Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of springing response for 550 000 DWT ore carrier

  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Application Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The desire to benefit from economy of scale is one of the major driving forces behind the continuous growth in ship sizes. However, models of new large ships need to be thoroughly investigated to determine the carrier’s response in waves. In this work, experimental and numerical assessments of the motion and load response of a 550,000 DWT ore carrier are performed using prototype ships with softer stiffness, and towing tank tests are conducted using a segmented model with two schemes of softer stiffness. Numerical analyses are performed employing both rigid body and linear hydroelasticity theories using an in-house program and a comparison is then made between experimental and numerical results to establish the influence of stiffness on the ore carrier’s springing response. Results show that softer stiffness models can be used when studying the springing response of ships in waves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ABS, 2010. Guidance notes on springing assessment for container carriers. ABS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barhoumi M, Storhaug G, 2014. Assessment of whipping and springing on a large container vessel. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 6(2), 442–458. DOI: 10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop RED, Price WG, 1979. Hydroelasticity of ships. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop RED, Price WG, 1983. An introduction to ship hydroelasticity. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 87(3), 391–407. DOI: 10.1016/0022-460X(83)90469-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop RED, Price WG, Wu YS, 1986. A general linear hydroelasticity theory of floating structures moving in a seaway. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 316, 375–426. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.1986.0016.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen ZY, Ren HL, Li H, Zhang KH, 2012. Experimental and numerical analysis of bow slamming and whipping in different sea states. Journal of Ship Mechanics, 16(3), 246–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi JH, Jung BH, Lee YW, Bigot F, Malenica S, Chung YS, 2010. Evaluation of springing-induced hull girder loads for ultra large containership and ore carrier. Proceedings of the 20th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui WC, Yang JM, Wu YS, Liu YZ, 2007. Theory of hydroelasticity and its application to very large floating structures. Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, Shanghai, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai YS, 1998. Potential flow theory of ship motions in waves in frequency and time domain. National Defence Industry Press, Beijing. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirdaris SE, Bai W, Dessi D, Ergin A, Gu X, Hermundstad OA, Huijsmans R, Iijima K, Nielsen UD, Parunov J, Fonseca N, Papanikolaou A, Argyriadis K, Incecik A, 2014. Loads for use in the design of ships and offshore structures. Ocean Engineering, 78, 131–174. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2013.09.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirdaris SE, Bakkers N, White N, Temarel P, 2009. Service factor assessment of a great lakes bulk carrier incorporating the effects of hydroelasticity. Marine Technology, 46(2), 116–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirdaris SE, Miao SH, Price WG, Temarel P, 2006. The influence of structural modelling on the dynamic behaviour of a bulker in waves. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Hydroelasticity in Marine Technology, Wuxi, China, National Defense Industry Press, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirdaris SE, Price WG, Temarel P, 2003. Two-and three-dimensional hydroelastic modelling of a bulker in regular waves. Marine Structures, 16(8), 627–658. DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2004.01.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirdaris SE, Temarel P, 2009. Hydroelasticity of ships: recent advances and future trends. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 223(3), 305–330. DOI: 10.1243/14750902JEME160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong SY, Kim BW, 2014. Experimental investigations of higher-order springing and whipping-WILS project. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering, 6(4), 1160–1181. DOI: 10.2478/IJNAOE-2013-0237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong SY, Kim BW and Nam BW, 2012. Experimental study on torsion springing and whipping of a large container ship. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 22(2), 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong SY, Kim KH, Kim BW, Kim YS, 2015. Characteristics of bow-flare slamming loads on an ultra-large containership in irregular waves. Proceedings of the 25th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Kona, Big Island, Hawaii, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu JJ, Wu YS, Tian C, Wang XL, Zhang F, 2012. Hydroelastic analysis and model tests on the structural responses and fatigue behaviours of an ultra-large ore carrier in waves. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 226(2), 135–155. DOI: 10.1177/1475090211430303

    Google Scholar 

  • ISSC, 2012. Report of technical committee II.2: Dynamic response. Proceedings of the 18th International Ship and Offshore Structures Congress, Rostock, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang CD, Jung JJ, Korobkin AA, 2007. An approach to estimating the hull girder response of a ship due to springing. Journal of Marine Science and Technology, 12, 95–101. DOI: 10.1007/s00773-007-0242-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SP, Yu HC, Hong SY, 2010. Segmented model testing and numerical analysis of wave-induced extreme and springing loads on large container carriers. Proceedings of the 20th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Beijing, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim Y, Kim KH, Kim Y, 2009. Analysis of hydroelasticity of floating shiplike structure in time domain using a fully coupled hybrid BEM-FEM. Journal of Ship Research, 53(1), 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korobkin AA, Parau EI, Vanden-Broeck JM, 2011. The mathematical challenges and modelling of hydroelasticity. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 369, 2803–2812. DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0116

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lee Y, Wang Z, White N, Hirdaris SE, 2011. Time domain analysis of springing and whipping responses acting on a large container ship. Proceedings of the ASME 2011 30th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li H, 2009. 3-D Hydroelasticity analysis method for wave loads of ships. PhD thesis, Harbin Engineering University. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyake R, Matsumoto T, Yamamoto N, Toyoda K, 2010. On the estimation of hydroelastic response acting on a ultra-large container ship. Proceedings of the 20th International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Beijing, China, 849–856.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyake R, Matsumoto T, Zhu T, Usami A, Dobashi H, 2009. Experimental studies on the hydroelastic response using a flexible mega-container ship model. Hydroelasticity in Marine Technology, University of Southampton, UK, 161–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman JN, 1994. Wave effects on deformable bodies. Applied Ocean Research, 16, 47–59. DOI: 10.1016/0141-1187(94)90013-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senjanovic I, Malenica S, Tomasevic S, 2008. Investigation of ship hydroelasticity. Ocean Engineering, 35, 523–535. DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2007.11.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin KH, Jo JW, Hirdaris SE, Jeong SG, Park JB, Lin F, Wang Z, White N, 2015. Two-and three-dimensional springing analysis of a 16,000 TEU container ship in regular waves. Ships and Offshore Structures, 10(5), 498–509. DOI: 10.1080/17445302.2015.1014255

    Google Scholar 

  • Skjørdal SO, Faltinsen OM, 1980. A linear theory of springing. Journal of Ship Research, 24(2), 74–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temarel P and Hirdaris SE, Eds., 2009. Hydroelasticity in marine technology. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference HYELAS’09, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

  • Wu YS, Cui WC, 2009. Advances in the three-dimensional hydroelasticity of ships. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 223(3), 331–348. DOI: 10.1243/14750902JEME159

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huilong Ren.

Additional information

Foundation item: Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51079034), and the National Basic Research Program of China (Grant No. 2011CB013703)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adenya, C.A., Ren, H., Li, H. et al. Estimation of springing response for 550 000 DWT ore carrier. J. Marine. Sci. Appl. 15, 260–268 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-016-1365-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11804-016-1365-7

Keywords

Navigation