Skip to main content
Log in

Performance comparison of batch and continuous flow surface aeration systems

  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The oxygen transfer rate and the corresponding power requirement to operate the rotor are vital for design and scale-up of surface aerators. The aeration process can be analyzed in two ways such as batch and continuous systems. The process behaviors of batch and continuous flow systems are different from each other. The experimental and numerical results obtained through the batch systems cannot be relied on and applied for the designing of the continuous aeration tank. Based on the experimentation on batch and continuous type systems, the present work compares the performance of both the batch and continuous surface aeration systems in terms of their oxygen transfer capacity and power consumption. A simulation equation developed through experimentation has shown that continuous flow surface aeration systems are taking more energy than the batch systems. It has been found that batch systems are economical and better for the field application but not feasible where large quantity of wastewater is produced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. Tchobanoglous and F. L. Burton, Wastewater engineering: Treatment, Disposal and Reuse, McGraw-Hill, New York (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. J. Hwang and M. K. Stenstrom, J. WPCF, 57, 1142 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Garcia-Ochoa and E. Gomez, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 92, 761 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. A. Galaction, D. Cascaval, C. Oniscu and M. Turnea, Biochem. Eng. J., 20, 85 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. ARK Rao, J. Environ. Eng., ASCE, 125(3), 215 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. A. R. K. Rao and B. Kumar, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 96, 464 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. A.R. K. Rao and B. Kumar, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 25, 1338 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. H. Cho and Y. Park, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20, 262 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. W. K. Lewis and W.G. Whitman, Ind. Eng. Chem., 16, 1215 (1924).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. WEF and ASCE Manual of practice for water pollution control, Aeration a waste water treatment process. Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, Va., and ASCE, New York (1988).

  11. B. Mitchell, A practical guide to energy conservation measures systems, University of Florida TREEO Center, Gainesville, Florida (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Mueller, W. C. Boyle and I.H. J. Popel, Aeration: Principles and Practice, CRC Press (2002).

  13. S. Jeyanayagam and I. Venner, Florida Water Res. J., 28 (2007).

  14. K. L. James, Electrical Motor Handbook. McGraw-Hill, New York (1988).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bimlesh Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, B., Rao, A.R. Performance comparison of batch and continuous flow surface aeration systems. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 27, 1796–1800 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-010-0303-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-010-0303-7

Key words

Navigation