Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 367))

Abstract

Accidents such as leakage, fire, and explosion have happened occasionally in the long-distance oil and gas pipelines engineering in these years. Those accidents have caused large casualties, wealth loss, and environment pollution. So it is necessary to study the risk of the pipeline engineering in order to better avoid accidents and minimize losses of the long-distance oil and gas pipelines engineering. Based on the system safety theory, experts’ advices, and survey data, a comprehensive risk analysis and assessment of oil and gas pipeline engineering was carried out in this paper. From humans, materials, environment, and management four aspects, 32 risk factors were identified and assessed by combining the possibility with the severity of those identified risks. The risk level of the oil and gas pipelines was divided into five degrades from low to high. The proposed method was then applied to a natural gas pipeline engineering to identify and assess the risk of each pipe of the selected long-distance natural gas pipeline engineering. As a result, the earthquakes, avalanches, tunnel construction, and third party liability were the higher risk factors, and the risk of the forth pipe was the highest and should strengthen the risk management. Finally, some suggestions were proposed to the safety and risk management of the oil and gas pipelines engineering. The risk assessment method was thus proved to be a powerful tool to the risk decision-making and management of the long-distance oil and gas pipelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wang JS, Chen M, Xiao ZH, Chao Y (2014) Study on social security risk of multinational oil and gas pipelines. J Saf Sci Technol 10(S2):83–86

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wu ZZ, Wang RJ (2014) Concern with the safety management of oil and gas pipelines–status. Chin Saf News 6:1–5

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jose L (2014) Challenges to the integrity of old pipelines buried in stable ground. J Eng Fail Anal 42:311–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Anjuman S, Rehan S, Solomon T (2012) Risk analysis for oil and gas pipelines: a sustainability assessment approach using fuzzy based bow-tie analysis. J Loss Prev Process Ind 25(3):505–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Spyros S, Fotis R (2006) Estimation of safety distances in the vicinity of fuel gas pipelines. J Loss Prev Process Ind 19(1):24–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu ZZ, Gao JD, Wei LJ et al (2001) Risk assessment method and its application. Chemical Industry Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang HB, Feng QS, Zheng HL, Bi YT (2008) QRA for the long distance oil and gas pipeline. J China, Saf Sci 8(9):161–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hu YH, He SH (2000) Comprehensive evaluation method. Science Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zheng XB (2007) Long distance oil and gas pipeline engineering and its safety evaluation method. J Oil Field Equip 36(8):5–10

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang SZ, Wu ZZ, Zhang J, Duo YQ (2012) Oil and gas pipe line selection and risk evaluation of relevant laws and regulations and methods. J Oil Gas Storage Transp 31(9):64–668

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen BZ (2011) System safety engineering, 2nd edn. Metallurgical Industry Press, Bingjing

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dawotola AW, Van G et al (2009) Risk assessment of petroleum pipelines using a combined analytical hierarchy process-fault tree analysis (AHP-FTA). In: Proceedings of the 7th international probabilistic workshop, Delft, pp 491–501

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research work was supported by National science and technology Foundation of China under Grant No. 2015BAK16B01.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shujiao Tong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tong, S., Wu, Z., Wang, R., Duo, Y. (2016). Risk Study on Long-Distance Oil and Gas Pipelines Engineering. In: Huang, B., Yao, Y. (eds) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Automatic Control. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 367. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48768-6_66

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48768-6_66

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48766-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-48768-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics