Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of pile spacing on seismic response of piled raft in soft clay: centrifuge modeling

  • Published:
Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to study the influence of pile spacing on the seismic response of piled raft in soft clay, a series of shaking table tests were conducted by using a geotechnical centrifuge. The dynamic behavior of acceleration, displacement and internal forces was examined. The test results indicate that the seismic acceleration responses of models are generally greater than the surrounding soil surface in the period ranges of 2–10 seconds. Foundation instant settlements for 4×4 and 3×3 piled raft (with pile spacing equal to 4 and 6 times pile diameter) are somewhat close to each other at the end of the earthquake, but reconsolidation settlements are greater for 3×3 piled raft. The seismic acceleration of superstructure, the uneven settlement of the foundation and the maximum bending moment of pile are relatively lower for 3×3 piled raft. Successive earthquakes lead to the softening behavior of soft clay, which causes a reduction of the pile bearing capacity and thus loads are transferred from the pile group to the raft. For the case of a 3×3 piled raft, there is relatively smaller change of the load sharing ratio of the pile group and raft after the earthquake and the distribution of maximum bending moments at the pile head is more uniform.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banerjee S, Goh SH and Lee FH (2007), “Response of Soft Clay Strata and Clay-Pile-Raft Systems to Seismic Shaking,” Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami, 1(3): 233–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee S, Goh SH and Lee FH (2014), “Earthquake-induced Bending Moment in Fixed-head Piles in Soft Clay,” Geotechnique, 64(6): 431–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bemben SM, Myers HJ (1974), “The Influence of Rate of Penetration on Static Cone Resistance in Connecticut River Valley Varved Clay,” Proc., European Symp. on Penetration Testing, Stockholm: National Swedish Council for Building Research, 2(2): 33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung SF, Randolph MF, Schneider JA (2006), “Effect of Penetration Rate on Penetrometer Resistance in Clay,” Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, 132(9): 1188–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dash SR, Govindaraju L and Bhattacharya S (2009), “A Case Study of Damages of the Kandla Port and Customs Office Tower Supported on a Mat-Pile Foundation in Liquefied Soils Under the 2001 Bhuj Earthquake,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29: 333–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DGJ08-9-2013 (2013), Code for Seismic Design of Buildings of Shanghai. (in Chinese)

  • Hamada J (2016), “Bending Moment of Piles on Piled Raft Foundation Subjected to Ground Deformation During Earthquake in Centrifuge Model Test,” Japanese Geotechnical Society Special Publication, 2(34): 1222–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamada J, Tanikawa T, Onimaru S, et al. (2012), “Seismic Observations on Piled Raft Foundation with Ground Improvement Supporting a Base-Isolated Building,” Proceedings of the 15th WCEE, Lisboa, Portugal.

  • Hardin BO and Drnevich VP (1972), “Shear Modulus and Damping in Soils: Measurement and Parameter Effects,” J. Soil Mech. Found. Div., ASCE, 98(6): 603–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashash YMA, Musgrove MI, Harmon JA, et al. (2015), DEEPSOIL 6.0, User Manual, pp.104.

  • Horikoshi K, Matsumoto T, Hashizume Y, et al. (2003), “Performance of Piled Raft Foundations Subjected to Dynamic Loading,” International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, 3(2): 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma K, Banerjee S, Lee FH, et al. (2012), “Dynamic Soil-Pile-Raft Interaction in Normally Consolidated Soft Clay During Earthquakes,” Journal of Earthquake and Tsunami, 6(3): 1250031.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma XF, He ZM, Zhu HH, et al. (2006), “Development of a New Geotechnical Centrifuge at Tongji University in Shanghai,” Proc. 6th IC Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, 2006: 151–156.

  • Matsuda H and O-Hara S (1990), “Geotechnical Aspects of Earthquake-induced Settlement of Clay Layer,” Marine Georesources and Geotechnology, 9(3): 179–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto T, Fukumura K, Horikoshi K, et al. (2004), “Shaking Table Tests on Model Piled Rafts in Sand Considering Influence of Superstructures,” International Journal of Physical Modelling in Geotechnics, 4(3): 21–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza MJ, Romo MP, Orozco M, et al. (2000), “Static and Seismic Behavior of a Friction Pile-Box Foundation in Mexico City Clay,” Soils and Foundations, 40(4): 143–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakai S, Katoa H, Ishida R, et al. (2004), “Load Bearing Mechanism of Piled Raft Foundation During Earthquake,” Proceedings of 3rd UJNR Workshop on Soil-Structure Interaction, 2004, Menlo Park, California, USA: 1–18.

  • Poulos HG (2001), “Piled Raft Foundations: Design and Applications,” Geotechnique, 51(2): 95–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha R, Haldar S and Dutta SC (2015), “Influence of Dynamic Soil-Pile Raft-Structure Interaction: an Experimental Approach,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 14(4): 625–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield AN (1981), “Dynamic and Earthquake Geotechnical Centrifuge Modelling,” Proceedings International Conference on Recent Advances in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics, Rolla, 3: 1081–1100.

  • Scholl RE (1989), “Observations of the performance of buildings during the 1985 Mexico earthquake, and structural design implications,” International Journal of Mining and Geological Engineering, 7(1): 69–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stringer ME and Madabhushi SPG (2013), “Remobilization of Pile Shaft Friction After an Earthquake,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 50(9): 979–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang L, Ling XZ, Xu PJ, et al. (2010), “Shake Table Test of Soil-Pile Groups-Bridge Structure Interaction in Liquefiable Ground,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 9(1): 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamura S and Hida T (2014), “Pile Stress Estimation Based on Seismic Deformation Method with Embedment Effects on Pile Caps,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 140(9): 04014049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang L, Zhang XY, Ling XZ, et al. (2016), “Experimental and Numerical Investigation on the Dynamic Response of Pile Group in Liquefying Ground,” Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 15(1): 103–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang YJ, Pei J and Zhao XH (2014), “Design and Measurement of Piled-Raft Foundations,” Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 167(5): 461–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vucetic M and Dobry R (1991), “Effect of Soil Plasticity on Cyclic Response,” Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 117(1): 89–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada T, Yamashita K, Kakurai M, et al. (2001), “Long-Term Behaviour of Tall Building on Raft Foundation Constructed by Top-Down Method,” Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Deep Foundation Practice, Singapore: 411–417.

  • Yamashita K, Hamada J and Tanikawa T (2016), “Static and Seismic Performance of a Friction Piled Raft Combined with Grid-Form Deep Mixing Walls in Soft Ground,” Soils and Foundations, 56(3): 559–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamashita K, Hamada J, Wakai S, et al. (2014), “Settlement and Load Sharing Behavior of Piled Raft Foundations Based on Long-Term Monitoring,” Takenaka Technical Research Report, 70: 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang M (2000), “Study on Reducing-Settlement Pile Foundation Based on Controlling Settlement Principle,” Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 22(4): 481–486.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang M and Yang J (2016), “Centrifuge Investigation on Seismic Response of Piled Raft Foundation with Large Spacing in Soft Clay,” Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 38(12): 2184–2193. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Goh SH and Liu HB (2017), “Seismic Response of Pile-Raft-Clay System Subjected to a Long-Duration Earthquake: Centrifuge Test and Finite Element Analysis,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 92: 488–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Goh SH and Yi J (2017), “A Centrifuge Study of The Seismic Response of Pile -Raft Systems Embedded in Soft Clay,” Geotechnique, 67(6): 479–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41372274) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Yang.

Additional information

Supported by: National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grand No. 41372274

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, J., Yang, M. & Chen, H. Influence of pile spacing on seismic response of piled raft in soft clay: centrifuge modeling. Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 18, 719–733 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-019-0532-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-019-0532-7

Keywords

Navigation