S. Arunraj and J. Maiti, J. Hazard. Mater., 142, 653 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. CCPS, Guideline for hazard evaluation procedures (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Demichela and N. Piccinini, J. Loss. Prevent. Proc., 19, 70 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. D. C. Hendershot, J. Loss. Prevent. Proc., 10, 151 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. F. I. Khan and S. A. Abbasi, J. Loss. Prevent. Proc., 14, 43 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D. Kim, I. Moon, Y. Lee and D. Yoon, J. Loss. Prevent. Proc., 16, 121 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. B. Knegtering and H. J. Pasman, J. Loss. Prevent. Proc., 22, 162 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. A. McCoy, S. J. Wakeman, F. D. Larkin, M. L. Jefferson, P.W.H. Chung, A.G. Rushton, F. P. Lees and P.M. Heino, Process Saf. Environ., 77, 317 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. D. F. Montague, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 29, 27 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Shah, U. Fischer and K. Hungerbühler, J. Loss. Prevent. Proc., 18, 335 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. N. Shebeko, I. A. Bolodian, V. P. Molchanov, Y. I. Deshevih, D. M. Gordienko, I.M. Smolin and D. S. Kirillov, J. Loss. Prevent. Proc., 20, 651 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Tixier, G. Dusserre, O. Salvi and D. Gaston, J. Loss. Prevent. Proc., 15, 291 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. C. Wei, W. J. Rogers and M. S. Mannan, J. Hazard. Mater., 159, 19 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Il Moon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yoon, H., Park, J., Lim, W. et al. Integration of qualitative and quantitative risk assessment methods for gas refinery plants. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 30, 1368–1374 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-013-0057-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-013-0057-0

Key words

Navigation